(3.231.29.122) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/02/25 21:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:胡嘉玲
研究生(外文):Chia Ling Hu
論文名稱:整合學習者經驗教學法對國小五年級學童英語學習態度成效研究
論文名稱(外文):Effects of Language Experience Approach on English Learning Attitude in Elementary School Students
指導教授:張鑑如張鑑如引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien-ju Chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北教育大學
系所名稱:兒童英語教育學系碩士班
學門:教育學門
學類:普通科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:103
中文關鍵詞:整合學習者經驗教學法英語閱讀教學法學習態度
外文關鍵詞:Language Experience ApproachEnglish Learning AttitudeReading Instruction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:533
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:176
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:15
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討台灣國小五年級學生接受整合學習者經驗教學法(簡稱LEA)之後,對其英語學習態度成效之影響。本研究採準實驗設計,研究對象為桃園縣一所中型國小的兩班五年級學生,一班為實驗組,另一班為控制組,共計66人。研究期間,實驗組學生於課文教學以外的時間進行整合學習者經驗英文教學活動,控制組的學生則於課文教學以外的時間進行包含遊戲、角色扮演、競賽、歌謠韻文等一般常用的混合式英語教學活動。實驗工具採前、後測之問卷施測方式,資料之收集包括研究者自編的「英語學習態度」問卷,及「LEA教學活動實施意見」調查表。
本研究結果顯示,實驗組學生與控制組學生「英語學習態度」問卷之後測成績並無顯著差異,但是實驗組學生組內後測成績顯著高於前測成績,而其中行為分量表之後測成績亦顯著高於前測,顯示整合學習者經驗教學法對實驗組學生之英語學習態度之行為面向有正面影響。據此結果,本研究針對有意實施整合學習者經驗教學法之教學者及未來相關研究提出數點建議。
Abstract
The purpose of this quasi-experiment study was to investigate the effects of language experience approach on language learning attitude in Taiwanese elementary school. The sample population was selected from two classes of the 5th graders in a rural town in Taoyuan. There were a total of 66 students participating in the study. The experimental group was taught with the language experience approach for twice a week while the control group was doing the learning activities such as role play, games, songs and chants, etc.
Data collected for analysis includes a pretest, a post-test, and questionnaires. The statistical tools of the independent samples t-test and paired samples t-test were used to determine whether there were significant inter- and intra-group differences. The results of the study showed that the experimental group did not outperform the control group significantly, while the experimental group did show positives effects on their language learning attitude, especially on the aspect of learning behavior. The major finding of this study was that students in the experimental group were interested in reading, which suggested that English teachers could apply the language experience based activities into their teaching. Finally, suggestions for future research were recommended.
目錄

英文摘要 i
中文摘要 ii
目錄 iii
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 5
第三節 名詞解釋 5
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 閱讀教學模式之探討 8
第二節 整合學習者經驗的教學模式之涵義 15
第三節 整合學習者經驗之讀寫教學活動實施之相關文獻探討 26
第四節 兒童的學習態度的探討 31
第三章 研究方法 34



iii
第一節 研究程序 34
第二節 研究對象 37
第三節 研究工具 38
第四節 前置研究 43
第五節 LEA教學之主要研究 54
第六節 資料分析 58
第四章 研究結果與討論 59
第一節 「英語學習態度問卷」組間前、後測分析 59
第二節「英語學習態度問卷」組內前、後測分析 61
第三節 「LEA教學實施意見」調查表分析 63
第四節 討論 69
第五章 結論與建議 74
第一節 結論 74
第二節 研究限制 76
第三節 建議 77
參考文獻 80
英文部分 80
中文部分 877


iv
附錄 888
附錄一:五年級試教過程及教室觀察摘要 888
附錄二:正式研究教學進度與課程分析一覽表 922
附錄三:學生英語學習經驗問卷調查表 977
附錄四:「學生英語學習興趣」前測問卷調查表 98
附錄五:LEA教學活動實施意見調查表 99
附錄六:範作 1000
附錄七:海報 1011
附錄八:A3/A4寫作紙 102
附錄九:一頁書 1033
參考文獻
英文部分
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keyes: Open University Press.
Allen, R. V. (1961). The language experience approach to reading instruction. Boston, MA: Ginn and Co.
Allington, R. L. (1977). If they don’t read much, how they ever gonna get good. Journal of Reading, 21(1), 57-61.
Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks.
Backer, C. (1999). Attitudes and language. Philadelphia : Multilingual Matters.
Barchers, S. (1990). Teaching reading: From process to practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bottomley, D.M., Truscott, D.M., Marinak, B.A., Henk, W.A., & Melnick, S.A.(1999). Reading Research and Instruction, 38(2), 115-129.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Calvert, J. D. (1973). Exploratory study to adapt the language experience approach to remedial seventh and tenth grade Mexican-American pupils. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Carline, D. A. & Hoffman, J. R. (1976). Comparison of language experience approach to reading with a conventional reading approach in eight summer migrant schools. Educational Reports: Migrant Education Research Report. Boulder, Colorado: Colorado Univ., Bureau of Educational Field Services. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED135557)
Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Clarke, M. A. & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27, 135-154.
Cohen, E. L. (1976). A case study of the implementation of an integrated language-experience approach in an elementary school. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED140308)
Cronin, J. M. (1973). The language experience to teaching reading. Springfield, IL: Illinois Office of Education.
Cramer. R. L. (1971). Dialectology-A case for language experience. Reading Teacher, 25(1), 33-39.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S.(1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
DeFord, D. E. (1985). Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (3), 336-67
Dlugosz, D. W. (2000). Rethinking the role of reading in teaching a foreign language to young learners. English Language Teaching Journal, 54(3), 284-290.
Eddowes, E. A. (1990). Teaching reading in kindergarten: Two contrasting approaches. Reading Improvement, 27(3), 220-223.
Ehrlich, M. F., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior , 25 , 365-381.
Feeley, J. T. (1976). A workshop tried and true: Language experience for bilinguals. Journal of Reading, 57, 25-27.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Goodman, K. S. (1986). What’s whole in whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Heald-Taylor, G. (1989). Whole language strategies for ESL students. San Diego: Dormac.
Henk, W. A. & Melnick, S. A. (1995). The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. Reading Teacher , 48 , 470-483.
Johnson, D. (1999). Balanced reading instruction: Review of literature. Retrieved Feb. 20, 2005, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/timely/briiss.htm
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. D. & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
Labbo, L. D. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young childeren’s symbol making a classroom computer center. Reading Reaserch Quarterly, 31(4), 356-385
Labbo, L. D., Eakle, A. J., & Montero, M. K. (2002). Digital language experience approach: using digital photographs and software as a language experience approach innovation. Reading Online, 5(8).
Larsen-Freeman, D. (l980). Personal communication. Language learning, 32, 109-132.
Lomangino, A. G., Nicholson, J., & Sulzby, E. (1999). The Nature of Children’s Interactions While Composing Ttogether on Computers [Rep. No. 2-005]. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA), University of Michigan.
Mallett, G. (1977). Using language experience with junior high native Indian students. Journal of Reading, 59(10), 25-28.
Manzo, K. K. (1999). Whole-language model survives despite swing back to basics. Education Week on the Web. Retrieved Feb. 20, 2005, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/27whole.h18
McC. Gallagher, J. N. (1975). Vocabulary retention of lower-class students in language experience and in basal text approaches to the teaching of reading. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED126444)
McCormick, T. W. (1988). Theories of reading in dialogue: An interdisciplinary study. New York: University Press of America.
McIntyre, E. & Pressley, M. (eds.) (1996). Balanced instruction: Strategies and skills in whole language. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Miller, D. (1994). Using literature to build self-esteem in adolescents with learning and behavior problems. The Clearing House, 67(4),207.
Moustafa, M. (1985). Comprehensible input plus the language experience approach: reading instruction for limited English speaking students. The Reading Teacher, 38(7), 640-647.
Moustafa, M. (1987). Comprehensible input plus the language experience approach: A longterm perspective. The Reading Teacher. 41(3), 276-286.
Molina, H., Siegel, D. F., & Hanson, R. A. (1992) Early reading instruction, Non-English background, and schooling achievement. Proceedings of the Third National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Middle and High School Issues. Washington, D.C.
Nessel, D. D. & Jones, M. B. (1981). The language experience approach to reading: A handbook for teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1995). Other people's words: The cycle of low literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1996). "rocess teaching with direct instruction and feedback in a university-based clinic. In E. McIntyre & M. Pressley (eds.), Balanced instruction: Strategies and skills in whole language. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Purcell-Gates, V. (1997). There's Reading...and Then There's Reading Process Models and Instruction. Focus on basics 1(B). Retrieved Feb. 20, 2005, from http://gseweb.harvard.edu/~ncsall/fob/1997/vpg.htm
Rabideau, D. (1993). Integrating reading and writing into adult ESL instruction. National Center for ESL Literacy Education Digest. DC: National Clearinghouse on Literacy Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358749)
Reinking, D. R., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. S. (1986). Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research: Volume II , 319-340. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Richard-Amato, P. A. (1996). Making it happen. New York: Longman.
Riendeau, B. A. (1973). An exploratory investigation of the effect of two differing approaches of reading instruction on the self-social concepts of first-grade children. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED090513)
Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The Reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Routman, R. (1996). Transitions. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Rubin, J. (l975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
Samuels, S. J. & Kamil, M. L. (1982). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 185-224). New York: Longman.
Saskatchewan Education. (1992). English language arts: A curriculum guide for the elementary level. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Education.
Scott & Ytreberg L.H. (1990). Teaching English to children. Essex, England: Longman .
Simons. R. (2003). A multimedia approach to language experience. Feb. 20, 2005, Retrieved from http://ferl.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=5353
Slattery, M. & Willis, J. (2001). English for primary teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sherman, L. (1998). Seeking common ground. Northwest Education Magazine. Retrieved Feb. 20, 2005, from http://www.nwrel.org/nwedu/fall_98/article2.html
Smith, F. (1983). Reading like a writer. Language Arts, 60, 558-567.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Spache, G. & Spache, E. (1964). Reading in the Elementary School. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Stauffer, R.G. (1980). The language-experience approach to the teaching of reading. New York: Harper & Row.
Susser, B. & Robb, T. N. (1990). EFL Extensive reading instruction: Research and procedure. JALT Journal, 12( 2). Retrieved Feb.20, 2005, from http://www.kyoto-su.ac.jp/~trobb/sussrobb.html
Tan, A. G. (1998). An exploratory study of Singaporean primary pupils'' desirable activities for English lessons. Educational Journal, 26(1), 59-76.
Taylor, M. (1992). The language experience approach and adult learners. National Center for ESL Literacy Education Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Literacy Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 887)
Tierney, R. J. & Readence, J. E. (2000). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Turbill, J. (2003). Exploring the potential of the digital language experience approach in Australian classrooms. Reading Online, 6(7).
Tway, E. (1982). Language experience in Luxembourg: Learning to read in three languages. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED227449)
Veatch, J. (1953). An experimental study of the relation of a program of specific creative activities to group acceptance, emotional needs and academic achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
Venezky, R. L. (1984). The history of reading research. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York, NY: Longman Inc.
Wagner, D., Spratt, J. E., Gal, I., & Paris, S. G. (1989). Reading and believing: Beliefs, attribution, and reading achievement in Moroccan schoolchildren. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 283-293.
Wang, C. I. (2002). Language experience approach: A pilot study on it’s effects on Taiwanese junior high school students' reading ability. Unpublished master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Waston, D. J. (1989). Definition and describing whole language. The Elementry School Journal, 90(2), 129-141.
Yorio, C. (1980). The teacher’s attitude toward the students’ output in the second language classroom. CATESOL Occasional Papers. California Association of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 6, 1-8.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 20.何偉真、郭俊開;〈生態旅遊年談生態綠化〉;《農政與農情》;119-356卷;民91.05;頁49-53。
2. 18.呂理政;﹤地球是個博物館—試論生態博物館的發展及其基本理念﹥;《國立臺灣史前文化博物館籌備處通訊:文化驛站》;4;民83.12;頁59-71。
3. 16.邱湧忠;<休閒農業在鄉村發展的社會意義>;《臺灣鄉村研究》;民93;頁77-98
4. 15.任靜嫻;<臺灣休閒農業之探討>;《旅遊健康學刊》;第2卷第1期;民91.10;頁85-92
5. 14.沈聰明;<宜蘭縣休閒農業之整合與推動>;《花蓮區農業專訊》;民91.03;頁16-21
6. 12.朱芝緯 王鑫;〈扮演保育的實踐者〉;《科學月刊》;第31卷;民89.07;頁597-603。
7. 11.江榮吉 沈建宏 林國仕;<臺灣休閒農業的發展>;《臺灣農業》;第30卷第4期;民83.08;頁27-37
8. 8.王鑫;﹤發展永續旅遊的途徑之一:生態旅遊﹥;《應用倫理研究通訊》;第24卷;頁28-44。
9. 7.王春華;﹤飛魚(Ayus):我們會飛翔的朋友—生態博物館觀念運用於蘭嶼之建議﹥;《博物館學季刊》;10:1民85.01;頁41-47。
10. 21.林維君 李繼宇;﹤留住福爾摩沙永恆的春天—臺灣生態旅遊發展潛力與方向﹥;《臺灣經濟研究月刊》;第25卷第4期;頁105-116。
11. 22.林澔貞 翁儷芯;〈試論森林生態旅遊之拓展〉;《臺灣林業》;第28卷;民91.02;頁63-67。
12. 23.林鴻忠;〈國家森林生態旅遊—遊程規劃與活的設計〉;《臺灣林業》;28卷;民91.02;頁55-62。
13. 24.金恆鑣;﹤臺灣生物多樣性與生態旅遊的發展﹥;《臺灣林業》;第29卷第1期,頁9-10。
14. 25.吳宗瓊;﹤淺談生態旅遊﹥;《應用倫理研究通訊》;第24卷;頁54-59。
15. 27.洪忠修;<淺談農村規劃策進休閒農業發展之構想>;《農業經營管理會訊》;民92.07;頁26-28
 
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔