臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在探討國中學生在校園內遭受幫派同儕欺害的情況與影響因素。研究途徑將採次級資料分析的方式進行，原始資料來源為周文勇（2004）所作之「防制幫派入侵校園研究」。該研究是以分層隨機抽樣的方式，針對基隆市（一所）、臺北市（六所）、臺北縣（九所）、桃園縣（四所）、新竹市（一所）以及新竹縣（一所）等六個縣市之國中一、二、三年級在學學生進行自陳問卷，共計抽出廿二所國中的六十六個班級學生作為調查樣本，有效樣本數為2159份。經卡方檢定、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、逐步迴歸、路徑分析等統計方法進行分析後，得到結果如下：
（一）人口特質為男性、14或15歲、高年級者，以及父母婚姻不和諧或離婚、家境富裕者，遭受幫派欺害的可能性較高。
（二）研究對象之家庭功能、居住環境、學校依附、學業成績、同儕依附、不良同儕人數、休閒活動型態、幫派認同、自陳偏差、校園幫派、入幫經驗等面向之情況，均能有效解釋其遭受幫派欺害的可能性。
（三）在全部樣本中，預測幫派欺害的重要變項依序為：校園幫派（Beta＝0.31，p＜0.001）、不良休閒（Beta＝0.23，p＜0.001）和自陳偏差（Beta＝0.20，p＜0.001）。
（四）在無入幫經驗樣本中，預測幫派欺害的重要變項依序為：校園幫派（Beta＝0.27，p＜0.001）、不良休閒（Beta＝0.24，p＜0.001）和居住環境（Beta＝0.16，p＜0.001）。
（五）在有入幫經驗樣本中，預測幫派欺害的重要變項依序為：校園幫派（Beta＝0.59，p＜0.001）、自陳偏差（Beta＝0.32，p＜0.001）和居住環境（Beta＝0.24，p＜0.05）。
根據研究結果，本研究認為：應健全家庭結構與功能、增強師生間的良性互動、建立正當的交友管道、慎選休閒型態、遏阻校園幫派形成、形塑正確的價值觀念、對有偏差傾向者加強監控等將能有效預防國中生遭受幫派同儕之欺害。

This study aims to investigate the phenomenon and causal factors of juvenile victimization by peer gangsters. At draws data from the ‘Gangster Activities in Campus Survey’ conducted by Wen-Yuen Chou in 2004. Samples were selected by hierarchical randomized sampling methods from junior high school students in six counties. Student samples are from 22 schools, including one in Keelung City, six in Taipei City, nine in Taipei County, four in Taoyuan County, one in Hsinchu City and one in Hsinchu County. Total samples are 2159. These samples were then analyzed by Chi-square test, t test, Oneway ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, stepwise multiple regression, and path analysis.

The results are as follows:
1. Samples who are males, between 14 to 15 years-old, senior students, living with divorced parents or with parents who have difficult marriage, and in better-off family economy, are more likely to be victimized by their peer gangsters.
2. The probability of victimization can be effectively explained by the target’s family function, residence, school attachment, school performance, peer attachment, the number of deviant peers, leisure activities, and recognition of gangsters, self-reported deviance, campus gangsters, and gang experiences.
3. Major predictors of victimization by peer gangsters among the overall samples are in the following order: campus gangs (Beta=0.31, p<0.001), deviant leisure activities (Beta=0.23, p<0.001) and self-reported deviance (Beta=0.20, p<0.001).
4. Major predictors of victimization by peer gangsters among non-gang members are in the following order: campus gangs (Beta=0.27, p<0.001), self-reported deviance (Beta=0.24, p<0.001), and residence (Beta=0.16, p<0.001).
5. Major predictors of victimization by peer gangsters among gang members are in the following order: campus gangs (Beta=0.59, p<0.001), self-reported deviance (Beta=0.32, p<0.001), and residence (Beta=0.24, p<0.05).
According to the finding, this research concludes with the following suggestions to prevent juvenile victimization. First of all, there is a need to strengthen family structure and function. Secondly, schools should encourage positive interaction between teachers and students and prevent the forming of campus gangs. Thirdly, students should be cautious on making friends and selecting leisure activities. Finally, the society, schools and family should help the students to develop healthy value and at the same time increase the supervision of youngsters prove to delinquency.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 相關名詞釋義
第二章 相關理論探討與文獻檢閱
第一節 生活型態理論
第二節 日常活動理論
第三節 少年幫派危險因子
第四節 被害調查與少年被害
第五節 校園被害
第六節 校園幫派、自陳偏差與被害
第七節 小結
第三章 研究設計與研究方法
第一節 研究架構
第二節 研究問題
第三節 研究假設
第四節 研究途徑與資料來源
第五節 研究樣本基本特性
第六節 研究變項擬定與測量
第七節 統計分析方法
第四章 統計結果分析
第一節 人口特質的差異性分析
第二節 家庭結構的差異性分析
第三節 幫派欺害經驗的成因分析
第五章 結論與討論
第一節 研究結論
第二節 研究討論
第三節 研究建議
第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議

參考文獻

附錄一 「防制幫派入侵校園研究報告」問卷
附錄二 研究變項各量表之次數分配情形

一、中文部份
朱武智
2005 ＜國中小學生 暑修「新課程」 1吸毒2吸菸3迷網 金車文教基金會調查 籲相關單位重視問題 研擬對策輔導、管控＞。《中時晚報》，2005年10月18日，7版。
吳嫦娥
2003 《小哥大的青春組曲－青少年加入成人幫派經驗之探討》，臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
沈旭凱
2005 ＜校園去霸凌 專線救我救我＞。《聯合報》，2005年1月5日，C1版。
周文勇
2001 ＜青少年幫派形成與演進之探討＞。《中央警察大學犯罪防治學報》2：223-242。
2002 《青少年犯罪幫派形成之影響因素與特質之研究》。中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
2004 《防制幫派入侵校園研究》，內政部刑事警察局委託研究報告。
周愫嫻
2004 《少年犯罪》。臺北市：五南。
林坤松
2000 《青少年校園暴力盛行率及危險因子研究：以台南市國中為例》，成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政
2000 《量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析》。臺北市：五南。
侯崇文、侯友宜
1999 ＜幫派介入校園問題面面觀＞。《警光》517：10-12。
侯崇文、黃啟賓
2002 ＜由校園環境探討學生偏差行為之發生與被害經驗＞，《中央警察大學警學叢刊》32（5）：145-176。
張平吾
1999 《被害者學概論》。桃園縣龜山鄉：中央警察大學。
張國治、梁志祥
1999 ＜防制幫派滲入校園之我見＞。《警光》，517：24-26。

張景然
2001 《青少年犯罪學》，二版。臺北市：巨流。
許春金
2003 《犯罪學》，修訂四版。桃園縣龜山鄉：中央警察大學。
許春金、陳玉書、孟維德、蔡田木、黃蘭媖、黃家珍、施雅甄、黃曉芬
2005a 《94年台灣地區犯罪被害調查報告（第一部份 面訪調查）》，內政部警政署委託。
2005b 《94年台灣地區犯罪被害調查報告（第二部份 電話調查）》，內政部警政署委託。
郭進成
2004 《犯罪恐懼的影響因素－臺灣民眾的分析》，臺北大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
陳祖輝
2003 ＜國中校園被害經驗研究：學生觀點的回顧＞，《校園點燈》42（4）：67-72。
程敬閏
2005 ＜青少年加入幫派之危險因子、情境脈絡與幫派生涯歷程之研究＞。《2005犯罪問題與對策國際研討會論文集》，頁403-433。2005年11月10-11日。台中：永豐棧麗緻大飯店。
黃富源
2002 ＜被害者學理論的再建構＞。《中央警察大學犯罪防治學報》3：1-24。
黃富源、范國勇、張平吾
2002 《犯罪學概論》。桃園縣龜山鄉：中央警察大學。
楊士隆、蔡德輝
2004 《犯罪學》，三版。臺北市：五南。
楊秀玫
2004 ＜幫派入侵校園因應對策之現實治療法觀點＞。《諮商與輔導》221：28-33。
蔡德輝、楊士隆
1999a ＜校園安全危機－幫派與少年之聯結＞。《師友》386：10-16。
1999b ＜幫派入侵校園之問題與對策＞。《學生輔導》65：8-17。
2003 《少年犯罪：理論與實務》，四版。臺北市：五南。
鄭瑞隆
1999 ＜幫派入侵校園與其因應之社會工作觀點＞。《學生輔導》65：32-41。
鄧煌發
1997 ＜報復或報應？台北市高中生非行與被害關係模式之研究＞。《中央警察大學學報》30：287-312。
1999 ＜學校因應校園幫派之對策＞。《學生輔導》65：26-31。
2001 ＜少年恐嚇加害與被害相關因素之比較研究＞，《中央警察大學警學叢刊》31（4）：207-232。
謝志龍
2005 ＜國中校園暴力的被害分析＞。《犯罪與刑事司法研究》4：83-117。

二、外文部份
Battin-Pearson, Sara R., Thornberry, Terence P., Hawkins, J. D., and Krohn, Marvin D.
1998 Gang Membership, Delinquent Peers, and Delinquent Behavior. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 171119. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Baum, K.
2005 Juvenile Victimization and Offending, 1993-2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 209468. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Catalano, Shannan M.
2005 Criminal Victimization, 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 210674. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Cohen, Lawrence E. and Felson, M.
1979 Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588-608.
Egley, Arlen Jr. and Arjunan, M.
2002 Highlights of the 2000 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 200204. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Egley, Arlen Jr. and Major, Aline K.
2003 Highlights of the 2001 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 200301. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
2004 Highlights of the 2002 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 200401. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Egley, Arlen Jr.
2000 Highlights of the 1999 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 200020. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
2002 National Youth Gang Survey Trends From 1996 to 2000. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 200203. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
2005 Highlights of the 2002-2003 National Youth Gang Surveys. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 210490. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Grove and Haack
1997 Youth Gangs in America: An Overview of Suppression, Intervention, and Prevention Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 164937. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Harrell, E.
2005 Violence by Gang Members, 1993-2003. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 208875. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Hickman, Matthew J.
2003 Tribal Law Enforcement, 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 197936. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Hindelang, Michael J., Gottfredson, Michael R. and Garofalo, J.
1978 Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Howell, James C. and Lynch, James P.
2000 Youth Gangs in Schools. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 183015. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Howell, James C., Egley, Arlen Jr. and Gleason, Debra K.
2002 Modern-Day Youth Gangs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 191524. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Howell, James C.
1997 Youth Gangs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 9772. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
1998 Youth Gangs: An Overview. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 167249. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Loeber, R., Kalb, L., and Huizinga, D.
2001 Juvenile Delinquency and Serious Injury Victimization. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 188676. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Major, Aline K., Egley, Arlen Jr., Howell, James C., Mendenhall, B., and Armstrong, T.
2004 Youth Gangs in Indian Country. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 202714. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Menard, S.
2002 Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Adolescent Victimization. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 191210. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Moore, John P. and Cook, Ivan L.
1999 Highlights of the 1998 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 99123. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Moore, John P. and Terrett, Craig P.
1998 Highlights of the 1996 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 9886. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
1999 Highlights of the 1997 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 9997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Moore, John P.
1997 Highlights of the 1995 National Youth Gang Survey. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 9763. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Paetsch, Joanne J. and Bertrand, Lorne D.
1999 Victimization and delinquency among Canadian youth. Adolescence Vol.34, Iss.134: 351-368.
Schonfeld, David J. and Newgass, S.
2003 School Crisis Response Initiative. Office for Victims of Crime, NCJ 197832. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Shaffer, Jennifer N. and Ruback, R. B.
2002 Violent Victimization as a Risk Factor for Violent Offending Among Juveniles. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 195737. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Snyder, Howard N. and Sickmund, Melissa
2006 Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 212906. Washington, D.C.: U.S Department of Justice.
Snyder, Thomas D.
2005 Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2005. Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 210697. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Thompkins, Douglas E.
2000 School Violence: Gangs and a Culture of Fear. THE ANNALS of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 567: 54-71.
Thornberry, Terence P. and Burch II, James H.
1997 Gang Members and Delinquent Behavior. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 165154. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
Thrasher, Frederick M.
1927 The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
van Kesteren, J., Mayhew, P. and Nieuwbeerta, P.
2001 Individual risk factors. In Criminal Victimisation in Seventeen Industrialised Countries: Key findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey. Retrieved 3/6, 2005, from http://www.minjust.nl:8080/b_organ/wodc/reports/ob187i.htm
Wilson, John J.
1994 Juvenile Victimization_ 1987-1992. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, FS 9417. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
2000 Children as Victims. From Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report, 1999, by Howard N. Snyder and Melissa Sickmund. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, NCJ 180753. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.