跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.94.18) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/12/10 14:11
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:謝宜君
研究生(外文):Hsieh, Yi-Jun
論文名稱:品牌延伸契合對品牌個性的影響
論文名稱(外文):The impact of brand extensions fit on brand personality
指導教授:方文昌方文昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fang,Wen-chang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:55
中文關鍵詞:品牌延伸 品牌個性
外文關鍵詞:brand personalitybrand extension
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:228
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
品牌個性為造成品牌形象的重要因素,如果管理者想要讓顧客對品牌有較強的情感連結且有較多的信任與忠誠,則建立一個良好的品牌個性將會是一個有用的方式(Johnson et al, 2000)。近年來關於品牌延伸的研究有增加的趨勢,然而當中並沒有將品牌個性作為依變數加以探討,而是將焦點放在延伸本身的評估及延伸後的態度等。本研究試圖將品牌個性做為依變數來探討品牌延伸是否會對品牌個性造成改變的影響。
本研究的主要目的是使用Aaker的品牌個性量表了解並且探討品牌延伸契合對品牌個性的影響。研究中利用了實驗設計的方式,將品牌的延伸分為高契合與低契合兩部份去操控高低契合的延伸對品牌個性是否有改變。研究中發現:在五個品牌個性構面中,延伸高契合比起延伸低契合對核心品牌有較大的改變。另外,核心品牌的知覺品質可以使延伸契合對品牌個性產生干擾,亦即,知覺到的核心品質會影響契合度對品牌個性構面的改變。
Brand personality is an important attribute that creates brand image. If the manager wants to let the customer have a stronger emotion to the brand and more trusts and loyalty, then establishing a good brand personality will be a useful way. In recent years the research about brand extensions has increased, however, brand personality has not been studied as a dependent variable in brand extension literature. Instead, the focus has been on consumer evaluations of the extension itself, attitude towards the core brand and so on. This research attempts to treat brand personality as a dependent variable and discuss if brand personality be affected by brand extensions.
The purpose of this research is to investigate empirically the impact of brand extensions on brand personality, using Aaker’s scale measure the latter. The methodology we use is an experimental study manipulating extension fit (good/poor fit). The findings are 1. the better the fit between the extension and the core brand, the smaller the change in brand personality dimensions following the introduction of the extension and 2. The higher consumers’ evaluations of core brand quality, the lesser the impact of fit on brand personality dimensions.
謝辭 I
中文論文提要 II
英文論文提要 III
目次 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 章節架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 品牌個性 4
第二節 品牌延伸 9
第三節 品牌延伸之評估與影響因素 13
第四節 品牌延伸契合度 16
第五節 相關實證研究 18
第三章 觀念架構與研究設計 19
第一節 研究架構與假說 19
第二節 實驗設計 21
第三節 變數定義與衡量 23
第四節 資料蒐集方法 25
第五節 資料分析方法 25
第四章 資料分析與討論 27
第一節 樣本分析 27
第二節 量表信度與效度 28
第三節 假說驗證 30
第四節 討論 41
第五章 結論與建議 42
第一節 研究發現與意涵 42
第二節 研究貢獻 43
第三節 研究限制 44
第四節 後續研究建議 44
參考文獻 46
附錄-正式問卷(A) 50
壹、中文部份

艾克等著、高登第譯,民94年,品牌管理,初版,台北:天下遠見。
宋秩銘、莊淑芬等,民85年,奧美的觀點,初版,台北:滾石文化。
李怡寬,民83年,影響品牌延伸領域及消費者對品牌延伸評估因素之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳欣怡,民89年,品牌個性契合度對品牌聯盟成效之影響,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳雯怡,民87年,品牌概念延伸與產品技術延伸對品牌延伸效果的影響,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
梁國泰,民87年,產品人格與品牌人格對品牌延伸評價的影響,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭英輝,民87年,品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文

貳、英文部分

Aaker, D.A. (1990), “Brand extensions: “the good, the bad, the ugly””, Sloan Management Review, summer, pp. 47-56.
Aaker, D.A. (1996), Building Strong Brands, Free Press, New York, NY, pp.136-74.
Aaker, D.A. and Keller, K.L. (1990), “Consumer evaluations of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp 27-41
Aaker, J.L. (1997), “Dimensions of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, August, pp. 347-56.
Aaker, J.L. (1999), “The malleable self: the role of self-expression in persuasion”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, pp. 45-57.
Aaker, J.L. and Fournier, S. (1995), “A brand as a character, a partner and a person: three perspectives on the question of brand personality”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, pp. 391-5.
Alba, J.W. and Hutchison, J.W. (1987), “Dimensions of consumer expertise”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13 No.3, pp. 55-9
Ambler, T. and Styles, C. (1997), “Brand development versus new product development: toward a process model of extension decisions”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 6 No 4, pp. 223-34.
Batra, R., Lehmann, D.R. and Singh, D. (1993), “The brand personality of brand good will: some antecedents and consequences”, in Aaker, D.A and nd Biel, A.L. (Eds), Brand Equity and Advertising, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 83-96.
Bhat, S. and Reddy, S.K. (2001), “The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 53, pp. 111-22
Biel, A.L. (1993), “Converting image into equity”, in Aaker, D.A. and Biel, A.L. (Eds), Brand Equity and Advertising, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67-82.
Bottomley, P.A. and Doyle, J.R. (1996), “The formation of attitudes towards brand extensions: testing and generalizing Aaker’s and Keller’s model”, Proceedings of the 25th EMAC Conference, Budapest, Vol. 2, pp. 109-26.
Boush, M.D. and Loken, B. (1991), “A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, pp. 16-28.
Broniarczyk, S.M. and J.W. Alba (1994), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, pp. 214-28
Dacin, P. A. and Daniel, C.S. (1994), “The Effects of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, pp. 229-42.
de Magalhaes Serra, E., Carvalho Vieira, J.M. and Varela Gonzalez, J.A. (1999), “Brand extension effects on attitudes and brand beliefs”, Proceeding of the 28th EMAC Conference, Berlin, 11-14 May, pp. 1-20.
Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. and Grewal, D. (1991), “The effects of price, brand and store information on buyers’ product evaluations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, August, pp. 307-19.
Dube, Laurette, Schmitt, B.H. and Sheri Bridges (1992), “Categorization Research and Brand Extensions,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.19, pp. 255-59
Erdem, T (1998), “An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, pp. 339-51.
Fauquhar, P.H. (1990), “Managing Brand Equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 30, pp. RC-7-RC-12.
Gurhan-Canli, Z. and Maheswaran, D. (1998), “The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, November, pp. 58-63.
Johnson, L.W., Soutar, G.N. and Sweeney, J.C. (2000), “Moderators of the brand image/perceived product quality relationship”, The Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 425-33.
Keller, K.L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 8 November, pp. 409-18.
Keller, K.L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hempstead.
Keller, K.L. and Aaker, D.A. (1992), “The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, February, pp. 35-50.
Kim, C.K., Han, D. and Park, S.B. (2001), “The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: applying the theory of social identification”, Japanese Psychological Research, Vol. 43 No.4, pp. 195-206.
Kolter, P. (1991), Marketing Management, 7th edition. Prentice-Hill International, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 428-51
Levy, S.J. (1959), “Symbols for Sales,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37, pp. 117-24
Loken, B. and John, D.R. (1993), “Diluting brand beliefs: when do brand extensions have a negative impact?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No.3, pp. 71-84.
Park, C.W., Jun, S.Y. and Shocker, A.D. (1996), “Composite branding alliances: an investigation of extension and feedback effects”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, November, pp. 453-66.
Park, C.W., Lawson, R. and Milberg, S.J. (1998), “Memory structure of brand names”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16, pp. 726-31.
Park, C.W., Milberg, S.J. and Lawson, R. (1991), “Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 185-93.
Plummer, J.T. (1985), “How personality makes a difference”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 27-31.
Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R.R. and Oliva, T.A. (1993), “Brand equity and the extendibility of brande names”. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 10. pp. 61-75.
Ries, A.L. and Trout (1986), “Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind,” New York: McGraw-Hill
Sheinin, D.A. and Schmitt, B.H. (1994), “Extending brands with new product concepts: the role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 1-10.
Sirgy, J. (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35, pp.287-300.
Smith, D.C and Park, C.W (1992), “The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29 No.3, pp. 296-313.
Smith, G.. and Grime, I. (2005), “The impact of brand extensions on brand personality: experimental evidence”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 1/2, pp.129-49.
Sunde, L. and Brodie, R.J. (1993), “Consumer evaluation of brand extensions: further empirical results”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.10, pp.47-53.
Swaminathan, V., Fox, R.J. and Reddy, S.K. (2001), “The impact of brand extension introduction on choice”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65 No.4, pp. 1-15.
Tauber, E.W. (1988), “Brand Franchise Extension: New Product Benefits From Existing Brand Names”, Business Horizons, pp. 36-41
Tauber, E.W. (1998), “Brand Leverage: Strategy for Growth in a Cost-Control World”, Journal of Marketing Research, August/September, pp. 26-30.
Zeithaml, V.A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 2-22.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊