臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

品質機能展開(Quality Function Deployment, QFD)的第一個展開矩陣稱為品質屋(House of Quality, HOQ)，品質屋將顧客的欲求及需求轉換成設計屬性，以提高顧客滿意，它提供一個架構讓所有參與者交流其對於產品的想法，進而讓顧客屬性與設計屬性可以契合，作為改良、開發產品的參考；品質屋是由顧客屬性與設計屬性，以及設計屬性與設計屬性這兩個關聯圖所構成的屬性關聯矩陣，所有的屬性關係皆列於上，所以表格不免龐大、複雜，無法一下就看出某特定屬性與其他屬性的關聯程度，必須在龐大且複雜的表格中尋找，不利於研發人員使用。
因此本研究以品質屋為基礎，運用一套顧客屬性與設計屬性的關聯性邏輯運算流程，將原本所有屬性皆列於上的兩個關聯圖，拆解成單一設計屬性與所有顧客屬性，及其他設計屬性的關聯圖，並依據關聯圖轉換成屬性向量圖，讓產品開發人員可以藉由觀察屬性向量圖，來瞭解顧客屬性與設計屬性之間的連動趨勢，進而利用向量圖做為產品設計參考之用。
本研究以實際開發的個案產品為應用對象，取得其顧客屬性與設計屬性之間的數值，再將此類資料投入本研究所建立的邏輯運算流程中，進行分析與權衡相關屬性得到屬性關聯圖，最終，將所獲得之向量圖予公司做為改良產品之依據，使得個案公司之新產品得到更高的顧客滿意度，證實本研究之方法確實可行。

The first expansion matrix of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is called the House of Quality (HOQ), HOQ transforms the customers' desire and demand into engineering characteristics (ECs), in order to improve the customers' satisfaction. It offers a structure to let all participants exchange its idea to the product and to make customer attributes CAs and ECs agree with. The result is as the reference of improving or developing the product. HOQ is the related matrix of attribute which made up from CAs-ECs and ECs-ECs related pictures. All attribute relations are all in HOQ, so the form is huge, complicated unavoidably. User can not find out the related degree between specific attribute and other attributes.
This paper is based on HOQ, use a logic operation procedure about the reference between CAs and ECs, to disassemble originally all attributes arranged in two related pictures that are had, into single design attribute and customer's attributes, and the related picture of other design attributes. And change into a vector picture of attributes according to the related picture. The products developer can be by observing the vector picture of attributes , to understand the relation between CAs and ECs, and then what utilized the vector picture to consult for the product design was used.
This paper makes the data of CAs and ECs from the case products that are developed actually. Then we put the data into the logic operation procedure that this paper sets up, and analyze relevant attributes to receive the related picture of attribute. Finally, the company uses the vector pictures as the basis of improving product. It made the new product of the case company receive higher customer satisfaction. The research method and analysis logic are feasible through company's product analysis of the case.

目錄.................................................................................................III
圖次................................................................................................ V
表次.................................................................................................VII
第壹章 緒論....................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機...............................................................1
第二節 研究目的............................................................................2
第三節 研究架構............................................................................3
第四節 研究流程............................................................................5
第五節 研究範圍與限制...............................................................6
第貳章 文獻探討............................................................................7
第一節 品質機能展開....................................................................7
第二節 品質屋............................................................................... 10
第參章 研究方法........................................................................... 16
第一節 顧客屬性........................................................................... 17
第二節 設計屬性........................................................................... 18
第三節 轉換向量........................................................................... 18
第肆章 個案研究........................................................................... 31
第一節 個案公司背景簡介.......................................................... 31
第二節 個案分析.......................................................................... 32
第伍章 結論與建議.......................................................................61
第一節 結論................................................................................... 61
第二節後續研究建議.................................................................... 62
參考文獻......................................................................................... 63




























圖次
圖1.1 屬性轉換向量..........................................................................4
圖1.2 研究流程..................................................................................5
圖2.1 品質機能展開......................................................................... 9
圖2.2 Bossert 提出之品質屋架構圖................................................11
圖3.1 邏輯運算流程..........................................................................19
圖3.2 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖..... 29
圖4.1 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖......48
圖4.2 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖.... 49
圖4.3 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖..... 50
圖4.4 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖.... 51
圖4.5 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖......52
圖4.6 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖..... 53
圖4.7 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖.... 54
圖4.8 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖..... 55
圖4.9 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖... 56
圖4.10 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖. 57
圖4.11 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖. 58
圖4.12 EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之向量圖. 59
圖4.13 PVM產品規格表..................................................................... 60


















表次
表3.1 顧客屬性與設計屬性..................................................................20
表3.2 屬性關聯矩陣.............................................................................. 22
表3.3 簡化之屬性關聯矩陣..................................................................24
表3.4 設計屬性對產品顧客屬性之影響程度................................... 26
表3.5a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖....... 28
表3.5b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序……............. 28
表4.1 顧客屬性與設計屬性..................................................................32
表4.2 屬性關聯矩陣............................................................................. 33
表4.3 簡化之屬性關聯矩陣................................................................ 35
表4.4設計屬性對產品顧客屬性之影響程度...................................37
表4.5a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖........ 39
表4.5b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序……..…….. 39
表4.6a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖....... 39
表4.6b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序……..…..….39
表4.7a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖........ 40
表4.7b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...…....….40
表4.8a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖..... 40
表4.8b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...…....….40
表4.9a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖........ 41
表4.9b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...…....….41
表4.10a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖...... 41
表4.10b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...…....….41
表4.11a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖..... 42
表4.11b 依E C 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…........….42
表4.12a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖.......42
表4.12b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….42
表4.13a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖...... 43
表4.13b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…............….43
表4.14a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖....... 43
表4.14b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….43
表4.15a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖....... 44
表4.15b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….44
表4.16a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖.....44
表4.16b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….44
表4.17a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖.....45
表4.17b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….45
表4.18a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖.... 46
表4.18b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序…...........….46
表4.19a EC 與各顧客屬性，及EC 與其他設計屬性之關聯圖.....46
表4.19b 依EC 與各顧客屬性之關聯加總值大小排序….........….46

【中文文獻】

1.品質機能展開研究小組譯，品質展開入門，赤尾洋二著，先鋒企業管理發展中心，民國八十四年。
2.品質機能展開研究小組譯，品質機能展開發法-如何有效掌握顧客需求，水野滋、赤尾洋二編著，先鋒企業管理發展中心，民國八十九年。
3.郭人傑，以品質機能展開應用於產品開發過程中規格訂定之研究以筆記型電 腦之設計為例，台灣科技大學工業管理研究所碩士論文，民國八十四年。
4.林全貴，品質機能展開法應用於彩色監視管開發之探討--以台灣飛利浦電子為例，交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文，民國九十年。
5.吳有典，整合Kano模式與品質機能展開法運用於數位相機產品設計之研究，台灣科技大學工業管理所碩士論文，民國九十二年。
6.張維昌，應用品質機能展開與品質工程於產品製程改善之研究，成功大學工業設計學系碩士班碩士論文，民國92 年。
7.許馨文，醫療結果品質影響因素之實證研究-以某醫學中心為例，政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國八十九年。
8.許馨方，銀行競爭策略之研究--以品質的觀點來探討，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，民國九十年。

【西文文獻】

9.Temponi, C., Yen, J., & Tiao, W. A., House of quality : A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 117 340-354, 1999.
10.Karsak, E., Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47, 149-163, 2004.

11.Sullivan, L. P., Quality Function Deployment, Quality Progress, June 1986, pp. 39-50.
12.Griffin, A. and Hauser, J., The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12(1), 1-27 ,1993.
13.George L., Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality, 17, 645-663, 1999.
14.Hauser, J. & Clausing, D., The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66, 63-73, 1988.
15.Kim, K.J., Moskowitz, H., Dhingra. A., Evans, G., Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 504-518, 2000.
16.Hauser, J., How Puritan-Bennett used the house of quality, Sloan Management Review, 34, 61-70, 1993.
17.Akao, Y., QFD: Past, present, and future. Proceedings of the international symposium on QFD’97, Linko¨ping, 1997.
18.Akao, Y., New product development and quality assurance – quality deployment system,(in Japanese), Standardization and Quality Control, Vol. 25 No. 4. pp. 7-14, 1972.
19.Garvin, D.A., What does Product Quality Really Mean, Sloan ManagementReview, 26（1）, pp.25-43, 1984.
20.Sullivan, L. P., Quality Function Deployment, Quality Progress, June 1986, pp. 39-50.
21.Conti, T., Process Management and Quality Function Deployment, QualityProgress, Vol.22, No.12, pp.45-48, 1989.
22.Cristiano, J. J., Liker, J. K., & White, C. C., Customer-driven product development through quality function deployment in the U.S. and Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 286-308, 2000.
23.Jebb, A., Sivalaganthan, S., Edney, R., Evbuomwan, N., Wynn, H., Design function deployment. Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, 1, 251-256, 1992.
24.Prasad, B., Review of QFD and related deployment techniques. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 17(3), 221-234, 1998.
25.Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L., Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 463-497, 2002.
26.Shillito, M. L., Advanced QFD-linking technology to market and company needs. New York: Wiley, 1994.
27.Cher Ming,Tan；Teck-Khim Neo, QFD Implementation In A Discrete Semiconductor Industry,Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Proceedings. Annual , 2002 ,pp.484 -489.
28.Shaikh, M.A.; Al-Badi, A.H.; Al-Elaiwi, A.H.; Al-Ameri, A.; Whittaker, J.A. , E-commerce need analysis via quality function deployment, Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution, 200. IEMC '01 Proceedings. , 2001 ,pp.317 -322
29.Bossert, J. L., Quality Function Deployment-A Practitioner’s Approach, ASQC Quality Press Inc., New York, 1991.
30.Brown, P.G., QFD: Echoing the voice of the customer. AT&T Technical Journal, pp. 18-32, 1991.
31.George L., Optimization tools for design and marketing of new/improved products using the house of quality, 17, 645-663, 1999.
32.Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., Alptekin, S. E., Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44, 171-190, 2002.
33.Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L., A system approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega, 33, 119-139, 2005
34.Moskowitz, H., & Kim, K. J., QFD optimizer: A novice friendly quality function deployment decision support systemfor optimizing product designs. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 32(3), 641-655, 1997.
35.Ross, P. J., The role of Taguchi methods and design of experiments in QFD. Quality Progress, June, 41-47, 1988.
36.Armacost, R. L., Componation, P. J., Mullens, M. A., & Swart, W. W., An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialized housing application. IIE Transactions, 26(4), 72-79, 1994.
37.Lu, M., Madu, C. N., Kuei, C., & Winokur, D., Integrating QFD, AHP, and benchmarking in strategic marketing. Journal of Business Industry Marketing, 9(1), 41-50, 1994.
38.Park, T., & Kim, K., Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 569-581, 1998.
39.Masud, A. S. M., & Dean, E. B., Using fuzzy sets in quality function deployment. Proceedings of the second industrial engineering research conference, Los Angeles, CA, 1993.
40.Bahrami, A., Routine design with information content and fuzzy quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 5, 203-210, 1994.
41.Khoo, L. P., & Ho, N. C., Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system. International Journal of Production Research, 34(2), 299-311, 1996.
42.Kalargeros, N., & Gao, J. X., QFD: Focusing on its simplification and easy computerization using fuzzy logic principles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 19(3), 315-325, 1998.


43.Chan, L. K., Kao, H. P., Ng, A., & Wu, M. L., Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37(11), 2499-2518, 1999.
44.Wang, J., Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research, 37(4), 899-916, 1999.
45.Wasserman, G. S., On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions, 25(3), 59-65, 1999.
46.Bode, J., & Fung, R. Y. K., Cost engineering with quality function deployment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 35(3-4), 587-590, 1998.
47.Fung, R. Y. K., Law, D. S. T., & Ip, W. H., Design targets determination for inter-dependent product attributes in QFD using fuzzy inference. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 10(6), 376-383, 1999.
48.Sohn, S. Y., & Choi, I. S., Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 72, 327-334, 2001.
49.Vanegas, L. V., & Labib, A. W., A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. International Journal of Production Research, 39(1), 99-120, 2001.