跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.184.63) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/11 02:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:葉瑋玲
研究生(外文):Yeh Wei-Lin
論文名稱:制度、人力資本與經濟成長-從金磚十五國談起
論文名稱(外文):Institutions, Human Capital and Economic Growth:the Lesson of Brics
指導教授:官德星官德星引用關係
指導教授(外文):Guan De-Xing
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:制度開放程度人力資本外人直接投資經濟成長金磚四國金磚國家規模效果
外文關鍵詞:InstitutionsOpennessHuman capitalFDIEconomic growthBRICsNext-11Scale effect
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:205
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
摘要:
本文以 Romer (1990) 及 Hall and Jones(1999) 理論架構為基礎,加入制度面因素,探討制度、人力資本、和經濟成長之間的關係。發現一國的總人力資本數量及該國的制度品質,是影響經濟成長最主要的兩個因素。當一國制度品質愈完善,愈能吸引國際資金和人才的進入,因此經濟成長率就會愈高。由於市場均衡的 GDP 成長率較社會福利最大時的 GDP 成長率小,因此政府可透過增加對外開放程度或強化國內制度品質等政策,提高長期的經濟成長率。
實證方面,利用包括金磚十五國以及七大工業國共二十四個國家的資料,對理論模型進行估計和檢定。結果顯示,制度和總人力資本均對經濟成長有顯著的影響,而制度的影響力又更明顯。制度的好壞對開發中國家或新興經濟體 ( 如金磚國家 ),不僅是正面而且是十分顯著的;但對於高度開發國家 ( 如七大工業國 ),其影響就相對減弱,以致每人所得和制度之間呈現「倒-U」的關係。此外,人口規模效果對經濟成長的直接貢獻的確不顯著,制度開放才是相對重要的因素;政府應回歸到經濟的基本面,讓市場機能在自由開放的制度下發揮,由此產生的制度改善效果,遠比任何其他政策更有效。
隨著近年來國家制度面問題,已逐漸為政府及專家學者重視,相信陸續會出現更詳細完整的資料,一旦更多制度面資料可被運用時,就可再次對此課題進行更深入地探討。
Abstract:
  In this paper an institution-based endogenous growth model is proposed, which is inspired by Romer (1990) and Hall and Jones (1999).
Two factors we find are most important in determining long-run economic growth of a country in the globalized world:institutional quality and human capital. In particular, openness of a country, which is one of the components of institutional quality index, can have significant effects on the attraction of both financial and human capital from abroad. A more open economy would have more capital
inflows, and therefore would grow faster. Because the equilibrium of the model is not Pareto optimal, this gives the government a role to promote economic growth by creating an infrastructure with better institutional quality.

We use both cross-sectional and time-series data for 24 countries ( including BRICs and G7 ) to test the hypothesis of the theoretical model. The empirical results show that institutional quality and human capital do have significant effects on long-run growth rates of these countries, but institutions have weakly negative effects on the growth rates of rich countries such as G7. This results in an
“ inverted-U ” relationship between institutional quality and economic growth over the cross section of these countries, which is consistent with the empirical results of Klein (2005). The“ scale effect ”of population on GDP growth rates is weaker, and is valid only through its effects on aggregate human capital stock of a
country.
目錄:

第一章 研究動機與目的
壹、 世界是平的 ………………………………………………… 1.
貳、 金磚四國 …………………………………………………… 2.
參、 小金磚十一國 ……………………………………………… 9.
肆、 本文架構 …………………………………………………… 15.
第二章 文獻回顧
壹、 人口與經濟成長 …………………………………………… 16.
貳、 資本與經濟成長 …………………………………………… 20.
參、 制度與經濟成長 …………………………………………… 24.
第三章 理論模型
壹、 模型介紹 …………………………………………………… 28.
貳、 平衡成長路徑 ……………………………………………… 32.
第四章 實證結果與分析
壹、 資料來源 …………………………………………………… 40.
貳、 時間序列實證結果 ………………………………………… 43.
參、 跨國橫斷面實證結果 ……………………………………… 52.
第五章 結論 ………………………………………………………… 68.
附錄 …………………………………………………………………… 71.
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………… 77.
壹、中文部分

尤元奎 (2005),〈正視台灣生育率驟降的問題〉《財團法人國家政策研究基金會國改評
論》科經 094-001 號。
世界銀行 (2005),〈改善投資環境,促使人人受益〉,2005年世界發展報告摘要。
朱雲鵬、瞿大文、馬克.墨比爾斯 (2005),《金磚四國關鍵報告》,商智文化。
朱雲鵬 (2005),〈BRICs是金磚還是空心磚〉,《財團法人國家政策研究基金會國改分
析》科經094-006 號。
赫南多.德.索托 (Hernando de Soto) (2001),《資本的祕密》,王曉冬譯,經濟新
潮社。



貳、英文部分

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson (2005):“
Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth, ”in
Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf, ed., Handbook of Economic
Growth, Amsterdam:North Holland.
Alfaro, Laura, Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, and Vadym Volosovych (2005a),
“ Capital Flows in a Globalized World:The Role of Policies and
Institutions, ”NBER Working Paper, No.11696.
Alfaro, Laura, Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan, and Vadym Volosovych (2005b),
“ Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Country ? An
Empirical Investigation, ”NBER Working Paper, No.11901.
Barro, Robert J., N. Gregory Mankiw, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1991),
“ Convergence Across States and Regions, ” Brookings papers
on Economic Activity, 1, pp.107–158.
Barro, Robert J., N. Gregory Mankiw, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1992a )
,“ Convergence, ”Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), pp.
223–251.
Barro, Robert J., N. Gregory Mankiw, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1992b),
“ Reginal Growth and Migration:A Japan–U.S. Comparison, ”
Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 6 (4),
pp.312–346.
Barro, Robert J., N. Gregory Mankiw, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1995),
“ Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Model of Growth, ”
American Economic Review, 85 (1), pp.103–105.
Becker, Gary S. (2004),“ What India Can Do To Catch Up With China, ”
Business Week, New York:Feb. 16, 2004, Issue 3870, p.26.
Becker, Gary S. (2005),“ Is Population Growth Good or Bad ? ”
posted in the Becker–Posner Blog (http://www.becker-posner-
blog.com), Oct. 3.
Bernanke, Ben S. (2005),“ The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current
Account Deficit, ”Speech Presented at the Sandridge Lecture,
Virginia Association of Economics, Apr. 14, 2005.
Buchanan, Mike, Fuentes, Monica, Purushothaman, Roopa, and Fiotakis,
Themistokis (2005),“ Bric Layers, ”Goldman Sachs Issue, No.:
05/03.
Dowrick, Steve and Duc–Tho Nguyen (1989),“ OECD Comparative Economic
Growth 1950–85:Catch–Up and Convergence, ”American Economic
Review, 79(5), pp.1010–1030.
Edwards, Sebastian (1991),“ Capital Flows, Foreign Direct Investment,
and Debt–Equity Swaps in Developing Countries, ”in Capital
Flows in the World Economy, Horst Siebert, editor. J.C.B. Mohr,
Tubingen.
Edwards, Sebastian (2001),“ Capital Mobility and Economic Performance
:Are Emerging Economies Different ? ”NBER Working Paper, No.
8076.
Fogel, Robert W. (2006),“ Why China Is Likely to Achieve Its Growth
Objectives, ”NBER Working Paper, No. 12122.
Friedman, Thomas L. (2006), The World is Flat:The Globalized World
in the Twenty – First Century, updated and expanded edition,
New York:Penguin Group.
Goldman Sachs (2003),“ Dreaming With BRICs:The Path to 2050, ”
Global Economics Paper, No.:99.
Goldman Sachs (2005),“ How Solid are the BRICs ? ”Global Economics
Paper, No.:134.
Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones (1999),“ Why Do Some Countries
Produce So Much More Output Per Worker Than Others ? ”
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), pp.83–116.
Hansen, L.P. (1982),“ Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method
of Moments Estimators. ”Econometrica, 50, 1982, pp.1029–1054.
Helpman, Elhanan, and Paul R. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and
Foreign Trade : Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and
the International Economy, Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
Jones, Charles I. (1995),“ R & D–Based Models of Economic Growth, ”
Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), pp.759–784.
Jones, Charles I. (1999),“ Growth:With or Without Scale Effects, ”
American Economic Review, 89(2), pp.139–144.
Jones, Charles I. (2002), Introduction to Economic Growth, 2nd ed.,
New York:Norton.
Klein, Michael W. (2005),“ Capital Account Liberalization,
Institutional Quality and Economic Growth:Theory and
Evidence, ”NBER Working Paper, No.11112.
Krueger, Anne O., (1968),“ Factor Endowments and Per Capital Income
Differences among Countries,”Economic Journal, 78, pp.641–659.
Krugman, Paul R. and Maurice Obstfeld (2003), International Economics:
Theory and Policy, 6th ed., Addison Wesley.
Lane, Philip (2004),“ Empirical Perspectives on Long – Term
External Debt, ”Topics in Macroeconomics, 4, pp.1–21.
Lucas, Robert E., Jr. (1990),“ Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich
to Poor Countries ?”American Economic Review, 80(2), pp.92–96.
Mankiw, N. Gregory, David Romer, and David N. Weil (1992),“ A
Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth, ”Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 107(2), pp.407–437.
Obstfeld, Maurice and Alan M. Taylor (2004), Global Capital Markets:
Integration, Crisis, and Growth, Cambridge, England:Cambridge
University Press.
Parente, Stephen and Edward C. Prescott (2000), Barriers to Riches,
Cambridge, Massachusetts:the MIT Press.
Portes, Richard and Helene Rey (2005),“ The Determinants of Cross–
Border Equity Transaction Flows, ”Journal of International
Economics 65, pp.269–296.
Romer, Paul M. (1990),“ Endogenous Technological Change, ”Journal
of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No.5, Pt.2., pp.S71-S102.
Rose, Andrew K. (2006),“ Size Really Doesn’t Matter:In Search of A
National Scale Effect, ”NBER working paper, No.12191.
World Development Report (2005),“ A Better Investment Climate for
Everyone, ”Washington, D.C.:The World Bank.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 張琬琳(2001),開放電台南北三條聯播網串起政商版圖的重分配,《新新聞週刊第》,第七四一期,頁72-73。
2. 曾瑋(2004),數位無線廣播電視政策之研究:公共利益的實踐過程,《經社法制論叢》,第三十四期,頁337-372。
3. 周韻采(2003),頻譜核釋與制度:財產權與公信力的實證研究,《政治科學論叢》,第十九期,頁203-224。
4. 彭松村、唐震寰、鄭鈞文(1997),無線電頻譜管理策略之探討,《電工通訊》,六月號,頁11-16。
5. 陳世敏(1991),國家與廣電頻率實用權之分析:論「有限頻道,無限使用」,《新聞學研究》,第四十五期,頁25-37。
6. 李建良(1997),基本權利理論體系之構成及其思考層次,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第九卷第一期,頁39-83。
7. 李建良(1999),論環境保護與人權保障之關係,《臺灣法學會學報》,第二十期,頁411-467。
8. 何吉森(2004),因應數位科技匯流之我國廣播電視政策-廣播電視法合併修正案評述,《科技法律透析》,頁52-62。
9. 石世豪(1996),市場競爭規範適用於廣播電視領域的理論基礎-德國法學界逾十載「卡特爾法」與「廣電法」論戰的啟示,《新聞學研究》,第五十三期,頁161-189。
10. 馮建三(2000),國家主權與廣電管制:一個動態觀點,從歐洲聯盟「電視無疆界」十年史談起,《傳播文化》,第八期,頁317-338。