臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

歐盟自2005 年1 月1 日起執行歐盟25國內部市場的溫室氣體排放量交易計畫，為最早實施的多國間溫室氣體排放權交易的交易平台，儼然為全球先驅，本研究探討廠商最適決策問題，掌握各項因子等外生變數對廠商生產、防制與排放權購買行為之影響，最後進行我國高能源密集產業排放權分配。研究發現：(1)歐盟排放交易制度，依據「國家分配計畫」規劃國內排放權分配，主要採取「溯往原則」的免費核發方式；(2)歐盟排放權採取兩層級的分配方式，亦即先決定部門排放總量，再依據部門核配總量分配給被管制的廠商，分配準則主要考量產業成長率、能源效率以及遵行等三項因子；(3)高能源密集產業面對高排放權價格，有提高源科技投資誘因；(4)廠商的歷史排放量較高，則在排放稟賦內生的情況下，具有激勵廠商節約能源的效果。

EU emissions trading scheme which has be adopted by 25 countries of EU since January 1, 2005 is the first implementation of the multi-national greenhouse gas emissions trading transaction platform. This paper analyzes a firm’s optimal decision programs about its production, abatement, and emission allowance when meeting a emissions trading scheme. The results of the research are obtained as the following: (1) under the EU Emission Trading Directive, Emission Allowance Allocation is based on grandfather rule; (2) three main criteria for consideration allocated emission is industrial growth rate, energy efficiency and compliance factor; (3) if Energy-intensive industries face high prices of emission allowance, they will increase incentives of the investment in technology; (4) under endogenous situation of emission endowment, there is an effect of encouraging manufacturers to conserve energy when the firms have more amounts of historical emissions.

第一章 緒論 1-1
第一節 緣起 1-1
第二節 研究目的 1-3
第三節 研究方法及內容 1-4
第四節 預期成果 1-6
第二章 文獻回顧 2-1
第一節 排放交易原理之研究 2-1
第二節 排放權分配之研究 2-9
第三節 廠商面對排放交易生產及投資行為之研究 2-18
第四節 本章小結 2-24
第三章 歐盟排放權分配法則分析 3-1
第一節 政策指令 3-2
第二節 歐盟各國責任分擔 3-10
第三節 歐盟各國國家分配計畫 3-27
第四節 本章小結 3-52
第四章 歐盟排放權分配理論模型建立 4-1
第一節 代表性廠商最適行為模型 4-1
第二節 部門排放權分配規劃 4-13
第三節 本章小結 4-54
第五章 結論與建議 5-1
第一節 結論 5-1
第二節 政策建議 5-2

參考文獻 R-1
附錄 A-1

一、中文文獻
台灣綜合研究院（2001），因應新經濟發展之產業競爭力提升策略—以排放交易制度設計為例，行政院經濟建設委員會。
行政院環保署（1999），建立溫室氣體排放權交易制度之規劃研究，行政院經濟建設委員會八十八年度研究計畫，台灣綜合研究院。
行政院環保署（1999），因應氣候變化綱要公約我國二氧化碳減量成本之經濟分析，行政院環境保護委託專案計畫，台灣綜合研究院。
行政院環保署（2002），總量管制制度建置計畫，行政院環境保護署九十一年度計畫書，中技社環境技術發展中心。
李堅明（2000），我國空氣污染物之排放權交易制度建制，行政院環保署八十八年度計畫書，台灣綜合研究院。
李堅明（2000），國際排放交易制度的發展與比較，我國空氣污染物排放交易制度暨溫室氣體自願減量認證制度委員會，台灣綜合研究院，台北。
李顯峰（2006），歐盟執行「京都議定書」之策略機制，淡江大學歐盟文獻中心通訊，9期，12-18。
黃宗煌、李堅明（2001），排放交易、廠商最適投資決策及經濟成長，農業經濟半年刊，70期，1-35。







二、英文文獻
Åhman M. and L. Zetterberg (2003), “Options for Emission Allowance Allocation under the EU Emissions Trading Directive”, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Butzengeiger S. and A. Michaelowa (2004), “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the European Union –Background and Implementation of a “New” Climate Policy Instrument”, Intereconomics, 116-118.
Dobos I. (2005), “The Effects of Emission Trading on Production and Inventories in the Arrow–Karlin Model”, International Journal of Production Economics, 93-94, 301-308.
Fischer C. I., W. H. Parry and W. A. Pizer (2003), “Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 523-545.
Foxon T., R. Gross and D. Anderson (2003), “Innovation in Long Term Renewables Options in the UK – Overcoming Barriers and ‘Systems Failures’ ”, ICEPT.
Goulder L. (2004), “Induced Technological Change and Climate Policy”, Report for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA, October.
Grimaud A. (1999), “Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 249-266.
Janssen M. (1998), “The Initial Allocation of Emission Rights: Modeling Global Change ~The Art of Integrated Assessment Modeling”, Advances in Ecological Economics, MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall.
Jouveta P. A., P. Michel and G. Rotillon (2005), “Optimal Growth with Pollution: How to Use Pollution Permits?”, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 29, 1597-1609.
Jung C., Krutilla K. and R. Boyd (1996), “Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at Industry Level: an Evaluation of Policy Alternatives”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 95-111.
KMPG (2002), “Allocation of CO2 Emission Allowances: Distribution of Emission Allowances in a European Emissions Trading Scheme”, Ministry of Affairs.
Kuik O. and M. Mulder (2004), “Emissions Trading and Competitiveness: Pros and Cons of Relative and Absolute Schemes”, Energy policy, 32, 737-745.

Landgrebe J. (2005), “Implementation of Emissions Trading in the EU: National Allocation Plans of all EU States”, German Emissions Trading Authority within the Federal Environmental Agency.
Miketa A. and L. Schrattenholzer (2006), “Equity Implications of Two Burden-Sharing Rules for Stabilizing”, Energy policy, 34, 877-891.
Montero J. P. (2002), “Permits, Standards, and Technology Innovation”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 23-44.
Montgomery W. D. (1972), “Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs”, Journal of Economic Theorty , 5, 395-418.
Reinaud J. (2002), “Emission Trading and Its Possible Impacts on Investment Decisions in Power Sector”, IEA.
Reinaud J. (2005), “Industrial Competitiveness under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme”, IEA.
Rubin, J. (1996), “A Model of Intertemporal Emission Trading, Banking, and Borrowing”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 269-286.
Tietenberg T. (1985), “Emission Trading: an Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy”, Resources for the future, Washing, D.C.
Zetterberg L., K. Nilsson, M. Åhman, A. S. Kumlin and L. Birgersdotter (2004), “Analysis of national allocation plans for the EU ETS”, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.