跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/14 11:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:胡馨
研究生(外文):Hsin Hu
論文名稱:台灣心臟衰竭病人β1-腎上腺素受體基因多型性與β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑耐受度及反應之預測因子
論文名稱(外文):β1-Adrenoceptor Genetic Polymorphisms and Other Predictors of the Tolerability and Response to β-Blockers in Patients with Heart Failure in Taiwan.
指導教授:李啟明李啟明引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chii-Ming Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:臨床藥學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:藥學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:心臟衰竭拮抗劑β1-腎上腺素受體基因多型性耐受度療效
外文關鍵詞:Heart failureβ-blockerβ1-adrenoceptorgene polymorphismtolerabilitytherapeutic response
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:295
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
背景:中國心臟衰竭病患對於β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑之耐受劑量較西方國家低,藥物對不同病患之間的療效亦具有差異性。雖然曾有研究指出,β1-腎上腺素受體基因密碼子49及389之多型性可能造成β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑耐受度及療效之不同,其對偶基因之分布在中國人和西方人之間並無差異。目前尚無亞洲人β1-腎上腺素受體基因全長定序之研究。

目的:本研究欲探討中國人之β1-腎上腺素受體基因中是否有其他位置發生基因多型性,導致我們與西方人對β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑耐受度之不同;並探討其他對於β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑的耐受度及療效之預測因子。

方法:我們針對69位目前正在使用,或曾經使用過carvedilol, metoprolol succinate,或bisoprolol之心臟衰竭病人之血液樣本進行β1-腎上腺素受體基因全長定序。此外,我們回溯性地收集病人開始服用β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑之前,以及增加至穩定劑量後之各種臨床參數(例如病史、心臟衰竭原因、併用藥物、左心室射出分率等等)以進行分析。
結果:不同心臟衰竭原因之病人對於β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑之耐受劑量有顯著的差異(p = 0.047)。擴張性心肌病變患者之耐受劑量較瓣膜性心臟病患顯著為高(分別為14.589 ± 8.882及5.357 ± 7.594 毫克/天,p = 0.018),亦傾向高於冠狀動脈心臟病患者(9.544 ± 5.558毫克/天,p = 0.054)。多元逐步迴歸分析顯示擴張性心肌病變(B = 4.852, p = 0.007)為β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑耐受劑量之顯著預測因子;而擴張性心肌病變(B = 9.015, p = 0.011)及服藥前之左心室射出分率(B = - 0.503, p < 0.001)為左心室收縮功能改善之顯著預測因子。次族群分析(26位服藥前左心室射出分率≦35%之冠狀動脈心臟病及擴張性心肌病變患者)顯示低劑量之carvedilol (12.464 ± 7.977 毫克/天)可顯著改善病患之左心室射出分率(13.49 ± 16.66 %,p < 0.001)。我們並未在β1-腎上腺素受體基因之轉錄區發現新的基因多型性;密碼子49及389之對偶基因分布與文獻報告相符,並且與β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑耐受性及療效之間沒有顯著關聯。

結論:低劑量之β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑即可對中國心臟衰竭的病人帶來助益。此外,擴張性心肌病變患者可耐受較高劑量的β-腎上腺素受體拮抗劑;而擴張性心肌病變及服藥前左心室射出分率較低之病患,其服藥後左心室收縮功能改善之幅度較大。我們並未在β1-腎上腺素受體基因之轉錄區發現新的基因多型性;而密碼子49及389之對偶基因分布亦與文獻報告相符。
Background: The tolerated doses of β-blockers in Chinese heart failure (HF) patients were substantially lower than those wildly used in the Western countries, and the therapeutic response was heterogeneous. Although the mechanism responsible for the various tolerability and response was often attributed to β1-adrenoceptor (β1-AR) genetic polymorphisms at codon 49 and 389, their allele distribution was similar between Chinese and Caucasian, and β1-AR genetic full length sequencing has not been performed in Asian population.

Objective: This study aimed to examine whether there are novel polymorphic loci in the β1-AR gene responsible for the difference in tolerability to β-blockers between Chinese and Caucasian HF patients, and to assess for other clinical predictors of tolerability and therapeutic response to β-blockers in Chinese population.

Methods: We performed full length sequencing for β1-AR in 69 patients who had the diagnosis of chronic HF and were using, or have used, one of the three β-blockers carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol. Clinical parameters including comorbidities, HF etiology, concurrent medication, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before the initiation and at the stable dose of β-blocker were retrieved from the medical records or inquiries into the patients.


Results: Tolerated carvedilol stable dose was significantly different by HF etiology (p = 0.047). The stable dose of carvedilol for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) as the etiology of HF was higher than that of valvular heart disease (VHD) patients (14.589 ± 8.882 and 5.357 ± 7.594 mg/day, respectively, p = 0.018), and also tended to be higher than that of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (9.544 ± 5.558 mg/day for CAD, p = 0.054). Multiple stepwise regression revealed that DCMP (B = 4.852, p = 0.007) was the only significant predictor of stable carvedilol dose; DCMP (B = 9.015, p = 0.011) and baseline LVEF (B = - 0.503, p < 0.001) appeared to be the significant predictors of LVEF improvement. In a subgroup analysis of 26 patients with CAD or DCMP (baseline LVEF≦35%), low-dose carvedilol (12.464 ± 7.977 mg / day) produced a significant improvement in LVEF (13.49 ± 16.66 %, p < 0.001). Neither novel variants other than the reported codon 49 and codon 389 within the coding region, nor correlation between β1-AR gene diplotypes and tolerability or response was found. The allele distributions of codon 49 and 389 were similar to those reported previously in the Chinese and Caucasian populations.

Conclusion: Low-dose β-blocker therapy improved left ventricular function in Chinese patients with HF. Moreover, DCMP patients tolerated better to β-blocker, and those with DCMP as the etiology of HF or those had lower LVEF at baseline gained a greater improvement. For the β1-AR gene polymorphism, neither novel variant within the coding region, nor a different distribution pattern of alleles at codon 49 and codon 389 was noted.
Contents -------------------------------------------------------------------------- i
Table Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii
Figure Contents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv
摘要 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v
Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------ viii
Chapter 1 Introduction --------------------------------------------------- 1
Section 1 Review of Literature ----------------------------------------------------------- 1
1 Chronic Heart Failure and β-blocker Therapy -------------------------------------- 1
2 Pharmacological Properties of the Three β-blockers Available for
Clinical Use in Heart Failure Patients ----------------------------------------------- 3
3 β1-Adrenoceptor Polymorphisms and β-blocker Therapy ------------------------- 4
Section 2 Research Motivation ----------------------------------------------------------- 7
Section 3 Research Purpose --------------------------------------------------------------- 8
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods -------------------------------------- 9
Section 1 Study Population ---------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Section 2 Study Design -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Section 3 DNA Preparation -------------------------------------------------------------- 10
Section 4 Polymerase Chain Reaction ------------------------------------------------- 12
Section 5 Polymerase Chain Reaction Product Purification ------------------------ 14
Section 6 Sequence Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------ 15
Section 7 Statistical Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------ 15
Chapter 3 Results --------------------------------------------------------- 17
Section 1 β1-Adrenoceptor Gene Polymorphisms ------------------------------------ 17
Section 2 Tolerability --------------------------------------------------------------------- 18
1 Carvedilol Stable Dose as a Categorical Variable -------------------------------- 18
2 Carvedilol Stable Dose as a Continuous Variable -------------------------------- 18
(1) Relationships between Heart Failure Etiology and Carvedilol Dose ------ 18
(2) Multiple Regression -------------------------------------------------------------- 18
Section 3 Response ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 20
1 Comparison with the MOCHA Trial ------------------------------------------------ 20
2 Relationship between Tolerability and Response --------------------------------- 20
3 Multiple Regression ------------------------------------------------------------------- 21
Section 4 Relationships between β1-Adrenoceptor Genetic
Polymorphisms and Carvedilol Dose and Left Ventricular
Ejection Fraction Improvement --------------------------------------------- 22
Chapter 4 Discussion ----------------------------------------------------- 23
Section 1 Relationships between Gene Polymorphisms and
Clinical Observation ---------------------------------------------------------- 23
Section 2 Tolerability -------------------------------------------------------------------- 24
Section 3 Response ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 26
1 Comparison with MOCHA Trial ----------------------------------------------------- 26
2 Dilated Cardiomyopathy as a Predictor of Left Ventricular
Ejection Fraction Improvement ------------------------------------------------------ 28
3 Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Predictor of Left
Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement ---------------------------------------- 29
Section 4 Limitations -------------------------------------------------------------------- 30
Chapter 5 Conclusion ---------------------------------------------------- 31
References ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 32
Table Contents
Table 1. Primers for polymerase chain reaction ------------------------- 41
Table 2. Primers for sequencing ------------------------------------------- 41
Table 3. Primers for forward confirmation ----------------------------- 41
Table 4. Baseline characteristics stratified by carvedilol tolerability - 42
Table 5. Genotypes and diplotypes of β1-adrenoceptor gene
stratified by carvedilol tolerability ----------------------------- 44
Table 6. Regression analysis for carvedilol dose ------------------------ 45
Table 7a. Comparison of the tolerability and response to carvedilol
between the present study and the MOCHA trial ------------- 46
Table 7b. Responses to carvedilol of the subgroup of patients
compared with the MOCHA trial ------------------------------- 47
Table 8a. Response to carvedilol therapy according to tolerability ---- 48
Table 8b. Response to carvedilol therapy according to tolerability ---- 49
Table 9. Regression analysis for left ventricular
ejection fraction improvement ---------------------------------- 50
Table 10. Baseline characteristics stratified by diplotypes -------------- 51

Figure Contents
Figure 1. Electrophoresis of the polymerase chain reaction products- 53
Figure 2. Electrophoresis of the purified polymerase
chain reaction products ------------------------------------------ 53
Figure 3. β1-adrenoceptor map -------------------------------------------- 54
Figure 4. Chromatograms of the β1-adrenoceptor gene
polymorphisms at codon 49 and 389 -------------------------- 55
Figure 5. Chromatogram of a new β1-adrenoceptor gene
polymorphism in the 3’ untranslated region ------------------ 56
Figure 6. Carvedilol stable dose by etiology ----------------------------- 57
Figure 7. Relationship between β1-adrenoceptor diplotype and
carvedilol stable dose -------------------------------------------- 58
Figure 8. Relationship between β1-adrenoceptor diplotype and
improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction ------------ 59
1.Esler, M., Kaye, D., Lambert, G., Esler, D. & Jennings, G. Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 80, 7L-14L (1997).
2.Kaye, D. M. et al. Adverse consequences of high sympathetic nervous activity in the failing human heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 26, 1257-63 (1995).
3.Francis, G. S. et al. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation 82, 1724-9 (1990).
4.Jessup, M. & Brozena, S. Heart failure. N Engl J Med 348, 2007-18 (2003).
5.Lowes, B. D. et al. Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 83, 1201-5 (1999).
6.Packer, M. New concepts in the pathophysiology of heart failure: beneficial and deleterious interaction of endogenous haemodynamic and neurohormonal mechanisms. J Intern Med 239, 327-33 (1996).
7.Hall, S. A. et al. Time course of improvement in left ventricular function, mass and geometry in patients with congestive heart failure treated with beta-adrenergic blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol 25, 1154-61 (1995).
8.Sackner-Bernstein, J. D. & Mancini, D. M. Rationale for treatment of patients with chronic heart failure with adrenergic blockade. Jama 274, 1462-7 (1995).
9.Francis, G. S., McDonald, K. M. & Cohn, J. N. Neurohumoral activation in preclinical heart failure. Remodeling and the potential for intervention. Circulation 87, IV90-6 (1993).
10.Bristow, M. R. beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in chronic heart failure. Circulation 101, 558-69 (2000).
11.Packer, M. et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med 334, 1349-55 (1996).
12.Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet 353, 2001-7 (1999).
13.The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet 353, 9-13 (1999).
14.Packer, M. et al. Effect of carvedilol on the morbidity of patients with severe chronic heart failure: results of the carvedilol prospective randomized cumulative survival (COPERNICUS) study. Circulation 106, 2194-9 (2002).
15.Packer, M. et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 344, 1651-8 (2001).
16.Rahko, P. S. An echocardiographic analysis of the long-term effects of carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling, systolic performance, and ventricular filling patterns in dilated cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography 22, 547-54 (2005).
17.Dubach, P. et al. Effects of bisoprolol fumarate on left ventricular size, function, and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure: analysis with magnetic resonance myocardial tagging. Am Heart J 143, 676-83 (2002).
18.Lechat, P. et al. Prognostic value of bisoprolol-induced hemodynamic effects in heart failure during the Cardiac Insufficiency BIsoprolol Study (CIBIS). Circulation 96, 2197-205 (1997).
19.Bristow, M. R. et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators. Circulation 94, 2807-16 (1996).
20.El-Sherif, N. & Turitto, G. Electrophysiologic effects of carvedilol: is carvedilol an antiarrhythmic agent? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28, 985-90 (2005).
21.Hunt, S. A. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 46, e1-82 (2005).
22.Swedberg, K. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 26, 1115-40 (2005).
23.Zhou, H. H., Koshakji, R. P., Silberstein, D. J., Wilkinson, G. R. & Wood, A. J. Altered sensitivity to and clearance of propranolol in men of Chinese descent as compared with American whites. N Engl J Med 320, 565-70 (1989).
24.Talbert, R. L. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta blockers in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 9, 131-7 (2004).
25.Reiter, M. J. Cardiovascular drug class specificity: beta-blockers. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 47, 11-33 (2004).
26.Sandberg, A., Blomqvist, I., Jonsson, U. E. & Lundborg, P. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a new controlled-release formulation of metoprolol: a comparison with conventional tablets. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 Suppl, S9-14 (1988).
27.Andersson, B., Aberg, J., Lindelow, B., Tang, M. S. & Wikstrand, J. Dose-related effects of metoprolol on heart rate and pharmacokinetics in heart failure. J Card Fail 7, 311-7 (2001).
28.Abrahamsson, B. et al. The relationship between metoprolol plasma concentration and beta 1-blockade in healthy subjects: a study on conventional metoprolol and metoprolol CR/ZOK formulations. J Clin Pharmacol 30, S46-54 (1990).
29.Bristow, M. R., Abraham, J. H., Gilbert, E. M., Yoshikawa, T. & Port, J. D. Relationships between carvedilol stereoisomer plasma concentrations and β-receptor occupancies in subjects with chronic heart failure in the Multicenter Oral Carvedilol Heart Assessment (MOCHA) trial. Eur Heart J 17, 135. Abstract. (1996).
30.Bristow, M. R., Roden, R. L., Lowes, B. D., Gilbert, E. M. & Eichhorn, E. J. The role of third-generation beta-blocking agents in chronic heart failure. Clin Cardiol 21, I3-13 (1998).
31.Yoshikawa, T. et al. Cardiac adrenergic receptor effects of carvedilol. Eur Heart J 17 Suppl B, 8-16 (1996).
32.Keating, G. M. & Jarvis, B. Carvedilol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure. Drugs 63, 1697-741 (2003).
33.Kubo, T., Azevedo, E. R., Newton, G. E., Parker, J. D. & Floras, J. S. Lack of evidence for peripheral alpha(1)- adrenoceptor blockade during long-term treatment of heart failure with carvedilol. J Am Coll Cardiol 38, 1463-9 (2001).
34.Bylund, D. B. et al. International Union of Pharmacology nomenclature of adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 46, 121-36 (1994).
35.Rathz, D. A., Gregory, K. N., Fang, Y., Brown, K. M. & Liggett, S. B. Hierarchy of polymorphic variation and desensitization permutations relative to beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 278, 10784-9 (2003).
36.Levin, M. C., Marullo, S., Muntaner, O., Andersson, B. & Magnusson, Y. The myocardium-protective Gly-49 variant of the beta 1-adrenergic receptor exhibits constitutive activity and increased desensitization and down-regulation. J Biol Chem 277, 30429-35 (2002).
37.Rathz, D. A., Brown, K. M., Kramer, L. A. & Liggett, S. B. Amino acid 49 polymorphisms of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor affect agonist-promoted trafficking. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 39, 155-60 (2002).
38.Borjesson, M., Magnusson, Y., Hjalmarson, A. & Andersson, B. A novel polymorphism in the gene coding for the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor associated with survival in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J 21, 1853-8 (2000).
39.Moore, J. D., Mason, D. A., Green, S. A., Hsu, J. & Liggett, S. B. Racial differences in the frequencies of cardiac beta(1)-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms: analysis of c145A>G and c1165G>C. Hum Mutat 14, 271 (1999).
40.Mason, D. A., Moore, J. D., Green, S. A. & Liggett, S. B. A gain-of-function polymorphism in a G-protein coupling domain of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem 274, 12670-4 (1999).
41.Tesson, F. et al. Characterization of a unique genetic variant in the beta1-adrenoceptor gene and evaluation of its role in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. CARDIGENE Group. J Mol Cell Cardiol 31, 1025-32 (1999).
42.Brodde, O. E. et al. Blunted cardiac responses to receptor activation in subjects with Thr164Ile beta(2)-adrenoceptors. Circulation 103, 1048-50 (2001).
43.Wagoner, L. E. et al. Polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor determine exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Circ Res 86, 834-40 (2000).
44.Liggett, S. B. et al. The Ile164 beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphism adversely affects the outcome of congestive heart failure. J Clin Invest 102, 1534-9 (1998).
45.Green, S. A., Turki, J., Innis, M. & Liggett, S. B. Amino-terminal polymorphisms of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor impart distinct agonist-promoted regulatory properties. Biochemistry 33, 9414-9 (1994).
46.Green, S. A., Cole, G., Jacinto, M., Innis, M. & Liggett, S. B. A polymorphism of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor within the fourth transmembrane domain alters ligand binding and functional properties of the receptor. J Biol Chem 268, 23116-21 (1993).
47.Moore, P. E. et al. Polymorphism of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor gene and desensitization in human airway smooth muscle. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162, 2117-24 (2000).
48.Chong, L. K., Chowdry, J., Ghahramani, P. & Peachell, P. T. Influence of genetic polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenoceptor on desensitization in human lung mast cells. Pharmacogenetics 10, 153-62 (2000).
49.Aziz, I., Hall, I. P., McFarlane, L. C. & Lipworth, B. J. Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation and bronchodilator sensitivity after regular treatment with formoterol in subjects with stable asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 101, 337-41 (1998).
50.Large, V. et al. Human beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms are highly frequent in obesity and associate with altered adipocyte beta-2 adrenoceptor function. J Clin Invest 100, 3005-13 (1997).
51.Walston, J. et al. Time of onset of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and genetic variation in the beta 3-adrenergic-receptor gene. N Engl J Med 333, 343-7 (1995).
52.Clement, K. et al. Genetic variation in the beta 3-adrenergic receptor and an increased capacity to gain weight in patients with morbid obesity. N Engl J Med 333, 352-4 (1995).
53.Widen, E. et al. Association of a polymorphism in the beta 3-adrenergic-receptor gene with features of the insulin resistance syndrome in Finns. N Engl J Med 333, 348-51 (1995).
54.Perfetti, R. et al. Pancreatic beta-cells expressing the Arg64 variant of the beta(3)-adrenergic receptor exhibit abnormal insulin secretory activity. J Mol Endocrinol 27, 133-44 (2001).
55.Kimura, K. et al. Mutated human beta3-adrenergic receptor (Trp64Arg) lowers the response to beta3-adrenergic agonists in transfected 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Horm Metab Res 32, 91-6 (2000).
56.Pietri-Rouxel, F., St John Manning, B., Gros, J. & Strosberg, A. D. The biochemical effect of the naturally occurring Trp64-->Arg mutation on human beta3-adrenoceptor activity. Eur J Biochem 247, 1174-9 (1997).
57.Brodde, O. E., Bruck, H., Leineweber, K. & Seyfarth, T. Presence, distribution and physiological function of adrenergic and muscarinic receptor subtypes in the human heart. Basic Res Cardiol 96, 528-38 (2001).
58.Molenaar, P. & Parsonage, W. A. Fundamental considerations of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes in human heart failure. Trends Pharmacol Sci 26, 368-75 (2005).
59.del Monte, F. et al. Coexistence of functioning beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in single myocytes from human ventricle. Circulation 88, 854-63 (1993).
60.Kaumann, A. J. & Molenaar, P. Modulation of human cardiac function through 4 beta-adrenoceptor populations. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 355, 667-81 (1997).
61.Strosberg, A. D. Structure and function of the beta 3-adrenergic receptor. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37, 421-50 (1997).
62.Gauthier, C., Tavernier, G., Charpentier, F., Langin, D. & Le Marec, H. Functional beta3-adrenoceptor in the human heart. J Clin Invest 98, 556-62 (1996).
63.Berkowitz, D. E. et al. Distribution of beta 3-adrenoceptor mRNA in human tissues. Eur J Pharmacol 289, 223-8 (1995).
64.Krief, S. et al. Tissue distribution of beta 3-adrenergic receptor mRNA in man. J Clin Invest 91, 344-9 (1993).
65.Brodde, O. E. et al. Regional distribution of beta-adrenoceptors in the human heart: coexistence of functional beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors in both atria and ventricles in severe congestive cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 8, 1235-42 (1986).
66.Bristow, M. R. et al. Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic-receptor subpopulations in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective beta 1-receptor down-regulation in heart failure. Circ Res 59, 297-309 (1986).
67.Frielle, T. et al. Cloning of the cDNA for the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84, 7920-4 (1987).
68.Sandilands, A. J., O''Shaughnessy, K. M. & Brown, M. J. Greater inotropic and cyclic AMP responses evoked by noradrenaline through Arg389 beta 1-adrenoceptors versus Gly389 beta 1-adrenoceptors in isolated human atrial myocardium. Br J Pharmacol 138, 386-92 (2003).
69.Molenaar, P. et al. Conservation of the cardiostimulant effects of (-)-norepinephrine across Ser49Gly and Gly389Arg beta(1)-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms in human right atrium in vitro. J Am Coll Cardiol 40, 1275-82 (2002).
70.Sofowora, G. G. et al. A common beta1-adrenergic receptor polymorphism (Arg389Gly) affects blood pressure response to beta-blockade. Clin Pharmacol Ther 73, 366-71 (2003).
71.Liu, J. et al. Gly389Arg polymorphism of beta1-adrenergic receptor is associated with the cardiovascular response to metoprolol. Clin Pharmacol Ther 74, 372-9 (2003).
72.Johnson, J. A. et al. Beta 1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and antihypertensive response to metoprolol. Clin Pharmacol Ther 74, 44-52 (2003).
73.Terra, S. G. et al. Beta1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and left ventricular remodeling changes in response to beta-blocker therapy. Pharmacogenet Genomics 15, 227-34 (2005).
74.Mialet Perez, J. et al. Beta 1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms confer differential function and predisposition to heart failure. Nat Med 9, 1300-5 (2003).
75.Wagoner, L. E. et al. Polymorphisms of the beta1-adrenergic receptor predict exercise capacity in heart failure. Am Heart J 144, 840-6 (2002).
76.de Groote, P. et al. Association between beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms and the response to beta-blockade in patients with stable congestive heart failure. Pharmacogenet Genomics 15, 137-42 (2005).
77.Terra, S. G. et al. beta-Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and responses during titration of metoprolol controlled release/extended release in heart failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther 77, 127-37 (2005).
78.Magnusson, Y. et al. Ser49Gly of beta1-adrenergic receptor is associated with effective beta-blocker dose in dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 78, 221-31 (2005).
79.White, H. L. et al. An evaluation of the beta-1 adrenergic receptor Arg389Gly polymorphism in individuals with heart failure: a MERIT-HF sub-study. Eur J Heart Fail 5, 463-8 (2003).
80.Xie, H. G. et al. Arg389Gly beta 1-adrenoceptor polymorphism varies in frequency among different ethnic groups but does not alter response in vivo. Pharmacogenetics 11, 191-7 (2001).
81.羅文帥. (Taiwan University, Taipei, 2001).
82.Podlowski, S. et al. Beta1-adrenoceptor gene variations: a role in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy? J Mol Med 78, 87-93 (2000).
83.Cascorbi, I., Paul, M. & Kroemer, H. K. Pharmacogenomics of heart failure -- focus on drug disposition and action. Cardiovasc Res 64, 32-9 (2004).
84.Voora, D. et al. Prospective dosing of warfarin based on cytochrome P-450 2C9 genotype. Thromb Haemost 93, 700-5 (2005).
85.Shastry, B. S. Pharmacogenetics and the concept of individualized medicine. Pharmacogenomics J 6, 16-21 (2006).
86.Kaye, D. M. et al. Beta-adrenoceptor genotype influences the response to carvedilol in patients with congestive heart failure. Pharmacogenetics 13, 379-82 (2003).
87.Zineh, I. et al. Pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 genotypes do not predict metoprolol adverse events or efficacy in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 76, 536-44 (2004).
88.van Zwieten, P. A. An overview of the pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic potential of combined alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Drugs 45, 509-17 (1993).
89.Zhou, H. H. & Wood, A. J. Stereoselective disposition of carvedilol is determined by CYP2D6. Clin Pharmacol Ther 57, 518-24 (1995).
90.Zanger, U. M., Raimundo, S. & Eichelbaum, M. Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 369, 23-37 (2004).
91.Seghatol, F. F. et al. Relation between contractile reserve and improvement in left ventricular function with beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 93, 854-9 (2004).
92.Boon, N. A. & Bloomfield, P. The medical management of valvar heart disease. Heart 87, 395-400 (2002).
93.O''Keefe, J. H., Jr. et al. Predictors of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction with carvedilol for congestive heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol 7, 3-7 (2000).
94.Green, P. et al. Long-term effects of carvedilol or metoprolol on left ventricular function in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 95, 1114-6 (2005).
95.Hori, M. et al. Low-dose carvedilol improves left ventricular function and reduces cardiovascular hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: the Multicenter Carvedilol Heart Failure Dose Assessment (MUCHA) trial. Am Heart J 147, 324-30 (2004).
96.Sugioka, K. et al. Early recovery of impaired coronary flow reserve by carvedilol therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a serial transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 45, 318-9 (2005).
97.Metra, M. et al. Marked improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction during long-term beta-blockade in patients with chronic heart failure: clinical correlates and prognostic significance. Am Heart J 145, 292-9 (2003).
98.Schleman, K. A. et al. Predicting response to carvedilol for the treatment of heart failure: a multivariate retrospective analysis. J Card Fail 7, 4-12 (2001).
99.Unverferth, D. V., Magorien, R. D., Lewis, R. P. & Leier, C. V. The role of subendocardial ischemia in perpetuating myocardial failure in patients with nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 105, 176-9 (1983).
100.Cleland, J. G. et al. Myocardial viability as a determinant of the ejection fraction response to carvedilol in patients with heart failure (CHRISTMAS trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 362, 14-21 (2003).
101.Neglia, D. et al. Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 105, 186-93 (2002).
102.Woodley, S. L. et al. Beta-blockade with bucindolol in heart failure caused by ischemic versus idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 84, 2426-41 (1991).
103.Mann, D. L., Kent, R. L., Parsons, B. & Cooper, G. t. Adrenergic effects on the biology of the adult mammalian cardiocyte. Circulation 85, 790-804 (1992).
104.Latini, R., Masson, S., Staszewsky, L. & Maggioni, A. P. Valsartan for the treatment of heart failure. Expert Opin Pharmacother 5, 181-93 (2004).
105.Greenberg, B. et al. Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiac structure and function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Results of the SOLVD echocardiography substudy. Circulation 91, 2573-81 (1995).
106.Frigerio, M. & Roubina, E. Drugs for left ventricular remodeling in heart failure. Am J Cardiol 96, 10L-18L (2005).
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 周慧菁(2005)。〈百人談信任〉,《天下雜誌》,324:38–52。
2. 紀慧君(2002)。〈編織新聞事實-紀律權力的觀點〉,《新聞學研究》,73:167–204。
3. 紀慧君(2003a)。〈定位的政治—主體與權力研究的再思考〉,《中華傳播學刊》,3:83–127。
4. 胡紹嘉(1999)。〈語言互動與經驗脈絡下的超自然論述:大學生對於新聞中靈異內容的意義建構與言說〉,《新聞學研究》,58:29–58。
5. 倪炎元(1999)。〈再現的政治:解讀媒介對他者負面建構的策略〉,《新聞學研究》,58:85–112。
6. 倪炎元(2002)。〈台灣女性政治精英的媒體再現〉,《新聞學研究》,70:17–58。
7. 翁秀琪(1997)。〈批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析:宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析〉,《新聞學研究》,57:91–126。
8. 翁秀琪、鍾蔚文、簡妙如、邱承君(1997)。〈似假還真的新聞文本世界—新聞如何呈現超經驗事件〉,《新聞學研究》,58: 59–83。
9. 陳烜之、鄧少林、梁展豪(1995)。〈兩岸三地常用中文字彙比較研究〉,《中華心理學刊》,第37卷2期:169–177。
10. 陳雪雲(1990)。〈論媒介現實之論述分析〉,《社會教育學刊》,19:135–167。
11. 游美惠(2000)。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉,《調查研究》,8:5–42。
12. 趙斯啟(2004)。〈信任破滅,黑心氾濫〉,《張老師月刊》,322:22–25。
13. 戴育賢(1994)。〈大眾媒體與真實建構-一次現象社會學的探討〉,《新聞學研究》,48:169–192。