臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以個案研究進行生物科技產業的破壞性技術發展之企業成長策略選擇的分析，以克里斯汀生的破壞性創新為預設產業型態，探討依S-C-P與動機/能力做為研究理論的框架，歸納出在不同企業條件背景下，適合不同的成長策略。
從個案的分析我們可以得知，當今我國經濟貿易發展處處受限，關鍵於技術研發且低資源依存度的生物科技業為我國發展的新契機，市場的挑戰者憑藉破壞性技術的創新進行市場顛覆時，會受到外在動機的牽引與內在核心能力的拉扯，而企業的成長策略選擇將影響營運狀況。
藉著本研究的分析可得知高科技產業企業未來的成長策略選擇，在動機為產品差異化時，應選擇內部發展策略；品牌塑造為企業動機時，適合內部創業的成長策略模式；企業目標為提高新廠進入障礙時，策略聯盟為營運策略的最佳選擇。

This research is a case studying based on the disruptive technology development to investigate the biotechnology industrial. By Christensen’s disruptive innovation, the research used the S-P-C and motivation / ability theories, and generalize a conclusion from some enterprises that the different enterprises’ conditions adaptation different grow strategies.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the disruptive innovation model of Taiwanese enterprises in biotechnology industry. By studying this case, we can draw some points. First, the biotechnology industry is a low resource interdependence in-dustry. It is the best way to economy and to trade for our country that focusing on de-veloping technology. Then, the grow strategy will be affect operated situation of an enterprise.
It comes to some conclusions as bellows: the choice of grow strategy in high technology industrial is Internal Development/ Spin-off, when the motive of an enter-prise is difference product. Having a molding brand motive, an enterprise will choice the internal venture grow strategy. When an enterprise’s ambition is advanced compli-cation to the entrant, the Strategic alliance is the best choice.

內容目錄
中文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iii
英文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iv
誌謝辭　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． v
內容目錄　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vi
表目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vii
圖目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． Viii
第一章　　研究背景．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第一節　　研究背景．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第二節　　研究問題與目的．．．．．．．．．．．． 2
第二章　　文獻探討．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 5
　　第一節　　產業演變與廠商策略．．．．．．．．．． 5
　　第二節　　分岔技術產業．．．．．．．．．．．．． 12
　　第三節　　廠商策略．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 19
第三章　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 29
　　第一節　　研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 29
　　第二節　　研究變數之操作性定義．．．．．．．．． 30
　　第三節　　研究對象．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 33
　　第四節　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 39
第四章　　個案分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 41
　　第一節　　個案簡介．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 41
　　第二節　　個案分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 56
第五章　　研究結論與建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 63
　　第一節　　命題發展．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 63
　　第二節　　後續研究與建議．．．．．．．．．．．． 66
參考文獻　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 68

表目錄
表 2- 1 產業變革的軌跡．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 9
表 2- 2 技術與相互依賴矩陣．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 18
表 2- 3 企業資源分配流程矩陣．．．．．．．．．．．．． 26
表 4- 1 A個案分析表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 58
表 4- 2 B個案分析表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 60
表 4- 3 C個案分析表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 61


圖目錄
圖 2-1 非市場因素的影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 7
圖 2-2 替代模型．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 12
圖 2-3 破壞式創新模型三度空間．．．．．．．．．．．． 15
圖 2-4 維持性創新與破性創新產品整理比較圖．．．．．． 17
圖 3-1 本研究架構圖．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 29
圖 3-2 台灣生物科技產業範疇．．．．．．．．．．．．． 34
圖 5-1 本研究結論架構圖．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 66

參考文獻
一、中文部份：
Charles, W. L. Hill & Gareth, R. Jones (2004)，策略管理(黃營杉，楊景傅譯)，台北：華泰文化事業公司(原本於2003出版)。
John, L. Nesheim (2000)，非常競爭優勢-知識創業十四步驟(李秋湄譯)，台北：天下雜誌。
中興大學生物系統工程研究室(2006)，蝴蝶蘭催花冷房新技術[線上資料]，來源：http://bse.nchu.edu.tw/index.htm
拓璞產業研究所(2005)，生物科業產業分析[線上資料]，來源：http://www.topology.com.tw/TRI/default.asp
朱兆文(1995)，生物技術產業現況與趨勢，台北:ITIS出版。
吳思華(1996)，策略九說，台北:麥田出版社。
陳婉琪(2003)，進入策略、成長策略與經營績效關係之研究─以台商連鎖服務業進入中國大陸觀點分析，私立中原大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，23-27。
張銀玲(2004)，台灣通訊市場VoWLAN之發展-以破壞創新角度探討，私立元智大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文， 9-16。
湯明哲(2003)，策略精論，台北：天下文化。
經濟部產業技術資訊服務推廣計畫(2004)，生物科技事業發展-國生物技上市公司策略佈局分析，經濟部。
蔡宏明(1992)，內部創業的理論基礎，發表於管理研討會，桃園:中央大學
廖宇雯(2005)，技術創新策略、策略聯盟合作對企業競爭優勢之影響研究-以IC產業為例，私立元智大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文，96-98。
劉昱岑(2004)，台灣生物科技公司創新行為之研究，政治大學科技管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，49-53。
蔡岳均(2005)，以破壞性創新與科技產品行銷理論分析網路電話之創新模式- Skype與Yahoo BB個案研究，交通大學管理科學系所未出版之碩士論文，22-25。
二、英文部分：
Anita, M. M. (2004). How industries change. Harvard Business Re-view, 10, 87-94.

Ansoff, H. I. (1965).Corporate strategy: An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Bourgeois, L. J. (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual in-tegration. Academy of management Review, 5(1), 25-29.

Bulow, J. I., Geanakoplos, J. D., & Klemperer, P. D. (1985). Multi-market oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. Jour-nal of Political Economy, 3, 75-79.

Clayton M. C., (2000). The Innovator’s Dilemma When New Tech-nologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. New York: Lexington Books.

Chandy, C. & Tellis, N.C. (1998). Organizing for radical product in-novation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Jourual of Marketing Research, 1, 474-487

Christensen, C. M. & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solu-tion.Clark Gilbert, ‘Can Competing Frames Co-exist? Boston: Harvard Business School.

Clark G. (2002). Can competing frames co-exist? The paradox of threatened response. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Clayton, M. C., Michael, E. R., & Anthony S. D., (2003). Six keys to building new markets by unleashing disruptive innovation. Boston: Harvard Management Update.

Clayton M., & Michael E. R.,(2004), The Innovator’s Solution : cre-ating and sustaining successful growth. New York: Lexington Books.

Clayton M. C., Anthony, S. D., & Erik A. R, (2005), Seeing What’s Next. New York: Lexington Books.
Clayton, M., Christensen, M. O. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 4 ,45-50.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Danneels, E. (2004). Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Manage-ment,21 (4), 246-258.

Devlin, G., & Bleackley, M., (1988). Strategic alliance-guidelines for success. Long Range Planning, 21(5), 18-23.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H., (1998).The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advan-tage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.

Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. R. (1994). Transformative capacity: Contin-ual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 365-385.

Gerde, V. W. & Mahto, R. V., (2004), Disruptive technology and in-terdependence: The relationships of BioMEMS technology and pharmaceutical firms. Journal of High Technology Manage-ment Researc., 15(1), 73-74..
Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-based theory of competitive ad-vantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Man-agement Review, 33(3), 114-135.

Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effects of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Man-agement Journal,15, 291-309.

Hambrick, D. C. (1980). Operationalizing the concept of busi-ness-level strategy in research. Academy of Management Re-view, 12, 567-575.

Hambrick, D. C., & Schecter, F. M., (1983). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product business units. Academy of Man-agement Journal, 26, 231-248.

Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. M., (1992). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the Failure of established firm Management International Review, 5, 9-30.

Hitt, M. A. (1999). The measuring of organizational effectiveness, multiple domains and constituencies. Management Interna-tional Review, 28(2), 28-40.

Kuniyoshi, C., & Tadao, K. T., (1988). Innovation and the Japanese Management System. Berlin：Walter de Gruyter and Co.

Jarillo, J. C. and Martinez, J. I. (1990). Different roles for subsidiar-ies: The case of multinational corporations in spain. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 501-12.

Kotabe, M., & Swan, K. S. (1995). The role of strategic alliances in high technology new product development. Strategic Man-agement Journal, 16, 45-50.

Martino, J. P. (1994). Technological forecasting for decision making. New York:McGraw-Hill Company.

Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Struc-ture and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Peteraf, J., & Margaret, A., (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organi-zations. New York: Harper & Row.

Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper and Row press.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M. & Fuller, M.,(1986). Coalitions and global strategy. Bos-ton: Harvard Business School Press, 315-344.

Prehoda, R. W. (1972).Technological forecasting and space explora-tion.Japen: Martino company.

Roberts, E. B. (1980). New ventures for corporate growth. Harvard Business Review, 7(8), 134-142.

Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic per-formance. Chicago: Rand Mcnally Company.

Schmidt, Glen M..,(2004), Low-end and High-end Encroachment Strategies for New Products. International Journal of Innova-tion Management.Vol. 8 Issue 2, p167-191

Tauber, S.(1988). Brand leverage: Strategy for growth in a cost con-trol world. Journal of Advertising Research, 5(3), 58-60.

Teece, D. J. (1987). Profiting from technological innovation: Impli-cations for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. New York: Wiley.

Teece, D .J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation organ-izational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological pro-gress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 1-25.

Tushman W., Michael, L. & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological dis-continues & organizational environments. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 31, 439-65.

Vyas, N. M., Shelburn, W. L., and Rogers D. C. (1995). An analysis of strategic alliances: Forms, functions and framework. Journal of Bussiness & Industrial Marketing,10 (3), 47-60.

Venkatraman, N. J. & Prescott, E. (1990). Environment-strategy coalignment : An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 1-23.

Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 91-903.