臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

現代經濟得以穩健發展與持續成長，以賒銷方式進行之商業信用交易無疑是關鍵影響因素之一，不過，信用交易方式下賣方企業亦有應收帳款產生，應收帳款累增意謂企業應收帳款到期無法收現的違約風險亦將相對增加，因此，在商業風險增高下，如何降低應收帳款違約風險是為業界所普遍關注的議題。目前較普遍採行的方法為以契約方式移轉應收帳款違約風險包括應收帳款讓售(factoring)與應收帳款證券化(securitization)等。除此以外，尚可利用信用衍生性商品(credit derivatives)，信用衍生性商品的特點為，可在不移轉標的資產下將資產的違約風險移轉給願意承擔風險者，目前與信用有關的衍生性商品主要有信用違約交換與信用違約選擇權，不過，此兩種商品主要以金融機構所持有之債權資產為標的物。因此，為有效滿足企業對所持有之應收帳款可能發生之違約風險的避險需求，本論文乃提出企業應收帳款選擇權的發行構想。當企業持有有違約之虞的應收帳款時，可以此筆應收帳款為標的物與發行機構簽訂一份企業應收帳款賣權契約，若該往來廠商到期違約時，企業即可執行此一賣權，將應收帳款按履約價格售予發行機構，藉此回收應收帳款以規避損失。除了提出發行構想與發行機制外，本論文亦嘗試建立企業應收帳款選擇權之評價方法，並根據違約後應收帳款負債企業是否仍具償債能力之不同而分別提出兩種對應的評價模型，在已無償債能力情況下本質上乃屬數值選擇權(二元選擇權)，而在尚具償債能力情況下為一組標準歐式賣權價格的價差。最後，本論文並進行評價模型之數值實例探討及避險成本比例與參數敏感度分析。

The commercial credit trades, which carry on business transaction by way of on credit is undoubtedly one of the key influence factors for modern economy being able to steadily develop and continuously grown up. After doing so, however, seller's companies will hold account receivable, and thus the risk of which the account receivable commitment cannot be honored while expiring and working capital becomes short also will increase accordingly. Confronting with the circumstances of trade credit risk increase, the companies have commonly paid close attention on how to reduce the default risk of the account receivable. Presently, several methods for transferring account receivable default risk such as factoring of accounts receivable, securitization of account receivable, and so on have generally been adopted by companies. Besides, the credit derivative is another usable and effective instrument, which is characterized by hedging the default risk without involving with shift of the underlying assets. The credit derivatives available at present are credit default swaps and options on credit default. However, these two kinds of credit derivative almost are exclusively traded between financial institutes to ensure their creditor’s right.
In view of above, this study endeavors to present an innovative concept of issuing options on business account receivable to effectively hedging the default risk of the account receivable held in a typical industrial company. A company, which holds the account receivable with potential default risk, can buy a put option on business account receivable with treating its account receivable as underlying asset from a certain financial institute. If the account receivable actually is not realized and cashed while expiring, this buyer can request for executing the right of put option to sell the creditor’s right of account receivable for exercise price to the issuing institute and retrieve the real account receivable property. Besides putting forward the issuing concept and scheme regarding options on business account receivable, this study also develops the assessing approaches to determine the reasonable premium amount. This study allows for whether the distressing company has the prospect of paying debt back and thus propose two corresponding assessing models. One assessing model, which essentially is similar to the digital options, uses in the situation with having not the prospect of paying debt back. Another assessing model, which is worked out as the difference between two European put option, uses in the situation with having the prospect of paying debt back. Finally, several numerical instances are demonstrated to illustrate and verify the assessing models. From these numerical results, this study considers that the concept and assessing models of option on business account receivable should be applicable and practicable.

第一章 緒論∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙1
第一節 研究背景∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙1
第二節 研究動機∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙4
第三節 研究目的∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙7
第四節 論文架構∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙9
第二章 文獻探討∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙12
第一節 信用衍生性商品∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙12
第二節 歐式選擇權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙23
第三節 數值選擇權∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙25
第四節 信用風險∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙28
第三章 企業應收帳款選擇權評價方法∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙36
第一節 已無償債能力之評價模型∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙36
第二節 尚有償債能力下之評價模型∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙41
第四章 實證結果與分析∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙44
第一節 研究樣本∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙44
第二節 實證結果分析∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙48
第三節 模型參數敏感度分析∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙52
第五章結論與建議∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙74
第一節 研究結論∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙74
第二節 未來研究建議∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙77
參考文獻∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙78

一、中文
1.田美蕙（2004），會計報表實務，台北：智高文化，頁.238。
2.李弘道（2002），有記憶性信用價差期間結構模型，國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
3.杜詩敏（2004），不同之類神經網路應用於財務危機預測模型之比較，樹德科技大學金融保險研究所碩士論文。
4.官旻慧（2005），以財務比率衡量公司信用風險，世新大學管理學院財務金融學系碩士論文。
5.林妙宜（2002），信用風險之衡量，國立政治大學金融學系碩士論文。
6.林志吉（2002），金融資產證券化及其法律機制之探討，台灣金融財務季刊，第3輯第3期，頁1-18。
7.紀景耀（2000），信用風險下可轉換公司債之評價，國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
8.郭雅芸（2000），多元數位選擇權--天天對獎，國立政治大學金融學系碩士論文。
9.陳松男（2006），信用連結商品個案之分析與評價，台北：新陸書局。
10.陳萬金（2002），金融資產證券化對整體金融市場之影響，台灣金融財務季刊，第3輯第3期，p.43-61。
11.曾祥珉（2002），運用財務指標建立建設公司財務危機預警模式之研究，國立中央大學土木所碩士論文。
12.程瑋苑（2003），轉換網格法求解 Black-Scholes 選擇權評價模型，國立中正大學應用數學研究所碩士論文。
13.廖植文（2002），信用價差期間結構與違約風險之評價，國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
14.蔡艾琪（1999），投資組合保險策略－歐式保護性賣權與Cash-or-nothing Put在台灣股市之實證研究與績效比較，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
15.蔡莉芸（2002），信用風險模型績效評估—以台灣股票市場為實例，淡江大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
16.駱金龍（2004），銀行授信決策模式與績效評估之實證研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
17.儲蓉（2005），進入信用衍生性金融商品殿堂，台北：台灣金融研訓院
18.謝劍平（2003），期貨與選擇權：財務工程的入門捷徑，再版，台北市：智勝文化。.
二、英文
1.Altman, E. I., 1968, “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy,” The Journal of Finance, 23, 4, 589-609.
2.Altman, E. I., Marco G., & Varetto F., 1994, “Corporate distress diagnosis：Comparisons using linear discriminate analysis and Neura.
3.Ammann, M., 2001, Credit Risk Valuation Methods, Models, and Applications, Second Edition, New York: Springer Verlag.
4.Black, F. & Sholes, M., 1973, ”The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”, Journal of Political Economy,3,pp637-659.
5.Black, F., & John C. Cox., 1976, "Valuing Corporate Securities: Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions." Journal of Finance, Vol.31, No.2, pp.351-367.
6.Coats, P. and Fant, L., 1993, “Recognizing financial distress patterns using a neural network tool,” Financial Management, 142-155.
7.Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., & Ross, S., 1980, A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Econometrica, 53, 4, 385-407.
8.Duffie, D., & Kenneth J, Singleton, 1997, "An Econometric Model of the Term Structure of Interest-Rate Swap Yields." Journal of Finance, Vol.52, No.4,pp.1287-1321.
9.Dutta, S. & Shekhar, S., 1988,「Bond Rating：A Non-Conservative Application of Neural Network」, Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, II,pp.443-450.
10.Harrison, J. M., Brownn, M. & Stochastic. F. S., 1990, Krieger Publishing Company, Fla.
11.Jarrow, R., Lando, D. & Turnbull, S., 1997, “A Markov model for the term structure of credit spread,” Review of Financial Studies 10, pages 481- 523.
12.Jarrow, Robert A., & Stuart M. Turnbull, 1995 , "Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk." Journal of Finance, Vol.50, No.1, pp.53-86.
13.Jones, Edward, Scott Mason, and Eric Rosenfeld, 1984, "Contingent Claims Analysis of Corporate Capital Structures: An Empirical Investigation." Journal of Finance, Vol.39, No.3, pp.611-627.
14.Mcquown, J. A., 1993, A Comment on Market vs. Accounting-Based Measures of Default Risk, September, San Francisco: KMV Corporation.
15.Merton, R., 1974, On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29(5), 449-470.
16.Ohlson, J. A., 1980, "Financial Ratios and The Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.18, No.1, Spring, 109-131
17.Schonbucher P.J., 2000,「The Pricing of Credit Risk and Credit Risk Derivatives」, Working Paper.
18.Trippi, R. and Turban, E., 1996, “Neural Networks in Finance and Investing, IRWIN,” USA.