跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.218.145) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/03/04 17:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林添禮
研究生(外文):Tien-li Lin
論文名稱:台灣與南韓GDP成長穩定性分解之比較
論文名稱(外文):A Decomposition of the Increased Stability of GDP Growth: the Cases of Taiwan and South Korea
指導教授:陳宏易陳宏易引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hung-Yi Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:國際貿易學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:58
中文關鍵詞:經濟成長
外文關鍵詞:GDP
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:712
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:132
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
自1952年起台灣GDP持續成長逾50年,平均成長率高達13.90%,平均每人國民生產毛額從196美元成長至15,676美元;而台灣的GDP成長自1987年以後有趨於穩定的現象,且不論是否剔除蕭條期的因素,對GDP成長趨於穩定的最重要因素,是存貨增加及進口。南韓與台灣並稱「亞洲四小龍」,成長情形頗為類似,該國自1954年至2005年間,平均經濟成長率達21.14%,平均每人國民生產毛額則從175美元成長至14,127美元;同時,該國的GDP成長自1987年以後也有趨於穩定的現象,與台灣不同的是,對該國GDP成長趨於穩定貢獻最顯著的是存貨增加與固定資本形成。
The GDP growth of Taiwan has continually grown over 50 years since 1952. The average growth rate reaches as high as 13.90%, the average each person of gross national product from US$196 to US$15,676. Since 1987, the growth of GDP and its components has been smoother in both recessions and expansions. The most marked reductions in volatility are the increases in inventory stock and import. They are also the main contributors to the increased stability of the economy. South Korea and Taiwan are called "Asian four dragons", their growth processes are quite similar. For Korea, its average growth rate reached 21.14%, the average each person of gross national product from US$175 in 1954 to US$14,127 in 2005. Since 1987, its growth of GDP and components also has been smoother in both recessions and expansions. The main contributors to the increased stability of the economy are the increases in inventory stock and the fixed capital formation.
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………1
第二節 本文架構………………………………………………………5
第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………6
第一節 台灣與南韓經濟發展的歷程…………………………………6
第二節 文獻回顧………………………………………………………10
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………13
第一節 資料來源………………………………………………………13
第二節 研究方法………………………………………………………17
第四章 實證與分析……………………………………………………21
第一節 台灣GDP及其組成部門成長變化分析……………………….21
第二節 南韓GDP及其組成部門成長變化分析……………………….36
第五章 結論……………………………………………………………49
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………50
附錄………………………………………………………………………53
參考文獻
1.行政院主計處,中華民國台灣地區國民所得統計摘要。
2.行政院主計處,中華民國台灣地區國民經濟動向統計季報。
3.行政院經濟建設委員會,經濟年報,中華民國七十六年。
4.行政院經濟建設委員會,經濟年報,中華民國八十四年。
5.林允哲 (民89),「台灣與韓國中小企業發展比較分析」,經濟前瞻,第六八卷第三期,
頁98-111。
6.林慈芳、林蕙薰 (民91),「臺灣經濟成長潛力與限制因素之探討」,自由中國之工業,
第九二卷第一期,頁87-116。
7.林鐘雄 (民82),台灣經濟發展40年,台北:自立晚報社。
8.余健源 (民90),臺灣戰後的經濟成長與技術進步初探,國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士
班碩士論文。
9.吳家興 (民94),韓國的經濟發展與政策,台北:臺灣商務印書館。
10.徐士勛、管中閔 (民90),「九零年代台灣景氣循環:馬可夫轉換模型與紀卜斯抽樣法的
應用」,人文及社會科學集刊,第十三卷第五期,頁515-540。
11.陳宏易 (民91),「從國際垂直分工的觀點探討台灣貿易的形態及其變動」,台灣經濟預
測與政策,第32卷,第2期,頁60-92。
12.陳明郎 (民88),經濟成長,台北:華泰文化書局。
13.陳明郎 (民89),總體經濟學,台北:學富文化書局。
14.陳仕偉、蔡兆龍 (民92),「臺灣景氣循環特性之探討:馬可夫轉換模型的應用」,臺灣
銀行季刊,第五十四卷第四期,頁1-27。
15.黃台心 (民91),「出口與經濟成長的因果關係:台灣的實證研究」,經濟論文叢刊,第
三十卷第四期,頁465-90。
16.黃寶玉、陳宏易、張大成 (民89),「臺灣國內生產毛額成長穩定性分解」,經濟情勢暨
評論季刊,第六卷第三期,頁178-93。
17.張萃貞 (民92),「台灣地區商品出口對經濟發展之影響」,經濟研究,第三期,頁87-
107。
18.張溫波 (民84),「總體經濟調整與成長來源變化之探討」,84卷6期,自由中國之工
業,頁13-27。
19.蔡玉時、陳惠薇 (民92),「我國進口設備與民間固定資本形成之關聯性」,經濟研究,
第四期,頁1-17。
20.鍾俊文 (民92),「三大人口問題減緩台灣經濟成長-臺灣人口停滯將使內需市場益形疲
弱」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,頁3-10。
21.蘇育萱 (民92),我國未來十年財政收支平衡的重要性與可行性之研究,國立中山大學公
共事務管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
22.饒秀華、林修葳、黎明淵 (民90),「藉由分期MS模型分析台灣景氣循環狀態」,經濟論
文,第二十九卷第三期,頁297-319。
23.Ahmed, S., A. Levin, and B. A. Wilson. (2004), “Recent U.S. Macroeconomic
Stability: Good Policies, Good Practices, or Good Luck?” The Review of
Economics and Statistics, 86, 3, 824-32.
24.Bechter, D. and S. Stanley. (1992), “Evidence of Improved Inventory
Control,” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review, 78, 1, 3-12.
25.Blanchard, O., and J. Simon. (2001), “The Long and Large Decline in U.S
Output Volatility,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 135-164.
26.Browne, F., Cronin, D., and Bernard Kennedy. (2005), “The Decline in the
Volatility of Output Growth: Its Causes and Consequences for Financial
Stability” The Central Bank & Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Financial Stability Report, 111-121.
27.Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler. (2000), “Monetary Policy Rules and
Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory,” Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 115, 147-180.
28.Dalsgaard, T., J. Elmeskov, and C.Y. Park. (2002), “Ongoing Changes in the
Business Cycle,” OECD Economic Outlook, 71, 141-157.
29.Diebold, F. X. and G. Rudebusch. (1992), “Have Postwar Economic
Fluctuations Been Stabilized?” American Economic Review, 82, 4, 993- 1005.
30.Filardo, A. J. (1995), “Recent Evidence on the Muted Inventory Cycles,”
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, l80, 2, 27-43.
31.Chen, H. Y, and Y. M. Chang. (2006), “Trade Verticality and Structural
Change In Industries:The Cases of Taiwan and South Korea,” Open Economies
Review, 17, 321-340.
32.Kahn, J. A., M. McConnell, and P. Q. Gabriel. (2002), “On the Causes of the
Increased Stability of the U.S Economy,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Economic Policy Review, May, 183-201.
33.Kim, C. J. and C. R. Nelson. (1999), “Has the U.S. Economy Become More
Stable? A Bayesian Approach Based on a Markov Switching Model of the
Business Cycle,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 4, 608-16.
34.Kim, C. J., C. R. Nelson, and J. Piger. (2003), “The Less-Volatile U.S.
Economy: A Bayesian Investigation of Timing, Breadth and Potential
Explanations,” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Finance and
Economics Discussion Series No. 707.
35.Kim, K and Y. Y. Choi. (1997), “Business cycle in Korea:Is There any
Feature?” Journal of Economic Studies, 24, 5, 275-293.
36.McConnell, M., P. C. Cosser, and P. Q. Gabriel. (1999), “A Decomposition of
the Increased Stability of GDP Growth,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 5, 13.
37.McConnell, M., and P. Q. Gabriel. (1998), “Output Fluctuations in the
United States: What Has Changed since the Early 1980s?” Federal Reserve
Bank of New York Staff Reports, 41.
38.Makoto, A., and Momoko, K. (1997), “A Distributive Comparison of Enterprise
Size In Korea and Taiwan,” The Developing Economies, 35, 4, 382–400.
39.Orphanides, A. (2001), “Monetary Policy Rules, Macroeconomic Stability and
Inflation: A View from the Trenches,” Quarterly Journal of Economics,
February, 47-79.
40.Romer, C. D. (1986a), “Is the Stabilization of Postwar Economy a Figment of
the Data?” American Economic Review, 76, 3, 314-34.
41.Sensier, M. and Dijk, D. (2004), “Testing for Volatility Changes in US
Macroeconomic Time Series,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 3,
833-39.
42.Shapiro, M. D. (1988), “The Stabilization of the U.S. Economy: Evidence
from the Stock Market,” American Economic Review, 78, 5, 1067-79.
43.The Bank of Korea (1982), NATIONAL INCOMES in KOREA.
44.The Bank of Korea (2004), NATIONAL ACCOUNTS.
45.Tamio, H. (1997), “A Comparative Study Of Development Mechanisms In Korea
and Taiwan :Introductory Analysis.” The Developing Economies, 35, 4,341-57.
46.Watson, M. W. and J. H. Stock. (2003), “Has the Business Cycle Changed?
Evidence and Explanations,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City symposium.
47.Watson, M. W. (1994), “Business-Cycle Durations and Postwar Stabilization
of the U.S. Economy,” American Economic Review, 84, 1, 24-46.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top