跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.96.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/12/06 16:45
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊育秦
研究生(外文):Yu-Chin Yang
論文名稱:董事會組成與盈餘管理之關聯性研究-以企業生命週期論析
論文名稱(外文):The Relationships between Board Composition and Earnings Management — The Corporate Lifecycles’ View
指導教授:沈維民沈維民引用關係
指導教授(外文):William W. Sheng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:88
中文關鍵詞:董事會組成盈餘管理企業生命週期
外文關鍵詞:Board compositionEarnings managementCorporate lifecycles
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:737
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
在以往國內外有關公司治理與盈餘管理之文獻中,對於董事會組成與盈餘管理間之關聯性討論相當廣泛。然而,其研究結論卻是不相一致。另一方面,以往研究亦指出,董事會組成與盈餘管理分別與企業生命週期存在關聯性。是故,本研究之目的在於利用企業生命週期的角度,重新詮釋董事會組成與盈餘管理間之關聯性。

本文以多變量迴歸模型,作為主要之實證方法。首先,本文援引Anthony and Ramesh(1992)之方法,以股利支付率、銷貨成長率、資本支出率及企業成立年數,作為企業生命週期之判斷因子,將樣本劃分為成長期、成熟期與衰退期。在解釋變數上,本文以董事長是否兼任總經理之虛擬變數,董事會規模及獨立董監佔董事席次比率,作為董事會組成之代理變數。在被解釋變數上,本文則採用the modified Jones model(1995)所估算出之裁決性應計項目的絕對值,作為盈餘管理之衡量指標。最後,本文亦探討產業特性對生命週期研究之影響,並提出產業相對生命週期之概念。

根據實證結果,本研究歸納出下列研究結論:(1)產業相對生命週期之概念可減少產業特性對於生命週期研究之影響。(2)企業處於成長期時,若董事長兼任總經理,則盈餘管理的程度越高。(3)在任何生命週期下,企業之董事會規模與盈餘管理間,呈現負相關,但不顯著。(4)在「台灣證券交易所及櫃檯買賣中心」於2002年開始要求,新上市上櫃的企業必需設置獨立董監後,處於成長期與成熟期之企業,其獨立董監佔董事會席次比率越高,則盈餘管理的程度越高。
In the previous literatures about corporate governance and earnings management, the discussions of the relationships between board composition and earnings management are broad. But the empirical results are mixed. Besides the above, some literatures suggest that both of board composition and earnings management are respectively related to corporate lifecycles. In this case, the purpose of this study is to reinterpret the relationships in corporate lifecycles’ view.

Our main empirical methodology is the multivariate regression models with OLS. First, according to the corporation lifecycles classification of Anthony and Ramesh (1992), we take the dividend payout, sales growth, capital expenditure, and ages of the firm as the descriptors to classify firm-years into growth, mature and stagnant stages. As for the independent variables, we take the dummy variable takes the value of one if the chairman of the board is the CEO and zero otherwise, the board size, and the percentage of independent directors on the board as the proxies of board composition. As for the dependent variable, we measure earnings management with the absolute value of discretionary accruals estimated by the modified Jones model (1995). Moreover, this study also discusses how the industry characteristics have the impacts on the lifecycles’ studies, and presents the concept of industry-comparative lifecycles.

According to the empirical results, this study draws the following conclusions:(1)The concept of industry-comparative lifecycles can decrease the impacts of the industry characteristics on the related studies of corporate lifecycles.(2)In the stage of growth, the chairman of the board is the CEO, the degree of earnings management is higher.(3)In any stage, the board size is negatively related to the degree of earnings management, but not significantly.(4)After compelling the new-listed corporations of Taiwan to install independent directors on boards, in the stage of growth and mature, the percentage of independent directors on the board is significantly and positively related to the degree of earnings management.
目 錄

圖目次 V
表目次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題與貢獻 4
第三節 研究架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 董事會組成與盈餘管理之關聯性 7
第二節 盈餘管理之衡量模型 10
第三節 企業生命週期 15
第四節 董事會組成與企業生命週期之關聯性 24
第五節 盈餘管理與企業生命週期之關聯性 26
第三章 研究設計 31
第一節 研究假說 31
第二節 變數定義與實證模型 36
第三節 研究樣本 44
第四章 實證結果與分析 46
第一節 敘述統計量 47
第二節 單變量分析 53
第三節 多變量分析 55
第四節 增額分析 57
第五章 研究結論與建議 72
第一節 研究結論 72
第二節 研究限制與建議 73
參考文獻 75
一、 中文部份 75
二、 英文部份 76


圖 目 次

圖1-1:研究動機與目的之架構圖 3
圖1-2:研究架構圖 6
圖3-1:研究設計之架構圖 45
圖4-1:整體絕對生命週期下,各企業生命週期判斷因子之趨勢圖 49
圖4-2:整體絕對生命週期下,生命週期間之董事會組成與盈餘管理的趨勢圖 54
圖4-3:產業相對生命週期下,各企業生命週期判斷因子之趨勢圖 58
圖4-4:產業相對生命週期下,生命週期間之董事會組成與盈餘管理的趨勢圖 65


表 目 次

表2-1:近年董事會組成與盈餘管理之關聯性研究 9
表2-2:應用企業生命週期之相關研究 18
表2-3:採用因素-群集法,劃分企業生命週期之相關文獻 20
表2-4:採用分位法,劃分企業生命週期之相關文獻 21
表2-5:採用定義法,劃分企業生命週期之相關文獻 22
表2-6:採用問卷衡量法,劃分企業生命週期之相關文獻 23
表2-7:盈餘管理動機之彙總表 29
表3-1:各企業生命週期間,盈餘管理與董事會組成之預期趨勢 33
表3-2:各企業生命週期下,盈餘管理與董事會組成之預期關聯性 35
表3-3:各企業生命週期間,各判斷因子之相對比較表 37
表4-1:總樣本之產業分佈狀況表 47
表4-2:整體絕對生命週期下,判斷因子之敘述統計 48
表4-3:整體絕對生命週期下,實證模型變數之敘述統計 50
表4-4:相關係數矩陣 52
表4-5:整體絕對生命週期下,董事會組成與盈餘管理之單變量分析 53
表4-6:整體絕對生命週期下,董事會組成與盈餘管理之多變量分析 56
表4-7:產業相對生命週期下,判斷因子之敘述統計 57
表4-8:整體絕對生命週期下,各週期之產業分布狀況表 59
表4-9:產業相對生命週期下,各週期之產業分布狀況表 61
表4-10:產業相對生命週期下,實證模型變數之敘述統計 63
表4-11:產業相對生命週期下,董事會組成與盈餘管理之單變量分析 64
表4-12:產業相對生命週期下,董事會組成與盈餘管理之多變量分析 68
表4-13:本研究假說之實證結果彙總 70
一、中文部份

金成隆、林修葳、紀信義,2004,專利權的價值攸關性:從企業生命週期論析,管理學報,第21卷,第2期:175-197。

金成隆、紀信義、鄭財發,2005,企業生命週期對分析師預測精確性的影響:以最終控制股東股權結構論析,國立雲林科技大學會計學術研討會。

吳琮璠、林美鳳,2005,資訊科技投資與企業績效之關係:從企業生命週期論析,2005會計理論與實務研討會。

周庭楷,2004,會計保守原則對權益評價影響之實證研究,國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。

洪永昌,2004,企業生命週期與融資策略,國立台灣科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。

侯運神,1993,企業生命週期與股價關聯性之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。

陳吟愷,2004,企業生命週期與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,國立中山大學企管理研究所碩士論文。

許明雄,2000,企業生命週期特性與股利政策關聯性之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。

馬瑜霙,2003,我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。

葉銀華、李存修及柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,商智文化出版。

楊朝旭、黃潔,2004,企業生命週期、資產組合與企業未來績效關聯性之研究,商管科技季刊,第五卷,第一期。

廖益興,2004,董監事獨立、企業結構特徵與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立臺北大學會計研究所博士論文。

謝松年,2001,財務預測對委託簿異質性之影響與企業生命週期之關係研究,國立中正大學會計研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份

Adizes, I., 1979. Organizational Passages-Diagnosing and Treating Life Cycle Problems of Organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 8(1),pp.3-24.

Adizes, I., 1989. Corporate lifecycles: How and Why Corporations Grow and Die and What to Do about it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh., 1992. Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices, Journal of accounting and Economics, 15(2-3), pp.203-227.

Antle, R., and B. Nalebuff., 1991. Conservatism and Auditor-Client Negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, pp.31-54.

Barnea, A., J. Ronen, and S. Sadan., 1975. The Implementation of Accounting Objectives: An Application to Extraordinary Items. The Accounting Reviews, 50(1), pp.58-68.

Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam., 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), pp.1-24.

Black, E. L., 1998. Life-cycle impacts on the increment value relevance of earnings and cash flow measure. Working paper, University of Asrkansas, Fayeeteville, Arkansas.

Beidleman, C. R., 1973. Income Smoothing: The Role of Management. The Accounting Review, 48(4), pp.653-667.

Bowen, R. M., S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam., 2003. Accounting Choice, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Working paper, University of Washington.

Chin, C. L., S. M. Tsao, and S. H. Chi., 2005. Trademark Value and Accounting Performance: Analysis from Corporate Life Cycle. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, September, 7(1), pp.106-112.

Ching, K. M., L. M. Firth., and O. M. Rui., 2002. Earnings Management, Corporate Governance and the Market Performance of Seasoned Equity Offerings. Working paper, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and J. Fan., 2002. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings, Journal of Finance, forthcoming.

DeAngelo, L. E., 1981, Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp183-199.

DeAngelo, L. E., 1986. Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders. The Accounting Review, 61(3), pp.400-420.

DeAngelo, L. E., 1988. Managerial Competition, Information Costs, and Corporate Governance: The Use of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy Contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10(1), pp.3-36.

DeAngelo, L., H. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner., 1994. Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), pp.113-144.

Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney., 1995. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), pp.193-226.

DeFond, M. L., and K. R. Subramanyam., 1998. Auditor Changes and Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1), pp.36–67.

Dhaliwal, D., 1980. The Effect of the Firm’s Capital Structure on the Choice of Accounting Method. The Accounting Review, 55(1), pp.78-84.

Downs, A. 1967. The Life Cycle of Bureaus. In A. Downs, Inside Bureaucracy, San Francisco: Little, Brown and Company.

Dye, R., 1991, Informationally Motivated Auditor Replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(4), pp.347-374.

Fama, E., 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), pp.288-307.

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., 1992. Structure and Process of Diversification, Compensation Strategy, and Firm Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), pp.381-397.

Greiner, L. E., 1972. Evolution and Revolution as Organization Grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), pp.37-46.

Haire, M., 1959. Biological Models and Empirical History of the Growth of Organizations. Modern Organizational Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Healy, P. M., 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(2), pp.85-113.

Healy, P.M. and J. M. Wahlen., 1999. A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), pp.365-383.

Jensen, M., and W. Meckling., 1976. Theory of the Film: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial economics, 3(4), pp.305-360.

Jones, J. J., 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), pp.193-228.

Katz, D., and R. L. Kahn., 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.

Kimberly, J. R., 1979. Issues in the Certain of Organizations: Initiation, Innovation, and Institutionalization. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), pp.437-457.

Kimberly, J. R. 1980. The Organizational Life Cycle: Constructive Concept or Misguided Metaphor? In J. R. Kimberly and Miles, R. H., The Organizational Life Cycle: New Perspectives for Organizational Theory and Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif.

Klein, A., 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), pp.375-400.

La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shieifer., 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), pp.471-517.

Lippitt, Gordon L., and Warren H. Schmidt., 1967. Crises in a Developing Organization. Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec, 45(6), pp.102-112.

Liu, Q., and Z. Lu., 2002. Earning Management to Tunnel: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies. Working paper, University of Hong Kong.

Lorange, P., and R. T. Nelson., 1987. How to Recognize and Avoid Organizational Decline. Sloan Management Review 28(3), pp.41-48.

Lyden, F. J., 1975. Using Parson’s Functional Analysis in the Study of Public Organizations. Administration Science Quarterly, 20(1), pp.59-70.

Lynall, Matthew D., Brian R. Golden, and Amy J. Hillman., 2003. Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: A Multitheoretic View. Academy of Management Review, Jul, 28(3), pp.416-431.

Magee, R. P., and M. C. Tseng., 1990. Audit Pricing and Independence. The Accounting Review, 65(2), pp.315–336.

Miller, D., and P. H. Friesen., 1984. A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science, 30(10), pp.1161-1183.

Moses, O. D., 1987. Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Test Using Accounting Changes. The Accounting Reviews, 62(2), pp.358-377.

Nelson, M.W., J. A. Elliott, and R. L. Tarpley., 2000. Where Do Companies Attempt Earnings Management, and When Do Auditors Prevent It? Working paper, Cornell University and George Washington University.

Pashley, M. M., and G. C. Philippatos, 1990. Voluntary Divestitures and Corporate Life Cycle: Some Empirical Evidence. Applied Economics, 22(9), pp.1181-1196.


Quinn, R. E., and K. Cameron., 1983. Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence. Management Science, 29(1), pp.33-51.

Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam., 1998. The Role of Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance: An Empirical Investigation. Working paper, University of Washington.

Rangan, S., 1998. Earnings Managements and the Performance of Seasoned Equity Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), pp.101-122.

Schipper, 1989. Katherine. Commentary on Earnings Management. Accounting Horizons, December, 3(4), pp.91-102.

Scott, B. R., 1971. Stages of Corporate Development. Boston: Harvard Business School, Intercollegiate Case Clearing House.

Smith, Mitchell, and Summer, 1985. Top Level Management Priorities in Different Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle. Academy of Management Journal 28(4), pp.799-820.

Studenmund, A. H., 2001, Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide, 4th ed. New York: Addition Wesley Longman.

Thain, D. H., 1969. Stages of Corporate Development. Business Quarterly, Winter, 34(4), pp.33.

Torbert, W. R., 1974. Pre-bureaucratic and Post-bureaucratic Stages of Organization Development. Interpersonal Development, 5(1), pp.1-25.

Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, and K. L. Wild., 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), pp.61-92.

Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman., 1978. Towards a Positive Accounting Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), pp.112-134.

Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman., 1986. Positive Theory of Accounting. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.

Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt., 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), pp.295-316.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top