跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.122.214) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/14 11:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:俞佳芬
研究生(外文):Chia-Fen Yu
論文名稱:亞洲新興市場股價指數效率性檢定—運用考慮多重結構性轉變點之縱橫單根檢定法
論文名稱(外文):The efficiency test of stock price indexes in Asian emerging markets:. applying the panel unit root test with multiple structural breaks.
指導教授:聶建中聶建中引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:淡江大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:59
中文關鍵詞:隨機漫步假說縱橫單根多重結構性變化
外文關鍵詞:Random Walk HypothesisPanel unit rootMultiple Structural Breaks
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:233
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究主要是應用隨機漫步假說來探討亞洲新興國家的股票市場是否具有效率,可視為弱式效率的檢定。研究對象選取包括印尼、日本、韓國、馬來西亞、菲律賓、新加坡、台灣、泰國、香港等9個新興國家1990年1月-2006年1月共193筆月資料進行單根檢定分析。在應用只考慮單筆時間序列的單根檢定法ADF、PP、KPSS等單根檢定方法,及Zvoit and Andrews (1992)與Lumsdaine and Papell (1997)二種考慮結構性轉變的單根檢定結果,及Levin-Lin test、IPS test 與Fisher test等panel單根檢定結果來看,發現大部分的國家股價指數不論是含時間趨勢的模型或是不含時間趨勢的模型皆呈現出非定態結果,亦即是亞洲新興股票市場為有效率之市場。
由於以上方法皆存在一些問題,因此本研究主要重點在藉著組合橫斷面與縱斷面的資料增加樣本數,使檢定力提升並考慮多個結構性轉變點,最後再加上使用拔靴分配解決橫斷面相依的問題。最後,根據考慮多重結構性變化的Carrion-i-Silvestre, del Barrio and López-Bazo (2005)縱橫單根檢定法的實證結果再一次證實我們的結論-亞洲新興股票市場為有效率之市場。
This paper applies random walk hypothesis to investigate whether stock-price indexes of nine Asia emerging markets can be characterized as random walk (unit root) or mean reversion processes. A more powerful test which allows for the presence of multiple structural breaks in the underlying series developed by Carrion-i-Silvestre, del Barrio and López-Bazo (2005) is employed. Results provide strong support for the random walk hypothesis.
目錄
第一章 緒論.......................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的....................................................................................................1
第二節 研究架構與流程....................................................................................................6
第二章 文獻回顧...............................................................................................................7
第一節 市場效率…............................................................................................................7
第二節 單根方法…............................................................................................................9
第三章 研究方法.............................................................................................................11
第一節 普通單根檢定......................................................................................................12
第二節 考慮結構性變化之普通單根檢定......................................................................16
第三節 縱橫單根檢定......................................................................................................19
第四節 考慮結構性轉變之縱橫單根檢定......................................................................23
第四章 實證結果與分析.................................................................................................26
第一節 資料來源與處理..................................................................................................26
第二節 傳統單根檢定之實證結果..................................................................................28
第三節 結構性變動單根檢定方法之實證結果…..........................................................30
第四節 縱橫單根檢定結果..............................................................................................36
第五節 縱橫單根考慮多重結構性變化檢定結果..........................................................38
第五章 結論.....................................................................................................................42
參考文獻.....................................................44
表次
表4-1:亞洲九國股價指數名稱、期間、筆數及資料來源...............................................27
表4-2:ADF、PP以及KPSS單根檢定...............................................................................49
表4-3.1:Zvoit and Andrews (1992) test results.................................................................50
表4-3.2:Lumsdaine and Papell (1997) test results............................................................51
表4-4:Panel unit root...................................52
表4-5:亞洲各國相關係數表............................................................................................53
表4-6:Panel unit root with structure breaks.....................................................................54
圖次
圖1-1:研究流程圖.........................................6
圖4-1:香港-恆生指數時間趨勢圖.................................................................................55
圖4-2:印尼-雅加達綜合股價指數時間趨勢圖.............................................................55
圖4-3:馬來西亞-吉隆坡綜合股價指數時間趨勢圖.....................................................56
圖4-4:韓國-韓國綜合股價指數時間趨勢圖…..............................................................56
圖4-5:菲律賓-馬尼拉綜合股價指數時間趨勢圖.........................................................57
圖4-6:泰國-曼谷SET股價指數時間趨勢圖…...............................................................57
圖4-7:新加坡-新加坡海峽時報指數時間趨勢圖..........................................................58
圖4-8:台灣-台灣加權股價指數時間趨勢圖.................................................................58
圖4-9:日本-東京日經225指數時間趨勢圖.....................................................................59
中文部分:
蔡啟明(1995),「利用變異數比率檢定台灣股票市場效率性之研究」,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
聶建中(2004),「考量結構性變化之美國總體經濟與購併行為之互動」,管理評論,23,91-115。
英文部分:
Abuaf, Niso and Jorion, phillipe, (1990). Purchasing Power Parity in the Long Run. Journal of Finance, 45, 157-174.
Balvers, R., Wu, Y., and E. Gilliland, (2000). Mean reversion across national stock markets and parametric contrarian investment strategies. Journal of Finance, 55, 745–772.
Bai, J., and P. Perron, (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66 (1), 47–78.
Bai, J., and P. Perron, (2001). Multiple Structural Change Models: A Simulation Analysis. Technical Report.
Breuer, J.B., R. McNown and M. Wallace, (1999). Series-specific Tests for a Unit Root in a Panel Setting with and Application to Real Exchange Rates. University of Colorado, Discussion Paper.
Chaudhuri, K. and Y. Wu, (2003). Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 575–592.
Chaudhuri, K. and Y. Wu, (2004). Mean reversion in stock prices: evidence from emerging markets. Managerial Finance, 30, 22–31.
Carrion-i-Silvestre, del Barrio and E. López-Bazo, (2005). Breaking the panels. An application to the GDP per capital. Econometric Journal, 8, 159-175.
Cheung, Y.W. and M.D. Chinn, (1994). Further investigation of the Uncertain Unit Root in GNP. University of California, Santa Cruz, Technical Report, 288.
DeBondt, W. and R. Thaler, (1985). Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, 40, 793-805.
Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller, (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregression Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 427-432.
Fama, E., (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.
Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 246–273.
Fisher, R.A., (1932). Statistical Methods for research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh 4th Ed.
Hadri, K., (2000). Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometrics Journal, 3, 148-161.
Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin, (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
Jewell, T., J. Lee, M. Tieslau and M.C. Strazicich, (2003). Stationarity of heath expenditures and GDP: evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 313–323.
Kim, M.J., C.R. Nelson and R. Startz, (1991). Mean reversion of stock prices: A reappraisal of the empirical evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 5151–5280.
Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
Levin, A., C.F. Lin and C.S. Chu, (2002).Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24.
Lo, A.W. and A.C MacKinlay., (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 41–66.
Lumsdaine, R. and D. Papell, (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 212–218.
Maddala, G.S. and S. Wu, (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-652.
McCoskey, S.K. and T.M. Selden, (1998). Health care expenditures and GDP: panel data unit root test results. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 369–376.
McQueen, G., (1992). Long-horizon mean reverting stock process revisited. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 1–18.
Narayan P.K. and R. Smyth, (2004). Is south Korea’s stock market efficient? Applied Economics Letters, 11, 707–710.
Narayan P.K. and R. Smyth, (2005). Are OECD stock prices characterized by a random walk? Evidence from sequential trend break and panel data models. Applied Economics Letters, 15, 547–556.
Nelson, C.R. and C.I. Plosser, (1982). Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139-162.
O’Connell and Paul G.J., (1998). The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of International Economics, 44, 1-19.
Perron, P., (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 55, 277–302.
Perron, P. and T.J. Vogelsang, (1992). Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 301–320.
Phillips, P.C.B., (1987). Time Series Regression With A Unit Root. Econometrica, 55(2), 277-301.
Phillips, P.C.B. and P. Perron, (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
Poterba, J.M. and L.H. Summers, (1988). Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 27–59.
Quah, D., (1994). Exploiting Cross Section Variation for Unit Root Inference in Dynamic Data. Economics Letters, 44, 9-19.
Richards, A.J., (1997). Winner–loser reversals in national stock market indexes: Can they be explained? Journal of Finance, 52, 2129–2144.
Richardson, M., (1993). Temporary components of stock prices: A skeptic’s view. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 199–207.
Richardson, M. and J.H. Stock, (1989). Drawing inferences from statistics based on multiyear asset returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 323–348.
Said, S.E. and D.A. Dickey, (1984). Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika, 71, 599-608.
Sarno, L. and M. Taylor, (1998). Real Exchange Rates Under the Recent Float: Unequivocal Evidence of Mean Reversion. Economics Letters, 60, 131-137.
Schwert, G.W., (1989). Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 147-159.
Wu, S. and J.L. Wu, (1998). Purchasing Power Parity under the Current Float:New Evidence from Panel Data Unit Root Tests. SUNY at Buffalo mimeo.
Zhu, Z., (1998). The random walk of stock prices: evidence from a panel of G7 countries. Applied Economics Letters, 5, 411–413.
Zivot, E. and D. Andrews, (1992). Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251–270.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top