跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.122.214) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/07 07:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張鼎煥
研究生(外文):Ting-Huan Chang
論文名稱:匯率相關跳躍強度共移分析-雙變量跳躍模型探討
論文名稱(外文):The comovement of bivariate correlated jump intensity with foreign exchange by CBP-GARCH model
指導教授:邱建良邱建良引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien-Liang Chiu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:淡江大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:41
中文關鍵詞:CBP-GARCH雙變量跳躍模型相關跳躍強度共移匯率
外文關鍵詞:CBP-GARCHJump IntensityCorrelated Jump IntensityComovementForeign Exchange Rate
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:184
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
GARCH模型係探討時間序列資料平滑連續的變動,本文採用Chan(2003)組合「卜松相關函數」提出的CBP-GARCH模型,加入考量波動與跳躍強度外溢效果,探討自1993年1月5日至2005年9月2日止新台幣與日圓匯率報酬率不連續跳躍且相關跳躍強度隨時間變動之共移性,依據模型實證結果找出相關跳躍強度較大之事件,就事件期間及前後相關係數與共變異數進行分析。
本研究發現新台幣與日圓匯率報酬率皆存在不連續跳躍現象,日圓較新台幣匯率報酬率跳躍波動性大,但新台幣較日圓匯率報酬率跳躍強度大,又新台幣匯率報酬率跳躍強度較日圓匯率報酬率跳躍強度受前期報酬率影響程度大,但兩國匯率報酬率相關跳躍強度不受前期新台幣或日圓匯率報酬率的影響。波動與跳躍強度外溢效果部份,新台幣匯率報酬率受到日圓匯率報酬率波動外溢效果影響;但日圓匯率報酬率跳躍強度受到新台幣匯率報酬率跳躍強度外溢效果影響,可能係受到我國中央銀行外匯管理政策干擾所致。
新台幣與日圓匯率報酬率相關跳躍強度呈現高度相關且隨時間變動之共移性,而日圓匯率報酬率跳躍強度與兩國匯率報酬率相關跳躍強度幾近完全相關,新台幣匯率報酬率跳躍強度與兩國匯率報酬率相關跳躍強度則三分之一相關。依據CBP-GARCH模型找出十三個相關跳躍強度共移事件分析事件期間之相關係數與共變異數,發現其中十二個事件期間相關係數與共變異數明顯較每一事件前後期間大,顯示某些訊息衝擊之下,新台幣與日圓匯率報酬率產生較明顯的相關波動現象,大致相關跳躍強度隨時間變動之共移現象時點一致。
This paper adopts the CBP-GARCH model of Chan (2003) that combines the “Poisson correlation function,” and incorporates the volatility and jump intensity spillover effects, in order to examine the discontinuous jump and the time-varying correlated jump intensity comovements for the rates of return of the New Taiwan dollar and Japanese Yen exchange rates over the period extending from January 5, 1993 to September 2, 2005. From the empirical results, it is discovered that the correlated jump intensity of the New Taiwan dollar and Japanese Yen exchange rate rates of return exhibit both a high degree of correlation and comovement that is time-varying. Moreover, the jump intensity of the Japanese Yen exchange rate return is almost from the correlated jump intensity for the two countries’ exchange rate return. However, the jump intensity of the New Taiwan dollar exchange rate return is only the same as the correlated jump intensity for the two countries’ exchange rate rates of return in about one-third of the cases. As for the volatility and jump intensity spillover effects, the New Taiwan dollar exchange rate return is influenced by the Japanese Yen exchange rate return volatility spillover effect. However, the Japanese Yen exchange rate return jump intensity is affected by the New Taiwan dollar exchange rate return jump intensity spillover effect. Based on the results of the model, various events for which the correlated jump intensities are relatively high are sought out, and from further analysis it is discovered that the correlation coefficients and covariance at the time the events take place are all significantly higher than either before or after the respective events, as is the case with the correlated jump intensity time-varying comovements.
目 錄
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………..…1
第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………………..1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………..…4
第三節 研究架構………………………………………………………………..5

第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………………..…7
第一節 國外文獻回顧…………………………………………………………..7
第二節 國內文獻回顧…………………………………………………………..9

第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………15
第一節 單根檢定………………………………………………………………15
第二節 CBP-GARCH模型……………………………………………………18

第四章 實證結果分析……………………………………………………………21
第一節 資料來源與處理………………………………………………………21
第二節 基本統計量……………………………………………………………22
第三節 單根檢定………………………………………………………………24
第四節 CBP-GARCH模型實證結果分析……………………………………26
第五節 相關跳躍強度共移事件分析…………………………………………30

第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………36

參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………38


圖表目錄
圖目錄
【圖1.1】研究流程圖..…………………………………………………………..6
【圖4.1】樣本期間新台幣與日圓收盤價格與日報酬率趨勢..………………23
【圖4.2】新台幣匯率報酬率跳躍強度 ……….……………………………29
【圖4.3】日圓匯率報酬率跳躍強度 ……….………………………………29
【圖4.4】新台幣與日圓匯率報酬率相關跳躍強度 .………………………29

表目錄
【表2.1】國內外相關研究文獻彙總…………………………………………..12
【表4.1】新台幣與日圓匯率日報酬率基本敘述統計………………………..23
【表4.2】ADF單根檢定法(水準項)……………………………………….25
【表4.3】PP單根檢定法(水準項)…………………………………………25
【表4.4】ADF單根檢定法(差分項)……………………………………….25
【表4.5】PP單根檢定法(差分項)…………………………………………25
【表4.6】CBP-GARCH模型實證估計結果……….……………………….…28
【表4.7】新台幣與日圓相關跳躍強度共移事件匯率報酬率相關係數與共變異數……………………………………………………………………35
Alesina, A., R. J. Barro and S. Tenreyro, 1958, “Optimal currency areas”, Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper.
Baillie, R.T. and P. C. McMahon, 1989, “The foreign exchange market: theory and econometric evidence”, Cambridge University Press.
Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp.307-27.
Bollerslev, T., 1990, “Modelling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: A multivariate generalized ARCH model”, Review of Economics and Statistics 72(3), pp.498-505.
Calvet, L. E., A. J. Fisher and S. B. Tompson, 2005, “Volatility comovement: a multifrequency approach”, Journal of Econometrics, Article in Press, pp.1-37.
Campbell, J. T., 1934, “The poisson correlation function”, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, Series 2, pp.18-26.
Cassel, G.., 1919, “The depreciation of the german market”, Econometric Journal, 29, pp.496-506.
Cassel, G.., 1922, “Money and foreign exchange after 1914”, London: Constable and Co.
Chan, W. H., 2004, “Conditional correlated jump dynamics in foreign exchange”, Economics Letter, 83(1), pp.23-28.
Chan, W. H., 2003, “A correlated bivariate poisson jump model for foreign exchange”, Empirical Economics, 28(4), pp.669-85.
Chan, W. H. and J. M. Maheu, 2002, “Conditional jump dynamics in stock market returns”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(3), pp.377-89.
Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, 1979, “Distribution of the estimators for time series regressions with a unit root”, Journal of Future American Statistical Association, 74(366), pp.427-31.
Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, 1981, “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Econometrica, 49(4), pp.1057-72.
Einzig, P. 1967, “A dynamic theory of forward exchange”, 2nd ed., London: MacMillan.
Engle, R., 1982, “Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of united kingdom. inflation”, Econometrica, 50(4), pp.987-1008.
Engle, R. F. and B. S. Yoo, 1987, “Forecasting and testing in co-integrated systems”, Journal of Econometrics, 35(1), pp.143-59.
Eraker, B., M. Johannes, and N. Polson, 2003, “The impact of jumps in volatility and returns”, Journal of Finance, 58(3), pp.1269-1300.
Fama, E., 1984, “Forward and spot exchange rates.”, Journal of Monetary Economics 14(3), pp.319-38.
Frenkel, J. A., 1980, “Tests of rational expectations in the forward exchange market”, Southern Economic Journal, 46, pp.1083-1101.
Granger, C. W. J., 1980, “Long-memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models”, Journal of Econometrics, 14(2), pp.227-38.
Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold, 1974, “Spurious regressions in econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), pp.111-20.
Hamao, Y., R. W. Masulis and V. Ng, 1990, “Correlation in price changes and volatility across international stock markets”, Review of Financial Studies, 3(2), pp.281-307.
Jorion, P., 1988, “On jump processes in the foreign exchange and stock markets”, Review of Financial Studies, 1(4), pp.427-45.
Lee, M. C. and W. H., Cheng, 2005, “Correlated jumps in crude oil and gasoline during the Gulf War”, Working Paper.
Lim, L. K, 2005, “A dollar or yen currency union in East Asia”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68(5-6), pp.507-16.
Maheu, J. M. and T. H. McCurdy, 2004, “News arrival, jump dynamics and volatility components for individual stock returns”, Journal of Finance, 59(2), pp.755-93.
Meese, R. and K. Singleton, 1982, “On unit roots and empirical modeling of exchange rates”, Journal of Finance, 37(4), pp.1029-35
Merton, R. C., 1976, “Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1-2), pp.125-44.
M’Kendrick, A. G., 1926, “Applications of mathematics to medical problems”, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 44, pp.98-130.
Nelson, C. R. and C. I. Plosser, 1982, “Trends and random walks in macroeconomics times series: some evidence and implications”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(2), pp.139-62.
Nucci, F., 2003, “Cross-currency, cross-maturity forward exchange premiums as predictors of spot rate changes: Theory and evidence”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(2), pp.183-200.
Pan, J., 2002, “The jump-risk premia implicit in options: evidence from an integrated time-series study”, Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), pp.3-50.
Phillips, P. and P. Perron, 1988, “Testing for a unit root in time series regression”, Biometrika, 75, pp.335-46.
Rapp, T. A. and S. C. Sharma, 1999, “Exchange rate market efficiency: across and within countries”, Journal of Economics and Business, 51(5), pp.423-39.
Said, S. and D. Dickey, 1984, “Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models of unknown order”, Biometrica, 71, pp.599-607.
Taylor, S. J., 1986, “Modeling financial time series”, Wiley, Chichester.
林秀美,2000,“外匯市場效率性與國際間匯率波動傳遞效果之研究”,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
林景春、邱建良和李命志,2002,“國際股市報酬關聯性與波動傳遞不對稱現象之研究”,企業管理學報,56,頁63-85。
邱建良、劉聰衡和紀嘉政,2000,“臺灣股市與國際股市共移性之研究”,商管科技季刊,1(3),頁263-85。
俞海琴、謝德宗和林師模,1994,“以時間序列頻譜分析方法探討整合與分隔市場理論對台灣股市適用性之研究”,台大管理論叢,5(1),頁113-64。
姚蕙芸、聶建中,2003,“空頭走勢期間臺灣股票市場成交量與股價之關聯性研究”,國立臺北商業技術學院學報,4,頁2-25。
張巧宜,2003,“美國與台灣共移程度之研究-分數共整合之應用”,東吳經濟商學學報,40,頁99-122。
劉祥熹、張英信,2000,“東亞主要國家股價與匯率關聯性之研究”,證券金融,67,頁1-33。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top