臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係以台北捷運高運量電聯車延誤與電聯車設備故障關係之探討。經由89-94近六年來統計結果顯示，台北捷運高運量301型及321型電聯車設備故障造成行車延誤，以車門及煞車系統組件之故障率偏高。故本研究將以特性要因圖之分析手法，嘗試將車門及煞車系統等相關故障組件，有體系的歸納分類出要因關係，並視結果提出改善對策，俾利降低車門及煞車系統之故障率。由前述過程中可使事實變得清楚，並逐漸聚焦問題，有助於現場人員溝通；同時亦可作為日後維修人員的工法改善、溫故訓練或教育訓練之參考。

This research aims to find out the relationship between delay and facility breakdown of high-loading MRT trains in Taipei. Through the statistical results from year 2000 to 2005, car door and brake system components possessed higher failure rate, causing delay of 301 Type and 321 Type. This research, therefore, will be concluded systematically by cause and effect of car door and relative brake failure module with cause and effect diagrams in order to bring up an improvement strategy to reduce this failure rate. The process will purify the facts, focus on problems gradually, and facilitate communication between staff on duty. This research could also become a reference for technical reform of maintenance staff and personnel education.

Chinese Abstract………....……………………….…………..…………………..…….i
English Abstract………..….........……………….…………..………….……………..ii
Acknowledgements………………………………….…….....……………………….iii
Contents...………………......……………………………..……………...…………..iv
List of Diagrams……….......……………………………..…………..………………vi
List of Tables………….....………………………………..…………..………………x
Symbol Index…..…………...…………………………..…………..……………….xi
CHAPTER 1-INTRODUCTION………...........……..……………..………..……….1
1.1 Research Background and Objectives…..………………………………1
1.2 Research Methodology……….…………………………….............…..2
1.2.1 Blueprint for This Research……………….………………....…...2
1.2.2 Research Procedure...………………….……………………….2
1.2.3 Cause and Effect Diagram Analysis.………………..…………..2
CHAPTER 2-INTRODUCTION OF THE CARRIAGE SYSTEM….…….………9
2.1 Taipei MRT system…...…………………………..…………………....9
2.2 Train Sub-system……………….……………….….…………………10
2.2.1 Function of MRT Trains…………………….……….………...10
2.2.2 Formation of MRT Trains..………………….……….………...11
2.2.3 Main Specifications of MRT Train………….……….………...12
2.2.4 9 Sub-systems of MRT Trains…..………….……….….……...13
2.3 Comparison of Train Sub-system Difference between Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. (301 Type) Siemens Inc. (321 Type)………………….33
CHAPTER 3-DELAY CAUSED FROM FAILURE OF TRAIN SUB-SYSTEM…..42
3.1 Failure Record of 301 Type Train Sub-System Delay and Breakdown…..42
3.2 Failure Record of 321 Type Train Sub-System Delay and Breakdown…..43
3.3 Failure Category Statistics and Trend of 301 Type Train Door Systems…44
3.4 Failure Category Statistics and Trend of 301 Type Train Brake Systems...47
3.5 Failure Category Statistics and Trend of 321 Type Train Door Systems…50
3.6 Failure Category Statistics and Trend of 321 Type Train Brake Systems..53
CHAPTER 4-FAILURE CATEGORY & CAUSE ANALYSIS OF TRAIN SUB-SYSTEM…………………………………………….………....56
4.1 Failure Category & Cause Analysis and Illustration of Train Sub-system…56
4.2 Failure Category and Cause Analysis of 301 Type Train Sub-system…....56
4.2.1 Door System……………………….………….................................56
4.2.2 Brake System…………………….…………....................................57
4.3 Failure Category and Cause Analysis of 321 Type Train Sub-system……..58
4.3.1 Door System………………….………….........................................58
4.3.2 Brake System.……………………….………………………...........60
CHAPTER 5-METHODOLOGY OF LOWERING FAILURE RATE OF MRT CARRIAGES…………………………………………………………….…………..61
5.1 Facility Improvement..........................……………………………………...63
5.2 Adequate Prevention Maintenance......................…………………………...64
5.3 Acquiring System Monitor Facility.....................…………………….……..64
5.4 Standard Operation Procedure……..............…………………………..…...65
CHAPTER 6-CONCLUSION....................................................................................66
Bibliography..........................…………………….………………………………….68
Appendix-Statistics Table & Year Trend Graph of 301-Type/321-Type Carriage
Sub-system Failure Causing Delay More Than Five Minutes (Year 2000-2005)……84








List of Diagrams
Figure 1.1 Research Procedure…………………………………….…………………..4
Figure 1.2 Quality Control Diagram………………………………..…..……………..6
Figure 1.3 Basic Structure of Cause and Effect Diagram..………….……….…….….7
Figure 1.4 Cause and Effect Expansion Diagram……………….………………….…8
Figure 2.1 Train Assembly…………………..………………………………………..11
Figure 2.2 Layout of Main Carriage Parts..……………………………….………….14
Figure 2.3 Equipment Arrangement under the Car (DM1 Car)………………….......14
Figure 2.4 Equipment Arrangement under the Car (T Car)…………………....…….15
Figure 2.5 Equipment Arrangement under the Car (M2 Car)…………….……...…..15
Figure 2.6 Car Body Assembly…..………………………………...……………..….16
Figure 2.7 Cab……………..………………………………………………………....17
Figure 2.8 Mechanical Coupler….…………………………………..……….………18
Figure 2.9 Semi-permanent Coupler………………..………….…..……………...…19
Figure 2.10 Electric & Mechanical Coupler……………………………...………….19
Figure 2.11 Door System………………..……………………………..……………..20
Figure 2.12 Car Door Drive Institute (301)…………………………………..………23
Figure 2.13 Car Door Drive Institute (321)…………………………………..………23
Figure 2.14 Air Conditioner System………………………………..………………...24
Figure 2.15 Auxiliary Power System Position……………………………..…….......27
Figure 2.16 Bogie Diagram………………………..……………………….…….......29
Figure 2.17 Brake System Component Diagram…………………………..…..……..31
Figure 2.18 Lighting Systems…………………………………………….…...……..32
Figure 3.1 Retardation Statistics Caused from 301-Type Train Sub-System
between years of 2000 and 2005…………..……………………….….42
Figure 3.2 Retardation Statistics Caused from 321-Type Train Sub-System
Between Years of 2000 and 2005….…………………………………..43
Figure 3.3 Cause and Effect Analysis of 301 Type Train Door System Failure……..45
Figure 3.4 Cause and Effect Analysis of 301 Type Brake System Failure…….…….48
Figure 3.5 Cause and Effect Analysis of 321 Type Door System Failure……..……..51
Figure 3.6 Cause and Effect Analysis of 321 Type Brake System Failure…………...54
Figure 5.1 Analysis of Lowering Failure Rate of Carriage Facility………………..62

List of Tables
Table 1.1 Cause and Effect Diagram Analysis…………………………………….…..4
Table 2.1 Main Specifications of MRT Train…….…………………….....………….12
Table 2.2 Door Operation and Relative Module Function ………...………………...21
Table 2.3 Door System Module ………………………………………………..…….22
Table 2.4 Propulsion System Position…………………………………..…..……….26
Table 2.5 Brake System Component List……………………………….……..…….30
Table 2.6 Comparison of High-loading 301 & 321 Trains (Car Body System)….….33
Table 2.7 Comparison of High-loading 301 & 321 Trains (Bogie System)…………33
Table 2.8 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Propulsion System)…...36
Table 2.9 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Auxiliary Power
System)……………………………………………………………………37
Table 2.10 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Air Condition
System)…………………………………………………………………..37
Table 2.11 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Lighting System)……39
Table 2.12 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Door System)……….40
Table 2.13 Comparison of High-Loading 301 & 321 Trains (Brake System)………40
Table 3.1 Retardation Statistics Caused from 301-Type Train Sub-System between years of 2000 and 2005……………………………………………..……42
Table 3.2 Retardation Statistics Caused from 321-Type Train Sub-System between years of 2000 and 2005………………………….………..………………43
Table 3.3 Failure Statistics of 301 Type Door Systems………………………..……46
Table 3.4 Failure Statistics of 301 Type Brake Systems…….………………………49
Table 3.5 Failure Statistics of 321 Type Door Systems……………………..………52
Table 3.6 Failure Statistics of 321 Type Train Brake System……………….………55
Table 4.1 Contrasts between 301 & 321-Type Car Door System Failure Reasons &
Attributions…………………………………………………………….…63
Table 4.2 Contrasts between 301 & 321-Type Brake System Failure Reasons & Attributions……………………………………………………….………67
Table 4.3 Failure Attribution causing 301-Type Carriages Delayed More Than Five Minutes (Year 2000-2005)………………………………………………..68
Table 4.4 Failure Attribution causing 321-Type Carriages Delayed More Than Five
Minutes (Year 2000-2005)………………………………………………..72

[1] Institute of Transportation, MOTC (1993) Security Issue & Research of Railway
[2] MRT Taipei (2000) Vehicle Operation Instruction sheet
[3] Wen, Hung-Yuan, Dissertation of Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Huafan Univ. (2004) A MRT Vehicle System Research Based on CAN BUS Spot Control Network
[4] Chang, Huan-Kuan, Disseration of Institute of Management, National Taiwan Univ. of Science & Technology (2004) Case Study of MRT Taipei, Effectiveness Research of MRT Carriage Breakdown Rule-Out Mode
[5] Chen, Chien-Tsai, Dissertation of Institute of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan Univ. of Science & Technology (2004) Independent Verification & Confirmation System to Domestic Rail Security Effect
[6] Chen, Yung-Chang (2003) Statistics Methodology & Quality Control
[7] Kajiyama, Yasuo (2002) Defective Structure & Strategy
[8] Ujita, Haru (2000) Basic of Quality Management
[9] Kao, Chun-Shi (2003) Appliance of Overall Quality Control in School Administration
[10] Cheng, Ching-Ho (2003) Seven Techniques of Quality
[11] Huang, Han-Jun (2003) Rail Engineering
[12] MRT Taipei (2005) Basic Training Material of High-Capacity Carriages
[13] Taipei MRT Incidents for Carriage Delay More or Less than Five Minutes