臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

高品質的理賠服務，到能保持老客戶，吸引新客戶以及精簡理賠成本、創造利潤。從目前一般觀念來看，大部分人認為在申請理賠時，保戶永遠是弱者。這個認識影響了投保意願及產險公司形象。
另從市場競爭角度來看，汽車公司挾其銷售與維修之優勢，強力控制汽車保險市場，產險公司為爭取市場乃屈服於汽車公司之業務壓力，造成產險公司忽略消費者需求之服務，侵蝕其顧客基礎。保戶對理賠服務品質滿意或不滿意的根源在於在申請理賠時保戶所認知的服務品質。再從目前保險司統計數字來看，民國八十九年產險業的保戶申訴案件310件，其中理賠爭議案件高達97%。九十二年度理賠爭議案件更大幅增加到565件，占申訴案件比率仍高達97%，顧客不滿意，更無忠誠度。在自由化、競爭的市場�堙A高品質的理賠服務是產險公司競爭力的重要因素。
本研究以汽車保險為例，探討理賠服務品質、顧客滿意度、顧客忠誠度三者之間的相互關聯，研究發現理賠服務品質對顧客滿意度、顧客滿意度對顧客忠誠度都有顯著正面的影響，而且理賠服務品質對顧客滿意度的影響，也因顧客是否具有理賠經驗而有顯著差異。此外迴歸分析也發現，顧客因理賠經驗不同，對於理賠服務品質屬性的認知也不同。本研究依照研究結果提出改善車險理賠服務品質之道，以作為產險公司擬定汽車保險經營策略之參考。

High quality claim service can keep old customer, attract new, reduce claim cost and create profit. From the general viewpoint, almost everyone believes consumer is always the weaker party in filing a claim. This cognition affects the intention to purchase insurance and the image of the non-life insurance company.
From the angle of market competition, automobile companies have the advantage of its marketing and repair and vigorously interfering the automobile insurance market. In order to secure the market, non-life insurance companies has to yield to pressure from automobile companies. As a result, non-life insurance companies had overlooked the services required by consumers, destroying its customer foundation. The root of satisfaction and dissatisfaction of customers to claim service quality was on the service quality perceived by customers during filing a claim. From the current statistics made by the Department of Insurance, there were 310 complaints made by insurance buyer in the non-life insurance industry in 2000, in which 97% were claim dispute cases. Claim dispute cases increased greatly to 565 cases in 2003, which was 97% of the complaints received. Customers were totally dissatisfied, let alone customer loyalty. In the liberalized and competitive market, high quality claim service is an important factor for non-life insurance company to be competitive.
Automobile insurance was used as an example in this study to prove into the interrelationship of claim service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. In this study, we found out that claim service quality has a significant and positive effect on customer satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty, and the effect of claim service quality to customer satisfaction differs between customers with and without claim experience. Besides, it was found from the regression analysis made that due to different claim experience, customers have different perception on the attribution of claim service quality. We, therefore put forth method to improve the claim service quality in automobile insurance based on the result of this study to serve as a reference for non-life insurance companies in drawing up their business policy on automobile insurance.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH iv
ABSTRACT IN CHINESE vi
LIST OF TABLE x
LIST OF ILLUSTRATION xii
Chapter
I INTRODUCTION 1
Research Background and Motivation 1
Research Objectives 4
Research Questions 4
Research Process 6
II LITERATURE REVIEW 7
Introduction of the Characteristic and Practice of Auto Insurance Claim Service Quality 7
Service Quality 7
Definition of Service Quality 12
Dimensions of Service Quality 12
Measurement of Service Quality 16
Customer Satisfaction 20
Definition of Customer Satisfaction 20
Measurement of Customer Satisfaction 22
Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality 24
Customer Loyalty 26
Definition of Customer Loyalty 27
Measurement of Customer Loyalty 27
Relationship between Customer Loyalty and Satisfaction 28
III RESEARCH DESIGN 30
Research Framework 30
Operational Definition 31
Research Hypotheses 35
Questionnaire Design 37
Research Subjects and Data Collection 39
Analysis Methods 39
Statistics Process 41
IV DATA ANALYSIS 43
Result of Reliability Test and Factor Analysis 43
Result of Correlation Analysis 59
Result of Independent Samples t-Test 60
Result of Regression Analysis 61
Regression Analysis in Controlling Variable 64
Result of Research Hypotheses 66
V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 67
Conclusions 67
General Discussion and Managerial Implication 68
Suggestion 69
Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 71
BIBLIOGRAPHY 72
VITA 75

1.Anderson, E. W. and M. W. Sullivan. “The Antecedent and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firm,” Marketing Sciences, Vol.12, (1993): 125-143.
2. Andre, M. M. and P. M. Saraiva. “Approaches of Portuguese Companies for Relating Customer Satisfaction with Business Result,” Total Quality Management, Vol.11, 7, Sep (2000): 929-939.
3.Baker, D. A. and J. L. Crompton. “Quality, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions,” Annals of Tourism Research, Vol.27, 3, (2000): 785-804.
4.Bolton, R. N. and J. H. Drew. “A Multistage Model of Consumer’s Assessments of Service Quality and Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, Mar (1991): 375-384.
5.Brown, T. J., G. A. Churchill, Jr. and J. P. Peter. “Research Note: Improving the Measurement of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.69, (1993): 127-139.
6.Buttle, F. “SERNQAL: Review, Critique, Research Agenda,” European Journal of Marketing, Vol.36, (1996): 8-32.
7.Cronin, Jr. J. J. and S. A. Taylor. ”Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, (1992): 55-68.
8.Cronin, Jr. J. J. and S. A. Taylor. ”SERVEPERF Versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.58. (1998): 125-131.
9.Churchill, Jr. G. A. and C. Surprenant. “An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.19, (1982): 491-504.
10.Czepiel, J. A. “Perspective on Consumer Satisfaction,” AMA Conference Proceedings, (1974): 119-123.
11.Dick, Alan S. and Kunal Basu. ”Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.22, (1994): 99-113.
12.Fornell, C. and Birger Wernerfelt. “A Model of Customer Complaint Management,” Marketing Science, Vol.7, (1992): 287-298.
13.Fornell, C. “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience,” Journal of Marking, Vol.56, January (1992): 6-21.
14.Fornell, C., M. D. John, E.W. Anderson, J. Cha, and B. E. Bryant. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature、Purpose and Finding,” Journal of Marking, Vol.60, (1996): 7-18.

15.Garin, David A. “What Does Product Quality Really Mean, ” Sloan Management Review, Fall, (1984): 509-514.
16.Gronholdt, L., A. Martensen, and K. Kristensen. “The relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Cross-Industry Differences,” Total Quality Management, 11(4/5&6), Jul, (2000): 509-514.
17.Heskett, James L., Thomas O. Jones, Glay W. Loveman, W. Earl Sasser, and Leonard A. Schlesinger. “Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work,” Harvard Business Review, vol.72, (1994): 164-174.
18.Jones, T. O. and W. Earl Sasser. ”Why Satisfied Customer Defect,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.73, Nov/Dec (1995): 88-99.
19.Kotler, Philp. “Marketing’s New Paradigm: What’s Really Happening Out There,” Planning Review, Sep/Oct., (1992): 51-52.
20.Lethinen, Uolevi and Jarmo R. Lethinen. “Two Approaches to Service Quality Dimension,” Service Industries Journal, Vol.11, (1991): 287-303.
21.Montfort, K. V., E. Masurel, and I. V. Rijn. “Service Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis of Customer Satisfaction in Financial,” The Service Industries Journal, Vol.20, (2000): 80-94.
22. Oliver, R. L. “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions” journal of Marketing Research, Vol.17, (1980): 460-469.
23. Oliver, R. L. and John E. Swan. “Consumer Perceptions of Inter personal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.53, Apr (1989): 21-35.
24. Oliver, R. L. “Whence Consumer Loyalty,” Journal of Marketing, 17 Special issue, (1999): 33-44.
25. Ostrom, Amy and Dawn Iacobucci. “Consumer Trade-Offs and the Evaluation of Services,” journal of Marketing, Jan (1995): 17-28.
26. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and It’s Implications for Future Research,” journal of Marketing, Vol.49, (1985): 41-50.
27. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Customer Perception of Service Quality,” journal of Retailing, Vol.64, (1988): 12-40.
28. Parasuraman, A. V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale,” journal of Retailing, Vol.67, (1991): 420-450.

29. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality Implications for Future Research,” journal of Marketing, Vol.58, (1994): 111-124.
30. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality,” journal of Marketing, Vol.60, No.2, (1996): 31-46.
31. Reicheld, F. F. and W. Earl Sasser. “Zero Defection: Quality Comes to Services,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, (1990): 105-110.
32. Rust, R. T. and R. L. Oliver. “Service Quality: Insights and Managerial Implications from the Frontier,” Service Quality: New Direction in Theory and Practice, (N.Y.: Sage Publications, Inc, 1994), 1-19.
33. Sasser, W. Earl, R.P. Olsen, Jr. and D. D. Wyckoff. Management of Service Operations, Text and Cases, (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1978), 33-54.
34. Wooddruff, R. B. “Modeling Consurmer Satisfaction Process Using Experience Based Norms,” journal of Marketing, Vol.10, (1983): 296-304.
35. Zeithaml, V. A. and Mary Jo Bitner. Service Marketing, (NewYork: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996), 204.