跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/15 10:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:吳德君
研究生(外文):Te-Chun Wu
論文名稱:促銷方式、促銷情境對購買意願的影響─購物方式與產品涉入為干擾變數
論文名稱(外文):THE IMPACTS OF PROMOTION TYPE AND PROMOTION SITUATION ON PURCHASING INTENTION─TV/ON-LINE SHOPPING AND PRODUCT INVOLVEMENT AS MODERATORS
指導教授:潘明全潘明全引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Chuan Pan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大同大學
系所名稱:事業經營學系(所)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:138
中文關鍵詞:促銷方式促銷情境產品涉入無店舖行銷購買意願
外文關鍵詞:Non-Store MarketingProduct InvolvementPromotion SituationPurchasing IntentionSales Promotion
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:3006
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1538
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:20
由於時代的變遷、科技的發達、社會的進步、消費型態改變,推動了虛擬通路的成長,也給忙碌的現代人,提供了很好的消費、購買管道。如何在琳瑯滿目的促銷活動中吸引消費者駐留,進而直接誘使消費者購買產品,就得靠良好的行銷策略。本研究希望瞭解促銷方法與促銷情境對購買意願的影響,其中加入兩個干擾變數-產品涉入(高涉入、低涉入)及購買模式(網路購物、電視購物)來深入探討。
本研究使用2*2*3*2實驗設計的方式,探討促銷方式及促銷情境是否會影響消費者的購買意願。另外,針對加入電視購物/網路購物及產品涉入的干擾效果進行探討。本研究發現:促銷方式與促銷情境對消費者購買意願有顯著的不同,而在在產品涉入的干擾下,促銷方式對購買意願有顯著影響;購物模式的干擾下,促銷情境對購買意願有顯著影響。
The rapid development of technology has greatly altered consumers’ purchasing patterns. The emergence of virtual marketing channels in particular has endowed busy consumers with the blessing of convenient shopping at home. As today’s consumers are confronted by an onslaught of promotion campaigns on a daily basis, effective marketing strategies are needed to successfully attract buyers. The present study accordingly strives to examine the influences of promotion type and promotion situation on consumers’ purchasing intention, and two moderators - production involvement (high vs. low) and shopping mode (online shopping vs. TV shopping), have been added to facilitate in-depth analysis.
The present study adopts a 2x2x3x2 experiment design to measure the potential influences of promotion types and promotion situations on purchasing intention. Also under analysis are the moderating effects of shopping mode and product involvement. Results of the study indicate that both promotion type and promotion situation report significant influences on consumers’ purchasing intention. Under the moderating effect of product involvement, promotion type shows a significant influence on purchasing intention. Under the moderating effect of shopping mode, on the other hand, promotion situation shows a significant influence on purchasing intention.
ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH………………………………………………. iii
ABSTRACT IN CHINESE………………………………………………. v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………………………………………………...vi
LIST OF TABLE…………………………………………………………..x
LIST OF ILLUSTRATION……………………………………………….xi
CHAPTER
Ⅰ INTRODUCTION………………………………………………...…...1 Research Background and Motives………………………………………………1
Research Objectives…………………………………….…..……………….…….3
Research Procedure…………………………………………………………….….4
Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………..6
Sales Promotion……………………………………………………………...........6
Promotion Situation…………………………………………….………………..8
Product Involvement…………………………………………….………………10
Non-store Marketing…………………………………………….…………..…. 12
Purchasing Intention…………………………………………………………….15
Ⅲ RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………………………………….17
Conceptual Framework……………………………………………………….…17
Operational Definitions……………………………………………………….…18
Research Hypotheses ……………………………………………………………20
Research Design……………………………………………………………….…27
Ⅳ DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION…………………….31
Reliability Analysis……………………………………………………..............31
Homogeneity of Variance Analysis……………………………….……….…...31
Variance Analysis……………………………………………………………….32
Summary of Hypothesis Tests………………………………………………….37
Ⅴ CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS…………………………..38
Conclusions……………………………………………………………………..38
Managerial Implication………………………………………………………..36
Research Limitations………………………………………………….……......41
Directions for Future Research……………………………………………...…42
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………….44
APPENDIX………………………………………………………………48
Bitta Della, A. J., K. B. Monroe, and J. M. Mcginnis, “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisement,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, (1981):416 –427.
Blattberg, R. C. and S. A. Neslin, Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies, Englewood Cloffs, 1990 N.J: Prentice Hal,1990.
Boyd, T. C. and C. H. Mason, “The Link Between Attractiveness of ‘Extrabrand’ Attributes and the Adoption of Innovations,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.27, (1999):306-319.
Campbell, L. and W. D. Diamond, “Framing and Sales Promotion: The Characteristics of a Good Deal,” Journal of Consumer Marketing 7,no. 4 (1990): 25-31.
Dickson, R. P. and A. G. Sawyer, “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, (1990):42-53.
Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe and D. Grewal, “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28 (Aug), (1991):307-319.
Engel, J. F., R. W. Martin, C. K. Thomas, and B. R. Bonnie, Promotional Strategy, 9th edition, Pinnaflex Educational Resources INC., Cincinnati Ohio, (2000).
Flynn, L. R. and R. E. Goldsmith, “Application of the Personal Involvement Inventory in Marketing.“ Psychology & Marketing, 1993, 10(4):357.
Grewal, D. R. Krishnan, J. Baker, and N. Borin, “The Effect of Store Name , Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 1998,Vol.74, (1998):331-352.
Harrell, G. D., “Involvement in Product Class and Confidence in Beliefs about Brands as Potential Determinants of Attitudes-Behavioral Intent Relationships,” Paper presented to the American Marketing Association, 18th Annual Attitude Research Conference (1977).
Ho, T. H., C. S. Tang, and D. R. Bell, “Rational Shopping Behavior and the Option Value of Variable pricing,” Management Science, 44(12),(1998):145-160.
Hsu, C. C., “ The Study of Relationships Between Firm Purposes and Promotional Incentive Characteristics.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Chung Yuan Christian University, (1998).
Huwang, C. M., “A Case Study for Business Model and Competitive Strategy Analysis on Virtual Channel Industry.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, (2002).
Inman, J. J., J. S. Dyer, and J. Jianmin, “A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-choice Valuation,” Marketing Science 16, no. 2, (1997):97-111.
Keegan, W. J., Global Marketing Management, N.J: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989:6.
Kotler P., “Planning implementing and control,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17(7), (1991):79-84.
_____, Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 10th Ed., NJ: Prentice Hall, (2000):3.
Lastovicka, J. L. and D. M. Gardner, “Low Involvement Versus High Involvement Cognitive Structures,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.5, (1978):87-92.
Lee, C. H., “ The Effect of Amount Limited on the Personal Preference.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Central University, (2004).
Lee, P. L., “The Study on the Effect of Discounts DEPTH, Product Attributes, and Situations on Brand Evaluation and Purchasing Intention.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ming Chuan University, (2001).
Laurent, G. and J. N. Kapferer, “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22, (1985):41-53.
Mobley, M. F., W. O. Bearden and J. E. Teel, “An Investigation of Individual Responses to Tensile Price Claims,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), (1988):273-279
Moore, D. J. and R. W. Olshavsky, “Brand Choice and Deep Price Discounts,” Psychology and Marketing,Vol.6, (1989):181-196.
Raghubir, P. and K. Corfman, “When do Price Promotion Affect Pretrial Brand Evaluation?” Journal of Marketing Research 36, no.2, (1999): 211-222.
Robertson, T. S., J. Zielinski, and S. Ward, Consumer Behavior, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company , (1984).
Schiffman, L. G. and L. L. Kanuk, Consumer Behavior, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, (2000).
Seipel, C. M. , “Premiums-Forgotten by Theory, ” Journal of Marketing , Vol.35 , (1971):26-34.
Sohn, Y. J., “A Distribution Revolution,” Business Korea 14,no. 2 (1997): 40-41.
Solomon, M. R., Consumer Behavior : Buying, Having, Being, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, (1992).
Stephens, D. L., R. P. Hill, and K. Bergman, “Enhancing the Consumer- Product
Relationship: Lessons from the QVC Home Shopping Channel,” Journal of business research, 37, (1996):193-200.
Strang, R.A., “Sales promotion : Fast Growth,Faulty Management,” Harvard Business Review, (1976):1114-1124.
Swinyard, W. R., “The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, (1993):271-280.
Underwood, E., “Why I'm a Home Shopper,” Brandweek , April(19), (1993):23-28.
Vaughn, R., “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.20, (1980):27-33.
Wang, Y. B., “The Effect of Promotion Activities on Consumer Purchasing Behavior.” PhD, dissertation, National Cheng-Chi University, (1996).
Wang, X. M, “The Effect of Price Construct and Venation Hint on Consumer’s Price Perceived.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Central University, (1995).
Wei, J. W, “The Impacts of Bundling Types on Consumers’ Perceived Value and Purchase Intention.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, FuJjen Catholic University, (2003).
Zaichkowsky, J. L., “Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.15, (1986):4-14.
Zeithaml, Valarie A. “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.” Journal of Marketing 52, no. 3, (1988):2-22.
Zeng, Q. C., “The Study of University Students’ Shopping Behavior.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Central University, (2000).
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊