跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.170) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/08 14:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:施其佑
研究生(外文):Chi-yu Shih
論文名稱:股權結構、資本結構與公司價值關聯性之研究
論文名稱(外文):A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND CORPORATE VALUE
指導教授:陳瑞璽陳瑞璽引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ruey-Shii Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大同大學
系所名稱:事業經營學系(所)
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:111
中文關鍵詞:所有權結構資本結構公司價值
外文關鍵詞:OWNERSHIP STRUCTURECAPITAL STRUCTURECORPORATE VALUE
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:722
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:285
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
自Berle and Means(1932)及Jensen and Meckling(1976)指出所有者與經營者間利益衝突所產生的代理問題,股權結構、公司價值與公司績效間關係,成為學者在理論及實務研究上的焦點;公司治理雖以監督公司管理階層,保障投資人基本權益為重點,惟其最終目的仍在於增加公司價值;然而,該透過哪些機制以緩和管理者與所有權人間代理問題,截至今日亦無定論;為使公司價值極大化,必須選擇最適內部人士及機構法人持股比率、股利決策及負債融資比率以使公司總代理成本降為最低。故本研究期望藉由所有權結構、資本結構與公司績效間關聯性探討,為後續研究提供最佳股權結構、資本結構及財務決策的方向。
Ever since Berle & Means (1932) and Jensen & Meckling (1976) suggested the correlation among enterprise performance, ownership structure and its agency problem from the conflict of interest between the business owner and the management, this topic has been the center for discussion and study for scholars. Although a good corporate governance lies on the efficient and effective management and safeguarding of investors’ interest, the ultimate objective is to enhance the business value. Nevertheless there has been no exhaustive conclusion in resolving the agency problem and the enhancement of business value requires the right composition of shareholding by the internal investors as well as the institutional investors. Besides this, the right dividend policy and capital structure will also directly contribute to minimize the agency cost involved. This study examine and assess the significance of the relationship among the ownership structure, capital structure and enterprise performance and develop a framework model for future studies and research on this area to facilitate the decision making on the three elements.
ENGLISH
Chapter
I INTRODUCTION 1
Research Background and Motivation 1
Research Purpose 5
II LITERATURE REVIEW 8
Ownership Structure, Capital Structure and Value of Company 8
Ownership Structure 8
Capital Structure 13
Value of Company 17
III RESEARCH DESIGN 26
Hypotheses 26
Operating definition of Variables 28
Data Description 30
Analysis Methodology 31
IV EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 34
Formula of Management Shareholding 34
Leverage Formula 38
Company’s Performance Formula 40
V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 45
Conclusions 45
Recommendations 48
BIBLIOGRAPHY 51
VITA 56

中文
第一章 緒論 1
背景與動機 1
研究問題 3
第二章 文獻探討 6
所有權結構、資本結構與公司價值 6
所有權結構 6
資本結構 9
公司價值 12
第三章 研究方法 18
研究假設 18
變數衡量 19
資料說明 21
分析方法 22
第四章 實證結果分析 24
管理者持股方程式 24
負責方程式 27
公司績效方程式 29
第伍章 結論與建議 33
結論 33
建議 35
參考文獻 37
Part of English
Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber,“Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 3(1996): 377-397.
Bamea, A., R.A. Haugen, and L.W. Senbet. Agmypmbh and financial comchg. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall(1985).
Barnhart, Scott Wen. and S. Rosenstein. “Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis,” The Financial Review, Vol.33 (1998): 1-16.
Bathala, C. T., K. P. Moon, and R. P. Rao. “Mangerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impact of Institutional Holdings: An Agency Perspective.” Financial Management 3(1994): 38-50.
Berle. and Means. “The Modern Corporation and Private Property.” Mac-Millan, New York, N.Y. (1932).
Byrd, John., Robert. Parrino, and Gunnar. Pritsch. “Stockholder-Manager Conflicts and Firm Value, ” Financial Analysts Journal, 54, no.3 (1998): 14-30.
Chen, CR. and T.L. Steiner. “Managerial ownership and agency conflicts: A onlinear Simultaneous equation analysis of managerial. ownership, risk taking, debt policy, and dividend policy,” The. Financial Review 34(1999): 119- 136.
Crutchley, C. E. and R. S. Hansen. “A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends.” Financial Management 3 (1989): 36-46.
Crutchley, C. E., M. R. H. Jensen, J. S. Jahera Jr., and J. E. Raymond. “Agency problems and the simultaneity of decision making: The role of institutional ownership.” International Review of Financial Analysis 8(1999): 177- 197.
Eric, R., G. T. Yoshikawa, and Motomi. Hashimoto. “Ownership Structure, Investment Behavior and Firm Performance in Japanese Manufacturing Industries.” Erasmus Research Institute of Management, 2001.
Fama, E. “Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review. ” Journal of Political Economy 88(1980): 288-307.
Gompers, Paul., Joy. Ishii, and Andrew. Metrick. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” NBER Working Paper no. 8449, 2001.
Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach. “Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature.” Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, 2000.
Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg, and T. S. Zorn. “Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2(1992): 247-263.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3(1976): 305-360.
Jensen, M.C. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76(1986): 323-329.
McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Jouranl of Financial Ecomonics 27(1990): 595-612.
Miller, M. “Debt and Taxes,” Journal of Finance 32(1977): 261-276.
Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review 48(1958): 261-297.
Modigliani, F. and M. H. Miller. “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital : A Correction.” American Economic Review 53(1963): 433-443.
Mohd, M. A., L. G. Perry, and J. N. Rimbey. “The Impact of Ownership Structure On Corporate Debt Policy: a Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis.” The Financial Review 33(1998): 85-98.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics 20(1988): 293-315.
Myers, S. C. “The Capital Structure Puzzle,” Journal of Finance 39(1984): 575-592.
Pound, J. “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder oversight,” Journal of Financial Economics vol.20(1988): 237-265.
Scott, W. B. and S. Rosenstein. “Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis.” The Financial Review 33(1998): 1-16.
Titmam, S. and R. Wessels. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice,” Journal of Finance 43(1988): 1-19.

Part of Chinese
Leu, Yann-Hui. “A study on the relationship ownership structure, internal control and audit mechanism, external investment, and cross shareholding with company’s performance, ”(Mater’s Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, 2000).
Lin, Chun-Qiong. “shareholding structure, capital structure and operation performance-Jensen, Meckling and Fama A practical review on the theory, ” China Jornal of Financial,(1994), 1-20
Qiu, Yi. and Xun hua. Zhang. “Shareholding structure, board of directors and enterprise financial performance, ” Bank of Taipei Monthly Journal, 22 no.5 (1991)
Yu, Hai Chin. and Ben O. Cho. “The Relationship Between The Equity Ownership Concentration of Directors, Privy and The Tobin's Q of Publicly Trade Corporations In Taiwan,” Manage the comment 13, no.1(1994):79-98.
Miao, Qi Hui. “The Relationship Between Equity Structure and Firm Performance,”(Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University, 1997).
Weng, Shu-Yu. “Ownership structure of listed company of Taiwan. Research of the key problem of agency and company value,”(Master’s Thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University Library, 2000)
Chen, Shu Ping. “A review on the relationship between ownership structure and capital structure from the perspective of agency theory,”(Mater’s Thesis, National Central University, 1998).
Huang, Jun Yao. “A study on the relationship of listed company financing pecking order with its operation performance,”(Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University, 1995).
Yang, Chun Chung. “The Relationship Between Equity Structure and Firm Performance,”(Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University, 1997).
Yang, Hui Ling. “The Effects of the Structure of the Board of Directors and Its Changes on the Wealth of Stockholders and Corporate Performance.”(Master’s Thesis, Chaoyang University of Technology, 2000).
Yang, Jiao Ying. “The study of relation between ownership structure and company’s value,”(Mater’s Thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University, 1989).
Yang, Yaw Chen. “A study on the relationship between management shareholding, risk and financial strategy.”(Master’s Thesis, National Dong Hwa University, 2000)
Ye, Yin-Hua. and Shean-Bii. Chiu. “The Relationship Between The Capital Structure、Ownership Structure and company’s value.” NTU Management Reivew 7, no.2 Journal of Finance 43(1996): 57-90.
Ye, Yin Hua., Chen en. Ko, and Yu Hui. Su. “Financial Structure and Corporate Performance for Taiwan SMEs,” Sun Yat-Sen Management Review 8, no.2 (2000):303-323.
Hsiung, Ta-Chung. “The financial crisis of domestic enterprises and it relationship with pledging of shares by executive directors,”(Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University , 2000)
Dai, Yuan Min. “A study on the relationship between business control pattern and its operation performance- a review based on listed companies in Taiwan.” (Master’s Thesis, National Chung Hsin University, 1986)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top