跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/08 04:57
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:汪素虹
研究生(外文):Su-Hong Uang
論文名稱:延伸相似度與品牌寬度對品牌延伸評價之影響:產品技術的干擾效果之探討
論文名稱(外文):The influence of similarity and brand breadth on the brand extention evaluation: the study of interfering effect on product technology.
指導教授:沈永正沈永正引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yong-Zheng Shen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:品牌延伸產品延伸相似性品牌寬度延伸產品技術
外文關鍵詞:brand extensionbrand similaritybrand breadthproduct technology
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:492
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究之目的在於了解品牌延伸時,品牌寬度與延伸產品技術對品牌延伸的影響為何。在品牌寬度中,本研究利用品牌寬度的概念區分品牌寬度為窄品牌與寬品牌兩種類別,所謂的窄品牌為此品牌下的產品類別較少,而寬品牌則為此品牌下的產品類別較多樣化。在許多文獻中提到品牌延伸中,原產品與延伸產品相似性之相似性是影響品牌延伸很重要的因素,因此本研究欲了解在品牌寬度的不同下延伸至高、低相似度時,其品牌延伸效果如何。除此之外,本研究也針對延伸產品技術程度上加以探討。
本研究結果顯示,窄品牌延伸至低技術層級產品時,其產生的品牌延伸評價高於延伸至高技術層級產品;而當寬品牌延伸至高技術層級產品時,其產生的品牌延伸評價高於延伸至低技術層級產品。而加入相似度此一變數時,在窄品牌上延伸至高技術層級產品在高、低延伸產品相似度上的變動幅度大於延伸至低技術層級產品;而在寬品牌上延伸至低技術層級產品在高、低延伸產品相似度上的變動幅度小於延伸至低技術層級產品。
The objective of this research is to recognize the influence of brand extension between brand extension, brand breadth and the extended of product technology. In the brand breadth section, this research is utilizing the concept of brand breadth. There are two concepts of brand breadth, narrow brand breadth and wide brand breadth. The narrow brand breadth means the product category is very low. However, the product category of wide brand breadth is more variety. In numerous of reports had been mentioned that the most important factor of brand extension is the similarity between original product and brand similarity. This research is going to recognize the effect upon the brand extension of both higher extension and lower extension. Furthermore, this research also discusses some product technology issues.
This research shows the narrow brand breadth with the lower technology, it’s evaluation of brand extension is higher than higher technology. And when wide brand breadth with the higher technology, it’s evaluation of brand extension is higher than lower technology. Then plus a factor-similarity, for a narrow brand, the difference in the perceived fit between the high and low similarity extensions is higher with the higher technology product than with the lower technology product, and for a wide brand, the difference in the perceived fit between the high and low similarity extensions is lower with the higher technology product than with the lower technology product.
第一章 緒論 9
1.1 研究動機 9
1.2 研究目的 10
1.3 研究流程 11
第二章 文獻探討 12
2.1 品牌延伸 12
2.1.1 品牌延伸的意義 12
2.1.2 品牌延伸的效益與風險 13
2.1.3 影響品牌延伸評估之主要變數 15
2.1.4 品牌延伸的效果評估 18
2.2 原品牌產品與延伸產品之相似度 18
2.3 品牌聯想 19
2.4 窄品牌與寬品牌 20
2.5 延伸產品的技術層級 20
2.6 企業規模 22
2.7 本研究假設之推論 22
第三章 研究方法 26
3.1 研究架構 26
3.2 研究假設 27
3.3 研究方法 28
3.3.1 前測 28
3.3.2 正式研究 34
第四章 研究結果 36
4.1 信度分析 36
4.2 研究結果 36
4.3 小結 48


第五章 結論與貢獻 49
5.1 研究結論 49
5.2 行銷實務上之涵義 50
5.3 學術貢獻 51
5.4 研究限制 51
5.5 未來研究方向 52
參考文獻 53
附錄 57
(1)前測一 57
(2)前測二 62
(3)正式問卷(MOTOROLA延伸至電子辭典) 67
【中文部份】
Aaker著,高登第譯(2001),「品牌管理」,天下遠見出版
彭建彰(2005),「品牌行銷與管理」,華泰出版
吳珮鈺(2000),「消費者對品牌延伸評價的決定因素探討」,長庚大學企業管理研究所
何蒼崧(2002),「品牌聯想形象與消費者特質對品牌延伸評估之影響」,義守大學管理科學研究所
杜盈盈(1997),「品牌延伸形式與消費者知覺風險對品牌延伸效果之影響」,東吳大學企業管理學研究所
陳雯怡(1997),「品牌概念延伸與產品技術延伸對品牌延伸效果的影響」,東吳大學企業管理學研究所
莊惠閔(2003),「產品技術層級、技術相似性,與來源國形象對品牌延伸評價的影響」,成功大學企業管理學研究所
施淑琳(1997),「品牌概念,品牌廣度暨品質變異程度對品牌延伸效果之影響」,台灣大學商學研究所
林婉臻(2003),「產品品質變異程度、技術可移轉性及訊息順序對延伸產品評價之影響--訊息處理過程」,台灣大學商學研究所
別蓮蒂(2003),「消費者認知的廠商移轉能力、產品製造困難度與品牌聯想對品牌延伸合適性的影響」,台灣管理學刊,第三卷第二期
賴士葆、陳松柏(1998),「研發資源與研發組合關係之研究—國內製藥業之實證」,管理評論,第十七卷第一期


【英文部分】
Aaker, D. A. D. L. K. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (January), 27-41.

Atuahene-Gima,K.(1992). Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development: a conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 156-167

Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 387-402.

Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 16-28.

Bridges, s., keller,K.L.&Sood. (2000). Communication strategies for brand extensions:enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 1-11.

Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214-228.

Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 1-16.

Engel, J. F., R. D. Blackwell and P. W. Miniard. (1995). Consumer behavior: Dryden Press.
Gardner, M. P. (1984). Advertising effects on attributes recalled and criteria used for brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(December), 310-318.

Jun, Sung Youl, Tridib Mazumdar, and S. P. Raj (1999). Effects of technological hierarchy on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 31-43

Kanwar, R., J. C. Olson and L. S. Sims. (1981). Toward conceptualizing and measuring cognitive structures. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 122-127.

Kotler, P. (1995). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control: Prentice-Hall.
Loken, Barbara and Deborah Roedder John (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? ” Journal of Marketing, 57(August), 71-84.

Marks, L. J. a. J. C. O. (1981). Toward a cognitive structure conceptualization of product familiarity. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 145-150.

Meyers-Levy, J., Therese A. Louie, & Mary T. Curren. (1994). How does the congruity of brand name affect evaluations of brand name extensions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 46-53.

Monroe, K. B. (1976). The influence of price differences and brand familiarity on brand preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(June), 42-49.

Morris, Peter A., Tesiberg, Elizabeth Olmsted, Kolbe, A. Lawrence, (1991). When choosing R&D projects, go with long shots. Research technology management, 34(1),35-40

Niraj Dawar (2001), Extensions of Broad Brands: The role of retrieval in evaluations of fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 189-207

Park, C. W., Milberg, S. A., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extension: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(September), 185-193.

Peter A. Dacin and Daniel C. Smith (1994). The effect of brand protfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 229-242

Russo, J. E. a. E. J. J. (1980). What do consumers know about familiar products? Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 17-23.

Sheinin, D. A., & Schmit, B. H. (1994). Extending brand with new product concept: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth. Journal of Business Research, 31(1), 1-10.

Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August), 296-313.

Staelin, R. (1978). The effects of consumer education on consumer product safety behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(June), 30-40.

Tauber, E. M. (1981). Brand franchise extensions: New product benefit from existing brand name. Business Horizon, 24(2), 36-41.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top