跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.91) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/03/16 12:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:曾婉妮
研究生(外文):Wan-Ni Tseng
論文名稱:以結構方程模式分析社會資本對策略採購人員績效之影響
論文名稱(外文):The impact of social capital on strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance is using structural equation modeling.
指導教授:曾盛恕曾盛恕引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:社會資本結構方程模式策略採購績效
外文關鍵詞:social capitalstructural equation modelingstrategic purchasing achievement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:223
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
在競爭的社會結構中,每ㄧ個人都會有自己的網絡,藉由此網絡與其他人連結、交往或從事交易。個人在不同的組織下工作,透過社會網絡、人際關係網絡,獲得所需的資訊與資源,這些資訊或資源會直接或間接地影響到個人工作績效與生涯的規劃。在策略採購作業中,大部分是透過電話、傳真、電子郵件或是面對面溝通等方式與供應商、準供應商進行洽談、協商,期能取得雙方都能接受的平衡點,進而開啟彼此間的交易模式。所以在策略採購作業中幾乎全然是人與人之間的行為,而社會資本就蘊藏於內。
在網際網路的盛行下,商品價格的透明化,公司獲利的來源有限,採購已成為企業獲利的第二泉源,做一個策略採購人員,不論在工作的倫理觀念上、採購貨源搜尋、供應商評選、價格與成本的分析、競標流程以及競標談判等,多方面的考量都需要透過積極策略性思考,才能達到企業與組織追求的目標。因此策略採購人員如何在眾多物源供應的選擇得知消息,就有賴於平時所累積的社會資本。
有鑑於社會資本與策略採購對公司的重要性,本研究試圖以結構方程模式(SEM)去探討透過社會資本對策略採購人員在工作上的績效表現影響,並建構社會資本與策略採購績效之模型。
研究結果顯示,社會資本的結構構面會影響認知構面,而認知構面會影響關係構面,但結構構面對關係構面檢定結果不顯著,在社會資本與採購績效間的關係,結構構面與策略採購服務面績效呈現負相關,認知構面與策略採購服務面績效有正相關影響,而關係構面與服務面績效檢定結果不顯著;另外在策略採購服務面的績效良好,可以使品質上、成本上、交期上都能有正面的良好的影響。
In competition society, everyone owns himself/herself network. They contact and trade with others via social network. Someone works in different origination and gets information or resource in demand via social network and relationship network. These information and resource will affect one’s working performance and career plans. In the strategic purchase process, most purchasing agents negotiate with suppliers and sub-suppliers by phone, fax, e-mail, or face to face. Moreover, they hope achieve acceptable balance. It is almost people-to-people behavior on strategic purchase assignment. However, social capital is involved in behavior.
The Internet prevails over the world. The prices of most products are easy to search. In view of this, it is limited to the company earning profits. So purchase has become the second source of enterprise getting profits. To be a purchaser must consider many aspects and own active strategic thinking so that achieve the goal of the enterprise and ordination. No matter sourcing, supplier evaluation, price and cost analysis, compete mark process, negation communication. Therefore, how does strategic purchaser get news about materiel supplying? It depends on establishing social capital.
Because social capital and strategic purchase are important for the company, the research try to discuss that the impact of social capital on strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance using structural equation modeling, and establish the model of social capital and strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance.
The results show that structural social capital significantly affects congestive social capital, and congestive social capital significantly impacts relative social capital, too. However, structural social capital not significantly affects relative social capital. Within social capital and strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance, structural social capital negative significantly impacts service of strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance. However, congestive social capital positive significantly affects service of strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance. Relative social capital not significantly affects service of strategic purchaser’s sourcing performance. In addition, if service performance of strategic purchase is better, the performances of quality, cost, and delivery have well impact.
1. 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 研究流程 3
2. 文獻探討 4
2.1社會資本理論 4
2.1.1 社會資本的定義 4
2.1.2 社會資本構面 13
2.1.3 社會資本與績效的關係 21
2.2 採購相關文獻 23
2.2.1採購的定義與內容 23
2.2.2「策略採購」的定義 27
2.2.3策略採購從業人員應有的特質 29
2.2.4策略採購與社會資本的關係 32
2.3 策略採購績效的相關理論與研究 33
2.3.1 績效評估 33
2.3.2 策略採購績效評估 35
3. 研究方法 38
3.1 研究架構 38
3.2 研究假設 39
3.2.1社會資本三構面的連結 39
3.2.2社會資本與策略採購績效的連結 40
3.2.3策略採購績效之間的連結 41
3.3 研究對象與資料蒐集 42
3.4 問卷變項的定義與衡量 43
3.5 分析方法與工具 46
4.研究結果與假設驗證 48
4.1敘述統計分析 48
4.1.1 受測廠商分佈情況 48
4.1.2 各構面趨勢分佈 52
4.2信度分析 56
4.3效度分析 57
4.4驗證性因素分析 62
4.5結構方程模式與假設檢定 70
5. 結論與建議 76
5.1 研究結論 76
5.2 管理意涵與學術貢獻 79
5.2.1管理意涵 79
5.2.2學術貢獻 80
5.3研究限制與未來研究方向 81
參考文獻 82
中文部分 82
英文部分 83
附 錄 90
中文部分
1. 中國採購管理協會. (1999). 採購 (Vol. 38): 1999 July.
2. 王忠宗. (1999). 採購管理手冊. 台北市: 中華企業管理發展中心發行.
3. 司徒達賢. (2002). 策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法. 台北: 智勝文化事業有限公司.
4. 孫清山、黃毅志. (1994). 社會資源、文化資本與地位取得. 東海學報, 第三十五卷, 127-150.
5. 張簡婉岑. (2004). 以社會資本之觀點探討知識流通對組織績效之影響-以連鎖企業為例. 國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理系碩士論文.
6. 許士軍、高翠霜譯. (2000). 績效評估: 天下遠見出版社.
7. 連崇智. (2004). 產業網絡中心廠商在地化鑲嵌之研究. 東海大學企業管理學系碩士班.
8. 陳明均. (2001). 運用協同商務模式,策略化物料採購流程. 電子化企業:經理人報告, 23, 52-58.
9. 陳榮德. (2004). 組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響:社會資本觀點. 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文.
10.傅和彥. (1990). 採購管理 (3rd ed.): 前程企管.
11.黃俊英. (2001). 企業研究方法. 台北: 東華書局.
12.黃俊英、林震岩. (1997). Sas精析與實例. 台北: 華泰書局.
13.葉建宏. (2004). 以智慧資本評量高科技製造廠商採購管理之研究─以c 公司為例. 國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文.
14.葉彬. (1976). 企業採購. 台北市: 三民書局.
15.輝偉昇. (2004). 從社會資本角度看對知識部門及團隊學習效能之影響. 元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文.
16.賴碧瑤. (2002). 社會資本、智慧資本和財務資本對於業務人員的業務效能之影響-以藥品行銷為例. 東海大學管理碩士在職專班.
17.謝錦鐘. (2005). 策略採購從業人員之社會資本對採購績效影響之研究─以電子相關產業為例. 元智大學管理研究所碩士論文.
18.魏文東. (1991). 企業經營管理實務. 台南市: 復文書局發行.
英文部分
1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2000). Social capital: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and social capital (pp. 89-115). Boston:Butterworth-Heinemann.
2. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
3. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance management handbook. Lodon: Ipm.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, S. Y. (1988). On the use of structural equation model in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 271-284.
5. Baker, W. E. (1990). Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 589-626.
6. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity.
7. Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction:A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Havard UP.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
10. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology.
11. Burt, R. S. (1986). A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data. Social Networks, 149-174.
12. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition.: Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
13. Burt, R. S. (1993). The social structure of competition. In Explorations in economic sociology (pp. 65-103).
14. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339-336.
15. Carr, A., S., & John, N. P. (1999). Strategically management buyer- supplier relationship and performance outcomes. Jounale of Operation Management, 497-519.
16. Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (1999). Strategically management buyer-supplier relationships and performance outcomes. Journal of Operation Management, 497-519.
17. Carrol, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance appraisal and development of performance in organizations.
18. Carter, J. (1996). Can hospice care be provided to people who live alone. Home Healthcare Nurse, 14, 710-716.
19. Choi, T. Y., & Hartley, J. L. (1996). An explortation of supplier selection practices across across the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 14, 333-343.
20. Clark, B. R. (1972). The occupational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 178-184.
21. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
22. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
23. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (1998). Business research methods (6th ed.): McGRAW-HILL.
24. Cooper, M., & Lambert, D., et al. (1997). Supply chain management: More than a new name for logistics. Int. J. of Logistics Management, 8(1), 1-13.
25. Cravens, D. W., & Woodruff, R. B. (1986). Marketing, addison-wesley. Reading, MA.
26. Dickson, G. W. (1996). An analysis of supplier selection system and decision. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5-17.
27. Dobler, D., Lee, J. L., & Burt, D. (1996). Purchchasing and material management (4th ed.): McGraw-Hill Book Company.
28. Douthit, M. W. (2000). The social capital of supervisory relations: Network structure, performance and job satisfaction. The University of Chicago.
29. Drucker, P. (1993). The post-capitalism. N. H. R: Publishers.
30. Flap, H. (2001). Getting started: The influence of social capital on the start of the occupational career. In Boxman (Ed.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 159-181).
31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
32. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215-239.
33. Fukuyama, F. (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace. Stern Business Magazine, 4(1).
34. Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption. New York, NY: Free Press.
35. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptations of social capital. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 11(2), p183-197.
36. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
37. Gulati, R. (1995). Dose familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112.
38. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293-317.
39. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203-215.
40. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
41. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
42. Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci, 67, 130-138.
43. Hansen, M. T. (1998a). Combining network centrality and related knowledge: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit firms. Unpublished Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
44. Hansen, M. T. (1998b). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Unpublished Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
45. Hayduck, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with lisrel: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Heinritz, S. F., & Farrell, P. V. (1991). Purchasing principleand applications. N. J.: Printice- Hall.
47. Johnston, W. J., & Lewin, J. E. (1996). Organizational buying behavior: Toward an intergrative framework. Journal of Business Research, 35, 1-15.
48. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). New features in lisrel 8. Chicago: Sciecntific Software International, Inc.
49. Joseph, F., Shi-Ming, H., & Shing-Han, L. (1997). Translate relation database model into extended entity relationship model: A reverse engineering approach. Tatung Journal, 26, 175-186.
50. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 217-237.
51. Kasilingam, R. G. (1996). Air cargo revenue management: Characters and complexities: European Journal of Operational Research 96.
52. Kim, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, I. (2003). Post-adoption behavior of mobile internet users: An empirical validation with a structural equation model. Working Paper, Feb.15, 2003.
53. Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 794-816.
54. Krackhardt, D. (Ed.). (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
55. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organization: Sage Publication.
56. Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. A cademy of Management Review, 24, 538-555.
57. Lebas, N. J. (1995). Measurement and per for mane management internation. Journal of Production Economics, 1(41), 25-35.
58. Lee, C., Lee, K., & M, P. J. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 615-640.
59. Leenders, M. R., Fearon, H., & B., E. W. (1989). Purchasing and materials management (8th ed.): Irwin.
60. Lin, N. (2002). Lin,nan. (2002). Social capital.
61. Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R. S., & eds. (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. In Sociology and economics: Controversy and integration series. New york: Aldine de gruyter.
62. Loury, G. C. (1987). Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy & Policy, 5, 249- 271.
63. MacGillivray, A., & Walker, P. (2000). Local social capital: Making it work on the ground. In S. Barron, J. Field & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 197-211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Mays, V. M., Ponce, N. A., Washington, D. L., & Cochran, S. D. (2003). Classification of race and ethnicity: Implications for public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 24(1), p83-p111.
65. Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1996a). Theories of economic organization: The case for realism and balance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 58-73.
66. Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1996b). Value creation by firms. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
67. Murphy, E., & Cruz, C. (1995). Function: Real payoffs result when suppliers join in va effort. Purchasing, 22-27.
68. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 35-39.
69. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
70. Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377-401.
71. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. In (pp. 1-23). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
72. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. 2nd, New York: McGraw-Hill.
73. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory z: How american business can meet the japanese challenge. MA: Addison Wesley.
74. Patton, W. E. (1996). Use of human jugement model in industrial buyers''s vender selection decision. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 135-139.
75. Pearce, J. L., & Randel, A. E. (2004). Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace social inclusion, and employee job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 81-98.
76. Pondy, L. R., & Mitroff, I. I. (1979). Beyond open systems models of organizations. In Greenwich (Ed.), Research in organization behavior (B. M. Staw ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-39). CT: JAI Press.
77. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Columbia University.
78. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1351.
79. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
80. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: Americans declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
81. Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration (Vol. 7).
82. Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (1998). A paradigm for social capital. Rational and Society, 10, 481-501.
83. Schuler, R. S., & Huber, V. L. (1990). Personnel and human resource management. (Vol. 1). MN.: West Pub.
84. Schwab, R. L. (1980). An analysis of the relationship between role conflict, role ambiguity personal variables, and perceived burnout among teachers. University of Connecticut, USA.
85. Seibert, R. T., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
86. Sethi, V. a. S. C. (1993). Developing measures for assessing the organizational impact of information technology: A comment on mahmood and soon’s paper. Decision Science, 24(4), 867-877.
87. Shah, J. B. (2002). Strategic sourcing gaining maturity. EBN, 1329, 40.
88. Shin, D. C.-F. (2000). Applicability of spectral analysis to determine hydraulic diffusivity. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.
89. Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(August), 367-392.
90. Smith, J. B., & Donald, W. B. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner. Relationship Journal of Marketing, 1(61).
91. Stevenson, W. J., 傅和彥 (Ed.). (1999). Production/operations management: 前程企業管理顧問公司.
92. Swift, C. O. (1995). Preference for single sourcing and supplier selection criterria. Journal of Business Research, 32(2), 105- 111.
93. Tagaras, G., & Lee, H. L. (1996). Economic models for vender selection with quality cost analysis. Management Science, 42, 1531-1543.
94. Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive interdependence: Collaboration between departments to service customers. Group and Organization Studies, 13(3), 274-289.
95. Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-940.
96. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-477.
97. Vesper, K. H. (1990). New venture strategies. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
98. Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8, 109-125.
99. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18.
100. Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in over identified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118-154.
101. Wilson, E. J. (1994). The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: A review and update. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Summer 1994, 30 (3), 34-41.
102. Woolock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 151-208.
103. Yeh, W. C. (2001). A simple algorithm to search for all d-mps with unreliable nodes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 73(1), 49-54.
104. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6,7), 587-614.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top