跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 12:37
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃依玲
研究生(外文):Yi-Ling Huang
論文名稱:運用分數共整合方法驗證Ohlson模型
論文名稱(外文):Testing the Ohlson Model-Fractional Cointegration Approach
指導教授:李詩政李詩政引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:一般商業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:英文
論文頁數:31
中文關鍵詞:Ohlson 模型單根檢定共整合分數共整合
外文關鍵詞:Ohlson modelUnit root testCointegrationFractional Cointegration
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:178
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:4
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Ohlson (1995) 模型已成為現今會計評價模型中最普遍且廣為使用之模型。然而,在相關實證研究中使用時間序列資料時並未明確地考量到模型的時間序列特性,在分析的過程中可能有假性迴歸(spurious regression)而影響實證結果的可信度。本研究主要的目的在於運用單根 (unit root) 與共整合檢定方法 (cointegration test) 測試Ohlson模型的時間序列特性,並且進一步使用分數共整合的方法來測試Ohlson模型,探討模型是否存在長期均衡關係。本研究以美國1994年第2季至2004年第4季共1352家公司為樣本。
實證結果發現:(1)多數樣本公司的市價與帳面價值是非定態的,更重要的是,在5% 信賴水準下,帳面價值和異常盈餘與市價呈現共整合僅佔全樣本的34.62%。(2) 使用Robinson的分數共整合分析方法後,共整合的比率大幅提昇,表示ohlson模型仍是成立的。
Ohlson (1995) model is the most pervasively and widely adopted model in the valuation models. However, we find cases where empirical research based on time-series data do not explicitly account for time-series properties of the Ohlson model. They are likely to have spurious regressions in the analytic process and affect the reliability of empirical results. The main purpose of this study is to apply unit root and cointegration test to examine time-series properties of the Ohlson model, and we further use the fractional cointegration method to test the Ohlson model and explore whether model exists the relation of long–term equilibrium. This study is based on a sample of 1352 firms, which complete data are available from second quarter of 1994 to the forth quarter of 2004.
Empirical results show that: (1) market value and book value are nonstationary for most of the sample firms. More importantly, book value and residual income cointegrate with market value for only 34.62 percent of the sample firms at the 0.05 level. (2) when we use a semiparametric frequency domain procedure of Robinson (1995), we find that the ratio of cointegration will widely elevate. It is represent that Ohlson model is still holding.
ABSTRACT-------------------------------------------------II
TABLE OF CONTENTS-----------------------------------------V
LIST OF TABLES------------------------------------------VII
LIST OF SYMBOLS----------------------------------------VIII
LIST OF ACRONTMS-----------------------------------------IX
1.Introduction--------------------------------------------1
2.Literature Review---------------------------------------3
2.1 The Ohlson (1995) Model-----------------------------3
2.2 Empirical Study of the Ohlson Model-----------------6
2.3 Empirical Study of the Fractional Cointegration-----7
3.Research Design-----------------------------------------9
3.1 Unit Root Test--------------------------------------9
3.2 Cointegration Test---------------------------------10
3.3 Fractional Differencing Modeling and Estimation----11
4.Sample Select and Variable Measurement-----------------14
4.1 Sample Select--------------------------------------14
4.2 Variable Measurement-------------------------------15
5.Empirical Result---------------------------------------16
5.1 Descriptive Statistics-----------------------------16
5.2 Tests for Stationary-------------------------------17
5.3 Tests for Cointegration----------------------------18
5.4 Tests for Fractional Cointegration-----------------19
6.Conclusion---------------------------------------------20
References-----------------------------------------------22
APPENDIX TABLES------------------------------------------25
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of the Sample------------26
Table 2. Autoregressive Properties and Augmented Dickey-Fuller Unit Root Test with No Trend----------------------27
Table 3. Regression and Cointegration Test-Ohlson model (1%)-----------------------------------------------------28
Table 4. Regression and Cointegration Test-Ohlson model (5%)-----------------------------------------------------29
Table 5. Interpretation of the d value-------------------30
Table 6. Gaussian Semiparametric Estimates of the Fractional Differencing Parameter d for- Ohlson model----31
Barkoulas, J.T., Baum, C.F., Caglayan, M., Chakraborty, A., 2000. Persistent Dependence in Foreign Exchange Rates? A Reexamination. Working Paper, 1-22
Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H., Hand, J.R.M., Landsman, W.R., 1999. Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values. Review of Accounting Studies 3, 205-229.
Beaver, W.H., 1999. Comments On An Empirical Assessment of The Residual Income Valuation Model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 35-42.
Bernard, V.L., 1995. The Feltham-Ohlson Framework: Implications for Empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 733-747.
Boutahar. M., Marimoutou. V., Nouira. L., 2005. The Effect of Taper On The Semiparametric Estimators In The Nonstationary long memory process. GREQAM, Univeraite de la Mediterranee 1-24
Callen, J.L., Morel, M., 2005. The Valuation Relevance of R&D Expenditures: Time Series Evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis 3, 304-325.
Caporale, GM., Gil-Alana, LA ., 2004. Fractional Cointegration and Real Exchange Rates. Review of Financial Economics 13, 327–340.
Cheung, Y.W., Lai, K.S., 1993. A Fractional Cointegration Analysis of Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11, 103-112.
Dechow, P.M., Hutton, A.P., Sloan, R.G.., 1999. An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 1-34.
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of American Statistical Association 74, 427-431.
Dickey, D. A., 1984. Stationarity Transformations in Vector Autoregressions, Proceedings of Business and Economic Statistics Section. American Statistical Assn, 171-174
Diebold, F.X., Husted, S., Rush, M., 1991. Real Exchange Rates Under the Gold Standard. Journal of Political Economy 99, 1252-1271.
Diebold, F.X., Rudebusch, G.D., 1991. On The Power of Dickey-Fuller Tests Against Fractional Alternatives. Economics Letters Vol. 35, 155-60.
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276.
Fama, E., Eugene, F., French, K., 1997. Industry Costs of Equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43, 153-193.
Frankel, R., Lee, C.M.C., 1998. Accounting Valuation Market Expectation and Cross-Sectional Stock Returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25, 283-319.
Friedman, B.M., Kuttner, K.N., 1992. Money, Income, Prices and Interest Rates. American Economic Review 82, 472-492.
Granger, C.W.J., Newbold, P., 1974. Spurious Regressions in Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2, 111-120.
Granger, C.W.J., 1986. Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables. Oxford Bulleting of Economics and Statistics 48, 213-228.
Hand, J.R., Landsman , W.R., 1998. Testing The Ohlson Model: V or not V, That is The Question. Working Paper, University of North Carolina.
Hand, J.R., Landsman, W.R., 2005. The Pricing of Dividends In Equity Valuation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32, 435-469
Hoffman, D.L., Rasche, R.H., Tieslau, M.A., 1995. The Stability of Long-Run Money Demand In Five Industrial Countries. Journal of Monetary Economics 35, 317-339.
Hosking, J.R.M., 1981. Fractional Differencing. Biometrika 68, 165 − 176.
Hurvich, C.M., Deo, R.S., Brodsky, J., 1998. The Mean Squared Error of Geweke and Porter-Hudak’s Estimator of the Memory Parameter of Aa Long-Memory Time Series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1, 19 − 46.
Jiang, J., Lee, B.S., 2005. An Empirical Test of The Accounting-Based Residual Income Model and the Traditional Present Value of Dividend Model. Journal of Business 78, 1465-1504
Johansen, S., 1988. Statistics Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.
Lee, C.M.C., Myers, J.N., Swaminathan, B., 1999. What is the Intrinsic Value of the Dow. Journal of Finance 54, 1693-1741.
Morel, M., 2003. Endogenous Parameter Time Series Estimation of the Ohlson Model: Linear and Nonlinear Analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30, 1341-1362
Myers, J.N., 1999. Implementing Residual Income Valuation with Linear Information Dynamics. The Accounting Review 74, 1-28.
Ohlson, J.A., 1995. Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Conte- porary Accounting research 11,661-687.
Penman, S. H., Sougiannis, T., 1998. A Comparison of Dividend, Cash Flow, and Earnings Approaches to Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15, 343-383.
Phillips, P.C.B., 1987. Time Series Regression with a Unit Root. Econometrica 55, 277-301.
Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a Unit Root. Econometrica 55, 277-301
Qi, D., Wu, Y.W., Xiang, B., 2000. Stationarity and Cointegration Tests of the Ohlson Model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Spring, 141-160.
Robinson, P.M., 1995. Gaussian Semiparametric Estimation of Long Range Dependence. Annals of Statistics 23, 1630-1661
Robinson, P. Henry, M., 1999. Long Memory Conditionally Heteroscedastic Errors In Semiparametric Estimation of Long Memory. working paper, Department of Economics, London School of Economics.
Said, S.E., Dickey, D.A., 1984. Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrica 71, 599-607.
Schwert, G., William., 1987. Effects of Model Specification on Tests for Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Data. Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 73-104.
Stober, T., 1996. Do Prices Behave As If Accounting Book Values Are Conservative? Cross-Sectional Tests of the Fetham-Ohlson (1995) Valuation Model. Working paper, Unversity of Notre Dame.
Walker, M., 1997. Clean Surplus Accounting Models and Market-Based Accounting Research: A Review. Journal of Accounting and Business Research 27, 341-355.
Villeneuve, J.F., Handa, J., 2006. Purchasing Power Parity as A Long-Term Memory Process: Evidence From Canada. Applied Financial Economics 16, 109-117
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊