中文部分
1. 王淑慧(1998),「產品種類、品牌知名度、參考價格與涉入程度對消費者購買意願的影響」,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。2.古永嘉、張威龍(2000),「社會期望反應偏差對負面消費者行為研究的影響:以物質傾向為例的間接量表驗證」,企業管理學報,46,49-76。3.李天蛟(1999),「世代別於品牌個性認知與品牌關係型態差異性之研究:產品類別與自我形象干擾效果之探討」,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。4. 吳明隆(2000),「SPSS 統計應用實務」,松崗電腦圖書。
5.邱皓政(2002),「量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析」,五南圖書出版有限公司。
6.林靈宏(1993),「消費品類型、創新類型與新產品行銷策略關係研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。7.林靈宏(2000),「消費者行為學」,五南圖書出版有限公司。
8.林妙冠(2002),「臺灣花卉產品分類與其行銷策略之研究-以中部四縣市為例」,朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文9.徐千田(1988),「青少年消費參與程度相關研究」,國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。10.徐達光(2004),「消費者心理學」,東華書局。
11.徐達光(1997),「物質主義:概念的發展與測量」,國家科學委員會專題研究報告。
12.徐心怡(1999),「消費者促銷知覺價值與促銷偏好程度之研究-產品類別干擾效果之探討」,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。13.楊世瑩(2005),「SPSS統計分析實務」,旗標出版股份有限公司。
14.張淑青(2000),「價格知覺對顧客滿意影響之研究-以觀光旅遊為例」,國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。15.張威龍(1988),「青少年家庭溝通型態對物質主義和強迫性購物之影響研究」,政大管理評論,第十八卷 第二期,87-117。16.張威龍(2000),「虛榮特性、物質傾向與強迫性購買關係之研究」,國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。17.國語辭典(1998.4),教育部國語推行委員會編錄。
18.曹俊漢(1990),「研究報告寫作手冊」,聯經出版事業公司。
19.蔡東峻、李奇勳,「消費者特性與網際網路購物意願關係之研究」,管理學報第十六卷第四期,民國88 年,頁557-580。20.鄧博伊(2001),「消費者購物導向、產品種類對網際網路購買意願影響之研究」。國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
21.謝千之(2000),「產品資訊情境、參考價格與知覺品質對消費者購買行為之影響」,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士論文。英文部分
1.Aspinwall,L.V. (1958).”The Characteristics of Goods and Parallel System Theories,” Managerial Marketing, E. J. Kelley and W.Lazer , eds., Homewood , I11:R.D. Irwin , pp.434-450.
2.Bucklin,L.P.(1962).”Retail Strategy and the Classification of Consumer Goods,Journal of Marketing,27,January,pp.282-289.
3.Daun, A. (1983),“The Materialistic Life – Style: Some Sociopsychological Aspects,” in Consumer Behavior and Environmental Quality, ed. Liisa Uusitalo, New York: St. Martin’s, pp.6-16.
4. Engel, J. F. and Blackwell, R. D. (1984), Consumer Behavior, Dryder Press , pp. 687-690.
5. Engel, J.F., R. D. Blackwell, and P. W. Miniard (1995), Consumer Behavior, 8th
edition Dryden Press
6. Erickson, Johansson and Chao (1984),“Image Variables in Multi-Attribute Product
Evaluations: Country-of-Origin Effects,“ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.
11(September), pp.694-699
7. Holbrook,M.B. and J.A.Howard(1977).”Frequently Purchased Nonduration Goods and Swrvicwsw,”in R.Ferber,ed.,Selected Aspects of Consumer Behavior:A Summary from the Perspective of Different Disciplines,Washington,DC National Science Foundation,Directorate for Researcsh Applications,Research Applied to National
Needs,pp.189-222.
8. Issues in Buyers’ Processing of Price Information,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, pp.207-225.
9. Kotler, Philip. (1984), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 8th ed., Prentice-Hall Inc.
10. Kotler, Philip, (1991), “Marketing Management” 7th, Prentice-Hall,p.171.
11. Kotler, P & Levy, S.J.(1971). “Demarketing, yes, Demarketing”, Harvard
Business Review, Vol.49(6), P74-80.
12. Monroe, Kent B. and R. Krishnan(1985), ” The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,”In Perceived Quality, J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexington, MA Lexington Books, pp.209-232.
13.. Monroe, Kent B.(1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decision, 2nd edition , New York, Mcgraw-Hill.
14. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product
Evaluation,” In Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise.
Eds. Jacob and Jerry C. OlsonLexington. MA: Lexington Books, pp.209-232.
15.Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Olshavsky, Richard N. and John A. Miller (1972), “Consumer Expectations, Product
Performance, and Perceived Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.9,
February, pp.19-21.
17. Olsavsky, Richard W.(1985), “Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision Making:
An Integrated Theoretical Perspective,”In Perceived Quality, Jacoby, J. Olson(eds.)
Lexington, MA:Lexington Books, pp.3-29.
18. Richins, M. L. and S. Dawson (1992),“A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement:Scale Development and Validation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (December), pp.303-316.
19.Solomon, M.R. (1985), The Psychology of Fashion. Lexington, MA: Heath.
20.Solomon, (1992), Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being, Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12, pp.341-352.