參考文獻:
中文部份
1.丁文玲(民84)。我國國立大學經營規模之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
2.丁志達(民92)。績效管理。台北:楊智文化。
3.王保進(民82)。高等教育表現指標之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。4.王保進(民85a)。評鑑高等教育表現指標可行模式之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學。6(1),127-147。
5.王保進(民85b)。教育指標基本概念之研究。教育研究資訊,4(3),1-17。6.王保進(民86)。大學教育評鑑之內涵分析。陳漢強主編,大學評鑑。台北:五南書局,161-218。
7.王保進(民91)。評鑑高等教育表現指標可行模式之研究。
8.王媛慧、李文福(民95)。我國大學院校技術效率之研究-資料包絡分析法的應用。輔仁管理評論,13(1),163-186。9.內政部統計處網站(民95)。取自
http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp.
10.司徒達賢(民88)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北:天下文化出版。
11.江明修(民83)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北:天下文化出版。
12.吳清山(民81)。學校效能研究。台北:五南圖書公司。
13.吳明清(民86)。大學教育學程及其評鑑。陳漢強主編,大學評鑑。台北:五南書局。327-368。
14.吳清山(民91)。提昇學校競爭力的理念與策略。臺灣教育育,613,2-10。15.吳明隆(民95)。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計(第二版)。台北:知城出版社。
16.吳萬益(民95)。企業研究方法(第二版)。台北:華泰書局。
17.呂怡璇(民93)。私立大學校院經營績效與教育部獎補助款之關聯性研究。中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。18.李友錚、賀力行(民93)。品質管理整合性思維。台北:前程企業管理公司。
19.李宜芳(民89)。教育部補助與公、私立大學辦學績效之評估。台北大學財政研究所碩士論文。20.李漢雄(民89)。人力資源策略管理。台北:楊智文化書局。
21.邱皓政(民92)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南書局。
22.林天佑(民86)。學校經營與教育品質。台北:現代教育論壇。
23.林如貞、田效文、張婷婷、陳元和(民93)。應用AHP探討技專校院經營績效指標。商管科技季刊,6(1),93-109。24.林志重、何猷賓(民95)。學生來源空間結構與大學競爭力相關之研究。教育政策論壇,9(1),71-91。25.林登雄(民90)。建構企業整合績效評估新模式-以提昇企業診斷能力。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。26.林容萱(民92)。台灣地區科技大學效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用。國民教育研究集刊,9,179-205。
27.林俐孜(民93)。大學校院績效評鑑指標建構。中原大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。28.周祝瑛(民88)。大陸高等教育問題研究:兼論台灣相關議題。台北:師大書苑。
29.馬信行(民86)。大學評鑑指標適切性之評析。陳漢強主編,大學評鑑。台北:五南書局,101-154。
30.姜波英(民92)。我國國立大學經營效率之探討。政治大學行政管理研究所碩士論文。31.洪鉦皓(民93)。臺灣地區高等技職院校之效率評估。臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。32.邵鳳卿(民95)。私立醫學大學經營績效評估之研究-資料包絡分析法之應用。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。33.范楊哠、梁金盛、吳曼阡(民95)。教育部獎補助私立技專校院發展經費研究。教育政策論壇,9(2),77-100。
34.高教簡訊(民93)。人口結構變化對高等教育及技職教育的影響及因應對策總結報告,162期。
35.財團法人高等教育評鑑中心基金會(民95)。大學校院系所評鑑實施計畫。http://www.heeact.org.tw,中華民國95年3月31日。
36.晏涵文、馮嘉玉、劉潔心(民95)。我國學校環境教育指標之研究。師大學報(教育類),51(1),91-122。
37.孫志麟(民87)。國民教育指標的建立及應用。政治大學教育研究所博士論文。38.孫志麟(民89)。教育指標的概念模式。教育政策論壇,3(1),117-136。39.張力允(民88)。我國公私立大學校院經營績效之比較研究。國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。40.張保隆、陳文賢、蔣明晃、姜齊、盧昆宏、王瑞深(民95)。生產管理(第三版)。台北:華泰書局。
41.張瑞濱(民92)。我國私立技術學院經營效率之研究。中華大學工程管理研究所博士論文。42.張潤書(民79)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
43.梅瑤芳(民94)。技術學院績效指標之發展研究。台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所博士論文。44.陳伯璋、侯永琪(民92)。美國大學學術聲譽排名指標之研究-以美國新聞與世界報導為例。教育研究月刊,116,77-96。45.陳伯璋、蓋浙生(民94)。新世紀高等教育政策與行政。台北:高等教育文化事業公司。
46.陳美菁、陳建勝(民92)。我國高等技職校院辦學績效之研究。商管科技季刊,4(3),261-280。47.陳鎰明(民92)。我國大專體育評鑑指標建構之研究。臺灣師範大學體育研究所博士論文。48.曾榮祥(民94)。學校經營效能指標建構與應用之研究:以平衡計分卡管理策略為依據。高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。49.康龍魁、許順發,(民93)。技專院校經營效率評鑑指標建構的研究。教育政策論壇,7(1),59-82。50.黃政傑、李隆盛(民87)。大學校務綜合評鑑指標建構之研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心專題研究成果報告,研究編號:137。
51.黃政傑(民90)。大學教育改革。台北:師大書苑。
52.黃義中(民91)。大學的經營績效與品質。逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。53.蓋浙生(民91)。高等教育經營管理。台北:師大書苑。
54.蓋浙生(民92)。我國高等教育財政改革計畫:挑戰與回應。教育研究資訊,11(1),23-47。55.教育部(民88)。地區性國立大學院校整併試辦計畫。
56.教育部(民90),大學教育政策白皮書。台北。
57.教育部(民95)。中華民國教育概況。
58.教育部統計處(民95)。取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/Web/STATISTICS/home.htm
59.教育部技職司(民95)。取自http://www.tve.edu.tw/new/index.asp
60.梅興邦(民90)。資料包絡分析法應用於軍事院校系(所)辦學成效評估之研究-以國防大學國防管理學院為例。國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。61.葉至誠(民91)。高等教育發展的策略與願景。台北:揚智文化。
62.郭昭佑(民89)。學校本位評鑑。台北:五南書局。
63.郭振雄(民89)。多重生產程序之績效評估:我國大學院校效率衡量。臺灣大學會計學研究所博士論文。64.郭峻韶(民92)。台灣地區公私立大學院校之效率差異研究-應用調整環境變數與干擾項之資料包絡法。東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。65.彭森明(民95)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究。教育部委託專案研究計畫成果報告,專案編號:94A1004EI。
66.湯堯(民90)。學校經營管理策略:大學經費分配、募款與行銷。台北:五南書局。
67.湯堯(民91)。論述高等教育經營策略分析:以內部品保系統與外部標竿系統之建立為例。教育研究資訊,10(5),1-27。68.湯堯、成群豪(民93)。高等教育經營。台北:高等教育文化事業有限公司。
69.歐進士、林秋萍(民89)。我國國立大學校長由官派改為遴選制對大學經營效率之影響。中山管理評論,8(2),213-248。70.賴仁基(民86)。我國綜合大學效率差異之衡量-資料包絡分析法的應用。國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。71.盧永祥(民94)。臺灣高等技職院校成本結構與經營效率之分析-考量產出品質及組織特性。臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所博士論文。72.蔡淑如(民92)。以資料包絡分析法評估科技大學之辦學績效。朝陽科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。73.潘惠靜(民90)。教育獎補助經費對私立大學辦學績效之研究。中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。74.楊錦洲(民91)。服務業品質管理。台北:品質管理學會。
75.楊錦洲(民93)。策略創造優勢。台北:中國生產力中心。
76.楊錦洲(民94)。績效經營管理。中原大學工業工程研究所上課講義。
77.傅和彥、黃士滔(民93)。品質管理觀念、理論與方法。台北:前程企管。
78.蘇錦麗(民86)。高等教育評鑑:理論與實務。台北市:五南圖書。
79.劉莉貞(民93)。技職教育指標多準則評估體系之建構與應用。銘傳大學管理科學研究所博士論文。80.劉雅芳(民93)。台灣地區私立技術學院經營效率之評估。世新大學經濟研究所碩士論文。81.劉耀武(民81)。台灣省政府試辦行政生產力衡量工作之研究。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會,研究編號:30174810041。
82.鄭淑芳(民87)。國立大學校院相對效率之研究-使用資料包絡分析法」。國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。83.羅正忠(民75)。現行教育規模經濟之研究。國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
84.簡茂發、李琪明(民90)。我國教育指標系統之發展與建構。台北:學富文化公司。
85.戴曉霞(民89)。高等教育的大眾化與市場化。台北:楊智文化公司。
86.戴曉霞(民92)。高等教育整併之國際比較。教育研究集刊,49(2),141-173。87.魏駿吉(民91)。財務自主性對學校經營效率影響之研究-以我國國立大學校院校務基金為例。東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。英文部分
1.Adelman, C., & Alexander, R. J. (1982). The self-evaluation institution: Practice of educational change. London: Methuen.
2.Ahn, T., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1988). Some Statistical and DEA Evaluation of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institution of Higher Learning, Socio-Econ. 22(6): 259-269.
3.Alavi, M., & Carlson, P. (1992). A review of mis research and disciplinary development, Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(4), 45-62.
4.Anderson, V. (1991). Alternative economic indicator. London: Routledge.
5.Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiency of Australian university through data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 35(1), 57-80.
6.Babbar, S. (1992). A dynamic model for continuous improvement in the management of service quality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12(2), 38–48.
7.Bailey, K. D. (1993). Methods of Social Research, (4rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
8.Barak, R. J., & Berdahl, R. O. (1978). State level academic: Within and without. Colorado: Education Commission of Colorado.
9.Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Landon: Open University Press.
10.Belanger, C. H., & Tremblay, L. (1982). A methodological approach to selective cutbacks. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 12, 325-335.
11.Berdie, D. R. (1994). Reassessing the Value of High Response Rates to Mail Surveys, Marketing Research, 1(3), pp.52-64
12.Bostingl, (1992). An Introduction to Total Quality Management in Education. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13.Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: Open University.
14.Brignall, T. J., Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., & Silvestro, R. (1991). Performance measurement in service business, Financial Management, 69(10), 34-36.
15.Brooks, W. K., & Coleman, G. D. (2003). Evaluating key performance indicators used to drive contractor behavior at AEDC. Engineering Management Journal 15(4), 29-39.
16.Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance, Productivity, Inc., Portland, OR.
17.Brown, R. (2000). The new UK quality framework. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(4), 323-342.
18.Chase, R.B. (1978). Where does the customer fit in a service operation? Harvard Business Review, November-December, 56(6), 137-142.
19.Casu, B., & Thanassoulis, E. (2006). Evaluating cost efficiency in central administrative services in UK universities. Omega, 34(5), 417-426.
20.Cave, M., Hanney, S., & Kogan, M. (1991). The use of performance indicators in higher education: A critical analysis of development in practice (2th ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
21.Cave, M., Hanney, S., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: A critical analysis of development in practice (3th ed.), London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
22.Chen, S. H., & Yang, C. C. (2004). Applications of Web-QFD and E-Delphi method in the higher education system. Human Systems Management, 23, 245–256.
23.Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., & Shiau, J. Y. (2005). Equipment management in higher education using a WLAN framework. Human Systems Management, 24, 209–214.
24.Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., & Shiau, J. Y. (2006a). The application of balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 190-205.
25.Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Shiau, J. Y. & Wang, H. H. (2006b). The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18 (5), 484-500.
26.Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Lin, W. T., & Yeh, T. M. (2007). Service quality attributes determine improvement priority. The TQM Magazine, 19(2), 162-175.
27.Climaco, C. (1992). Getting to know schools using performance indicators: Criteria, indicators and process. Educational Review, 44(3), 295-308.
28.Cochran, P. A., & Hengstler, D. D. (1984). Political process in an academic audit: Linking evaluation information to programmatic decisions. Research in higher education, 10, 181-192.
29.Colbert, A. C., Levary, R. R. & Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA program using DEA, European Journal of Operational Research. 125, 656-669.
30.Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2004). Benchmarking best NPD practices—III, Research Technology Management. 47(6), 43-55.
31.Cuenin, S. (1986). International study of the development of performance indicators in higher education, paper presented at OECD, IMHE Project, Special Topic Workshop.
32.Cuieford, J. P., (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. 4th Edition, McGraw Hill.
33.Cuttance, P. (1990). Performance Indicators and the Management of Quality in Education. EDRS ED333575.
34.CVCP/UGC (1986). Performance Indicators in Universities: A first statement by joint CVCP/UGC Working Group, London.
35.Davis, & Cosnza, (1993). Business Research for Decision Marking, (3rd ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
36.DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. (Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 26), Newbury Park: Sage
37.Donald, J. G. (1984). Quality indicator for faculty evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 9, 41-52.
38.Dowlatshahi, S. (1992). Purchasing’s role in a concurrent engineering environment. Journal of Supply Chain Management 28(1), 21-25.
39.Dowlatshahi, S. (1996). The role of logistics in concurrent engineering. International Journal of Production Economics 44, 189-199.
40.Dowlatshahi, S. (1997). The role of product design in designer-buyer-supplier interface. Production Planning & Control 8 (6), 522-532.
41.Dowlatshahi, S., (1999). A modeling approach to logistics in concurrent engineering. European Journal of Operation Research 115, 59-76.
42.Dowlatshahi, S. (2000). Designer-buyer-supplier interface: Theory versus practice. International Journal of Production Economics 63, 111-130.
43.Dowlatshahi, S. (2001a). Product life cycle analysis: a goal programming approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52, 1201-1214.
44.Dowlatshahi, S. (2001b). The role of product safety and liability in concurrent engineering. Computer and Industrial Engineering 41, 187-209.
45.Downey, C. J., Frase, L. E., & Peters, J. J. (1994). The Quality Education Challenge, Corwin Press, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
46.Druker, P. F. (1990). Managing the Non-profit organization: Principles and practices. New York, HarperBuness
47.Easton, P. A., et al., (1993). Collaborative Design of Educational Indicator System in Developing Countries: An Interview Report an IEES Project Initiative. (ERIC Document Reproduct Service NO. ED 367321).
48.EFQM Excellence Model (2006). Available online at:
http://www.efqm.org/Default.aspx?tabid=35
49.Elliott, E. J. (1991). Education courts: An indicator system to monitor the nation’s educational health. Washington, DC: Acting Commissioner of Education Statistics.
50.Emrouznejad, A. & Thanassoulis, E. (2005). A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation 160, 363–378.
51.Fandel, G., (2007). On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Government s redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures, European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521-533.
52.Farhoomand, A. F. (1987). Scientific progress of management information systems, Date Base, Summer 48-56.
53.Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1996). Monitoring Education-Indicators, quality and effectiveness. London, Cassell.
54.Frackmann, E. (1987). Lessons to learn from a decade of discussions of performance indicators. International Journal of Institutional Management of higher education, 11, 149-162.
55.Fox, W. (1994). Higher education policy in California. In Goedegebuure, L. Kaiser, F. Maassen, P. Meek, L, van Vught, F. & de Weert, E. (Eds.). Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
56.Gay, L. R. (1992) Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application, (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
57.Glass, J. C., Mckillop, D. G., & O’Roruke, G. (1998). A Cost Indirect Evaluation of Productivity Change in UK University, Journal of Productivity Analysis. 10: 153-175.
58.Goertz, M. E., & King, B. (1989). Developing a state education indicator system in Missouri. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
59.Green, D. (1994). Trends and issues. In A. Craft (Ed.). International developments in assuring quality in higher education (168-177). Landon: The Falmer Press.
60.Haksever, C., & Muragishi, Y. (1998). Measuring Value in MBA Programmers, Education Economics. 6: 11-25.
61.Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering Work – Don’t automate obliterate, Harvard Business Review, 68 (4), 1-7.
62.Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2003). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business, NY.
63.Hattie, J. (1990). Performance indicators in education. Australian Journal of Education, 34, 249-276.
64.Hides, T. M., Davies, J., & Jackson, S. (2004). Implementation of EFQM Excellence model self-assessment in the UK higher education sector – lessons learned from other sectors. The TQM Magazine, 16(3), 194-201.
65.Hopkins, D., & Leask, M. (1989). Performance indicator and school development. School Organization, 9(1), 3-20.
66.Hung Y. H., Huang M. L., & Chen K. S. (2003). Service quality evaluation by service quality performance matrix. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 14(1), 79-89.
67.Jaraiedi, M., & Ritz, D. (1994). Total Quality Management applied to engineering education, Quality Assurance in Education, 2(1), 32-40.
68.Jackson, S. (2001). Using the EFQM Excellence Model within Health Care: A Practical Guide to Success, Kingsham Press, Chichester.
69.Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Oxford Economic Paper. 45:332-347.
70.Johnstone, J. N. (1981). Indicators of Education Systems, London: Kogan Page Press.
71.Johnes, G. (1988). Research performance indicators in the university sector. Higher Education Quarterly, 42,52-71.
72.Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in Higher Education: UK Universities. Buckingham. UK: SRHE & Oper University.
73.Johnson, J. H. (1993). Total Quality Management in Education, Oregon School Study Council.
74.Johnes, J. (1996). Theory and methodology performance assessment in the higher education. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 18-33
75.Jr Osseo-Asare, E. A. & Longbottom, D. (2002). The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 26-36.
76.Kanji, G. K., & Tambi, A. M. B. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 10(1), 129-153.
77.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71-79.
78.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (1996a). The Balanced Scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
79.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (1996b). Linking the Balanced Scorecard to strategy. California management review, 39(1), 53-79.
80.Kaplan, P. S., & Norton D. P. (2001a). The strategy-focused organization: How Balanced Scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
81.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (2001b). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: PartⅠ. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
82.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (2001c). Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: PartⅡ. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160.
83.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
84.Kaoa, C., & Hungb, H. T. (2006). Efciency analysis of university departments: An empirical study. Omega, accepted 7 February 2006, Available online at: www.elsevier.com/locate/omega
85.Kast, F E., & Rosenzweug, J. E. (1985). Organization & Management: A system and contingency approach, 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
86.Katouzian, M. A. (1970). The development of the service sector: A new approach. Oxford economic papers Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
87.Kell, H. R. (1992). Purposes and means in higher education evaluation. Higher Education Management, 4 (1), 91-103.
88.Kuo, T.C., Huang, S. H., & Zhang, H. C. (2001). Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 41, 241-260.
89.Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1995). Quality and economies of scale in higher education. Applied Economics, 15, 323-340; 27, 773-778.
90.Kotler, P., & Fox, K. F. A. (1994). Strategic Marketing for Education Institutions. Englewood Cliffs N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
91.Lembcke, B. A. (1994). Organizational performance measures: the vital signs of TQM investments. New Directions for Higher Education, 86, Summer.
92.Lewis, R. G., & Smith, D. H. (1993). Total Quality in Higher Education, 92-93.
93.Lin, W. T., Chen, S. C., Jang, H. F., & Wu, H. H. (2006). Performance evaluation of introducing QS-9000 to the Taiwanese semiconductor industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27, 1011-1020.
94.Madden, G., Savage, S., & Kemp, S. (1997). Measuring Public Sector Efficiency: A Study of Economics Department at Australian Universities, Education Economics. 5(2), 153-168.
95.Madu, C. N., Kuei, C. H., & Winokur, D. (1994). TQM in the university: a Quality code of honor. Total Quality Management. 5/6, 375-90.
96.Mayston, D. J., & Jesson, D. J. (1991). Educational performance assessment: A new framework of analysis. Policy and Politics, 19, 99-108.
97.MBNAQ (2006). Available online at: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/eduhome.htm
98.Michel, J. L. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. Int. J. Production Economics, 41, 23-35.
99.Montgomery, D. C. (1991). Statistical Quality Control, (2rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
100.Morse, & Flanigan (2002). Available online at:
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/about/02cbrank.htm
101.National Agency for Higher Education in Sweden (2001a). Annual Report.
102.Nebeker, D., Licia, B., Philipp, D., Werenfels, H. D., Agnieszka, C., & Bernardo, F. (2001). Airline station performance as a function of employee satisfaction, Journal of Quality Management, 6, 29-45.
103.Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced Scorecard Step by Step. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
104.Nuttall, D. (1992). The functions and limitations of international education indicators. In OEAD/CERI (Ed.). The OEAD international education indicators- A framework for analysis (pp.13-23). Paris: OEAD/CERI.
105.Oakes, J. (1986). Educational Indicators: A Guide for Policymakers. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Policy Research in Education.
106.Oakland, J. S. (1999). Total Organizational Excellent, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
107.Odden, A. (1990). Educational indictors in the United States: The need for analysis. Educational Research, June-July, 24-29.
108.Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). Quality in higher education-a survey. Total Quality Management, 7(2), 161-171.
109.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
110.Parker, J. (1993). An ABC guide to business process reengineering, Industrial Engineering, 25(5), 52-53.
111.Perkins, J. A. (1973). The university as an organization. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
112.Plomp, T., Huijsman, H., & kluyfhout, E. (1992). Monitoring in education development projects: The development of a monitoring system. International Journal Educational Development, 12(1), 65-73.
113.Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13-29.
114.Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150.
115.Rosairo, L. M., & Knight, W. A. (1989). Design for assembly analysis: extraction of features from a CAD system database. Annals of CIRP 38 (1), 13.
116.Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49, 13~25.
117.Sallinen, A., Konttinen, R., & Panhelainen, M. (1994). Interactive model of self- evaluation quality Assessment at the University of Jyvaskla: A pilot study. Higher Education Management, 6(3), 348-375.
118.Sallies, E., & Hingley, P. (1991). College quality assurance system. Mendip Papers 020. The Further Education Staff College, England. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED342323).
119.Sallis, E. (1993). Total Quality Management in Education. London; Philadelphia Kogan Page.
120.Sahney, S., Banwet, D. K., & Karunes, S., (2004). Conceptualizing total quality management in higher education. The TQM Magazine, 16(2), 145-159.
121.Scheerens, J., Stoel, W. G., Vermeulen, C. J., & Pelgrum, W. J. (1988). The feasibility of a system of educational indicators for elementary and secondary education. Center for Applied Educational Research, OCTO, University of Twente, Enschede.
122.Scheerens, J. (1991). Process indicator of school functioning: A selection based on the research literature on school effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17, 371-403.
123.Schumacher, S., & Cauley, K. (1990). Data-based teacher education evaluation: Toward an indicator system of program quality. Commonwealth Univ.
124.Shattock, M. (1991). The evaluation of university contribution to society. In U. Dahllof, J. Harris, M. Shattock, A. Ataropoli, & R. in'tVeld (Eds.), Dimensions of evaluation in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
125.Shavelson, R., McDonnell, L., Oakes, J., & Carey, N. (1987). Indicator Systems for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
126.Shavelson, R., McDonnell, L., & Oakes, J. (1991). What are educational indicators and indicators system? ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED338 701.
127.Smith, M. (1988). Educational indicators. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 487-491.
128.Soares De Mello, J. C. C. B., Gomes, E. G., Meza, L. A., Soares de Mello, M. H., & Soares de Mello, A. J. (2006). Engineering post-graduate programmes: A quality and productivity analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 136-152.
129.Spanbauer, S. J. (1995). Reactivating higher education with total quality management: using quality and productivity concepts, techniques and tools to improve higher education. Total Quality Management, 6(5/6), 519-538.
130.Spee, A., & Bormans, R. (1992). Performance indicators in government institutional relations: The conceptual framework. Higher Education Management, 4 (2), 139-155.
131.Staropoli, A. (1991). Institutional evaluation: The role of the main actors in the higher education. In U. Dahllof, J. Harres, M. Shattock, A. Ataropoli, & R. in’t Veld (Eds.), Dimensions of evaluation in the higher education (pp. 43-56) Landon: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
132.Statistics Canada (2005). Consolidated Federal, Provincial, Territorial and Local Government Revenue and Expenditure, available at: www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/govt01b.htm
133.Stufflebeam, (1982). Explorations in the evaluation of teacher education. In S. M. Hord (Eds) Toward usable strategies for teacher education program evaluation (pp.131-168). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
134.Storey, A. (2002). Performance management in schools: could Balanced Scorecard help? School Leadership & Management, 22(3), 321-338.
135.Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E. A., & Hsiang, T. C. (1989). Quality Engineering in Production Systems, New York, McGraw-Hill.
136.Tang, K. H., & Zairi M. (1998). Benchmarking quality implementation in a service context; A comparative analysis of financial services and institutions of higher education: Part II. Total Quality Management, 9(7), 539-552.
137.Taylar, J. (2001). Improving Performance Indicators in Higher Education: the academics’ perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 379-393.
138.Thursby, J., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31, 109–124.
139.Trow, M. (1973). The expansion and transformation of high education. New York: General Learning Press.
140.van Herpen, M. (1992). Conceptual Models in Use for Education Indicators, in OECD (Ed.), International Education Indicator: A Framework for Analysis, Paris: OECD, 25-51.
141.Whitman, N., & Weiss, E. (1982). Faculty evaluation: The use of explicit criteria promotion, retention, and tenure. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
142.Windham, D. M. (1988). Improving the Efficiency of Educational System: Indicators of Educational Effectiveness and Efficiency, Albany: State University of New York.
143.Wiklund, H., Klefsjo, B., Wiklund, P. S., & Edvardsson, B. (2003). Innovation and TQM in Swedish higher education institutions– possibilities and pitfalls, The TQM Magazine, 15(2), 99-107.
144.Woo, A. (1997). Balanced Scorecard transfer into action strategy (I), Accounting Research Monthly Magazine 134, 133-139.
145.Yang, C. C. (2003a). Improvement actions based on the customers’ satisfaction survey, TQM & Business Excellence, 14(8), October, 919–930.
146.Yang, C. C. (2003b). Establishment and applications of the integrated model of the measurement of service quality. Managing Service Quality, 13(4), 310-24.
147.Yang, C. C., Chen, S. H., & Shiau, J. Y. (2007). A DFX and concurrent engineering model for the establishment of a new department in a university, International Journal of Production Economics, 107, 179-189.
148.Zikmund, W. K. (1999). Business Research Methods, (6rd ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.