臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究參照 (Shang, and Marlow, 2005)有關「在台灣主要製造業的物流能力與績效」研究中以台灣前1,200大企業以結構方程式驗證物流績效與財務績效之概念性研究架構。本研究蒐集國內外相關文獻並經探討；並針對我國工業之特性（中小企業為主體）而選擇以工業區、加工出口區、科學工業園區進駐主要廠商為樣本進行實證探討。透過因素與信度分析、Pearson相關係數檢定、逐步多元迴歸分析以及路徑分析，探討台灣工業區廠商在資訊整合能力、標竿能力、彈性能力與物流績效對財務績效間之相互影響關係。本研究之實證發現如下：
一、 資訊整合能力、標竿能力及彈性能力與物流績效等因子構面與模式中財務績效之兩兩構面間，均呈現顯著的相關性。
二、 資訊整合能力對標竿能力、彈性能力與物流績效，均具有顯著影響性。
三、 資訊整合能力、標竿能力及彈性能力對於物流績效，均具有顯著影響性，而其中以彈性能力之解釋能力為最高。
四、 資訊整合能力對財務績效無直接顯著的影響性，但是其透過中間變項標竿能力及彈性能力與物流績效而間接影響財務績效；而標竿能力及彈性能力與物流績效對財務績效具有直接影響性，其中以標竿能力對財務績效的影響性為最高。

The conceptual framework of this study is based on the framework for Logistics capability and performance in Taiwan’s major manufacturing firms (Shang, and Marlow, 2005) to test and verify how benchmarking, information-based capability, flexibility and logistics performance to influence financial performance.
According to the conceptual framework, hypotheses and objectives, by way of factor analysis, validity and reliability analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient test, stepwise regression analysis and path analysis, the major findings were as follows:.
1. Each paired dimension of benchmarking, information-based capability, flexibility, logistics performance and financial performance of this study was significantly correlated.
2. Information-based capability has significant effectiveness to benchmarking, flexibility and logistics performance.
3. Benchmarking, information-based capability and flexibility have significant effectiveness to logistics performance, and flexibility has the most interpretation power to logistics performance.
4. Information-based capability has no significant effectiveness directly on financial performance, but it does have significant effectiveness on financial performance indirectly through logistics performance, benchmarking and flexibility; both of benchmarking and flexibility have significant effectiveness directly on financial performance, and benchmarking exerts the most influence on financial performances.

摘要---------------------------------------------------III
Abstract------------------------------------------------IV
誌謝----------------------------------------------------VI
目錄---------------------------------------------------VII
表目錄-------------------------------------------------VII
圖目錄-------------------------------------------------VII
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機-------------------------------------1
第二節 研究目的-------------------------------------------8
第三節 研究流程-------------------------------------------9
第四節 研究範圍與限制------------------------------------12
第五節 論文架構------------------------------------------12

第二章 文獻探討
第一節資 訊整合能力--------------------------------------13
第二節 標竿能力------------------------------------------14
第三節 彈性能力------------------------------------------18
第四節 物流績效------------------------------------------20
第五節 財務績效------------------------------------------28

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構------------------------------------------31
第二節 研究假說------------------------------------------32
第三節 研究步驟------------------------------------------34
第四節 問卷設計------------------------------------------36
第五節 各構面操作型定義----------------------------------37
第六節 資料分析方法--------------------------------------40

第四章 實證分析
第一節 回收樣本結構--------------------------------------48
第二節 因素與信度分析------------ -----------------------54
第三節 相關分析------------------------------------------59
第四節 線性回歸分析--------------------------------------61
第五節 路徑分析------------------------------------------64

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論----------------------------------------------70
第二節 研究貢獻------------------------------------------72
第三節 後續研究與建議------------------------------------74
參考文獻-------------------------------------------------75

一、中文部分
1.蘇雄義，『物流與運籌管理—觀念、機能及整合』，東華書局，台北 (1989)。
2.管康彥，「超越顛峰的管理」，「標竿管理—向企業典範借鏡」序文：天下出版社，台北 (1996)。
3.李鴻毅，土地法論。中國地政研究所 (1996)。
4.黃仁安，貨物運輸與物流，國際商業物流管理研討會論文集(1996)。
5.廖森貴，「物流能力與組織績效關係之研究」，台北科技大學學報，32期，第299-312頁（1999）。
6.李明勇，研發彈性能力、製造彈性能力與競爭優勢之關係研究－台 灣科技產業之實證，私立銘傳大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文（2000）。
7.張世佳、楊振隆。製造彈性能力與產品策略關係之實證研究-以主機板產業為例，8 卷 1 期：61-78（2000）。
8.黃俊英，多變量分析：中國經濟企業研究所，台北，第223-235頁 (2000)。
9.張世佳、林能白，產品彈性能力決定因素之實證研究，管理評論 ，20 卷 1 期：第99-128頁（2001）。
10.張世佳，環境因素不確定性對製造彈性能力之影響關係研究 －台灣 資訊產業為例，中山管理評論，9 卷 1 期：第111-133頁（2001）。
11.陳國超、薛竣文、黃瀛東，淺談歐美與國內科技工業區之差異。工業簡訊， 31（ 12 ），第57-61頁 (2001)。
12.柯大鈞，新竹科學工業園區對周遭工業區影響之研究。中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士班未出版碩士論文，新竹(2001)。
13.林傑斌、陳湘、劉明德，SPSS11 統計分析實務設計寶典，博碩文化公司，台北 (2002)。
14.呂長民，行銷研究-研究方法與實例應用（四版三刷），前程企業管理有限公司，台北（2002）。
15.吳明隆，SPSS統計應用實務，松崗電腦圖書公司，台北 (2003)。
16.陳建男，電子商務伙伴關係供應鏈管理與競爭優勢之關係-以台灣高科技產業為例，長榮大學經營管理研究所未出版論文，台南（2003）。
17.桑國中，物流整合能力與績效在台灣製造業的實證研究航運季刊 第三卷第一期，第91-117頁（2004）。
18.邱皓政，結構方程模式LISREL的理論、技術與應用，雙業書廊有限公司，台北 (2004)。
19.經濟部統計處「工業生產統計」；http://www.moea.gov.tw (2006)。
20.經濟部工業局；http://www.moea.gov.tw (2006)。
21.經濟部投資處；http://www.moea.gov.tw (2006)。
22.科學工業園區管理局，「園區25週年回顧」，http://www.sipa.gov.tw/industry/develop.html (2006)。
23.南部科學工業園區管理局，http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/web/indexGroupsfrontTarget =DEFAULT（2006）。
24.中部科學工業園區開發籌備，處http://www.ctsp.gov.tw（2006）。
25.經濟部統計處「工業生產統計」，http://www.moea.gov.tw (2006)。
26.經濟部中小企業處，94 年中小企業白皮書，http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw (2006)。


二、英文部分
1.APQC (American Productivity Quality Center), The Benchmarking Management Guide, Portland, Oregon: Productivity Press, 1993.
2.Barney, J. B. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 99-120, 1991.
3.Bogan, C. E. and English, M. J. Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning through Innovative Adaptation, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
4.Boxwell, R. J. Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
5.Bowersox, D. J. and Closs, D. J. Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process, International Editions, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
6.Burgess, R. “Avoiding Supply Chain Management Failure: Lessons from Business Process Re-engineering,” International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 15–23, 1998.
7.Camp, R. C. Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality Control (ASQC), 1989.
8.Chakravarthy, B. “Measuring Strategic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, Iss. 5, pp. 437-458, 1986.
9.Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 2001.
10.Codling, S. Benchmarking, Great Britain: Gower Publishing, 1998.
11.Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp. 7-25, 1991.
12.Day, G. S. “The capabilities of market-driven organizations,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, Iss. 4, pp. 37-52, 1994.
13.DeVellis, R. F. Scale Development Theory and Applications, London, Sage: 1991.
14.Fawcet, Stanley, “Developing a Logistics Capability to Improve the Performance of International Ooperations,” Journal of business logistics,Vol.18, Iss. 2, pp. 101-127, 1997.
15.Finnign, J. P. The Manager’s Guide to Benchmarking, Essential Skills for the New Competitive-Cooperative Economy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1996.
16.Gay, L. R. Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application, Macmillan, 1992.
17.Goldsby, T. J. and Stank, T. P., World Class Logistics Performance and Environmental, Responsible Logistics, 2000.
18.Goldwasser, C. “Benchmarking: People Make the Process,” Management Review, June , 1995 , pp. 39–43, 1993.
19.Howell, E. C. Statistical Methods for Psychology, Boston: Duxbury Press, 1987.
20.Kotler, P. Marketing Management An Asian Perspective, 2nd. Ed., Singapore : Prentice Hall, 1999.
21.Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A. and Gardner, J. T. “Developing and Implementing Supply Chain Partnerships,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 1-17, 1996.
22.Kalakota, L. and Robinson, M. e-Business—Roadmap for Sucess, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
23.Lynch, D. F., Keller, S. B. and Ozment, J. “The Effects of Logistics Capabilities and Strategy on Firm Perormance,” Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 21, Iss, 2, pp. 47-67, 2000.
24.Michigan State University Global Logistics Research Team (MSUGLRT), World Class Logistics: The Challenge of Managing Continuous Change, Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management, 1995.
25.Rosenbloom, B. and Anderson, R. “Channel Management: Some Key Factors,” Journal of Academy of Science, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, Summer, pp. 97-106, 1985.
26.Stank, T. P., Daugherty, P. J. and Ellinger, A. E. “Information exchange, responsiveness and logistics provider performance,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 43-57, 1996.
27.Shang, K. C. and Marlow, P. B. “Logistics Capabilities and Performance In Taiwans Major Manufacturing Firms,” Transportation Research, Part E Vol. 41, pp .217-234, 2005.
28.Spendolini, M .J. The Benchmarking Book, NY: AMACOM, 1992.
29.Suarez, R. F., Cusumano, M. A. and Fine, C. H. “An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly,” Operations Research, Vol. 44, Iss. l, pp. 223-240, 1996.
30.Tacq, J. Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research, London: Sage, 1997.
31.Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. 801-815, 1986.
32.Vickery, S., Calantone, R. and Droge, C. Supply Chain Flexibility, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Summer, pp. 16-24, 1999.
33.Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. 801-814, 1986.
34.Wernerfelt, B. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180, 1984.
35.Woo, C. Y. and Willard, G. “Performance Representation in Business Policy Research: Discussion and Recommendation,” this paper was presented at the 23rd Annual National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas, 1983.