臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

對於企業間之跨國電子交易在目前各機構所制定與設計的交易協定中，尚存在一些使用簽章上可供改善的部分，與協定設計欠缺的交易模式。例如企業間跨國交易參與者對於發送的訊息的簽章，會因為該筆訊息傳送參與者的個數增加，造成訊息簽章的長度增長，亦使簽章的核驗作業較為煩瑣，而且對於簽章者順序無法於訊息中得知，對於交易整體安全上，有運作上安全的缺失。諸如上述之問題將於本研究中進行討論與改良，以增進交易協定的安全及提昇核驗簽章的效率。
由於企業間之跨國交易於網際網路上進行，有利於交易協助者協助買方或賣方進行訂單合併與訂單分割的交易模式，目前現行的交易協定標準中，並無法完整提供此類的交易協定，導致金流與物流的運作會回歸到非網際網路電子訊息傳送的運作模式，使得交易協定運作時，作業平台需因交易協定欠缺而需轉換，讓交易作業連續性的降低。對於此類交易模式之交易協定設計，本研究將設計訂單合併與訂單分割的交易模式協定，以降低交易的風險與增加交易的便利，是本研究設計的目的。

There''s still room for improving the use of stamped signature and the lack of well designed trading model in the trading protocols made and designed in business transnational electronic commerce. For example, the sizes of stamped signatures, that send in business transnational electronic commerce, would be increased by the number of businesses been send. It would lead to the transactional security problems such as, making the size of stamped signature being too long for verification and making the stamped signature cannot fully reveal the sequence of the senders. This study will discuss these problems and will make some suggestions in improving the security of trading protocols and the efficiency of verifying stamped signature.

With the higher acceptance in doing transnational business over the Internet, it shall bring brokers to smoothly go through the trading model in combining or splitting orders with either the buyer party or the selling party in transnational electronic commerce. However, current trading protocol can’t fully offer these transactions. It would lead cash flow and material flow to non-Internet electronic information transmission model and would lower the continuity of trading, due to the transfer among operating systems from the defects of the current trading protocol. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to refining a trading protocol for combining and splitting orders to reduce the trading risks and toimprove the trading convenience.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 2
第三節 研究目的 10
第四節 研究範圍 11
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 企業與企業間的交易模式 13
第二節 企業與企業間的支付工具 16
第三節 網際網路企業間交易訊息傳輸協定 34
第四節 金融機構提供之電子帳務移轉清算機制 39
第五節 所運用的資訊安全方法 41
第三章 企業間跨國電子交易協定之研究 44
第一節 企業間跨國電子交易協定 44
第二節 訂單分割與合併的交易協定 57
第四章 結論 72
第一節 研究貢獻 72
第二節 未來研究方向 72
參考文獻 74

[1]彭喜樞譯、邊裕淵審定(2000)，國際商務支付，中國生產力中心。
[2]蔡淵(2000)，國際商業信用狀實務，華泰文化事業公司。
[3]中時電子報，電子支票制度擬七月試辦，(http://ctnews.yam.com/news/200201/28/230435.html, 2002/1/19).
[4]台北市票據交換所(2002)，電子票據細部業務流程規劃，台北市票據交換所民國91年一月份主管會議會議記錄。
[5]賴溪松、韓亮、張真誠(1999)，近代密碼學及其應用，松崗電腦圖書股份有限公司。
[6]經濟部即時新聞，經濟部「產業電子化CDE計畫」預將有二十九件計畫提案申請加入，將在九十一年度起，由資訊業及半導體業者與政府共同建構一個高附加價值全球運籌中心示範性體系，(http://w2kdmz1.moea.gov.tw/user/news/detail-1.asp?kind=&id=2492, 2001/12/28).
[7]經濟部即時新聞，經濟部技術處金流電子化計畫(C計畫)成效卓越經濟部技術處金流電子化計畫(C計畫)成效卓越，(http://w2kdmz1.moea.gov.tw/user/news/detail-1.asp?kind=&id=7033, 2004/3/10).
[8]經濟部即時新聞，經濟部技術處CD計畫推動成果豐碩─為電子化供應鏈「鍍金」與「暢流」， 加溫台灣成為全球運籌中心，(http://w2kdmz1.moea.gov.tw/user/news/detail-1.asp?kind=&id=7328, 2004/5/4).
[9]沈榮嘉、孫蘭英、陳正賢、楊安和、劉鴻益(譯) (1999)，信用狀統一慣例+電子信用狀統一慣例，台灣金融研訓院。
[10]Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), The preliminary Standards Release Guide, (http://www.swift.com/index.cfm?item_id=40740, 2002/1/22)
[11]Financial Information exchange (FIX), FIX Protocal Specification Documents, (http://www.fixprotocol.org/cgi-bin/Spec.cgi?menu=4, 2002/1/22)
[12]Open Financial exchange (OFX), OFX Protocal Specification Documents, (http://www.ofx.net/, 2002/1/22)
[13]Interactive Financial eXchange (IFX), IFX Business Message Specification v1.2, (http://www.ifxforum.org/ifxforum.org/bmspecs_12.html, 2002/1/22).
[14]VISA International & MasterCard International(1997), Security Electronic Transaction (SET) Specification： Book1. Bussiness Description version 1.0.
[15]M. H. Sherif, A. Serhrouchni, A. Y. Gaid ,and F. Farazmandnia(1998), “SET and SSL: Electronic Payments on the Internet, ” Proceedings of The Third IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC’98, pp. 353-358.
[16]A. Segev, J. Porra, and M. Roldan(1996), “Internet-Based Financial EDI: The Case of the Bank of America and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Pilot,” Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 2 No. 1 (part 2).
[17]C. Anthony(2001), “The Role of XML in Finance,” The Proceeding of XML Conference & Exposition 2001, Presentation Code 04-03-01.
[18]IBM STP WorkBench Services, International Business Machines corporation (IBM), (http://www.financialfusion.com/, 2002/2/05).
[19]T. Okamoto(1988), “A Digital Multisignature Scheme Using Bijective Public-Key Cryptosystems,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Vol. 6, No. 8, November 1988, pp. 432-441.
[20]T. Hardjono, and Y. Zheng(1993), “A Practical Digital Multisignature Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms,” Advances in Cryptology-AUSCRYPT’92, Vol. 718, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 122-132, Springer-Verlag.
[21]H. Doi, E. Okamoto, and M. Mambo(1999), “Multisignature Schemes for Various Group Structures,” The 36th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, control, and computing, pp. 713-722.
[22]K. Ohta, and T. Okamoto(1999), “Multi-Signature Schemes Secure Against Active Insider Attacks,” IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences, pp. 21-31.
[23]K. Ohta, S. Micali, and L. Reyzin(2001), “Accountable-Subgroup Multisignatures,” The ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security CCS-8, pp. 245-254.
[24]D. Wagner, and B. Schneier(1996), “Analysis of the SSL 3.0 Protocol,” The Second USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce Proceedings, USENIX Press, pp. 29-40.