跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.205.192.201) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/05 10:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:莊松融
研究生(外文):Sung-Rung Juang
論文名稱:策略網絡與信任之共演關係-科雅電子之單一個案研究
論文名稱(外文):The co-evolution of strategic network and trust: A case study of Goyatek
指導教授:劉子歆劉子歆引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tzu-Hsin Liu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:事業經營研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:策略網絡信任個案研究共演
外文關鍵詞:strategic networktrustcase studyco-evolution
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:87
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
台灣半導體產業以專業分工聞名於全球,而具有彈性靈活與可因應多樣化市場需求特質化網絡關係也鑲嵌於半導體這個掌握全球經濟脈動的產業之中。本論文以台灣IC設計服務廠商-科雅電子為例,透過網絡互動關係研究,以策略網絡與信任的概念解釋兩者如何產生共演的關係,以期對策略網絡與信任提出理論意涵。根據文獻、個案資料與深度訪談後,分析歸納提出:一、網絡關係會因為信任改變或轉移而產生變化;二、而網絡關係改變之後也會產生新的信任程度。本論文最後綜合前述分析,提出研究結論與對未來研究之建議。
The semi-conductor industry in Taiwan is internationally famous for the professional division of labor. The industry, always keeping up with the global economIC trends, also includes the flexible network with the feature of various demands in the market. This research focuses on Goyatek, with the service of designing IC in Taiwan. The interaction in the network is studied, and the concept of strategic network and trust can explain how the co-evolution between the two occurs so that theories about them should be suggested. The results from analyzing review of related literature, case data, and in-depth interviews are: First, the relation of the network changes as the trust does; secondly, the changed relation of the network produces a new degree of the trust. Based on the very results, this study will propose the conclusion and suggestions for the following researches.
內容目錄
中文摘要 ..................... ii
英文摘要 ..................... iii
誌謝辭  ..................... v
內容目錄 ..................... vi
表目錄  ..................... viii
圖目錄  ..................... Ix
第一章  緒論................... 1
  第一節  研究背景與動機............ 1
  第二節  研究的流程.............. 3
  第三節  研究目的............... 4
第二章  文獻探討................. 5
  第一節  策略網絡............... 5
  第二節  信任................. 9
  第三節  共演關係............... 12
  第四節  研究架構............... 13
第三章  研究方法................. 15
  第一節  研究方法的選取............ 15
  第二節  研究資料的蒐集............ 17
  第三節  研究資料的分析............ 23
第四章  個案分析................. 25
  第一節  IC設計服務產業整體環境產業概況.... 25
  第二節  科雅、台積電及世界先進個案介紹.... 30
  第三節  科雅發展過程網絡與信任之變化..... 37
第五章  結論與討論................ 45
  第一節  研究結論............... 45
  第二節  研究貢獻............... 46
  第三節  研究限制與未來研究建議........ 47
參考文獻 ..................... 49
附錄A  科雅電子公司發展沿革與重要記事 ...... 57
附錄B  台積電公司發展沿革與重要記事 ....... 58
附錄C  世界先進公司發展沿革與重要記事 ...... 59
附錄D  科雅電子公司訪談問題 ........... 61
附錄E  世界先進公司訪談問題 ........... 62

表目錄
表 2- 1 網絡定義之整理................ 6
表 2- 2 組織間的信任定義整理............. 9
表 3- 1 六種資料來源優缺比較............. 18
表 3- 2 訪談三方式.................. 22
表 3- 3 本論文深度訪談名單.............. 23
表 4- 1 台灣IC產業產值統計結果............ 27
表 4- 2 科雅主要業務之營業比重表........... 31
表 4- 3 台積電主要業務之營業比重........... 32
表 4- 4 世界先進主要業務之營業比重.......... 35
表 4- 5 科雅、台積電與世界先進-策略網絡與信任之共演事件... 36

圖目錄
圖 1- 1 研究流程圖 .................. 3
圖 2- 1 Hakansson網絡模型 .............. 7
圖 2- 2 理論架構 ................... 14
圖 3- 1 三角檢定法模型 ................ 19
圖 4- 1 台灣IC工業上、中、下游分工結構圖 ....... 26
圖 4- 2 IC設計服務業產業鏈 .............. 28
圖 4- 3 科雅電子公司發展演進............. 38
參考文獻
ㄧ、中文部份

Fukuyama, F. (1998),誠信(李宛蓉譯),台北:立緒文化事業有限公司。(原文於1995年出版)。

Yin, R. K. (2001),個案研究法(尚榮安譯),台北:弘智文化。(原文於2001年出版)。

工業技術研究院[線上資料],來源:http://www.itri.org.tw/chi/index. jsp [2006, December 31]。

世界先進積體電路股份有限公司(2005),世界先進公開說明書[線上資料],來源:http://www.vis.com.tw/servlet/IndexServlet?en able_en=N &enable_ch=Y [2005, July 28]。

台灣半導體協會(2005),TSIA 2006年度問卷調查[線上資料],來源:http://www. tsia.org.tw/ [2005, July 28]。

台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司(2006),台積電公開說明書[線上資料],來源:http://www.tsmc.com/ chinese/default.htm [2006, April 12]。

科雅電子(2005),科雅公開說明書[線上資料],來源:http://www. goya.com. tw/chi/ [2005, August 9]。

訪問科雅高階主管紀錄(2007, June 9),科雅副總,新竹科學園區。

訪問世界先進高階主管紀錄(2006, May 27),世界先進SQM副理,新竹科學園區。

陳向明(2004),社會科學質的研究,初版四刷,台北:五南。

創意電子[線上資料],來源:http://www.globalunichip.com/ [2006, November 15]。

智網[線上資料],來源:http://www.itis.org.tw/ [2006, December 15]。

聚富文化(2005),產業情報-電子業關聯圖大全,台北:開文科技。

聚富文化(2005)產業情報-半導體,台北:開文科技。


二、英文部分

Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1990). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8 , 310-323.

Arsenault, A., & Anderson, G. (1998). Qualitative research. (2nd. Ed.). In Anderson. G.Fundamentals of educational research. London : Falmer Press..119-135.

Bantham, J. H., Celuch, K. G., & Kasouf, C. J. (2003). A perspective of partnership based n interdependence and dialectical theory. Journal of Business Research, 56, 265-274.

Bernard., H. R. (1998). Unstructured and semistructured interviewing. research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park; Sage.

Carnevale, D. G., & Wechsler, B. (1992). Organizational trust in the public IC sectors: A model of it determinants. Administration & Society, 23, 471-494.

Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks, AmerICan SociologICal Review, 43, 721-739.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). Behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice.

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill: New York.

Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 35-51.

Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction cost and improving performance: empirical evidence from the united states. Japan and Korea. Organization Science, 14 (1), 57-68.

Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679

Ely, M., Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A. M. (1997). Doing quailtative research: circles within circles. (4th ed.). PA: The Falmer Press.

Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data. beverly hills. CA: Sage Publications.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage PublICations, 361-376.

Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, eds., Networks and Organizations, 25-56.

Hakansson, H. (1989). Corporate technologICal behaviour: co- operation and networks. Routledge, London.

Hite, J. M. (2000). Patterns of multidimensionality in embedded network ties of emerging entrepreneurial firms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.

Jarillo. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31-41.

Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1988). Internationalization in industrial systems-a network approach. In N. Hood and J. E. Vahlne(eds.), Strategies in Global Competition, Routledge, England, 287-314.

Johnson, J. L., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). The development of interfirm partnership competence: platforms for learning, learning activities, and consequences of learning. Journal of Business Research, 56(9): 757-766.

Lane, C. (1998). Trust within and between organization: conceptual issues and empirical applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

LewICki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations-Frontiers of Theory and Research, Newbury Park, CA:sage, 114-139.

Lewis, J. (1990). Partnerships for profit: structuring and managing strategic alliances. New York, The Free Press.

Laumann, E. O. (1982). Microstructural analysis in interorganizational systems. Soc Netw, 4 (4), 329-348.

Madlok, A. (1995). Revisiting multinational firms’ tolerance for joint ventures: a trust-based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 117-137.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: a qualit- ative approach. Califonia: Jossey-Base Publisher.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: context and narrative. cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltmen, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationship. Journal Marketing, 57, 81-101.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.

Porter, M. E., &. Fuller, M. B. (1987). Coalitions and global strategy competition in global industries. Boston: Harvard University Press, Structure Form and Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 315-343.

Ratnasingam, P. (2003). Inter-organizational trust in business- to-business: a case study in customs clearance. Internet of Global Information Management, 11(1), 1-19.

Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483-498.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage.

Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.

Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: institutional sources of economIC structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top