跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.235.56.11) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/29 04:32
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃乙城
研究生(外文):Huang,Yi-Cheng
論文名稱:資訊應用促進產品協同設計及其產品設計績效
論文名稱(外文):Toward an understanding of IT-enabled collaboration in product development
指導教授:林清同林清同引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lin,Ching-Torng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學系碩士班
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:85
中文關鍵詞:協同設計任務/科技配適度模式產品開發主管的權力產品設計績效
外文關鍵詞:collaboration designtask-technology fit modelheavyweight product development managersproduct design performance impacts
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:100
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在微利和供過於求時代的經營環境中,以ODM 或OEM生產模式的廠商即被要求開發速度快、品質好與好售價。新產品在開發上,能利用資訊科技於協同設計上來提高設計績效。本研究以資訊科技應用於產品協同設計的觀點,研究其產品設計績效,以任務/科技配適度模式做為衡量模式,研究其產品協同設計(任務)、資訊系統(科技)、任務/科技配適度與產品開發主管的權力,並研究其產品協同設計資訊系統實際使用後的產品設計績效,以產品開發部門主管或相關人員為對象回收了205份有效問卷,再以結構方程模式進行分析方法。
研究結果顯示,產品協同設計(任務)、資訊系統(科技)、與產品開發主管的權力為影響產品設計績效的根本因子,產品開發人員必須具有良好的產品協同設計資訊系統使用能力,產品開發部門人員必須使用產品協同設計資訊系統,產品開發主管的權力比重必須提高。因此,企業在資訊科技選用投資上,必須充分評估工作任務與科技的配適度,進而使產品設計績效提高。
According to the meager profit and supply of exceeds the demand among the management environment of times, it is develop speed fast, quality fine and kind price to demand by ODM or OEM manufacturer. So the speed and the practice personnel of the performance and tactics tool of product development, as to manufacturers, let new products can utilize information technology to collaboration design and improving the performance of new product design. This research is applied to the view that IT-enabled collaboration in product development, study its product design performance, by TTF model, in product collaboration design (task) , the information system (technology) , task-technology fit and heavyweight product development managers, product development of executive, than study product design performance impacts after actually use, and recovered 205 valid questionnaires to product developing department managers or relevant personnel, again with the structural equation modeling be analytical method.
The result of study shows, product collaboration design (task) , the information system (technology) and heavyweight product development managers are the basic factor of the product design performance. So, when enterprises to select information technology for use must fully evaluate the task-technology fit, and then makes the product design performance improve.
中文摘要 ..................... iii
英文摘要 ..................... iv
誌謝辭  ..................... v
內容目錄 ..................... vi
表目錄  ..................... viii
圖目錄  ..................... ix
第一章  研究背景、動機與目的........... 1
  第一節  研究背景............... 1
  第二節  研究動機............... 2
  第三節  研究目的............... 4
  第四節  研究流程............... 6
第二章  文獻探討................. 7
  第一節  任務/科技配適模型.......... 7
  第二節  產品開發主管的權力.......... 14
  第三節  產品設計績效............. 16
第三章  研究方法................. 19
  第一節  研究架構............... 19
  第二節  研究假說............... 20
  第三節  變數操作型定義............ 23
第四節  資料分析方法............... 27
第五節  敘述分析................. 27
第六節  結構方程模式............... 28
第七節  研究對象................. 40
第四章  資料分析與結果.............. 41
  第一節  問卷回收結果統計........... 41
  第二節  研究模型之驗證............ 44
  第三節  驗證性因素分析模式分析........ 44
第四節  測量模式................. 52
第五節  結構模式適合度分析............ 56
第六節  效果分析................. 58
第七節  假設驗證................. 62
第五章  研究結論與未來發展............ 64
  第一節  研究結論............... 64
  第二節  管理意涵與建議............ 66
  第三節  未來研究............... 67
參考文獻...................... 68
附錄A 研究問卷 ................. 81
一、中文部份
范錚強(2005),經濟部ABCDE計畫研究成果彙編,台北市:經濟部技術處。
張存金、盧淵源(2001),研發團對結構特性及整合機制與研發績效關係之研究-路徑分析模式,企業管理學報, 97-134。
邱皓政(2003),結構方程模式,台北市:雙葉書廊。
陳淑鳳(2001)。電子化政府下國稅稽徵人員資訊科技行為模式之研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理系碩士論文,高雄市。
黃芳銘(2006),結構方程模式,台北市:五南。
二、英文部分
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P.A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-248.
Attaran, M., & Attaran, S. (2002). Collaborative computing technology: The hot new managing tool. Journal of management development, 21, 598-609.
Barkan, P. (1992). Productivity in The Process of Product Development an Engineering Perspective, In: Susman, G. (Ed.), Integrating Design for Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage (pp. 56–68). New York: Oxford University Press
Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(11), 562-584.
Baroudi, J. J., Olson, M. H., & Ives, D. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29(3), 232-238.
Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1986). An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 59-84.
Bagozzi, R. P., (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions and behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(11), 562-584.
Barkhi, R. (2002). The effects of decision guidance and problem modeling on group decision making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 259-282.
Barczak, G. (1995). New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry, Journal of Product Innovation Management , 12(2), 224– 234.
Bentler, P. M. (1998). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
Bollen, K. A., (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
Cheney, P. H., Mann, R. I., & Amoroso, D. L. (1986). Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing, Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(1), 65-80.
Cooper, R., & Zmud, R. (1990). Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123-139.
Culnan, M. J. (1983). Environmental scanning: the effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behavior. Decision Sciences, 14, 194-206.
Cronan, T. P., & Douglas, D. E. (1990). End-user training and computing effectiveness in public agencies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(4), 123-139.
Drucker, P. (1993), Post-Capitalist Society, New York: Butterworth Heineman.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 14, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science , 35(8), 982-1003.
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1991). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 5-12.
Dickson, G. W., DeSanctis, G., & McBride, D. J. (1986). Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach. Communications of the ACM, 29(1), 40-47.
Detmar, S., & Adrew, B. J. (2002). Reconceptualizing the system usage construct (Working Draft). Uiversity of Georgia Terry College of Business, MIS Workshop.
Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Ad Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, R. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information and Management, 36, 9-21.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science ,32(5), 554–571.
Fishbein, Martin, & Isek Ajzen. (1975). Belief , Attitude , Intention , and Behavior : An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fry, L. W., & Slocum, J. W. (1984). Technology, structure, and workgroup effectiveness: a test of a contingency model. Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 221-246.
Franz, C. R., & Robey, D. (1986). Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 17(3), 329-356.
Fulk, J., & Ryu, D. (1990). Perceiving electronic mail systems: Partial test of the social information processing model. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Dublin, Ireland.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gerardine D., & Marshall S. P. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use:Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science ,5(2), 121-147.
Goodhue,Dale L., & Thompson, Ronald L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision sciences, 29(1), 105-137.
Gupta, A. K., & Wilemon, D. L. (1990). Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products. California Management Review , 32(2), 24–44.
Heppelmann, J. (2000). Collaborative Commerce in the Design Chain. Implementation Road Map at IMET 2000 Expo, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Hershock, R. J. , Cowan, C. D. & Peters, D. (1994). From Experience:Action Teams That Work. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 95–104.
Hull, F., Collins, P & Liker, J. K. (1996). Composite Forms of Organizationas a Strategy for Concurrent Engineering Effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 43(2), 133–142.
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, L. E., Tatham, L. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York: Macmillan.
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis(5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1997). The consequence of information technology acceptance subsequent individual performance. Information and Management, 32, 113-121
Jarvenpaa, S. L (1989). The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science, 35(3), 285-303.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. In: A.S. Goldberger & O.D. Duncan (Eds.). Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences.New York: Seminar Press.
Koufteros, X. A., Vonderembse M. A., & Doll, W. J. (2002). Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: the effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 331-355.
Kim, Y. , Min, B., & Cha, J. (1999). The roles of R&D team leaders in Korea: a contingent approach. R&D management, 29(2), 153 - 165.
Lucas, H. C. (1975). Performance and the use of an information system. Management Science, 21(8). 908-919.
Lucas, H. C. (1981). The analysis, design, and implementation of information systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Liker, J. K., & Sindi , A. A. (1997). User acceptance of expert systems: a test of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 147-173
Leenders, M. A. & Wierenga, B. (2002). The Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19, 305 - 317.
Marcie J. Tyre., Wanda J., & Orlikowski. (1994). Windows of Opportunity:Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations. Organization Science, 5(1),98-118.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1992). An empirical examination of a model of the factors affecting utilization of information technology by end users. Working paper. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
Maidique, M. (1980). Entrepreneurs, Champions, and Technological Innovation. Sloan Management Review, 21(2), 59–76.
Mohammad Z., & Meybodi. (2003). Using Principles of Just-in-Time to Improve New Product Development Process. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 11(1),116.
Olson, M. H., & Ives, B. (1982). Chargeback systems and user involvement in systems — an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 6(2), 47-60.
O'Reilly., & Charles A. (1982). Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: the impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756-771.
Olson, E.M., Walker, O.C., & Ruekert, R.W. (1995). Organizing for Effective New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, January 59, 48-62.
Olfman, L., & Mandviwalla, M. (1994). Conceptual versus procedural software training for graphical user interfaces: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 18, 405-426.
Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(3), 241-255.
Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194-208.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing With Power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Pawar, K.S., Menon, U., & Riedel, J.C., (1994). Time to market. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 5(1), 14–22.
Robey, D. (1979). User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 527-538.
Robert S., & David P. (2004). Strategy Maps :Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Sanderson, S. ( 1992). Design for Manufacturing in an Environment of Continuous Change, In: Susman, G. (Ed.), Integrating Design for Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage (pp. 36-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
Swanson, E. B. (1987). Information channel disposition and use. Decision Sciences, 18(1), 131-145.
Stoker, J. I., Looise, J. C., Fisscher, O.A.M., & de Jong, R.D. (2001). Leadership and Innovation : Relation Between Leadership, Individual, Characteristics and The Function of R&D Team. The international journal of human resource management, 12 (7), 1141 - 1151.
Sandra V., & Lucia A. (2003). Cross-Functionality and Leadership of New Product Development team. European Journal of Innovation Management , 6(1), 32 - 48.
Thompson, R. L, Higgins, C. A., & Howell. J. M. (1991). Towards a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Values, Attitudes and Interpersonal Behavior. In H. E. Howe (Eds.) (pp. 195-259). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-im-plementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
Vessey, I. (1991). Cognitive fit: a theory-based analysis of the graphs vs. Tables literature. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 219-240.
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991). Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 63-86.
Xenophon A., Mark A., & William J. (2003). Integrated Product Development Practices and Competitive Capabilities: The Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy. Journal of Operations Management 20 , 331– 355.
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in Organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top