跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/19 01:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:顏怡青
研究生(外文):Yi-Ching Yen
論文名稱:線上圖片與簡易句子註解對大學生閱讀理解力的影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Annotations of Illustrations and Simplified Text on College Students’ Reading Comprehension in the Web-based Learning Environment
指導教授:倪淑芳倪淑芳引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:應用外語研究所
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:109
中文關鍵詞:多媒體註解閱讀理解能力讀後回憶線上學習第二語言學習
外文關鍵詞:multimedia annotationsreading comprehensionrecallweb-based learningsecond language learning
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:396
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
一些致力於研究電腦輔助學習的學者建議整合圖片與文字可以幫助第二外語學習者,創造一個真實且具有互動功能的學習環境。本研究主要探討大學非英語學系的學生在網路學習的環境下,透過簡易句子註解、情境式圖片註解、以及簡易句子加情境式圖片等多媒體註解方式,來輔助大學生閱讀理解能力之影響。此外,本研究還調查學習者對本研究所使用的多媒體註解的效能以及對幫助閱讀理解的看法。本研究將以實驗方式進行,一百二十位非英語系的大一學生分成四組,其組別分別為一組控制組和三組實驗組-簡易句子註解組、情境式圖片註解組以及簡易句子和情境式圖片組。實驗組的學生可以自由點選多媒體註解,以輔助線上閱讀的過程。
閱讀之後,進行讀後回憶測試以及閱讀理解測試。學生對多媒體註解的態度與看法由問卷以及訪談得知。本研究的結果如下:
(1)當簡易句子與情境式圖片註解同時提供時,參與者在閱讀理解測試中表現最好。
(2)當簡易句子與情境式圖片註解同時提供時,參與者在讀後回憶測試中表現最好。
(3)大部分參與者對本實驗中所設計的線上多媒體註解都抱持著正面的態度與看法。依據本實驗的結果,可以用來解釋線上多媒體註解對於幫助學生閱讀理解能力的重要性。實驗結果也將對設計多媒體輔助教學以及未來研究提出建議。
Researchers of computer assisted language learning have suggested that integration of text and pictures can create an authentic and interactive environment for learning languages. However, how well non-English major college students comprehend the reading passage through multimedia annotations deserves more attention. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of different annotation modes in web-based learning environment. In addition, the participants’ attitudes and perspectives toward different multimedia annotation modes were also examined. The participants were 120 non-English major freshmen at a university in central Taiwan. All participants were assigned into four groups. The first group was the control group, and participants in this group read a text in the web-based environment without any annotation. The participants in Group Two comprehended the reading passage with the assistance of ten simplified text annotations. The participants in Group Three comprehended the reading passage with the assistance of ten text-related pictorial annotations. The participants in the Group Four utilized the assistance of text-picture combination annotation to facilitate the reading process. A multiple-choice reading comprehension test, a recall protocol test, a questionnaire, and an interview were adopted in this study.
The main findings from the present study are:
(1) Participants’ performance on the multiple-choice reading comprehension was better while reading with text-picture combination annotations in the web-based learning environment.
(2) Participants’ performance on the recall protocol test was better while reading with text-picture combination annotations in the web-based learning environment.
(3) Most participants had positive attitudes and perspectives toward multimedia annotations on comprehending the reading text in the web-based environment.
Results of the present study were of importance in explaining the effectiveness of different kinds of multimedia annotations. The pedagogical implications for multimedia design further discussed in the fifth chapter and some suggestions for future study were also drawn.
Chapter I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study...........1
1.2 Purposes of the Study.............4
1.3 Significance of the Study.........5
1.4 Research Questions................6
1.5 Definition of Terms...............6
1.6 Limitation of the Study...........8
1.7 Overview of the Study.............9

Chapter II. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The Theoretical Background of Multimedia Processing ...........10
2.1.1 Generative Theory of Multimedia Learning to Second-Language learning...........................................................112.1.2 Dual-Coding Theory...........................................12
2.2 The Value and Effect of Multimedia Annotation..................13
2.3 The Process of Reading Comprehension...........................14
2.4 The Relationship between Annotations and Reading Comprehension.17
2.5 The Theoretical Foundation and the Components of Simplification.....................................................19
2.6 Visual and Verbal Effects in Second-Language Multimedia Learning...........................................................23
2.7 Summary........................................................24

Chapter III. METHODOLOGY
3.1 The Design of the Study........................................26
3.2 Participants...................................................29
3.3 Experimental Materials.........................................29
3.3.1 The Material: Hypertext Design with Multimedia Annotations...30
3.3.2 Instruments..................................................33
3.3.2.1 The Written Recall Protocol Test...........................33
3.3.2.2 The Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension Test.............34
3.3.2.3 The Questionnaire..........................................35
3.3.2.4 The Interview..............................................36
3.4 Scoring........................................................37
3.5 Procedure of the Study.........................................38
3.6 Data Analysis..................................................40
3.7 Reliability and Validity of the Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension Test andQuestionnaire................................41
3.8 Pilot Study ...................................................42
3.9 Summary........................................................46

Chapter IV RESULTS
4.1 Demographic Data of the Respondents ...........................47
4.2 The Result of the Participants’ Reading Comprehension..........49
4.2.1 The Result of Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension Test.....51
4.2.2 The Result of Recall Protocol Test...........................53
4.3 The Participants’ Perceptions of Different Modes of Multimedia Annotations........................................................56
4.3.1 The Result of the Perceptions of Simplified-text Annotations.56
4.3.2 The Result of the Perceptions of Text-related Pictorial Annotations........................................................58
4.3.3 The Result of the Perceptions of Multimedia Annotations......60
4.4 The Result of the Interview....................................63
4.5 Summary of the results.........................................65

Chapter V DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Discussion of the Result.......................................66
5.1.1 Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Reading Comprehension.66
5.1.2 Participants’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Multimedia Annotations........................................................69
5.1.2.1 The Effects of the Simplified Text Annotations.............70
5.1.2.2 The Effects of the Text-related Pictorial Annotations......70
5.1.3.3 The Functions of the Multimedia Annotations................71
5.1.3.4 The Result of the Interview..........................................................72
5.2 Conclusion.....................................................74
5.3 Pedagogical Implications.......................................76
5.4 Suggestion for Future Study....................................77
REFERENCE..........................................................80
Appendix A: Multiple-choice Reading Comprehension Test.............87
Appendix B: Recall Protocol Test (Chinese Version) ................90
Appendix C: Recall Protocol Test (English Version) ................91
Appendix D: The Questionnaire......................................92
Appendix E: The Intervieew.........................................96
Appendix F: The Idea Units of the Written Recall Protocol..........97
Appendix D: The Questionnaire......................................92
Appendix E: The Interview..........................................96
Appendix F: The Idea Units of the Written Recall Protocol..........97
Appendix G: The Central Ideas of the Reading Text..................99
Appendix H: The Supporting Ideas of the Reading Text..............100
Appendix I: The Translation and the Detailed Scoring Criteria.....102
Appendix J: Simplified Text and Text-related Pictorial Annotations for Complicated Sentences.........................................104
Appendix K: An Example of One Student’s Recall Protocol with the Detailed Scoring..................................................108
Abraham, L.B. (2001). The effects of multimedia on second language vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Doctorial dissertation. University of New Mexico.
Adamsand, M.J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-theoretic view of reading. In R.O. Freddle (ED.), New Directions in Discourse Processing (pp.1-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processed in Reading Comprehension. In P.L. Carrel, J. Devine & D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bartoli, J., & Brown, A. L. (1988). Reading learning disability: An ecological
approach. New York: New Teachers College Press.
Bernard, R. M. (1990). Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations. British Journal of Educational Technology. 21, 215-225.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Burmeister, L. E. (1974). Reading strategies for secondary school teachers. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Butler-Pascoe, M. E., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and Teaching English Language Learners. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Campbell, N. (1987). Adapted literary texts and the EFL reading comprehension. ELT Journal, 41, 132-135.
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33(2), 183-207.
Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (1988). Interactive approaches to second
language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1989). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, S. (2002). The roles of marginal glosses and pocket electronic dictionaries in EFL incidental vocabulary learning. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University
Chen, H. C. (2001). The effects of guessing from context and translation on English vocabulary retention of junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University
Chen, T. C. (2000). Vocabulary teaching and semantic feature analysis. Bulletin of
National Taipei Institute of Commerce, 55, 267-284.
Chuang, S. Y. (2004). The effect of marginal glosses upon junior high school students’ incidental vocabulary learning through a simplified novel, Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80 (2), 183-198.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environment. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 1-35
Cochran, J. A. (1993). Reading in the content areas for junior high school and high school. MA: Simon & Schuster
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 11(12), 37-54
Davey, B. (1988). Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for
successful and unsuccessful readers. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 67-76.
Davis J. N. (1989) Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Reading, 73, 41–52.
Davis, J. N., & Lyman-Hager, M. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 58-72
Dechant, E. (1991). Understanding and Teaching Reading: An Interactive Model. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaumn Associate, Inc.
Dewalt, M., Winkler, M. C., & Rubel, S. (1992). Effects of instructional method on reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Improvement, 30(2), 93-99
Duquette, L., Renie, D, & Laurier, M. (1998). The evaluation of vocabulary acquisition when learning French as a second language in a multimedia environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(1), 3-34
Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Mason, J. (1984). Comprehension instruction. New York: Longman.
Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409-441
Fry, E. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading. 11, 513-516.
Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. New York: Metheun.
Gettys, S., Imhof, L. A., & Kautz, J. O. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: the effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34 (2), 91-106.
Glenberg, A. H., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129-151.
Goodman, K. S. (1975). The reading process: Theory and practice. Bellingham: Wash.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 3, 375-396.
Guri-Rozenblit, S. (1998). The interrelationship between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science text. Instructional Science, 17, 219-234.
Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (1986). Principles and Practices of Teaching Reading. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.
Holley, F. M. (1970). Vocabulary glosses in foreign language reading materials.
Language Learning, 21, 213-219.
Honeyfield, J. (1977), Word frequency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning, RELC Journal, 8(2), 35-42
Hu, Y. N.(2003). The effects of original text vs simplified text the adventures of Tom Sawyer on reading attitudes and reading comprehension of EFL senior high students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan
Irvin, J. W. (1986). Teaching reading comprehension processes. New Jersey
City: Prentice-Hall.
Jacobs, G. M. (1991). Second language reading recall as a function of vocabulary
glossing and selected other variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University
of Hawaii at Manoa.
Jacobs, G.. M. (1994). What lurks in the margin: Use of vocabulary glosses as a strategy in second language reading. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 4 (1), 115-137.
Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15(2), 169-182.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 503-516.
Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.
Kommers, P. A. M., Grabinger, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1996). Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbum
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lee, J. F. (1986). Background knowledge & L2 reading. The Modern Language
Journal, 70, 350-354.
Leow, R. P. (1993). To simplify or not to simplify. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (3), 337-55.
Liang, G. P. (2003) The effects of visual aids on junior high EFL students’ English reading performance. National Kahsiung Normal University.
Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension
online. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2), 41-50
Lotherington-Woloszyn, H. (1993). Do simplified texts simplify language comprehension for EFL learner? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED371583)
Lucas, M. A. (1991). Systematic grammatical simplification. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(3), 241-248.
Mandl, H., & Levin, J. R. (1989). Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Martinez-Lage, A. (1997) Hypermedia technology for teaching reading. In Bush, M. D. & Terry, R. M. (Eds.), Technology enhanced language learning (pp. 122-163). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Martinez-Lage, A., & Herren, D. (1998). Challenges and opportunities: Curriculum
pressures in the technological present. In J. Harper, M. Lively, & M. Williams
(Eds.), The coming of age of the profession: Issues and emerging ideas for the
teaching of foreign languages (pp. 141-167).
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower. G., & Mars, R. (1995) A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31-44
Moore, P. J., & Scevak, J. J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: a developmental perspective . Journal of Research in Reading, 20(3), 205-223
Mountford, A. (1976). The notion of simplification: its relevance to materials preparation for English and technology. In J. C. Richards (ED), English for Science and Technology (pp.143-162). Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall.
Omaggio, A. C. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: do they help? Foreign Language Annuals, 12(2), 107-116
Ostler, S. (1980). A survey of academic needs for advanced ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 489-502.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Pak, J. (1986). The effects of vocabulary glossing on ESL reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Pearson, D., & Johnson, D. D. (1972). Teaching reading comprehension. New
York City: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
Purnell, K. N., & Solman, R. T. (1991). The influence of technical illustrations on
students’ comprehension in geography. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 277-299.
Richards, J.C., Platt, J. & Platt, H. (1998). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong: Pearson Education North Asia Limited.
Roby, W. B. (1999). What’s in a gloss? Language Learning & Technology, 2(2): 94-101. Retrieved from the World Wide Web July 20, 2006: http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/roby/index.html
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. (CHIP Technical
Report No. 56). Paper presented at the Attention and Performance VI
International Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, July 1975). (Retrieved From
ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 155 587).
Shieh, Yen-Lung. (1992). Reading English exposition for gist by Chinese EFL learners: Comprehension, recall and instruction. unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University:
Shin, Y. F. and Alessi, S. M. (1996). Effects of Text versus Voice on Learning in
Multimedia Courseware. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,
5(2), 203-218.
Silberstein, S. (1994). Techniques and Resources in Teaching Reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
Singer, M., & Hallderson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging
influences. Cognitive Psychology, 80(1), 1-32.
Spache, G. S. (1974). Good reading for poor readers. Champaign, IL: Garrard
Stemler L. K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: a literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3-4), 339-359.
Sultan, A., & Marshall, J. (1995). The effects of computer visual appeal on learners’ motivation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391488)
Tickoo, M. L. (1993). Simplification: a viewpoint in outline. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 371586).
Tommola, J. (1980). Some parameters of simplification. (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED269975)
Waddil, P. J., McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O. (1988). Illustrations as adjuncts to prose: A test-appropriate processing approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 457-464.
Wang, M. C. (2003). A case study of multimedia in TEFL. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan
Winder, B. (1996). Aesop’s fables. Taipei: Bookman
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211-247.
Wolf, D. F. (1993). A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure FL reading
comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 473-489.
Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (1991). The first days of school. Sunnyvale, CA:
Imagery Wong.
Wu, J. C. (2002). The effects of multimedia annotations on second language vocabulary retention. Unpublished master’s thesis, Providence University, Taiwan
Yano, Y., Long, H. M. & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189-219.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top