臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

論文名稱：女性志工之人格特質、投入程度與幸福感關係之探討─以中南部慈濟志工為例
校(院)所組別：大葉大學管理學院休閒事業管理學系研究所
畢業時間及提要別：九十五學年度第一學期碩士學位論文提要
研究生：吳曉瑜
論文提要內容：
本研究之主要目的在探討慈濟女性志工之人格特質、投入程度與幸福感間的關係。以立意抽樣法，選取五處慈濟聯絡點之女性志工為研究樣本，共發放問卷618份，有效問卷483份，有效回收率為78.2%。資料分析方法包含描述性統計、因素分析、信度分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析及Pearson積差相關分析等，分析結果摘述如下：
一、樣本特性
平均年齡44歲，以專科、家庭主婦、已婚有偶、子女都已成人並離家另立門戶、有宗教信仰為最多，個人每月可支配所得60,001~80,000元居多，參與狀況以有擔任志工幹部稍多，平均服務年資為2年9個月，每週平均服務時數為5.2小時。
二、假設驗證
(一)年齡、家庭狀況、教育程度在其投入程度上有顯著差異。
(二)婚姻狀況、教育程度、經濟狀況在其幸褔感上有顯著差異。
(三)參與年資、每週服務時間在其投入程度上有顯著差異。
(四)外向人格與其投入程度呈顯著正相關。
(五)神經質人格與其投入程度呈顯著負相關。
(六)人格特質與其幸褔感呈顯著正相關。
(七)投入程度與其幸褔感呈顯著正相關。
關鍵字：女性志工(female volunteers)，慈濟(Tzu Chi)，人格特質(personality traits)，投入程度(involvement)，幸福感(well-being)

The Relationships of Personality Traits, Involvment,
and Well-being: An Exploratory Study on the
Female Volunteers of Tzu-Chi

This study seeks to explore the relationship between personal traits, degree of involve-ment, and Well-being of female Tzu Chi volunteers. Purposive sampling were used to select the female volunteers of five Tzu Chi contact locations as the research sample. 618 question-naires were released, 483 were valid, and the rate of valid retrieval was 78.2%. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, t-test, one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis; the analytical results are summarized as follows:
1. Sample traits
Average age is 44, most of whom graduated from vocational schools, are housewives, married, with grown children who have left the home, and have religious beliefs. Most have dispensable income of between 60,001 and 80,000 NT dollars. Slightly fewer participate as volunteer cadres, the average year of service is two years and nine months, and the average service hours are 5.2.
2. Proving hypotheses
(1) There is a significant difference in age, family situations, and education in terms of degree of involvement.
(2) There is a significant difference in marital status, education, and financial conditions in terms of well-being.
(3) There is a significant difference in years of participation and numbers of service hours per week in terms of degree of involvement.
(4) There is a positive correlation between an extrovert personality and the degree of involve-ment.
(5) There is a negative correlation between a neurotic personality and the degree of involve-ment.
(6) There is a positive correlation between personality traits and the well-being.
(7) There is a positive correlation between degree of involvement and the well-being.


Key words: female volunteers, Tzu Chi, personality traits, involvement, well-being

中文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iii
英文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iv
誌謝辭　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vi
內容目錄　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vii
表目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ix
圖目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． x
第一章　　緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第一節　　研究動機．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第二節　　研究問題．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 3
　　第三節　　研究對象與範圍．．．．．．．．．．．． 4
　　第四節　　研究限制．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 5
第二章　　文獻探討．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
　　第一節　　志願服務．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
　　第二節　　人格特質．．．．．．．．．．．． 14
　　第三節　　投入程度 16
　　第四節　　幸福感．．．．．．．．．．．． 22
　　第五節　　人格特質、投入程度與幸福感間之關係． 27
第三章　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 29
　　第一節　　研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 29
　　第二節　　研究假設．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 30
　　第三節　　抽樣方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 30
　　第四節　　預試及正式調查．．．．．．．．．．．． 31
　　第五節　　問卷設計與操作型定義．．．．．．．．．． 32
　　第六節　　資料分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 36
第四章　　研究結果．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 38
　　第一節　　基本資料分析．．．．．．．．．．．．． 38
　　第二節　　女性志工之投入程度分析．．．．．．．．．．． 42
　　第三節　　女性志工之幸福感分析．．．．．．．．．． 49
　　第四節　　人格特質、投入程度與幸福感間之關係． 54
第五章　　結論與建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 57
　　第一節　　研究結果摘要．．．．．．．．．．．．． 57
　　第二節　　綜合討論．．．．．．．．．．．．． 59
　　第三節　　建議．．．．．．．．．．．．． 66
參考文獻　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 70
附錄A　　女性志工之人格特質、投入程度與幸福感關係
調查表．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 83

一、中文部分

(一)專書、期刊、博碩士論文
G. Godbey (2000)，你生命中的休閒(康箏譯)，昆明：雲南人民。

J. Sternberg (2002)，普通心理學(陳億貞譯)，台北：雙葉書廊。

L. A. Pervin (1993)，人格心理學(洪光遠等人譯) ，台北：桂冠圖書。

M. Csikszentmihalyi (2001)，快樂，從心開始(張定綺譯)，台北：天下。

吳佳玲(2003)，觀光業職業婦女角色衝突、休閒阻礙與休閒活動參與之探討，南華大學旅遊事業管理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。

吳衍潔(2002)，大台北地區民眾休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究，國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。

宋世雯(2000)，成人參與志願服務之工作投入與滿足相關研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。

林秀英(2003)，婦女參與志願服務動機與工作滿足之研究－以花蓮地區祥和計畫志工為例，國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所未出版之碩士論文。

林淑芬(2003)，女性保健志工人格特質、組織承諾與神馳經驗關係之探討－以彰化縣市為例，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

邱皓政(2000)，量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(初版)，台北：五南圖書。
施建彬、陸洛(1997)，幸福心理學，(M. Argyle 原著)，台北：巨流。

施建彬(1995)，幸福感來源與相關因素之探討，國立高雄醫學院行為科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。

胡家欣(2000)，大學生的休閒認知、涉入與體驗－兼論人格特質的影響，高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。

翁振益，林若慧，吳芳儀(2006)，認真休閒者之動機、承諾與休閒結果關係之研究－非營利組織志工為例，戶外遊憩研究，19(1)，77-100。

張春居(2003)，志工的休閒活動與工作投入關係之研究─以救國團為例，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。

莊雅雯(2004)，活動志願工作者人格特質、參與動機與神馳體驗關係之探討，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

郭淑菁(2003)，登山社員休閒涉入、休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

陳亞雅(2004)，宗教志願工作者休閒態度與休閒阻礙關係之研究，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

陳玲婉(2005)，國小學童母親人格特質與親職壓力、幸福感之相關研究，國立高雄師範大學教育學系研究所未出版之碩士論文。

陳泰元(2002)，國人參與志願服務之決定性因素，南華大學非營利事業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。

陸洛(1998)，中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討，人文及社會科學彙刊，8(1)，115-137。

曾艷秋(2002)，已婚婦女生活目標、目標社會支持與幸福感之相關研究，國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所未出版之碩士論文

馮燕(1992)，我國婦女成長教育的學習需求，載於中華民國成人教育學主編，婦女教育，台北:師大書苑。

黃庭芳(2003)，花蓮市職業婦女工作壓力、家庭壓力和休閒阻礙關係之研究，大葉大學休閒事業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。

黃曼婷(2001)，家庭主婦志願工作者社會支持、婚姻滿意度、親子關係之研究，國立政治大學社會學研究所未出版之碩士論文。

黃國誠(2003)，高雄市志工幸福感、死亡態度與生命意義之相關研究，國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。

廖宮凰(2004)，婦女志工服務學習經驗之研究，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。

趙文祺(2004)，體驗教育活動參與者內在動機、活動投入程度與神馳體驗關係之探討，大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。
劉盈足(2005)，公務員週末休閒涉入與其休閒滿意度之關係─以彰化縣鄉鎮市公所為例。大葉大學休閒事業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。

賴玫凰(2003)，家庭主婦志工參與動機、督導關係與組織承諾之相關研究，東海大學社會工作學系未出版之碩士論文。

嚴幸文(1993)，醫院志願服務人員人格特質和工作滿意度之研究。東海大學社會工作研究所未出版之碩士論文。

(二)報紙、雜誌、網路
內政部統計資訊網(2005, July 12)，性別統計指標：台閔地區社會褔利志願服務調查表[線上資料]，來源：http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/。

內政部統計資訊網(2005, August 12)，性別統計指標：台閔地區社會褔利志願服務調查表[線上資料]，來源：http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/。

慈濟全球資訊網(2005, November 7)，慈濟基金會簡介[線上資料]，來源：http://www2.tzuchi.org.tw/tw-brief/index.htm。




二、英文部份

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London and New York: Routedge.

Argyle, M. (1992). The social psychology of everyday life. London: Routledge.

Argyle, M., & Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extraverts. Personal-ity and Individual Differences, 11, 1011-1017.

Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531-1544.

Bialeschki, M.D., & Michener, S. (1994). Re-entering leisure: Tran-sition within the role of motherhood. Journal of Leisure Re-search, 26(1), 57-74.

Bloch, P. H., & Bruce, G. D. (1984). The leisure experience and consumer products: An investigation of underlying satisfac-tions. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 74-88.


Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Market-ing, 47, 69-81.

Bongguk, J . & David, R. A. (1995). The relationship between per-sonality types and leisure preferences. 1995 Symposium On Leisure Research. San Antonio, Texas: October (5-9), 87.

Bryce, J. & Haworth, J. (2002). Wellbeing and flow in sample of male and female office workers. Leisure Studies, 21, 249-263.

Cantor, N., & Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 230-243). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Costa, P. T., ＆ McRae, R. R. (1980). Somatic complaints in males as a function of age and neuroticism: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3, 245-257.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality & Social Psy-chology, 47(1), 1105-1117.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjec-tive well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-303.

Dimanche, F., Havitz, M, E., & Howard, D. R. (1991). Testing the Involvement Profile Scale in the context of selected recrea-tional and touristic activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 51-66.

Ellis, S. J., & Noyes, K. K. (1990). By the people: A history of Americans as volunteers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of sub-jective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulle-tin, 11, 89-97.

Eysenck, H. J. (1944). Types of personality─A factorial study of 700 neurotic soldiers. Journal of Mental Science, 90, 851-861.

Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of person-ality. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 245-261.

Godbey, G. (2002). Professional issues in leisure studies, physical education and tourism: implications for Taiwan. The 2ed Sport and Leisure International Conference ─ Trends in Sport and Leisure manaement. Unpublished workshop essay. Grantute Institute of Sport and Leisure Management, Taiwan.

Gora, J., & Nemerowicz, G. (1985). Emergency squad volunteers: Professionalism in unpaid work. New York: Praeger.

Gunter, B., & Gunter, N. (1980). Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modern leisure. Sociological Quarterly, 2, 361-374.

Haggard, L. M., & Williams, D. R. (1992). Identity affirmation through leisure activities: Leisure symbols of the self. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 1-18.

Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1991). Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts. Leisure Sciences, 12, 179-195.

Haworth, J. T. (1986). Meaningful activity and psychological model of non-employment. Leisure Studies, 5, 281-297.

Haworth, J. T., & Hill, S. (1992). Work, leisure, and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 147-160.

Heintzman, P. & Mannell, R. C. (2003). Spiritual functions of lei-sure and spiritual well-being: Coping with time pressure. Leisure Sciences, 25(2/3), 207-230.
Hill, P., & Argyle, M. (1998). Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality. Personal-ity and Individual Differences, 25, 523-535.

Kaplan, M. (1975). Leisure: Theory and policy. New York : Wiley.

Kim, S. S., Scott, D., & Crompton, J. L. (1997). An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavior involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 320-341.

Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer in-volvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 41-53.

Lu, L. (2000). Gender and conjugal differences in happiness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(1), 132-141.

Lu, L., & Argyle, M. (1994). Leisure satisfaction and happiness as a function of leisure activity. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 10, 89-96.

Mannel, R. C. (1994). High investment activity and life satisfaction- among older adults: Committed, serious leisure, and flow ac-tivities. In J. R. Kelly (Ed.). Activity and aging: Staying in-volved in later life. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.

McIntyre, N. (1989). The personal meaning of participation: Endur-ing involvement. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(2), 167-179.

Miller, S. A. (1998). Developmental research methods. Upper Sad-dle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Negrey, C. (1993). Gender, time and reduced work. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and in-volvement in personal projects: Toward and intergrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 762-767.

Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality: Theory and research (6th ed.). New York: John Wily & Sons.

Ragheb, M. G. (1993). Leisure and perceived wellness: A field in-vestigation. Leisure Sciences, 15, 13-24.

Schuett, M. A. (1993). Refining measure of adventure recreation involvement. Leisure Sciences, 15, 205-216.

Selin, S. W., & Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Re-search, 20, 237-244.

Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego- involve-ment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Shih, J. B. (1999). Cultural, social and individual correlates of hap-piness in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Univer-sity of Oxford Brookes, UK.

Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25, 251-272.

Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

Stebbins, R. A. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211-224.

Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Serious leisure. Society, 38(4), 53-58.

Stone, R. N. (1984). The marketing characteristics of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 210-215.

Sundeen, R. (1990). Family life course status and volunteer behav-ior：Implications for the single parent. Social Perspective, 33, 483-500.

Tedrick, T. & Henderson, K. A. (1989). Volunteers in leisure: A management perspective. Reston, VA.: Association of Leisure and Recreation.

Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.

Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in Amer-ica’s fragmental communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.