跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.84.18.52) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/10 20:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:于紹霖
研究生(外文):Shao-lin Yu
論文名稱:螞蟻對台灣產奴草屬植物授粉之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on ant-pollination of Mitrastemon in Taiwan
指導教授:蕭淑娟蕭淑娟引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:生命科學系所
學門:生命科學學門
學類:生物學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:46
中文關鍵詞:奴草屬螞蟻授粉
外文關鍵詞:Mitrastemonantpollination
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:511
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
奴草屬(Mitrastemon)植物為大花草科根部全寄生型植物,主要寄主為殼斗科之植物。台灣產有兩種:菱形奴草(M. kanehirai Y. Yamamoto)以及台灣奴草(M. kawasasakii Hayata)。菱形奴草分布於台灣低海拔闊葉林,台灣奴草則分布在台灣中海拔闊葉林,花期分別為9-12月、1-4月。奴草為兩性花,筒狀雄蕊先熟,隨後脫落露出雌蕊,屬於異花授粉之植物。開花期間可見大量螞蟻、蜂類、蠅類等昆蟲訪花。螞蟻為常見的訪花者,但在植物授粉作用中常被認定為盜蜜者。故本研究之目的為證實訪花螞蟻是否為台灣產奴草屬植物之授粉者。以野外觀察以及套袋實驗對兩種奴草進行授粉機制探討,並藉由觀察種子是否有多細胞團狀之內含物來判定授粉作用結果(結子率)。結果摘述如下:
以SEM觀察發現訪花螞蟻身上帶有奴草花粉,並由授粉實驗處理證實訪花螞蟻為奴草的授粉者,且菱形奴草比台灣奴草更依賴螞蟻授粉。但由平均結子率來看,顯示在授粉者重要性方面飛行性昆蟲仍大於螞蟻。且各授粉實驗處理發現奴草有效種子集中在果實上層,與中層、下層達到顯著差異(P<0.0001),顯示奴草開花期間子房內有多數胚珠未被授精,此現象推測與奴草花粉量不足以及花粉稔性低有關。此外本研究顯示螞蟻授粉的現象並不一定侷限在如過去研究所認為的乾、熱以及高山棲地中。
Mitrastemon is a root-holoparasitic plant in Rafflesiaceae. The hosts are mainly fagaceous plants. There are two species in Taiwan: M. kanehirai Y. Yamamoto and M. kawasasakii Hayata, which are distributed in broad-leafed forests at low- and mid-altitudes of Taiwan respectively. The flowering period is in September to December for the former, and January to April for the latter. The flower is bisexual and cross-pollinated, with protandrous, tubular androecium, and the pistil appears after tubular androecium abscises. During the flowering period many ants, bees, and flies visit the flowers. Although ants are common flower visitors, they are generally considered as “nectar thieves”. The study aims to demonstrate if ants are pollinator of Mitrastemon in Taiwan. This study assessed pollination success under field investigations and different pollination experiments by estimating the seed set that was seeds determined by seed containing a cell mass. The result shows that there were pollen grains on ants, and ants are pollinator of Mitrastemon. The pollination experiments also show that M. kanehirai Y. Yamamoto depend more on ants for pollination than M. kawasasakii Hayata. However, the average of seed sets shows that winged insects appear to be better pollinator than ants. The seed set at the upper layer of the fruit is the highest, which is significantly different from those at the middle and lower layers(P<0.0001), suggesting there were many ovules not been fertilized during the flowering period due to fewer pollen grains and low pollen vitality. Finally, this study indicates that ant-pollination is not confined to hot and dry habitats or alpine region.
中文摘要......................................................................................................i
英文摘要…..................................................................................................ii
目次............................................................................................................iii
表目次…....................................................................................................iv
圖目次….....................................................................................................v
前言…........................................................................................................1
前人研究….................................................................................................2
材料及方法…..............................................................................................5
結果............................................................................................................8
討論..........................................................................................................11
參考文獻….….….………….………………..…………….…………………. 43
1. 林珈芝。 2003 。紫背脈葉蘭種子發育與發芽之研究。國立中興大學農藝學系碩士論文 1-79。
2. 姚榮鼐、許世忠 。1996。 溪頭台灣奴草、蓮華池菱形奴草之初步生物研究。 台大實驗林研究報告 10:131-144。
3. 劉盈吟。2007。台灣產奴草屬植物蜜腺構造和蜜液動態變化與成份。國立中興大學生命科學系碩士論文
4. 劉聖譽。 2000。 台灣產奴草屬植物之授粉作用與族群遺傳研究。 國立中興大學植物學系碩士論文 1-97。
5. Akuzawa, E. 1985. Problems concerning the period of occurrence of Kinabalu Mitrastemon. Parasitic Plants Magazine Preserving Society of Mitrastemon & Balanophora Tokyo, Japan 13:23-27.
6. Akuzawa, E. 1986. Blooming season of Kinabalu Mitrastemon (follow-up report). Parasitic Plants Magazine Preserving Society ofMitrastemon & Balanophora Tokyo, Japan 15:26-31.
7. Akuzawa, E. 1989. Member of Rafflesiaceous family (1) a peculiargroup of parasitic plants. Parasitic Plants Magazine PreservingSociety of Mitrastemon & Balanophora Tokyo, Japan 18(1):36-58.
8. Altshuler, D. L. 1999. Novel interactions of non-pollinating ants with pollinators and fruit consumers in a tropical forest. Oecologia. 119:600-606.
9. Ashman, T.-L. and E. A. King. 2005. Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or anatagonisis? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Am. J. Bot. 92: 891-895.
10. Barkman T. J., S. H. Lim, K. M. Salleh, and J. Nais. 2004. Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world’s largest flower. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 101:787-792.
11. Beaman, R. S., P. J. Decker, and J. H. Beaman. 1988. Pollination of Rafflesia (Rafflesiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75:1148-1162.
12. Beattie, A. J., C. Turnbull, R. B. Knox and E. G. Williams. 1984. Ant inhibition of pollen function:a possoble reason why ant pollination is rare. Amer.J.Bot. 71:421-426.
13. Beattie, A. J., C. Turnbull, T. Hough, S. Jobson and R. B. Knox. 1985. The vulnerability of pollen and fungal spores to ant secretions:evidence and some evolutionary implications. Amer.J.Bot.72:606-614.
14. Bouman, F. and W. Meijer. 1994. Comparative structure of ovulesand seeds in Rafflesiaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 193:187-212.
15. Faegri, K. and L. Van Der Pijl. 1971. The principles of pollination ecology. 2nd edition. Pergamon Press, Oxford: New York. USA
16. Garcia-Franco, J.G. and V. Rico-Gray. 1997. Reproductive biology of the holoparasitic endophyte Bdallophyton bambusarum (Rafflesiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 123:237-247.
17. Gomez, J. M. and R. Zamora. 1992. Pollination by ant:consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system. Oecologia. 91:410-418
18. Gomez, J. M., R. Zamora, J. A. Hódar and D. Garcia. 1996. Experimental study of pollination by ants in Mediterranean high mountain and arid habitats. Oecologia. 105:236-242.
19. Hayata, B. 1913. On the systematic position of Mitrastemon, as agenus representing a special tribus of the Rafflesiaceae. Icon. Plant From.3:199-213.
20. Herrera, M. C. 1987. Components of pollinator “qulity”: comparative analysis of a diverse assemblage. Okios. 50:79-90.
21. Herrera, M. C. 1989. pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate:analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator system. Oecologia. 80:241-248.
22. Hickman, J. C. 1974. Pollination by ants: A low-energy system. Science. 184: 1290-1292.
23. Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson. 1990. The Ants. p.1-732. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Massachusetts. USA.
24. Kawakita, A., and M. Kato 2002. Flora biology and unique pollination system of root holoparasites, Balanophora kuroiwai and B. tobiracola (Balanophoraceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:1164-1170.
25. Makino, T. 1909. Mitrastemma yamamotoi. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 23:325-327.
26. Meijer, W. and J. F. Veldkamp. 1993. A revision of Mitrastema (Rafflesiaceae). Blumea. 38:221-229.
27. Nickrent D. L., A Blarer, Y-L Qiu, R. Vidal-Russell and Anderson F E. 2004. Phylogenetic inference in Rafflesiales: the influence of rate heterogeneity and horizontal gene transfer. BMC Evol. Biol. 4(40):1-17.
28. Patiño, S., J. Grace and H. Bänziger. 2002 .Endothermy by flowers of Rhizanthes lowii (Rafflesiaceae). Oecologia. 124:149-155.
29. Patiño, S., T. Aalto, A. A. Edwards and J. Grace. 2002. Is Rafflesia an endothermic flower? New Phytol. 154:426-437.
30. Proctor, H. C. and L. D. Harder. 1994. Pollen load, capsule weight, and seed production in three orchid species. Can. J. Bot. 72:249-255.
31. Ramsey, M. 1995. Ant pollination of the perennial herb Blandfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Oikos 74: 265-272.
32. Wanger, D. 1997. The influence of ant nests on Acacia seed production, herbivory and soil nutrients. J. Ecol. 85:83-93.
33. Wanger, D. 2000. Pollen viability reduction as a potential cost of ant association for Acacia constricta (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:711-715.
34. Watanabe, K. 1933. Biologie von Mitrastemon yamamotoi Makino (Rafflesiaceae).1.fruchte und samen. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 47:798-805.
35. Yang, Y. P. and S. Y. Lu. 1996. Rafflesiaceae, pp. 652-655. InEditorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Flora of Taiwan. 2nd edition. Vol. 2. Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Taiwan.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top