跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.222.134.250) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/10/07 04:00
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林祐詳
研究生(外文):You-Hsiang Lin
論文名稱:換股比率對合併企業長期績效之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effect of Exchange Ratio on Post-acquisition Performance
指導教授:紀志毅紀志毅引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-yi Chi
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:財務金融系所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:34
中文關鍵詞:換股比率支付工具併購合併後績效
外文關鍵詞:Exchange RatioMethod of PaymentMerge and AcquisitionPost-acquisition Performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:130
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
過去許多文獻試著用股權結構、投資機會、資訊不對稱、景氣循環等因素,探討不同併購支付方式對往後公司的影響,而本文探討以股票交換為併購方式的公司其換股比率是否影響合併後的績效,其結果依不同績效因子而有所不同。
以營運現金流量衡量公司營運上的績效,結果發現,換股比率的合理性對此無顯著影響,可能原因為公司規模所造成;扣除公司規模的影響,以營運現金流量的成長率衡量公司績效,結果發現,換股比率的合理性具有顯著的影響力,這隱含公司欲以股票作為合併支付的工具時,務必力求雙嬴的局面,因換股比率的不當而對一方或雙方不利,必會影響往後的發展;以股東的角度切入合併後的績效,結果顯示,換股比率對股東權益報酬無顯著影響,這表示即便是雙嬴的換股合併案,股東也無法就此獲利。
Recent studies on corporate merge and acquisition examine whether subjects such as ownership structure, investment opportunity, asymmetric information, business cycle have impacted on post-acquisition firm performance. This article examine whether exchange ratio used in stock offer as a method of payment, and the results rely on different performance factors.
The first performance factor using operating cash flows as performance on firm’s operating provides inconclusive result on the rationality of exchange ratio. It could result from firm size. The second performance factor using operating cash flows growth rate to exclude size effect provides significant influence that implies merging firms using stock offer as a method of payment have to get a double wins situation because irrationality exchange ratio will affect development in the future. The third performance factor in shareholder perspective provides inconclusive result on the rationality of exchange ratio. It means that even stock-offered acquisition with rational exchange ratio couldn’t benefit to shareholder.
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1
第二節 研究架構……………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 不同支付方式影響合併績效之相關文獻……………3
第二節 換股比率的相關文獻…………………………………7
第三節 L-G換股比率介紹 ……………………………………8
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究資料來源 ……………………………………………14
第二節 研究樣本的選擇標準 ………………………………14
第三節 迴歸分析 ……………………………………………15
第四章 實證結果
第一節 敘述統計 ……………………………………………19
第二節 迴歸結果 ……………………………………………21
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論 ……………………………………………30
第二節 研究建議 ……………………………………………31
參考文獻……………………………………………………………32
胡慈容 (2003), 企業購併之長期績效之評估, 東海大學管理研究所碩士論文.
Agrawal, A., J.F. Jaffe, and G.N. Mandelker, 1992, The Post-merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Re-examination of an Anomaly, Journal of Finance, 47, 1605-1621.
Amihud, Y., B. Lev, and N.G. Travlos (1990), Corporate Control and the Choice of Investment Financing The Case of Corporate Acquisitions, Journal of Finance, 45, 603-616.
Asquith, P., R.F. Bruner, and D.W. Mullins (1983), The Gains to Bidding Merge, Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 121-140.
Bae, S.C. and S. Sakthivel (2000), An Empirical Analysis of Exchange Ratio Determination Models for Merger: A Note, Journal of business finance andf accounting, 27, 511-521.
Black, B. (1992), Agent Watching Agents: The Promise of Institution Investor Voice, UCLA Law Review, 39, 811-893.
Chang, S. and E. Mais (2000), Managerial Motives and Merger Financing, Financial Review, 35,139-152.
Chung, K.H. and C. Charoenwong (1991), Investment Options, Asset-in-place, and the Risk of Stocks, Financial Management, 20, 21-33.
Choe, H.R., R.W Masulis, and V. Nanda (1993), Common Stock Offerings Across The Business Cycle, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 3-31.
Conn, R.L. and J.F. Nieisen (1977), An Empirical Test of the Larson-Gonedes Exchange Ratio Determination Model, Journal of Finance, 32, 749-759.
Cooke, T., A. Gregory, and B. Pearson (1994), A UK Empirical Test of the Larson-Gonedes Exchange Ratio model, Accounting and Business Research, 24, 133-147.
Doukas, J. and Travlos, N.G. (1988) ‘The Effects of Corporate Multinationalism on Shareholders’ Wealth: Evidence from International Acquisitions’, Journal of Finance 43: 1161–1175.
Eckbo, B.E., R.M. Giammarino, and R.L. Heinkel (1990), Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests, The Review of Financial Studies, 3,651-675.

Faccio, M. and R.W. Masulis (2005), The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Finance, 60, 1345-1387.
Ghosh, A. and W. Ruland (1998), Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention, Journal of Finance, 53, 785-798.
Gilson, R.J. (1986), The Law and Finance of Corporate Acquisitions, (The Foundation Press, Inc., Mineola, NY)
Hansen, R.G (1987), A Theory For the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Business, 60, 70-95
Heron, R. and E. Lie (2002), Operating Performance and the Method of Payment in Takeovers, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 137-155.
Hung, Y.S. and R.A. Walkling (1988), Target abnormal Returns Associated with Acquisition Announcements: Payment, Acquisition form, and Managerial Resistance, Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 329-349.
Jarrell, G.A. and A.B. Poulson (1989), The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offer: Evidence form three decades, Financial Management, 12-19.
Jensen, M.C. (1986), Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
Jensen, M.C. (1991), Corporate Control and the Politics if Finance, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 4, 13-33.
Jung, K., Y.C. Kim, and R. Stulz (1996), Timing, Investment Opportunities, Managerial Discretion, and the Security Issue Decision, Journal of Financial Economics, 42, 159-185.
Larson, K.D and N.J. Gonedes (1969), Business Combinations: An Exchange Ratio Determination Model, The Accounting Review, 720-728.
Linn, S.C. and J.A. Switzer (2000), Are Cash Acquisitions Associated With Better Post Combination Operating Performance than Stock Acquisitions, Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 1113-1138.
Loughran, T. and A.M. Vijh (1997), Do Long-term Shareholders Benefit from Corporate Acquisitions, Journal of Finance, 52, 1765-1790.
Marsh, P. (1982), The Choice between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study, Journal of Finance, 37, 121-144.
Martin, K.J. (1996), The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership, Journal of Finance, 51, 1227-1246.
Martin, K.J. and J.J. McConnell (1991), Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeover, and Management Turnover, Journal of Finance, 46, 671-688.
Myers, S.C. and N.S. Majluf (1984), Corporate Finance and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221.
Peterson, D.R. and P.P. Peterson (1991), The Medium of Exchange in Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Banking and Finance, 15, 383-405.
Song, M.H. and R.A. Walkling (1993), The Impact of Managerial Ownership on Acquisition Attempts and Target Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 4, 439-457.
Stulz, R.M. (1988), Managerial Control of Voting Rights Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-54.
Taggart, R.(1977), A Model of Financing Decisions, Journal of Finance, 32, 1467-1484.
Travlos, N.G. (1987), Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms'' Stock Returns, Journal of Finance, 42, 943-963.
Yagil, J.(1987), An Exchange Ratio Determination Model for Merge, Finance Review, 22, 195-202.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top