臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

科技的快速發展，使得生活在資訊社會的人們需要時而接觸新科技，並且依賴科技帶來的便利性，根據研究報告指出，大約有80%的人在日常生活中會接觸到資訊產品。現今行動資訊產品已成為人們生活的一部分，因此針對其開發一套新的輸入方式是必要的。
本研究將針對行動資訊產品，發展新式的輸入方式。研究的重點在於探討將和弦鍵盤的控制單元轉移至觸控筆上操作的可行性。因為根據研究指出，雙手同時工作能較單手獨自作業帶來更高的效率。故提出新型態觸控筆搭配和弦輸入的組合，並與現有產品的輸入方式作比較，找出最佳之組合。研究結果可做為未來行動資訊產品之輸入設備設計的參考。
本研究所得出的結論與建議如下
1. 和弦鍵盤搭配觸控筆的輸入效率因學習而逐漸成長－
　　本實驗所進行的三組和弦鍵盤搭配觸控筆編組，皆顯示使用者會因為使用天
　數的增加而增加輸入效率。
2. 和弦鍵盤搭配具控制單元觸控筆的輸入效率高於傳統和弦輸入鍵盤－
　　雙手同時工作有助於提昇工作效率，將和弦鍵盤的控制單元移植至觸控筆上
　有助於提升輸入的效率。
3. 觸控筆上過多的控制單元無助於輸入效率與輸入錯誤率的提升－
　　雙手同時工作雖有助於提昇工作效率，但雙手間存在過多訊號的傳達與處理可能反而會降低其效率。
4. 手機編組搭配一控制單元觸控筆有較高的輸入效率與較低的輸入錯誤率－
　　在各組的測試之中，顯現出類似手機的編組漸漸為一般使用者所接受並有較高的輸入效率與較低的輸入錯誤率，尤其是在錯誤率上面最為明顯。
5. 和弦鍵盤上從屬單元的多寡會影響操作手的舒適度－
　　操作的從屬單元遞減手部的舒適度便遞增。
6. 觸控筆上增加的控制單元會影響執筆手的舒適度－
　　控制單元遞增舒適度便會遞減。
7. 手機編碼方式的學習性較為簡單－
　　類似手機編排的編組對於受測者來說是較為簡單的，也較容易被接受。
8. 觸控筆上的控制單元多寡會影響學習的難易度－
　　觸控筆上放置適度的控制單元數量，能在學習性與輸入效率上取得平衡。

With the fast development of science and technology, people who lived in the information society always need to expose to new science and technology. According to some research papers, probably 80% of the persons will contact information products. The mobil information products have already become a part of people's life now, so it is essential to develop new input devices.
This research will develop the new Input Device for mobile information products. The main point of this research is to research the improvements when replaced the control unit from the chord keyboards to the touch pen. Because pointing out in the research paper, both hands work at the same time brings higher efficiency than one hand. Propose that the new-type attitude that the merger of chord keyboards and touch pens. And compare with the existing products, find out the best association. The result of study can be done for the reference of mobile information products’ input device design.
In conclusion and suggestion:
1. The input efficiency of using chord keyboards and touch pen increases with practice.
2. The input efficiency of using chord keyboards and touch pen with control units is higher than traditional chord keyboards.
3. Too many control units on the touch pen is helpless to improve the input efficiency and input wrong rate.
4. The third group has higher input efficiency and lower input wrong rate.
5. The numbers of subordinate units on the chord keyboards will influence the comfort of the operating hands.
6. The increased numbers of control units on the touch pen will influence the comfort of the write hands.
7. The fourth group is easier to practice.
8. The numbers of control units on the touch pen will influence the difficulty or ease of practice.

中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………1
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………2
目錄……………………………………………………………………………………3
表目錄…………………………………………………………………………………6
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………………7
第一章 緒論 …………………………………………………………………………8
1-1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………………8
1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………………………………8
1-3 研究架構…………………………………………………………………………9
1-3-1前置作業 ………………………………………………………………………9
1-3-2文獻探討 ………………………………………………………………………9
1-3-3實驗階段………………………………………………………………………10
1-3-4結論……………………………………………………………………………10
第二章 文獻與理論探討……………………………………………………………12
2-1現有輸入設備的現況探討………………………………………………………12
2-1-1文字鍵盤………………………………………………………………………12
2-1-2滑鼠……………………………………………………………………………12
2-1-3語音輸入………………………………………………………………………12
2-1-4觸控螢幕………………………………………………………………………12
2-1-5觸控筆…………………………………………………………………………13
2-1-6和弦鍵盤………………………………………………………………………13
2-2現有行動資訊產品輸入設備探討………………………………………………15
2-2-1單一指向設備…………………………………………………………………15
2-2-2外接式鍵盤……………………………………………………………………15
2-2-3嵌入式鍵盤……………………………………………………………………16
2-2-4語音輸入………………………………………………………………………16
2-3使用輸入設備所照成之傷害……………………………………………………16
2-3-1滑鼠所造成相關之傷害………………………………………………………17
2-3-2鍵盤所造成相關之傷害………………………………………………………17
2-4和弦鍵盤…………………………………………………………………………18
2-4-1和弦鍵盤分析…………………………………………………………………18
2-4-2 Half QWERTY和弦鍵盤分析…………………………………………………19
2-5輸入設備選定……………………………………………………………………20
2-5-1傳統Half QWERTY和弦鍵盤搭配傳統觸控筆 ………………………………20
2-5-2新式Half QWERTTY和弦鍵盤搭配新式觸控筆………………………………21
2-5-3學習性佳和弦鍵盤(洪湘穎,2002)搭配新式觸控筆 ………………………22
2-5-4類似手機編組之和弦鍵盤(陳俊宇,2004)搭配新式觸控筆 ………………23
2-6觸控筆……………………………………………………………………………24
2-6-1觸控筆分析……………………………………………………………………24
2-6-2觸控筆輸入……………………………………………………………………25
2-6-3人類輸入操作之習慣…………………………………………………………26
2-7配合人類手部的設計……………………………………………………………27
2-7-1與手部抓握方式相關研究……………………………………………………27
2-7-2抓握或夾捏動作與力量相關研究……………………………………………27
2-7-3抓握直徑與力量相關研究……………………………………………………28
2-7-4最適直徑、長度、角度、材質與型態之相關研究…………………………29
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………………30
3-1建立觸控筆與和弦鍵盤組合……………………………………………………30
3-2實驗分析方法……………………………………………………………………30
3-2-1使用性工程（Usability Engineering） …………………………………30
3-2-2統計與分析方法………………………………………………………………32
3-3實驗一：操作觸控筆按鍵之手指伸曲範圍……………………………………33
3-3-1實驗目的………………………………………………………………………33
3-3-2實驗變項………………………………………………………………………33
3-3-3受測者…………………………………………………………………………33
3-3-4實驗設備………………………………………………………………………33
3-3-5實驗場地規劃…………………………………………………………………34
3-3-6實驗任務………………………………………………………………………34
3-3-7實驗流程與步驟………………………………………………………………34
3-3-8實驗流程示意圖………………………………………………………………35
3-3-9實驗小結………………………………………………………………………36
3-4實驗二：和弦鍵盤編組之設計與規劃…………………………………………39
3-4-1實驗目的………………………………………………………………………39
3-4-2實驗變項………………………………………………………………………39
3-4-3四組實驗編組示意……………………………………………………………40
3-4-4受測者…………………………………………………………………………41
3-4-5實驗設備………………………………………………………………………41
3-4-6實驗場地規劃…………………………………………………………………43
3-4-7實驗畫面………………………………………………………………………43
3-4-8實驗任務………………………………………………………………………43
3-4-9實驗流程與步驟………………………………………………………………45
3-4-10實驗流程示意圖 ……………………………………………………………46
3-4-11前測實驗 ……………………………………………………………………47
3-4-12正式實驗 ……………………………………………………………………50
第四章 實驗結果與分析……………………………………………………………52
4-1文字輸入速率分析………………………………………………………………52
4-1-1和弦編組文字輸入速率進步情況……………………………………………52
4-1-2和弦編組文字輸入速率分析…………………………………………………53
4-2文字輸入錯誤率分析……………………………………………………………56
4-2-1和弦編組文字輸入錯誤率率進步情況………………………………………56
4-2-2和弦編組文字輸入錯誤率分析………………………………………………57
4-3受測者主觀量表分析……………………………………………………………59
4-3-1主觀滿意舒適度評比結果……………………………………………………59
4-3-2主觀滿意學習難易度評比結果………………………………………………60
4-4小結………………………………………………………………………………60
第五章 結論…………………………………………………………………………62
5-1和弦鍵盤搭配觸控筆的輸入效率因學習而逐漸成長…………………………62
5-2和弦鍵盤搭配具控制單元觸控筆的輸入效率高於傳統和弦輸入方式………62
5-3觸控筆上過多的控制單元無助於輸入效率與輸入錯誤率的提升……………62
5-4手機編碼方式有較高的輸入效率與較低的輸入錯誤率………………………62
5-5和弦鍵盤上從屬單元的多寡會影響操作手的舒適度…………………………62
5-6觸控筆上增加的控制單元會影響執筆手的舒適度……………………………63
5-7手機編碼方式的學習性較為簡單………………………………………………63
5-8觸控筆上的控制單元多寡會影響學習的難易度………………………………63
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………………64
附錄 …………………………………………………………………………………68

中文參考文獻
1.朱經明。1995。交談式多媒體電腦輔助教學促進輕度障礙兒童基本能力閱讀成效之研究。台中師範學院，台中。
2.何正斌，吳水丕，林姿芬。2002。抓握方式、筷子材質及筷尖紋路對挾物效能影響之研究。2002年人因工程學會年會暨研討會。265-270。
3.洪湘穎。2002。適用於行動資訊產品之和弦輸入設備研究。已出版碩士論文，國立成功大學，台南。
4.陳俊宇。2004。行動化資訊產品之整合輸入設備研究。已出版碩士論文，國立成功大學，台南。
5.陳志勇。1993。電腦工作站之人因工程相關危害簡介。勞工安全衛生簡訊。46。
6.陳柏州。2001。滑鼠設計與操作之評估研究。已出版碩士論文，大葉大學，彰化。
7.張一芩。1998。人因工程學。揚智文化事業股份有限公司，台北。
8.羅書宜。2004。觸控筆於電腦輸入之績效與創新。已出版博士論文，國立成功大學，台南。
9.梁濟康及譚宗城。2001。信報財經新聞星期六醫療寰宇版。2-10。
10.蔡登傳及宋同正。1996。產品設計的人因工程。六和出版社，台北。
英文參考文獻
1.Blote A. W., Zielstra EM., and Zoerewey MW. 1987. Writing posture and writing movement of children in kindergarten. J. Human Movement in Student. 13: 323-341
2.Buxton W. 2002. Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories, Techniques and Technology. 6 -2: 1-13.
3.Buxton W. and Brand A. M. 1986. A study in two handed input. CHI’S Proceedings.
4.Conrad R., Longman D.J.A. 1965. Standard Typewriter Versus Chord Keyboard: An Experimental Comparison. Ergonomics. 8: 77-88.
5.Cumming G. 1984. QWERTY and keyboard reform: the soft keyboard option. In Man-Machine Studies. 21: 445-450.
6.Cushman M. H., and D. J. Rosenberg. 1991. Human Factors in Product Design. Elsevier Amsterdam. 217-222.
7.Edgar Matias, I. Scott MacKenzie, and William Buxton. 1996. One-Handed Touch-Typing on a QWERTY Keyboard. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. 11: 1-27.
8.Fernstrom E. A., and M. O. Ericson. 1997. Computer mouse or trackpoint-effect on muscular load and operator experience. Applied Ergonomics. 28-5,6: 347-354.
9.Fisher D.A., and Bond C.W. 1992. A single-handed braille chord system for computer keyboard input. Computing Applications to Assist Persons with Disabilities. 200-202.
10.Fogleman M., and G. Brogmus. 1995. Computer mouse use and cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremities. Ergonomics. 38-12: 2465-2475.
11.Griffith R. T. 1949. The minimotion typewriter keyboard. Journal of Franklin Institute. 399-436.
12.Hahn Robert. 2002. How to select the right PDA data input device for your application. tDevice. 1-9.
13.Hargreaves W., D. Rempel, N. Halpern, R. Markison, K. Kroemer, and J. Litewka. 1992. Toward a more human keyboard.
14.Harvey R., and E. Peper. 1997. Surface electriomyography and mouse use position. Ergonomics. 40-8:781-789
15.Johnson P. E., J. J. Dropkin, J. Hews, and D. Remple. 1993. Office ergonomics: motion analysis of computer mouse usage. Proceeding of the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition. 12-13
16.Johnson P. W., R.Tal, W. P. Smutz, and D. Rempel. 1994. Fingertip forces measured during computer mouse operation：a comparison of pointed and dragging. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association 1994 Meetings. 2:208-210.
17.John W. Hole, and Karen Koos. 1991. Human Anatomy. USA.
18.Joshua Goodman, Gina Venolia, and Keith Steury. 2002. Short Papers: Language modeling for soft keyboards. Chauncey Parker Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces.
19.Karlqvist L., M. Hagberg, and K. Selin. 1994. Variation in upper limb posture and movement during word processing with and without mouse use. Ergonomics. 37-7: 1261-1267.
20.Kroemer K., H. Kroemer, and K. K. Elbert. 2002. Ergonomics - How to Design for Ease and efficiency : 403-413.
21.Laurent Denoue, Patrick Chiu, and Tohru Fuse. 2002. Short Talks: Shared text input for note taking on handheld devices. Human Factors in Computer Systems.
22.Liang C.I. and Lo Q.J. 2002. Research of PDA Touch Pen in Identifiable, Comfortable and Stable. Industrial Design in Chinese. 30-2. 131-136.
23.Mark S. Sanders, and Ernest J. McCormick. 1976. Human Factors In Engineering and Design.USA.
24.Nakamura, S., M. Tsukamoto, and S. Nishio. 2001. A method of key input with two mice. Fifth International Symposium : Wearable Computers Proceedings. 13-20.
25.Nishinaka Y., Y. Tsujino, and N. Tokura. 1990. A pointing method for graphics. Systems and Computer in Japan. 21-1: 13-22.
26.Nordicom. 2002. Goteborg : Nordisk Information Center for Media Communications cop. Swedish.
27.Parush S., N. Lavanon-Erez, and N.Weintraub. 1998. Ergonomic factors influencing handwriting performance. Work. 11: 295-305.
28.Poika Isokoski; and Mika Kaki. 2002. Comparison of two touchpad-based methods for numeric entry, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves. 25-32.
29.Rochester N., Bequaert F. C., and Sharp, E. M. 1978. The chord keyboard. Computer. 11-12: 57-63.
網頁:
1.http://half-qwerty.com/
2.http://www.siggraph.org/s2003/
3.http://www.canesta.com/products.htm
4.http://www.keytools.com/images/extra/half-qwerty.htm
5.http://www.halfkeyboard.com/