跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/02 21:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李勇輝
研究生(外文):Yong-Hui Li
論文名稱:新事業策略與知識創造過程在創業導向與公司績效間關係之中介效果
論文名稱(外文):The Mediating Effects of New Venture Strategy and Knowledge Creation Process on the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance
指導教授:蔡明田蔡明田引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Tien Tsai
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系碩博士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:88
中文關鍵詞:新事業策略知識創造過程公司績效創業導向
外文關鍵詞:Entrepreneurial orientationNew venture strategyKnowledge creation processFirm performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:314
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
創業導向已被視為是經濟成長與增加創造就業機會的驅動力,而且它在當代世界經濟中扮演關鍵性的角色。有許多的實證研究已經探討創業導向和公司績效之間的關係。很多研究發現在創業導向和公司績效之間存在顯著的正向關係,但是一些研究發現沒有顯著的關係。因此,創業導向和公司績效之間的關係似乎是不一致的。為了要解釋這個複雜的關係,本研究提出一理論架構來探討新事業策略與知識創造過程在創業導向與公司績效之間關係的角色。
使用台灣新事業165家公司的資料,本研究利用統計分析方法來驗證本研究提出的各項假設,包括敘述統計分析、多變量變異數分析、信度分析、效度分析、驗證性因素分析和結構方程模式分析。
整體上,本研究整體理論模式配置的適合度符合可接受的檢定水準。實證結果支持在創業導向、新事業策略、知識創造過程以及公司績效這四個構念間確實存在著影響關係。本研究發現創業導向和公司績效之間的關係是經由新事業策略和知識創造過程的中介效果。研究結果建議在探討創業導向和公司績效之間的關係時需要考量新事業策略和知識創造過程作為主要的中介變數。
Entrepreneurial orientation has been considered to be a driving force of both economic growth and increased job creation, and it plays a critical role in contemporary world economies. There are various empirical studies that have examined the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance. Many studies have found a significantly positive relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance, but some studies have found no significant relationship. Therefore, the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance appears inconsistent. To explain the complicated relationship, this research proposes a theoretical framework to examine the roles of new venture strategy and knowledge creation process in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance.
Using data collected from 165 firms in Taiwan's new ventures, this study utilize statistical analysis methods to test the proposed hypotheses of this research, including descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, reliability analysis, validity analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.
Overall, the model fit of proposed framework is acceptable. This empirical result supports the relationships between entrepreneurial orientation, new venture strategy, knowledge creation process, and firm performance. This study finds that the entrepreneurial orientation-firm performance relationship is mediated by new venture strategy and knowledge creation process. The research results suggest the need for consideration of new venture strategy and knowledge creation process as mediators in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance.
LIST OF TABLES II
LIST OF FIGURES III
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Purposes 5
1.3 Research Procedure 6
1.4 The Organization of This Study 7
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 Definition of Research Variables 8
2.2 The Relationships between Research Constructs 17
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 33
3.1 The Conceptual Model 33
3.2 Hypotheses to be Tested 35
3.3 Construct Measurement 36
3.4 Questionnaire Design 40
3.5 Data Collection and Sampling Design 41
3.6 Data Analysis Method 43
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 45
4.1 Descriptive Statistic Analysis 45
4.2 Reliability and Validity 48
4.3 Hypothesis Testing 59
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 67
5.1 Research Conclusions 67
5.2 Managerial Implications 70
5.3 Research Suggestions 73
REFERENCES 75
APPENDIX 83
Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107-136.
Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural evaluation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1): 74-94.
Baker, J., A. Parasuraman, D. Grewal, and G. B. Voss. 2002. The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions, Journal of Marketing, 66(2): 120-141.
Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
Barringer, B. R. and A. C. Bluedorn. 1999. The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 421-444.
Becerra-Fernandez, I. and R. Sabherwal. 2001. Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 23-55.
Bloodgood, J. M. and W. D. Salisbury. 2001. Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies, Decision Support Systems, 31(1): 55–69.
Bucklin, L. P. and S. Sengupta. 1993. Organizing successful co-marketing alliances, Journal of Marketing, 57(2): 32-46.
Burgers, W. P., C. W. L. Hill, and W. C. Kim. 1993. A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 419-432.
Carter, N. M., T. M. Stearns, P. D. Reynolds, and B. A. Miller. 1994. New venture strategies: Theory development with an empirical base. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1): 21-41.
Chandler, G. N. and S. H. Hanks. 1994. Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies, and venture performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4): 331-349.
Chia, R. 2003. From knowledge-creation to the perfecting of action: Tao, Basho and pure experience as the ultimate ground of knowing, Human Relation, 56(8): 953-981.
Cohn, T. and R. A. Lindberg. 1972. How management is Different in Small Companies, American Management Association, New York.
Cooper, A. C. and W. C. Dunkelberg. 1986. Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1): 53-68.
Dess, G., G. Lumpkin, and J. Covin. 1997. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1): 2-23.
Doh, J. P. 2000. Entrepreneurial privatization strategies: Order of entry and local partner collaboration as sources of competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 551-571.
Dowling, M. J. and J. E. McGee. 1994. Business and technology strategies and new venture performance: a study of the telecommunications equipment industry, Management Science, 40(12): 1663-1677.
Droge, C., C. Claycomb, and R. Germain. 2003. Does knowledge mediate the effect of context on performance? Some initial evidence, Decision Sciences, 34(3): 541-568.
Eisenhardt, K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven. 1990. Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3): 504-529.
Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural evaluation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
Frese, M., A. Brantjes, and R. Hoorn. 2002. Psychological success factors of small scale businesses in Namibia: The roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation and the environment, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3): 259-283.
Gold, A. H., A. Malhotra, and A. H. Segars. 2001. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Grant, R. 1996. Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter): 109-122.
Griffith, D. A, S. M. Noble, and Q. Chen. 2006. The performance implications of entrepreneurial proclivity: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Retailing, 82(1): 51-62.
Hsueh, L. and Y. Tu. 2004. Innovation and the operational performance of newly established small and medium enterprises in Taiwan, Small Business Economics, 23, 99-113.
Hult, G. T. M., R. F. Hurley, L. C. Giunipero, and E. L. Nichols. 2000. Organizational learning in global purchasing: A model and test of internal users and corporate buyers, Decision Sciences, 31(2): 293-325.
Inkpen, A. C. and A. Dinur. 1998. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures, Organization Science, 9(2): 454-468.
Ireland, R. D., M. A. Hitt, and D, Vaidyanath. 2002. Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 28 (3): 413-446.
Jain, B. A. 2001. Predictors of performance of venture capitalist-backed organizations, Journal of Business Research, 52(3): 223-233.
Joreskog, K. and D. Sorbom. 1986. LISREL 6: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
Khanna, T., R. Gulati, and N. Nohria. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 193-210.
Knight, G. 2000. Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization, Journal of International Marketing, 8(2): 12-32.
Kogut, B. and U. Zander. 2003. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 516-529.
Kotabe, M. and K. S. Swan. 1995. The role of strategic alliances in high technology new product development, Strategic Management Journal, 16(8): 621-636.
Lee, C., K. Lee, and J. M. Pennings. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 615-640.
Lee, H. and B. Choi. 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1): 179-228.
Li, H. and K. Atuahene-Gima. 2001. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1123-1134.
Li, H. 2001. How does new venture strategy matter in the environment-performance relationship? Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2): 183-204.
Lumpkin, G. T. and G. G. Dess. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
Lumpkin, G. T. and G. G. Dess. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5): 429-451.
Lussier, R. N. 1995. A nonfinancial business success versus failure prediction model for young firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 33(1): 8-20.
MacMillan, I. C. and D. L. Day. 1987. Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1): 29-37.
Matusik, S. F. and C. W. L. Hill. 1998. The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 680-697.
McDougall, P. P. and R. B. Robinson. 1990. New venture strategies: an empirical identification of eight 'archetypes' of competitive strategies of entry, Strategic Management Journal, 11(6): 447-467.
Miles, R. E. and C. C. Snow. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure and process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Miller, A. and B. Camp. 1985. Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 87-105.
Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7): 770-791.
Miller, D. 1987. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 8(1): 55-76.
Murphy, G. B., J. W. Trailer, and R. C. Hill. 1996. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research, Journal of Business Research, 36(1): 15-23.
Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamic of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Nonaka, I. and N. Konno. 1998. The concept of 'Ba': building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, 40(3): 40-54.
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.
Nonaka, I., H. Takeuchi, and K. Umemoto. 1996. A theory of organizational knowledge creation, International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7): 833-845.
Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and A. Nagata. 2000a. A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1): 1-20.
Nonaka, I., R. Toyama, and N. Konno. 2000b. SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1): 5-34.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, S. and Z. Bae. 2004. New venture strategies in a developing country: Identifying a typology and examining growth patterns through case studies. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1): 81-105.
Podsakoff, P. M. and D. W. Organ. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544.
Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy---Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York.
Quinn, J. B. 1992. Intelligent enterprise: A knowledge and service-based paradigm or industry? The Free Press, New York, NY.
Sabherwal, R. and I. Becerra-Fernandez. 2003. An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels, Decision Sciences, 34(2): 225-260.
Sharkie, R. 2003. Knowledge creation and its place in the development of sustainable competitive advantage, Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1): 20-31.
Sveiby, K. 1996. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, Berret Koehler, San Francisco, CA.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter): 27-43.
Teece, D. J. 1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California Management Review, 40(3): 55-79.
Tsai, W. M., I. C. MacMillan, and M. B. Low. 1991. Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets, Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1): 9-28.
Van de Ven, A., and M. S. Poole. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 510-540.
Verhees, F. J. H. M. and M. T. G. Meulenberg. 2004. Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2): 134-154.
Von Krogh, G., I. Nonaka, and M. Aben. 2001. Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework, Long Range Planning, 34(4): 421-439.
Webster, F. A. 1977. Entrepreneurs and ventures: An attempt at classification and clarification. Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 54-61.
Wiklund, J. and D. Shepherd. 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1307-1314.
Wiklund, J. and D. Shepherd. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1): 71-91.
Zack, M. 1999. Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41(3): 125-146.
Zahra, S. A. and D. M. Garvis. 2000. Entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility, Journal of Business Venturing 15(5): 469-492.
Zahra, S. A. and J. G. Covin. 1995. Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1): 43-58.
Zhang, Q., J. Lim, and M. Cao. 2004. Innovation-driven learning in new product development: A conceptual model, Industrial Management + Data Systems, 104(3): 252-261.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 18. 姚思遠,OECD公司治理原則(2004),華岡法粹半年刊,第32期,民國93年12月,PP.67-94。
2. 16. 林家榮,我國參與經濟合作暨發展組織(OECD)農業活動之現況與展望,農政與農情月刊第172期,民國95年10月,PP.40-45。
3. 13. 沈中華、陳錦村與吳孟紋,更早期預警模型:台灣銀行道德指標的建立及影響,管理學報,第22卷第1期,民國94年2月,PP.1-28。
4. 12. 沈中華、吳孟紋,銀行治理、銀行失敗與銀行績效:以台灣為例,亞太經濟管理評論,第6卷第1期,民國91年9月,PP.27-46。
5. 9. 李智仁,落實金融機構之公司治理—以機關改造與資訊揭露為中心,財稅研究,第38卷第2期,民國95年3月,PP.148-150。
6. 8. 李美雀,基層財會人員面臨不實財報之處境與對策-力霸案的延伸,會計研究月刊,第259期,民國96年6月,PP.45-59。
7. 22. 張振山、包幸玉,我國資訊公開制度之探討,證券暨期貨月刊,第22卷第4期,民國93年4月,PP.15-24。
8. 23. 許士軍,企業帝國為何一夕傾圮,管理雜誌,第392期,民國96年2月,PP.58-61。
9. 3. 王志誠,金融機構關係人交易之監控機制—從力霸企業集團事件談起,月旦法學雜誌,第143期,民國96年4月。
10. 26. 陳美華、洪世炳,公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究,台北大學「企業管理學報」,第65期,民國94年6月,頁129-153。
11. 27. 陳琪,我國金融業及金融監理未來發展問題之探討,今日合庫,第382期,民國95年10月,PP.45-61。
12. 28. 陳琪,我國金融業最近十年之回顧與全球金融發展之趨勢,今日合庫,第383期,民國95年11月,PP.5-21。
13. 31. 陳錫龍,如何健全我國金融業公司治理,存款保險資訊季刊,第20卷第1期,民國96年3月,PP.16-60。
14. 35. 黃惠雯,談證券交易法引進獨立董事及審計委員會等制度之緣起及重點,證券暨期貨月刊,第24卷第3期,民國93年3月,PP.10-11。
15. 40. 葉銀華,台灣公司治理的問題與改革之道,證券暨期貨管理,第20卷第11期,民國91年11月,PP.1-16。