參考文獻
中文部分
1.黃聖源,「駕駛行為因素對市區幹道系統的服務水準影響分析之初探」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國77年。2.姚景星、劉睦雄,「實驗設計」,民國78年。
3.傅介棠,「多條最短路徑方法應用於行車路線導引系統之運輸效果模擬分析」,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國79年。4.林弘慎,「敘述性偏好法在個體路線選擇上的應用」,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所,民國80年6月。5.張式先,「動態路徑選擇模式應用於行車路線導引系統之研究」,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國81年。6.呂錦隆,「個體旅行路線選擇與轉移傾向行為之研究」,國立成功交通管理科學研究所,碩士論文,民國83年6月。7.何志宏,「高(快)速公路之用路人資訊需求與系統架構之研究」,交通部國道新建工程局研究報告,民國85年3月。
8.胡大瀛,「即時性資訊對路網車流分佈之影響」,中華民國運輸學會第十二屆學術論文研討會論文集,民國86年。
9.鄭鴻明,「小汽車駕駛人路線選擇行為模式之研究」,國立交通運輸研究所碩士論文,民國86年6月。10.王慶瑞,「運輸系統規劃增訂版」,亞聯工程顧問公司,1999。
11.黎韋利,「人行道服務水準評估之研究」,國立交通運輸研究所碩士論文,民國88年。12.鄧忠祥,「台灣地區航空站旅客服務水準之研究」,海洋大學航運管理學系研究所碩士論文,民國89年。13.黃燦煌,「即時資訊狀況下駕駛人路線選擇行為之分析」,國立交通大學運輸研究所博士論文,民國89年6月。14.交通部運輸研究所,「2001年台灣地區公路容量手冊」,民國90年3月。
15.許鳳升,「不同交通資訊來源對城際通勤者路線選擇行為影響之研究」,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,民國90年6月。16.周榮昌、陳志成、翁美娟,「即時交通資訊對高速公路使用者路線移轉之影響」,運輸學刊第15卷第1期,中華民國92年3月。17.陳科宏、周榮昌、劉祐興,「即時交通資訊對高速公路用路人路線移轉之影響」,中華民國運輸學會第十八屆論文研討會,中華民國92年12月。
18.交通部統計處,「台灣省公路里程統計年報」,民國93年。
19.交通部運輸研究所、中華民國運輸學會合作辦理,「台灣地區多車道郊區公路容量及特性研究(二)」,民國93年5月。
20.杜鈺錚,「捷運車站內人行系統服務水準之研究」,國立交通大學運輸研究所碩士論文,民國95年6月。英文部分
21.Abdel-Aty, M.A., Kitamura, R. and Jovanis, P. P., “Using Stated Preference Data for Studying the Effect of Advanced Traffic Information on Drivers’ Route Choice,”Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 39-50, 1997.
22.Ben-Akiva, M., De P. A. and Kaysi I., “Dynamic Network Models and Driver Information Systems,” Transportation Research 25A, Vol. 5, pp.251-266, 1991.
23.Benson, B. G., “Motorist Attitude about Content of Variable Massage Sign,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1550, pp.48-57, 1996.
24.Bovy, P. H. L. and Bradley, M. A., “ Route Choice Analyzed with Stated-Preference Approaches,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1037, pp.11-20, 1985.
25.Choocharukul, K., Sinha, K.C. and Mannering F.L., “User Perceptions and Engineering Definitions of Highway Level of Service: An Exploratory Statistical Comparison,” Transportation Research Part A 38, pp.677–689, 2004.
26.Flannery, A., Wochinger, K. and Martin, A. “Driver Assessment of Service Quality on Urban Streets,” Transportation Research Record, No.1920, pp.25-31, 2004.
27.Greene, W. H., “NLOGIT-VERSION 3.0,” Econometric Software, Inc, New York, 2002.
28.Hall, F., Wakefield, S., and Al-Kaisy, A.F., “Freeway Quality of Service:What Really Matters to Drivers and Passengers? ,” Transportation Research Record, No.1776, pp.17-23, 2001.
29.Hostovsky, C., Wakefield, S. and Hall, F.L., “Freeway Users’ Perceptions of Quality of Service : A Comparison of Three Groups,” Transportation Research Record, No.1883, pp.150-157, 2004.
30.Khattak, A. J., Koppelman, F. S. and Schofer, J.L., “Stated Preference For Investigation Commuters’ Diversion Propensity,” Transportation, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.107-127, 1993.
31.King, G.F., “Driver Performance in Highway Tasks,”Transportation Research Record, No.1093, pp.1-11, 1986.
32.Maitra, B., Sikdar, P. K. and Dhingra, S. L.,” Modeling congestion on urban roads and assessing level of service,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 125, No.6, pp. 508-514, 1999.
33.Mannering, F., Kilareski, W., Washburn, S., “Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, Third Edition, 2005.
34.Matsui, H. and Fujita, M., “Definition of Congestion Based on Drivers’ Consciousness,” Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings (IEEE), pp.339-344, 1994.
35.McFadden, D., “Modelling the Choice of Residential Location,” In A. Karlquist et al., (eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential location, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.75-96, 1978.
36.McFadden, D. and Train, K., “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response,” Journal of Applied Econometrices, Vol. 15, No.5, pp. 447-470, 2000.
37.Mckelvey, R.D., Zavoina, W., “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variances,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol.4, pp.103-120, 1975.
38.Nakamura, H., Suzuki, K. and Ryu, S., “Analysis of the Interrelationship Among Traffic Flow Conditions, Driving Behavior, and Degree of Driver’s Satisfaction on Rural Motorways,” Transportation Research Circular E-C018:Fourth International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp.42-52, 2000.
39.Naverro, M.E. and Rouphail, N.M., “Analysis of Alternative Service Measures for Freeway Facilities,” Transportation Research Board, pp.73-83, 2000.
40.Rao, C.R., “Factorial experiments derivable from combinational arrangements of arrays,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, vol.9, pp.128-139, 1947.
41.Train, K., “Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
42.Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209:Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000.
43.Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 1965.
44.Tsuji, H., Takahashi, R., Kawashima, H. and Yamamoto, Y., “A Stochastic Approach for Estimating the Effectiveness of a Route Guidance System and ITS Related Parameters,” Transportation Science. Vol.19, No.4, pp.333-351, 1985.
45.Washburn, S.S., Ramlackhan, K. and McLeod, D.S., “Quality of Service Perceptions by Rural Freeway Travelers: An Exploratory Analysis,” Transportation Research Record, No.1883, pp.132-139, 2004.