跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.82) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/21 03:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李亞蒳
研究生(外文):LEE YA-NA
論文名稱:泰國塔信(ThaksinShinawatra)政權的穩定性與變動性分析(2001-2006)
論文名稱(外文):An Analysis of Political Changes in Thaksin Shinawatra Era(2001-2006)
指導教授:陳佩修陳佩修引用關係
指導教授(外文):Dr.Chen, Pei-Hsiu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:東南亞研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:區域研究學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:154
中文關鍵詞:半民主體制新政治塔信政權反塔信穩定性變動性
外文關鍵詞:semi-democracyNew politicsThaksinAnti-ThaksinStabilityVariation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:509
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本論文旨在進行泰國塔信政權的穩定性和變動性的因素分析,研究時程涵蓋塔信執政屆滿的第一任期(2001-2004)以及塔信連任成功到遭軍事政變推翻的期間的第二任期(2005-2006),這也是落實泰國1997年新憲法選舉制度改革與強化政黨政治發展的階段,一般稱之為泰國的「新政治」階段。

塔信領導泰愛泰黨依循內閣體制,逐步建制泰國議會政治的穩定性,一般認為,泰國民主政治基礎將趨於穩固,選舉成為政治權力遞嬗的唯一合法方式;塔信更於連選連任貨的壓倒性勝利,將「泰愛泰黨」推上泰國憲政史上史無前例的「一黨獨大」地位。究竟是哪些因素導致塔信政權的成功?然而,在塔信第二任期開始不久,泰國軍方突然發動睽違15年的軍事政權,一舉「終結」泰國近10年來趨於穩定的議會政治,這一急遽的變動因素為何,殊值探究。

本研究試圖透過塔信政權的穩定與變動因素分析,論證泰國「舊政治」之下的泰國價值,仍然強勢主導泰國政局的發展,反塔信勢力堅持「道德正當性」論調,和塔信主導泰愛泰黨以市場取向的世俗化政黨大相逕庭,道德正當性凌駕法理性基礎。此外,泰國政治長期缺乏憲政慣例,當國內憲法被廢除或國會遭逢解散之際,人民的託付就會回到國王身邊;然而,一但掌權者非由制度催生,正當性歸屬依然缺乏法理性基礎,「尊崇國王」依舊是政治決裂後凝聚泰國的核心要素,泰國的民主退卻可能重回「半民主」的舊途。




關鍵字:半民主體制、新政治、塔信政權、反塔信、穩定性、變動性
This thesis aims to analyize the political changes in Thailand’s Thaksin Shinawatra era which covers the fulfillment of Thaksin’s first administration (2001-2004) as well as the short second administration terminated by a military coup (2005-2006). The Thaksin regime carried out the missions on electoral system reform and party politics development offered by the 1997 constitution.
Thaksin formed the first majority government based on one party in Thai politics and won a landslide victory in the second term election that demonstrates an unprecedented absolute majority in Thai political history. However, this solid regime suddenly overthrown by the military and the representative democracy terminated at the same moment. Why?
This research tries to explore the factors of the stabilities and variation of Thaksin regime so as to demonstrate that Thai tradition political culture still dominates modern Thai politics. The fall of Thaksin seems to indicate that moral legitimacy bypasses legal legitimacy and Thai politics might come back to the semi-democracy before the 1997 constitution.

Key Word:
semi-democracy、New politics、Thaksin、Anti-Thaksin、Stability、Variation
目錄
第壹章
起源:緒論……………………………………………01

第一節 研究緣起……………………………… …01
第二節 研究動機與目的…………………………14
第三節 分析架構與章節安排…………………...17
第四節 研究方法………………………………….20
第五節 文獻探討…………………………………21


第貳章
背景:泰國「新」、「舊」政治的轉換
-從傳統「協商政治」過渡到「制度化民主」….27

第一節 半民主體制的延續與阻隔……………27
第二節 1997年新憲法的政治改革……………32
第三節 政黨體系結構的改變…………………..46




第參章
革新:塔信政權的穩定性
-再造政黨政治………………………………… 52

第一節 塔信的第一任期(2001-2004年)
-泰愛泰黨「行銷型政黨」的崛起..….52
第二節 塔信的第二任期(2005-2006)
-泰愛泰黨組織「單一政黨」執政……63
第三節 塔信政權穩定性因素探討……………. 67
第肆章
回溯:塔信政權的變動性-傳統價值再現………73

第一節 2006「反塔信」政治浪潮……………… 73
第二節 軍事政變的傳統與政治文化的遺緒……79
第三節 塔信政權變動性因素分析……………….84

第伍章
結論………………………………………………. 106


參考書目
一、 中文書目
二、 中文期刊
三、 英文書目
四、 英文期刊

附件目錄

附件一:泰國歷屆國會選舉政黨席位一覽表(1975-2005)
附件二:1997憲法對泰王權力的相關規範整理
附件三:1979-1998年選舉法的統列表
附件四:泰國歷次政變統列表(1932-2006)
附件五:泰國歷次憲法 ( 名稱與效期 )
附件六:泰國歷次憲法 ( 重要內涵 )
附件七:泰國憲法、內閣、總理任期對照表 (1932-1997)
附件八:跨國性政變分析研究舉隅
附件九:泰國官僚政體下軍文關係結構圖
附件十:泰國1991年政變後的選舉 (1992-2001)
附件十一:泰國比例代表制(PR)選票範例
附件十二:泰國單一選區制(SMD)選票範例
附件十三、泰愛泰黨16項政策內容





圖表目錄
【圖1-1】新舊政治模式………………………………………17
【圖2-1】泰國舊政治的動態運作模式………………………32
【圖2-2】泰國選舉組織架構……………………………………41
【圖3-1】塔信的選舉策略……………………………………54
【圖4-3】政變原因的綜合模型………………………………86

【表1-1】九七新憲基本內容…………………………………13
【表1-2】各章節安排之研究主體和基本內涵之整理………19
【表1-3】塔信政權穩定性與變動性變項分析………………20
【表2-1】泰國歷次國會選舉「主要政黨席次」與「政黨體系簡化」之趨勢……………………………………………35
【表2-2】泰國國會議員的的資格條件………………………42
【表 3-1 】新政黨組織法 (1999) 以後的泰國政黨概況……………. 53
【表3-2】2001年泰國大選結果…………………………….. 61
【表3-3】塔信第一任期重大政策人民認同度 (2001–2004) 63
【表3-4】民主黨歷屆選舉中各地區所佔的議席數
(1957-2005)……………………………………….65
【表3-5】2005年各政黨選票區域分部……………………..65
【表3-6】1980年代以來泰國內閣更迭表(1980-2006)….66
【表4-1】泰國政變頻率表 (1932 - 1991)…………………….82
【表4-2】泰國民眾對社會及政治機構信賴程度(2001)…84
參考書目
一、中文書目
宋鎮照,1996,《政黨與選舉概論》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。

李秀琪,1978,《泰國憲法的變遷》,台北:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。

林若雩等譯,Michael R. Jvatikiotis著,1999,《東南亞的政治與發展》,台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。

林右峰,2003,《泰國1997年選舉制度改革》,台北:私立淡江大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

金榮勇,2000,《東南亞國家的軍方轉型》,台北:志一出版社。

高德源譯,Arend Lijphart 著,2001,《民主類型》,桂冠圖書公司。

康樂譯、Max Weber原著,1997,《支配的類型-韋伯選集3》,台北:遠流出版社。

陳敏正,2004,《當代泰國教父政治的變遷》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

陳佩修,1999,《泰國的軍人與文人關係》,台北:國立政治大學政治研究所博士論文。

- - -,2004,《當代泰國政治-選舉制度的變革與政黨政治的發展1995-2004》,台北:五南文化事業公司。

黃玉樹,2002,《泰國政黨政治之發展(1991-2001年)》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

黃子堯,2004,《王室角色與當代泰國政治變遷-以拉瑪九世為例》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

黃世光,2004,《泰國「泰愛泰黨」(Thai Rak Thai)的發展策略研究》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

張喬博,2001,《泰國民主化過程中非政府組織的角色》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

張錫鎮,1995,《東南亞政府與政治》,台北:揚智出版社。

雷飛龍譯,Giovanni Sartori著,2000,《政黨與政治制度》,台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。

蔡百銓譯,D.R.SarDesai 著,2001,《東南亞史》,台北:麥田出版。

謝明勳,2003,《泰國「半民主」政治下的政黨發展-以民主黨為個案研究》,南投:國立暨南大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。

蘇世岳,2000,《泰國政治變遷與金融自由化-1997年泰銖貶值之政治原因探討》,台北:國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。

譚國安譯,1996,《政治改革:泰國唯一的出路》,曼谷:摩操挽出版社。

顧長永,1995,《東南亞政府與政治》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。













二、中文期刊
任一雄,2001,「政黨的素質與民主政治的發展-從泰國政黨的歷史與現狀看其民主政治的前景」,東南亞研究,第5期。

宋鎮照,1994,「泰國國家機關與社會階級關係之政治經濟學分析」,問題與研究,第33卷,第2期,頁43-55。

李建良,1999,「政黨比例代表制與選舉平等原則:以德國聯邦眾議院選舉制度為中心」,歐美研究,第29卷,第2期,頁105-169。

李美賢、陳丁輝,2001,「領袖人格特質、權力觀、權力移轉-李光耀和馬哈迪之比較研究」,發表於2001年台灣的東南亞區域研究年度研討會,頁1-37。

阿南Anan Chantara-opakorn,民國89年8月,「泰國的民主化:從事威抗議到新憲法」,二十一世紀評論,第60期。

林若雩,2001,「政治文化與威權體制-兼論李光耀與馬哈迪之領導風格比較」,發表於2001年台灣的東南亞區域研究年度研討會,頁1-25。

陳鴻瑜,1993,「泰國的軍人與政治變遷」,東亞季刊,第24卷,第3期,頁1-35。

---,1994,「泰國君主政治的變遷」,問題與研究,第33卷,第2期,頁25-41。

陳佩修,1994,「泰國國家機關與跨國公司之政治經濟學分析」,問題與研究,第33卷,第5期,頁51-64。

---,1996,「泰國政黨政治之發展及其特質」,東南亞季刊,第1卷,第4期,頁82-98。

---,1997,「泰國軍人與文人關係之演變」,東南亞季刊,第2卷,第3期 ,頁65-87。

---,2000,「軍事政變的成因、結果與影響:泰國個案研究」,問題與研究,第39卷,第1期,頁35-65。

---,2000,「泰國的軍人與文人關係:回顧與展望」,戰略與國際研究,第2卷第4期,頁97-127。

---,2001,「非政府組織與泰國的民主化:市民社會途徑的分析」,海華與東南亞研究,第1卷,第1期,頁133-161。

---,2001,「1992『五月事件』以後泰國的政治變遷:『惡性循環』的再現?」,海華與東南亞研究,第1卷,第3期,頁115-123。

---,2002,「泰國『新政治』的發展與危機」,海華與東南亞研究,第2卷,第3期,頁1-19。

---,2004,「當代泰國政黨政治之發展-民主黨的角色」,海華與東南亞研究,第4卷,第1期,頁 18-42。

---,2005,「泰國新政治形成-2005年國會大選的意義」,台北:中央研究院亞太區域專題研究中心出版中。

---,2006,「泰國民主的虛像與實像─ 塔信(Thaksin Shinawatra)政權變動的分析」,發表於成功大學東南亞年會初稿。

陳尚懋,2001,「2001年泰國大選的政經分析」,問題與研究,第40卷,第5期,頁68-70。

張耀秋,1988,「泰國國會選舉與政局展望」,問題與研究,第27卷12期,頁48-59。

---,1991,「泰國軍事政變與政局展望」,問題與研究,第30卷5期,頁12-22。

---,1993,「泰國軍事政變後的國會選舉與政局展望」,問題與研究,第32卷,第2期,頁46-61。

楊日青,2000,「憲法修改與政黨重組對憲政體制的影響」,理論與政策,第14卷,第2期,頁199-218。

趙永勝,1999,「古代泰國政治中的親屬關係和依附制度」,歷史研究,第1期,頁58-64。

劉擎譯,2000,「泰國的民主化:從抗議示威到新憲法」,二十一世紀,第60期,頁27-33。

謝志鵬,2001,「泰愛泰黨贏得泰國大選的緣由」,南洋問題研究,第2期,頁37-42。

謝復生,1991,「比例代表制:一票制乎?兩票制乎?」,選舉改革研討會論文集,台北:二十一世紀基金會。

謝復生,1995,「內閣型態與憲政運作」,問題與研究,第34卷,第12期,頁1-10。

羅石圃,1992,「泰國浴血政潮落幕後的政局展望」,問題與研究,第31卷,第11期,頁41-50。

譚國安,1998,「泰國政治改革的原因、理念和新憲法的內容」,東南亞季刊,第3卷,第3期,頁1-13。

龔宜君、張景旭,1997,「發展中的東南亞中產階級:對馬來西亞、印尼、泰國與菲律賓中產階級形成之評析。」,東南亞研究論文系列,台北:中央研究院東南亞區域研究計畫。









三、英文書目
Anek Laothamatas. 1992. Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand:from Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Arghiros, Daniel. 2001. Democracy, Development and Decentralisation in Provincial Thailand. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2001, pp. 16-19.

Baston, Benjamin A. 1974.Siam’s Political Future:Documents for the End of the Absolute Monarchy. Ithaca, NY:Cronell University Southeast Asian Program, Data Paper, No.96

Blais, Andre. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Callahan, William A. 1998. Imagining Democracy:Reading “The Events of May”in Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Chai-Anan Samudavanija and Morell David. 1981. Political Conflict in Thailand Refore, Reaction. Massachusetts:Oelgeschlager Gunn and Hain.

Clark, Terry N. and Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot, eds. 1998. The New Political Culture, Boulder, Westview Press.

Cooper, Donald F. 1995. Thailand:Dictatorship or Democracy?London: Minerva Press.

Delury, George E. ed. 1999. World Encyclopedia of Political Systems and Parties. New York: Facts on File.

Dick Wilson and Elliott Kulick.2000. Time for Thailand for Thailand:Profile of a New Success, White Lotus, Bangkok Cheney.

DiClerico, Robert E. 2000. Political Parties, Campaigns, and Elections, New York, Prentice Hall.

Duverger, Maurice. 1972. Political parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (trans. by Barbara and Robert North ; with a foreword by D. W. Brogan). New York: Harper & Row.

Elliott Kulick and Dick Wilson.1996. Time for Thailand for Thailand:Profile of a New Success, Bangkok:White Lotus.

Finer , Samuel E.1995. Comparing Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gill, Graeme. 2000. The Dynamics of Democratization : Elites, Civil Society and the Transition Process. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Girling, John L.S. 1981. Thailand: Society and Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

―――.1996. Interpreting Development Capitalism, Democracy, and the Middle Class in Thailand, New York, Cornell Southeast Asia Program.

Grofman, Bernard Norman. ed. 1999. Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote: The Comparative Study of an Embedded Institution, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

Gunther, Richard., Jose Ramon Montero, and Juan J. Linz, eds. Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002

Hewison, Kevin, ed. 1997. Political Change in Thailand-Democracy and Participation. New York: Routledge.

Ji Giles Ungpakorn. 1997. The Struggle for Democracy and Social Justice in Thailand. Bangkok:: Arom Pongpangan Foudation Press.

―――.ed. 2003. Radicalising Thailand: New Political Perspectives. Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University.

Kershaw, Roger. 2003. Monarchy in South-East Asia: The Faces of Tradition in Transition, New York: Routledge.

King Bhumibol. 1992. Royal Advice by His Majesty the King 20 May 1992/2535. Bangkok: Office of His Majesty’s Principal Private Secretary.

King Prajadhipok’s Institute (KPI). 2003. Monitoring the Pulse of the Nation: Indicators of Good Governance and Development in Thailand. Nonthaburi, Thailand: KPI Press.

Kiratipong Naewmalee. 1995. ed. Policies of Thai Political Parties in the 1995 General Election. Bangkok: Institute of Public policy Studies.

Kobkua Suwannathat-Pian. 1995. Thailand's Durable Premier: Phibun Through Three Decades 1932-1957. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

―――.2004. Kings, Country and Constitutions: Thailand’s Political Development 1932-2000. New York: Routledge Curzon.

Kramol Tongdhamachart. 1982. Toward a Theory of Political Parties in Thai Perspecti, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Laird, John. 1997. Proposals for Constitutional Reform. Bankok: Craftsman Press.

───. 2000. Money Politics, Globalisation and Crisis: The Case of Thailand. Singapore: Graham Brash.

Levine, Charles. ed. 1997. Thailand. Singapore: APA Publications.

Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

―――. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1845-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.

Likhit Dhiravegin. 1984. Social Change and Contemporary Thai Politics:An Analysis of the Interrelationship between the Society and the Polity. Bangkok:Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University Press.

―――. 1985 Thai Politics:Selected Aspects of Development and Change. Bangkok:Tre‐Science Publishing House.

---. 1992. Demi‐Democracy:The Evolution of the Thai Political System. Singapore:Times Academic Press.

LoGerfo, James Paul. 1997. Civil Society and Democratization in Thailand. 1973–1992. Ph.D. Dissertation of the Columbia University.

Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization. California: Stanford University Press.

McCargo, Duncan. 1997.Chamlong Srimuang and the New Thai Politics. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers.

―――. 2000. Politics and the Press in Thailand: Media Machinations. London: Routledge.

McVey, Ruth. ed. 2000. Money and Power in Provincial Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

Milkis, Sydney M. 1999. Political Parties and Constitutional Government : Remaking American Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Murray, David. 1996. Angels and Devils: Thai Politics from February 1991 to September 1992 – A Struggle for Democracy? Bangkok: White Orchid Press.

Neher, Clark D. 1984.The end of the absolute monarchy in Siam. New York:Oxford University Press.

---1987.Politics in Southeast Asia. Rochester,Vermont:Schenkman Books.
Nelson, Michael H. 1998. Central Authority and Local Democratization in Thailand. Bangkok: White Lotus.

―――. ed. 2000. Thailand’s New Politics. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute & White Lotus.

Ori, Kan. 1982. Political Parties and Elections in Postwar Japan. Tokyo: Japan Foundation.

Panebianco, Angelo. 1998. Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Parichart Siwaraksa, Chaowana Traimas and Ratha Vayagool. 1997. Thai Constitutions in Brief. Bangkok: Institute of Public Policy Studies.

Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker. 1995. Thailand:Economy and Politics. Kuala Lumpur:Oxford University Press.

―――. and Chris Baker.1995. Thailand: Economy and Politics. Bangkok: Asia Books & Oxford University Press.

―――. and Sungsidh Piriyarangsan. 1996. Corruption and Democracy in Thailand. Bangkok:Silkworm.

―――. 2000. Thailand’s Crisis. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

―――. and Chris Baker. 2004. Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm.

Pisan Suriyamongkol. 1988. Institutionalization of Democratic Political Process in Thailand: A Three-Pronged Democratic Polity. Bangkok: The National Institute of Development Administration Press.

Prudhisan Jumbala. 1992. Nation‐Building and Democratization in Thailand:A Political History. Bangkok:Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University Press.

Rae, Douglas W. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, Yale University Press.

―――. 1971. The Political Consequence of Electoral Law. New Haven:Yale University Press.

Rajchagool,Chaiyan.1997.The Rise And Fall Of The Thai Absolute Monarchy.Bangkok:White Lotus.

Riggs, Fred W. 1966. Thailand:The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity, Honolulu:East–West Center Press.

Sachsenroder, Wolfgang. and Ulrike E. Frings. eds. 1998. Political Party System and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia – Volume I: Southeast Asi., Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Sartori, Giovanni. 1984. Parties and Party System:A Framework for Analysis. New York:Cambridge University Press.

Sombat Chantornvong. 1989. The Evolution and Trend of New Political Parties:A Case Study of the Palang Dharma Party. Bangkok: Foundation for Democracy and Development.

Somboon Suksamran. 1984. Military Elite in Thai Politics:Brief Biographical Data on the Officers in the Thai Legislature. Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Streckfuss, David. Ed. 1996. Modern Thai Monarchy and Cultural Politics:The Acquittal of Sulak Sivaraksa on the Charge of lese majeste in Siam 1995 and Its Consequences. Bangkok:Santi Pracha Dhamma Institute.

Stevens, Anne. 2003. Government and Politics of France (Third Edition) New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Stevenson, William. 2001. The Revolutionary King: The True-Life Sequel to The King and I, London, Constable & Robinson.

Suchit Bunbongkarn. 1987. The Military in Thai Politics, 1981–1986. Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Cultural Studies.

―――. 1996 State of the Nation:Thailand. Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Sungsidh Piriyarangsan and Pausk Phongpaichit. 1993. The Middle Class and Thai Democracy. Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University Press.

Surapongse Sotanasathien. 2000. Electoral Process and Its Campaign: A Comparison between Thailand and Japan. Bangkok: Prasitphan Press

Surin Maisrikrod. 1992. Thailand’s Two General Elections in 1992:Democracy Sustains. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Thaksin Shinawatra, 1999. Thaksin Chinnawat: Ta du dao thao tit din [Thaksin Shinawatra: Eyes on the Stars, Feet on the Ground] Bangkok: Matichon.

The Democrat Party, 2002. Information Kit of the Democrat Party. Bangkok: Secretariat of the Democrat Party.

Thongthamcthati, K. 1988. The Election of Political Parties and Governmental Stability. Bangkok, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.

Traimas, C. 1999. A New Electoral System: Why Thais Should Vote. Bangkok: Institute of Educational Policies.

Wilson, David. 1962. Politics in Thailand, Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.

Wyatt, David K. 1984. Thailand: A short History. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

Xudo, Somsakdi. et al. 1981. Thailand in the 1980s:Significant Issues, Problems, and Prospects. Bangkok:Tura Institute.

四、英文期刊
Anek Laothamatas. 1993.“Sleeping Giant Awakens?The Middle Class in Thai Politics.” Asian Review 7(Fall):78–125.

Banducci, Susan A., Todd Donova and Jeffrey A. Karp. 1999. “Proportional Representation and Attitude about Politics: Results from New Zealand. ” Electoral Studies, 18(4), pp.533-55

Blonde, Jane. 2000. “The Role of Parties and Party Systems in the Democratisation Process.” in I. Marsh, J. Blonde and Takashi Inoguchi, eds., Democracy, Givernance and Economic Performance: East and Southeast Asia. Tokyo: New York and Paris, United Nations University.

Brown, Andrew. 1997. “Angels and Devils: Thai Politics from February 1991 to September 1992 - A Struggle for Democracy?” Pacific Affairs, Vol.70, No.4, December 1997, pp. 693-716.

Case, William F. 1996. “Can the ‘Halfway House’ Stand? Semidemocracy and Elite Theory in Three Southeast Asian Countries,” Comparative Politics,29(1), pp. 436-461.

---. 2001. “Thai Democracy, 2001-Out of Equilibrium. Asian Survey, 41 (3), pp. 525–547.

---. 2003.“New Democratisation in Southeast Asia .”In Amitav Acharya and Lee Lai To (eds).Asia in the New Millennium.

Chai-Anan Samudavanija 1997. “Old Soldiers Never Die, They Are Just Bypassed: The Military, Bureaucracy and Globalization.” in Kevin Hewison.(ed).Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London:Routledge, pp. 42-57.

--- .2002.“Thailand:State-Building ,Democracy and Globalisation .” Bangkok:Institute of Policy Studies ,pp.15-17.

Chen, Pei-Hsiu.2001.“Non-Governmental Organisations and Democratic Development in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines:A Reappraisal. ”paper presented at the 3rd Conference of the European Association for South-East Asian Studies. London ,SOAS ,University of London.

---.2003.“Thai Rak Thai and the New Politics in Thailand:An Authentic Party on the March?”paper presented at the First Asian Political and International Studies Association-APISA Asia in the New Millennium:Development ,Democracy ,and Security .(Nov.):27-30.

Dalpino, Catherine. 1991.“Thailand’s Search for Accountability.” Journal of Democracy 2(4), 61–72.

Darling, Frank C.1971. “Political Party in Thailand.” Pacific Affairs. 24,2 (Summer):228-241.

Finer , Samuel E.1995 .“Thailand is one of those countries where constitutions are constantly and continually torn up to make a new one ,”Vernon Bogdanor , and Bernard Rudden,Comparing Constitutions ,Oxford, Oxford University Press ,p.2.

Ganesan, N. 2004. “Thaksin and the Politics of Domestic and Regional Consolidation in Thailand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 26(1), pp. 26-45.

Jayasuriya, Kanishka. 2000. “ Authoritarian Liberalism, Governance and the Emergence of the Regulatory State in Post-Crisis Asia.” in Richard Robinson, et., eds. Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis. London: Routledge, pp. 67-74.

Ji Giles Ungpakorn. 2002. “From Tragedy to Comedy: Political Reform in Thailand.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 32(2)

King, Daniel E. 1992.“ The Thai Parliamentary Elections of 1992-Return to Democracy in an Atypical Year.” Asian Survey, 32(12), pp. 109–113.

King, Daniel and Jim LoGerfo. 1996. “Thailand:Toward Democratic Stability.” Journal of Democracy, 7(1), pp. 102–117.

Lijphart, Arend 1985. “The Field of Electoral System Research: A Critical Survey,” Electoral Survey, 4(1), pp. 3-14.

Maisrikrod, Surin 1993. “Emerging Patterns of Political Leadership in Thailand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia. 15,1 (June):80-97.

McBride, E. 2002. “A Survey of Thailand.” The Economist, 28 February 2002.

McCargo, Duncan. 1997. “Thailand’s political Parties: Real, Authentic and Actual.” in Kevin Hewison. ed. Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation, London: Routledge.

―――. 2001. “Populism and Reformism in Contemporary Thailand.” South East Asia Review, 9(1), pp. 89-107.

―――. 2002. “Thailand’s January 2001 General Election: Vindicating Reform?” in Duncan McCarg. ed. Reforming Thai Politics, Copenhagen: NIAS,2002, pp. 247-251.

―――. 2003. “Balancing the Checks: Thailand’s Paralyzed Politics Post-1997.” Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(1), pp. 129-132.

Montesano, Michael J. 2001. “Thailand in 2000: Shifting Politics, Dragging Economy, Troubled Border.” Asian Survey, 41(1), pp.171-180.

Mosher, Robert G. 1995. “The Impact of the Electoral System on Post-Communist Party Development: The Case of the 1993 Russian Parliamentary Elections.” Electoral Studies, 14(4), pp.377-98.

Nakharin Mektrairat. 1991. “The Economic Base and Power of Modern Thai Political Parties.” in Murashima Eiji, Nakharin Mektrairat and Somkiet Wanthana, eds., The Making of Modern Thai Political Parties. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economics.

Nakata, Thinapan. 1987. “Political Culture: Problem of Development.” In Xuto Somsakdi (ed). Government and Politics of Thailand. Singapore:Oxford University, pp. 168-195.

Neher, Clark D.1992. “Political Succession in Thailand.” Asian Survey, 32(7), 585-605.

Nicro, Somrudee. 1993. “Thailand’s NIC Democracy: Studying from General Elections.” Pacific Affairs, 66(2), pp. 167-183.

OcKey, James. 1997. "Thailand: the Crafting of Democracy," in Southeast Asian Affairs. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 66-78.

Pasuk Phongpaichit 2002. “Recent Popular Movements in Thailand in Global Perspective.” Asian Review, (15), pp. 1-20.

―――. and Christ Baker. (Forthcoming 2005) “Billionarism: Thaksin and Popular Politics in Post-Crisis Thailand,” in Eva-Lotta Hedman and John Sidel, eds. Populism in Southeast Asia. New Haven: Southeast Asia Program, Yale University.

Pinai Narakorn. 2001. “Reform of the Parliamentary Electoral System under the New Constitution.” Thammasat Review, 6(1), pp, 105-119.

Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two–Party System and Duverger’s Law:An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review, (76), pp. 753–766.

Shiratori, Rei. 1984. “The Introduction of Proportional Representation System in Japa.” Electoral Studies, 3(2), pp. 151-70.

Somchai Phatharathananunth. 2002. “Civil Society and Democratisation in Thailand: A Critique of Elite Democracy.” in Duncan McCargo, ed., Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen.Copenhagen: NIAS, 2002, pp. 125-142.

Stemetko, H.A. and P.M. Valkenburg. 1998. “The Impact of Attentiveness on Political Efficacy: Evidence from a Three-Year German Panel Study.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research,10(3), pp. 195-210.

Suchit Bunbongkarn. 1993. “Thailand in 1992-In search of a Democratic Order.” Asian Survey, 33(2), pp. 218–233.

Surin Maisrikrod. 1993. “Emerging Patterns of Political Leadership in Thailand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 15(1), 80-97.

Taagepera, Rein. and Mathew S. Shugart. 1998. “Design Electoral System.” Electoral Studies, 8(1), pp.49-58.

Thaksin Shinawatra, 2003. “Kham prasai khong Thaksin Shinawatra nai ‘kan prachum yai saman pracham pi 2546’ klong phak thai,” [Speech of Thaksin Shinawatra at TRT annual general assembly 2003] (English version) Rangsit, 27 April 2003.

Ukrist Pathmanand. 1998. “The Thaksin Shinawatra Group: A Study of the Relationship between Money and politics in Thailand.” The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, (13), pp.60-82.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top