跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.171) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/13 21:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:連啟泰
論文名稱:結合專案管理觀點與軟體品質標準之ERP系統評鑑模式構建與分析
論文名稱(外文):An ERP Assessment Model with Project Management Viewpoint and Software Quality Standard
指導教授:梁馨科梁馨科引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shing-Ko Liang
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理系所
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:94
中文關鍵詞:企業資源規劃系統ISO/IEC 9126軟體品質標準模糊層級程序分析決策分析
外文關鍵詞:Enterprise Resource PlanningERPISO/IEC 9126 StandardFuzzy Analytic Hierarchy ProcessFAHPDecision Making
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:347
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
企業資源規劃(Enterprise Resource Planning; ERP)系統之導入過程十分昂貴且曠日費時,因此初期階段對ERP系統的評鑑與選擇,扮演成敗的關鍵。本研究以專案管理的觀點,提出一個包含工程以及管理兩大構面的五階段ERP系統評鑑模型。
本評鑑模型應用ISO/IEC 9126軟體品質標準,來闡述ERP系統評鑑之工程特性,並且使用模糊層級程序分析法(Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process; FAHP)做為分析工具,以克服人類判斷問題時,語意含糊不明確的困難。本評鑑模型共有32項評鑑準則,其中工程構面共有21項準則,管理構面則有11項準則。
最後以半導體製造業以及連鎖型零售服務業兩家不同公司作實證分析,來驗證本評鑑模型的實用性,並比較不同公司對於評鑑準則權重的看法是否存在差異性。分析結論顯示,不同公司對於準則權重的看法,在管理構面中存在顯著的差異,而在工程構面的差異,則主要集中在功能性以及易使用性兩個項目。
Establishing an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is a high-priced and time-consuming project. It is crucial to the success of ERP system in the assessment process. This research proposes a five-stage assessment model which contains both engineering aspect and management aspect with project management viewpoint.
We use ISO/IEC 9126 software quality standard to represent the engineering characteristics of ERP system. For the ambiguity of human judgment, we apply fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to solve it. There are a total of 32 criteria including 21 engineering criteria from the ISO/IEC 9126 standard and 11 management criteria.
Two empirical studies are applied to verify the practicality of the assessment model; one is from the semiconductor manufacturing industry and the other one is from the chain-store retailer service industry. According to the results, there are significant differences in management aspect between two companies. For the engineering aspect, the different items are “functionality” and “usability”.
中文摘要…………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要…………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝………………………………………………………………… iii
目次………………………………………………………………… iv
表目次……………………………………………………………… vi
圖目次……………………………………………………………… vii
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1
1.1 研究動機…………………………………………………1
1.2 研究目的…………………………………………………2
1.3 論文架構…………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………4
2.1 ERP系統之專案管理…………………………………… 4
2.2 ERP系統與IT系統之評選方法………………………… 5
2.3 ERP系統之評選準則…………………………………… 6
2.4 軟體品質模型……………………………………………7
2.4.1 功能性……………………………………………………8
2.4.2 可靠度……………………………………………………9
2.4.3 易使用性…………………………………………………9
2.4.4 軟體效能…………………………………………………10
2.4.5 維護度……………………………………………………10
2.4.6 便攜性……………………………………………………11
2.5 模糊層級程序分析法……………………………………11
2.5.1 模糊層級程序分析法執行步驟…………………………12
2.5.2 重心法解模糊化策略……………………………………15
2.5.3 三角模糊數之語意變數表示法…………………………15
第三章 專案管理觀點之ERP系統評鑑模型…………………… 17
3.1 ERP系統評鑑模型……………………………………… 17
3.2 ERP系統評鑑準則建立………………………………… 20
3.2.1 工程構面…………………………………………………20
3.2.2 管理構面…………………………………………………20
3.3 ERP系統評鑑之層級架構……………………………… 21
第四章 實例分析…………………………………………………23
4.1 半導體製造業―A公司……………………………………23
4.2 連鎖型零售服務業―B公司………………………………28
4.3 個案比較…………………………………………………31
第五章 結論與未來研究方向……………………………………35
5.1 研究結論…………………………………………………35
5.2 建議………………………………………………………36
5.3 未來研究方向……………………………………………36
參考文獻…………………………………………………………… 37
附錄一 A公司之模糊權重值總表……………………………… 42
附錄二 ERP系統方案對全體準則之模糊評分值總表(A公司)…45
附錄三 B公司之模糊權重值總表……………………………… 53
附錄四 ERP系統方案對全體準則之模糊評分值總表(B公司)…56
附錄五 FAHP問卷…………………………………………………64
參考文獻

[1] APICS Dictionary, 9th ed. (1998). APICS—The educational society for resource management. VA: Alexandria.
[2] Avital, M. and Vandenbosch, B. (2000). SAP implementation at Metalica: an organizational drama in two acts. Journal of Information Technology, 15(3), 183-194.
[3] Bache, R. and Bazzana, G. (1994). Software metrics for product assessment. England: McGraw-Hill.
[4] Beach, R., Muhlemann, A.P., Price, D.H.R., Paterson, A. and Sharp, J.A. (2000). The selection of information systems for production management: an evolving problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 64, 319-329.
[5] Bingi, P., Sharma, M.K. and Godla, J.K. (1999). Critical issues affecting and ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 30-36.
[6] Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M. MacLeod, F.J. and Merritt, M.J. (1978). Characteristics of software quality, TRW series of software technologies 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[7] Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247.
[8] Buss, M.D.J. (1983). How to rank computer projects. Harvard Business Review, 61(1), 118-125.
[9] Butler, J. (1999). Risk management skills needed in a packaged software environment. Information System Management, 16(3), 15-20.
[10] Buyukozkan, G., Kahraman, C. and Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criterial decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33(2-3), 259-280.
[11] Buyukozkan, G. (2004). Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Research—Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 14(2), 139-154.
[12] Cheng, C.H. and Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 174-186.
[13] Grady, R.B. and Caswell, D.L. (1987). Software metrics: establishing a company—wide program. Prentice-Hill.
[14] Herrera, F. and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 67-82.
[15] Hicks, D.A. and Stecke, K.E. (1995). The ERP maze: enterprise resource planning and other production and inventory control software. IIE Solutions, 27 (8), 12-16.
[16] Holland, C.P. and Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software 16(3), 30-36.
[17] Hsu, T.H. (1999). Public transport system project evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process: a fuzzy Delphi approach. Transportation Planning and Technology, 22, 229-246.
[18] Huang, L. C. and Wu, R.Y.H. (2005). Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the managerial talent assessment model—an empirical study in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 30(1/2), 105-130.
[19] ISO/IEC 9126 (1991). Information technology - software product evaluation - quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. Geneva: ISO.
[20] Kapp, K.M. (2001). Integrated learning for ERP success: a learning requirements planning approach. Florida: CRC Press LLC.
[21] Kerzner, H. (2001). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[22] Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B. and Kumar, U. (2002). Enterprise resource planning system adoption process: a survey of Canadian organizations. International Journal of Production Research, 40(3), 509-523.
[23] Langenwalter, G.A. (2000). Enterprise resources planning and beyond integrating your entire organization. Florida: CRC Press LLC.
[24] Lee, J.W. and Kim, S.H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 367-382.
[25] McCall, J., Richards, P. and Walters, G. (1977). Factors in software quality. NTIS AD-A049-014, 015, 055.
[26] Mendoza, L.E., Griman, A.C., Perez, M.A. and Rojas, T. (2002). Evaluation of environments for portals development: a case study. Information Systems Management, 19(2), 70-84.
[27] Motwani, J., Mirchandani, D., Madan, M., Gunasekaran, A. (2002). Successful implementation of ERP projects: evidence from two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics, 75, 83-96.
[28] Nixon, B.A. (2000). Management of performance requirements for information systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(12),1122-1146.
[29] Rao, S.S. (2000). Enterprise resource planning: business needs and technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(2), 81-88.
[30] Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[31] Santhanam, R. and Kyparisis, G.J. (1995). A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Computer & Operations Research, 22(8), 807-818.
[32] Santhanam, R. and Kyparisis, G.J. (1996). A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 380-399.
[33] Sarkis, J. and Sundarraj, R.P. (2001). A decision model for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies. Information Systems Management, 18(3), 62-72.
[34] Schniederjans, M. J. and Wilson, R.L. (1991). Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection. Informaiton & Management, 20, 333-342.
[35] Scott, J. E. and Kaindl, L. (2000). Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package. Information & Management, 37, 111-122.
[36] Semich, J.W. (1994). Here’s how to quantify IT investment benefits. Datamation, 40 (1), 45-47.
[37] Sohal, A.S., Power, D.J., and Terziovski, M. (2002). Supply chain management in Australian manufacturing- two case studies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43, 97-109.
[38] Talluri, S. (2000). An IT/IS acquisition and justification model for supply-chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics, 30(3/4), 221-237.
[39] Teltumbde, A. (2000). A framework of evaluating ERP projects. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 4507-4520.
[40] Umble, E.J., Haft, R.R. and Umble, M.M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: implementationprocedure and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 241-257.
[41] Verville, J. and Halingten, A. (2003). A six-stage model of the buying process for ERP software. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 585-594.
[42] Wang, J. and Lin, Y.I. (2003). A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134, 343-363.
[43] Wei, C.C., Chien, C.F. and Wang, M.J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96, 47-62.
[44] Wei, C.C. and Wang, M.J. (2004). A comprehensive framework for selecting an ERP system. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 161-169.
[45] Wognum, P.M., Krabbendam, J.J., Buhl, H., Ma, X. and Kenett, R. (2004). Improving enterprose system support—a case-base approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 18(4), 241-253.
[46] Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A. and Abthorpe, M.S. (2004). Enterprise information systems project implementation: a case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 251-266.
[47] Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊