臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

組織發展的目標在於創造價值與永續經營，因此，企業必需具備將資源整合、學習與轉化的能力。在現今動態競爭的商業環境下，組織學習的速度往往代表了組織競爭優勢的來源。比競爭對手更快吸收新知，並將這些知識快速的轉換成實際行動的組織，往往被視為具有成功的要素。在影響組織學習的因素中，資訊技術能力在快速變化的市場環境中，可以機動的調整組織資源與程序；社會因子可以提昇知識的互動與理解，以達成組織學習的目的。有鑑於此，本研究以知識能力的角度來思考組織中不同型態的資源對組織學習過程的影響，同時整合社會－技術觀點對於組織能力、組織學習與績效間關係進行探討。
研究結論指出，技術基礎組織能力及社會基礎組織能力均對於組織學習具有正向的影響效果，而組織學習的成效，則會顯著的提升組織的績效；同時，社會基礎組織能力有助於提升組織的績效，而技術基礎組織能力則對於組織績效沒有直接影響。此外，在組織能力與績效的關係中，組織學習扮演著重要的中介角色。

The goal of organiziation development lies in creating value and continuing survival. Therefore, a business needs to have the capability to integrate, learn, and transform the resources it has. Nowadays, due to the dynamic business competition, organizational learning speed has often represented the source of competition advantage. The key factors to succeed are based on absorbing new knowledge and transfer it into practices faster than rivals. In impacting factors of organizational learning, information technology capabilities can tactically adjust organizational resources and procedures in dynamic business environment; social factors can enhance knowledge interaction and understanding, to achieve the objective of organizational learning. Thus, this study considers different types of resources in the organization which influence the organizational learning process from a knowledge capability view, and integrates socio-technical perspective by investigating the relationship between organizational capabilities, organizational learning, and performance.

The results show that both technical-based organizational capabilities and socio-based organizational capabilities have a positive impact on organizational learning. The effects of organizational learning have a significant symbiotic relationship with organizational performance. Meanwhile, socio-based organizational capabilities contribute to improving organizational performance and technical-based organizational capabilities not to influence organizational performance directly. Moreover, organizational learning plays a critical role between organizational capabilities and organizational performance.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 知識管理 5
第二節 資源基礎觀點 9
第三節 社會－技術觀點 11
第四節 組織知識能力 12
第五節 組織學習 18
第六節 組織績效 20
第三章 研究方法 22
第一節 研究架構 22
第二節 研究假說 23
第三節 變數操作性定義與問卷設計 25
第四節 資料收集與分析方法 28
第四章 資料分析與研究結果 31
第一節 樣本敘述性統計 31
第二節 資料分析方法與流程 33
第三節 LISREL 測量模式分析 39
第四節 LISREL 結構模式分析 46
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 51
第二節 研究貢獻 53
第三節 研究限制 54
第四節 未來發展方向 55
參考文獻 56
中文部份 56
英文部份 57
附錄一 研究問卷 64

中文部份
1.林永源，知識管理策略與組織學習行為關聯性之研究－以積體電路設計及製造公司之研發單位為例，國立清華大學高階主管經營管理碩士班 (EMBA) 碩士論文，2003。
2.林東清，知識管理，智勝文化公司，2003。
3.邱皓政，結構方程模式-LISREL的理論、技術與應用，雙葉書廊，2006。
4.黃芳銘，結構方程模式理論與應用，五南圖書，2002。
5.勤業管理顧問公司(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting)，知識管理的第一本書，商周出版，1999，劉京偉譯。
6.陳崇志，跨國光學企業導入精實生產績效差異之分析，東海大學管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)碩士論文，2005。
7.楊千、陳良駒，組織知識能力與企業競爭優勢之影響－以知識管理觀點探討，ICIM2005 第十六屆國際資訊管理學術研討會，台北輔大，2005。
8.楊千，策略管理理論與實務，華泰文化，2007。
9.劉哲良，從社會資本觀點探討知識分享、組織學習對組織學習績效影響之研究，大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文，2005。
10.廖英傑，組織內外在特質、事業網路鑲嵌與創新績效之關聯性研究－交易成本理論、資源基礎觀點與組織學習理論，國立成功大學企業管理所博士論文，2004。

英文部份
1.Amit, R. and P. J. Schoemaker, Strategic Assets and Organizational Rents, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 1993, pp.33-46.
2.Anderson, J. C. and D. W. Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 1988, pp.411-423.
3.Andreu, R. and Ciborra, C., Core capabilities and information technology: an organizational learning approach, In Moingeon, B and A. Edmondson (eds.), Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage, London: SAGE, 1996.
4.Argyris, C., and D. A. Sch�圢, Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
5.Bagozzi, R. P., and T. F. Heatherton, A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 1994, pp.35–67.
6.Bandalos, D. L., and S. J. Finney, Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001.
7.Barney, J. B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 1991, pp.99-120.
8.Barney J. B., Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 1995, pp.49–61.
9.Beckman, T., A Methodology for Knowledge Management, Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on AI and Soft Computing, 1997.
10.Bergman, J., A. Jantunen, and J. M. Saksa, Managing knowledge creation and sharing – scenarios and dynamic capabilities in inter-industrial knowledge network, Journal of Knowledge Management 8(6), 2004, pp.63-76.
11.Bharadwaj, A.S., A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 2000, pp.169-195.
12.Bhatt, G. D., Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 2001, pp.68-75.
13.Bllinger, A. S. and Smith, R.D., Managing Organizational Knowledge as a Strategic Asset, Journal of Knowledge Management (5:1), 2001, pp. 8-18.
14.Calantone, R. J., S. T. Cavusgil, and Y. Zhao, Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management 31, 2002, pp.515-524.
15.Capton, N., and R. Glazer, Marketing and technology: a strategic coalignment, Journal of Marketing 51(July), 1987, pp.1-14.
16.Cattell, R. B., Validation and intensification of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 1956, pp.205-214.
17.Chou, S.W., Computer systems to facilitating organizational learning: IT and organizational context, Expert Systems with Applications, 24, 2003, pp.273-280.
18.Chuang, S.H., A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation, Expert Systems Applications, 27(3), 2004, pp.459-465.
19.Cohen, W. N. and D. A. Levinthal, Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, pp.1128-1152.
20.Davenport, T.H., and P. Laurence., Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
21.Davenport, T. and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they Know., Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
22.Dawson, R., Knowledge capabilities as the focus of organisational development and strategy, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 2000, pp.320-327(8).
23.Debowski, Shelda, Knowledge management, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd, 2006.
24.Delaney, J. T., and M. A. Huselid, The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance, Academy of Management Journal 39(4), 1996, pp. 949-969.
25.Dierickx, I. And K. Cool, Assets Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage, Management Science, 35, 1989, pp.1504-1511.
26.Donoghue, L.P., J.G. Harris, and B. E. Weitzman, Knowledge management strategies that create value, Andersen Consulting’s Journal, 1, 1999, pp.48-53.
27.Drucker, P., The Coming of the New Organization, Harvard Business Review, 1988.
28.Earl, M., Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy, Journal of Management Information System, 18(1), 2001, pp.215-233.
29.Ekbia, H. R., and N. Hara, Incentive structures in knowledge management, Schwartz, D. G. (ed), Encyclopedia of knowledge management, 2006, pp.237-243.
30.Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker, Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 1981, pp.382-388.
31.Garvin, David A., Building a learning organization, Harvard Business Review, July/August, 1993, pp.78-91.
32.Glazer R., Marketing in an information-intensive environment: strategic implications of knowledge as an asset, Journal of Marketing, 55(October), 1991, pp. 1-19.
33.Gold, A.H., A. Malhotra, and A.H. Segars, Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 2001, pp.185-214.
34.Grant, R. M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 1991, pp.114-135.
35.Grant, R. M., Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 1996, pp.109-122.
36.Grant, R. M., The Knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice, Long Range Planning, 30(3), 1997, pp.450-454.
37.Hair, J. F. J., and R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
38.Hall, H. (2001), Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets, Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 2001, pp.139-146.
39.Hill, C.W.L., and G.R. Jones, Strategic Management Theory: An integrated Approach, Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA., 2004.
40.Hitt, M. A., L. Bierman, K. Shimizu, and R. Kochhar, Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms:A Resource-based Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 2001, pp.13-28.
41.Holsapple, C. W., and K. D. Joshi, Organizational knowledge resources, Decisio Support Systems, 31(1), 2001, pp.39-54.
42.Huber, G.P., Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures, Organizational Science, 2(1), 1991, pp.88-115.
43.Inkpen, A.C., and W. K. Tsang, Social capital, network, and knowledge transfer, Academy of Management Review 30(1), 2005, pp.146-165.
44.Janz, B.D., and P. Prasarnphanich, Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: the importance of a knowledge- centered culture, Decision Sciences, 34(2), 2003, pp.351-384.
45.Jerez-G�曠ez, P. J. C�臃pedes-Lorente, and R. Valle-Cabrera, Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement, Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 2005, pp.715-725.
46.Kalling, T., Knowledge management and the occasional links with performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3), 2003, pp.67-81.
47.King, W.R., Strategies for creating a learning organization, Information Systems Management, 18(11), 2001, pp.12-20.
48.King, W.R., P.V. Marks, and S. McCoy, The most important issues in knowledge management, Communications of the ACM, 45(9), 2002, pp.93-97.
49.Kline, R., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press New York, 1998.
50.Kogut, B., and U. Zander, Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology, Organization Science, 3, 1992, pp.383-397.
51.Lam, Y.L.J., Toward reconceptualizing organizational learning: a multidimensional interpretation, The International Journal of Educational Management 15(4/5), 2001, pp.212-219.
52.Leavitt, H.J., Applying Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological, and Humanistic Approaches, In Handbook of Organizations. 1965, Rand McNally: Chicago.
53.Lee, H., and B. Choi, Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 2003, pp.179-228.
54.Lee, K.C., S. Lee, and I.W. Kang, KMPI: measuring knowledge management: a latent content analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 45(3), 2005, pp.469-482.
55.Leonard-Barton, D., Wellsprings of knowledge. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, 1995.
56.Little, T. D., U. Lindenberger, and J. R. Nesselroade, On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 1999, pp.192–211.
57.Little, T. D., W. A. Cunningham, and G. Shaher, To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits, Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 2002, pp.151-173.
58.Llorens Montes, F.J., A. Ruiz Moreno, and V. Garcia Morales, Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: an empirical examination, Technovation, 25(10), 2005, pp. 1159-1172.
59.L�櫝ez, S.P., J.M.M. Pe�曝, and C.J.V. Ord�龍, Managing knowledge: the link between culture and organizational learning, Journal of Knowledge Management 8(6), 2004, pp.93-104.
60.Marsh, H.W., K. T. Hau, J. R. Balla, and D. Grayson, Is more ever too much: The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 1998, pp.181–220.
61.Mitcham, C. and R. Mackey, Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the philosophical problems of technology. Free Press: New York, 1983.
62.Nevis, E.C., A.J. DiBella, and J.M. Gould, Understanding organizations as learning systems, Sloan Management Review, Winter, 1995, pp.73-85.
63.Nonaka, I., A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science 5 (10), 1994, pp.14-37.
64.Nonaka, I. and N. Konno, The concept of “Ba” : building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, 40(3), 1998, pp.40-54.
65.Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
66.Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
67.O’Dell, C. and C. Grayson, If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices, California Management Review, 40(3), 1998, pp.154-174.
68.Pasmore, W. A. Designing effective organizations: the sociotechnical systems perspective, NY: John Wiley&Sons, 1988.
69.Pemberton, J.D., G.H. Stonehouse, and D.J. Yarrow, Benchmarking and the Role of Organizational Learning in Developing Competitive Advantage, Knowledge and Process Management, 8(2), 2001, pp. 123–135.
70.Penrose, E., The theory of the growth of the firm, New York: John Wiley,1959.
71.Porter, M. E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press, Macmillan, New York, 1980.
72.Powell, T.C. and Dent-Micallef, A., Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources, Strategic Management Journal 18(5), 1997, pp.375-405.
73.Real, J.C. Leal, A. And Rolda´n, J.L., Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies, Industrial Marketing Management 35, 2006, pp.505 – 521.
74.Ruiz-Mercader, J., A. L. Mero�瓨-Cerdan, and R. Sabater-S�鴨chez, Information Technology and Learning: Their Relationship and Impact on Organizational Performance in Small Businesses, International Journal of Information Management 26, 2006, pp.16–29.
75.Senge, P. M., and M. Peter, The Fifth Discipline The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday, 1990.
76.Singh J., J. R. Goolsby, and G. K. Rhoads, Behavioral and psychological consequences of boundary spanning burnout for customer service representatices. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(November), 1994, pp.558-569.
77.Slater, S.F. and J.C. Narver, Market orientation and the learning organization, Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 1995, pp.63-74.
78.Stalk, G., P. Evans, and L. E. Shulman, Competing on Capabiities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1992, pp.57-69.
79.Syed-Ikhsan, S. O. S. and F. Rowland, Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 2004, pp.95-111.
80.Taylor J. C., Techonolgy and planned Organizational Change, Braun-Brumfield: Ann Arbor, MI, 1971.
81.Taylor, J. C., and D. F. Felten, Performance by Design: Sociotechnical Systems in North America, Prentice Hall, 1993.
82.Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 1997, pp.509–533.
83.Tippins, M.J., and R.S. Sohi, IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 2003, pp.745-761.
84.Trist, E. and F. E. Emery, Analytical model for sociotechnical systems, Sociotechnical Systems: a Sourcebook, University Associates, La Jolla, CA, 1978, pp.120-131.
85.Turban, E. and L. E. Frenzel, Expert Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1992.
86.Ulrich, D., and D. Lake, Organizational capability-competing form the inside out, John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
87.Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam, Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches, Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 1986, pp.801-814.
88.Wernerfelt, B. A resourced-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 1984, pp.171-180.
89.West, S. G., J. F. Finch, and P. J. Curran, Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, 1995, pp. 56–75.
90.Wiig, K. M., Knowledge Management, Schema Press, Texas, 1994.
91.Wiig, K. M., Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go?, Expert Systems with Applications, Pergamon Press/ Elsevier, 14 1997.
92.Woolf, H., and C. Merriam, Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, New York, 1990.
93.Yang, C., and L.C. Chen, Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior?, Journal of Information Science., 2007, pp.95-109.
94.Youndt, M. A., S. A. Snell, J.W. Jr. Dean, and D. P. Lepak, Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance, Academy of Management Journal 39(4), 1996, pp. 836-866.
95.Zott, C., Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Industry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 2003, pp. 97-125.