跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.201.97.138) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/09 08:52
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳淑芳
研究生(外文):Shu-fang Chen
論文名稱:台灣就業人口工時偏好的研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Preference of Work Hours of Employees in Taiwan
指導教授:李誠李誠引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:工時偏好彈性工時工作時間
外文關鍵詞:preference of work hoursflexible work hourswork hours
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:1042
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:202
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
21世紀開始,台灣正式邁入了知識經濟時代,行業、職業特性轉變,使得員工工作時間的需求跳脫出傳統的固定工時與固定時段。我國政府遂於2000年修訂勞動基準法,使工時規範更具彈性化以符合人民需求與順應國際潮流。但是,台灣多數雇主仍然使用僵化的固定工時,使得員工無法享受工時彈性化的好處。此外,根據2005年瑞士洛桑管理學院公布的《世界競爭力年報》,台灣人在2005年的平均工時已超過2,300個小時,居全球之冠。因此,本研究意在探討台灣現行的工時狀況、影響員工工時長短的因素、比較藍領員工與白領員工工時長短與工時偏好的差異、了解員工對於工時彈性化的需求、探討提升工時彈性化的可行方法。
本研究以敘述性統計與邏輯迴歸為分析方法,第一部份採用主計處人力資源調查資料,研究結果顯示:1980年以後,台灣就業人員的工時呈現逐漸下降之趨勢,但男性工時仍多於女性工時。因為絕大多數雇主未採行彈性工時制度,所以多數就業人口的工時偏好與實際工時間有差距;尤其女性在此項差距上大於男性,因為她們必須兼顧家庭與工作。台灣就業人員中,1995年之前,25-49歲的男性為工作時間最長之工作者,50歲以上的男性次之,24歲以下之男性最短者。但是2000年以後,50歲以上之人的工時最多。男性學歷愈高者,工作時間愈短;男性自營作業者相較於其他受雇者,擁有較長之工作時間。但是女性則是年齡愈大者,工作時間愈短;學歷愈高者,工作時間亦愈短;女性自營作業者擁有較少的工時。
本研究第二部份以問卷抽樣調查北部地區白領員工,研究結果則為:北部地區白領員工的工時並未下降、男性員工工時仍大於女性員工、絕大多數白領工作者存在著實際工時與理想工時有落差的情況、女性白領員工的工時偏好差距大於男性、白領員工的工時長短受教育程度影響。
本研究第三部份介紹外國政府解決員工工時偏好與實際工時差距的方式,以供政府與企業工時政策的參考。
Since 2000 Taiwan has been moving towards the stage of knowledge-based economy and thus the structure of industries and occupations have been changing rapidly, and both employers and employees demand for a more flexibile work schedule in order to coup with the new economic environment. In response to these needs the government has revised the Labor Standards Law to relex the work hour regulations and thus make work hours more flexible. However, most employers in Taiwan still have the rigid and fixed work schedule. According to IMD, in 2005 employees in Taiwan had the longest annual work hours in the world. The purpose of this study is to investigate the present situation of work hours in Taiwan, factors affecting work schedule and pattern of work hours, comparing work hour preference between blue and white collar employees, employees demand for flexibile work schedule and work hours, and finally the possibilities of making work hour more flexible in Taiwan.
This study is divided into three parts, by using data collected by government and supplmented by data collected by this writer via mailed questionnaires we first provide the descriptive statistics of these data and then logistic regression of these government and privately collected data. In the first part of this paper we analyze data collected by the government. The results show that work hours in Taiwan have been shortened since 1980, and males have longer work hours than females. Most employees expressed the gaps between their ideal and actual work hours. At the same time, the problem of working time preference of the female is more serious than the male. Before 1995, 25-49 year-old male employees worked the longest work hours, while since 2000 employees who are 50 years old and above have the longest work hours and older female workers have shorter work hours. In general workers male amd female alike who are better educated enjoy shorter work hours.
Since white and blue collar workers have different preference towards work hours and since Taiwan is moving towards knowledge-based economy which means ther will be more and more white collear workers and there we sent out mailed questionnaires to a sample of white collar workers in the Notheren part of Taiwan in finding out the work hour preference of these white collar workers. In the second part of this study we analyze these mailed questionnaires and the results show that the work hours for white collear have not been decling in recent years and male white collar workers work longer hours than their counterparts, female white collar workers. There are gaps between white collar workers’ ideal and actual work hours also, and the gap is wider for females than for male workers. It is also interesting to find that better educated white collar workers would like to work more hours than the hours they currently have becausae there is an association between the length of work hours and the opportunity of promotion.
In the third part of this study we discuss the ways in which Taiwan government can learn from foreign governments in closing the gap between idea and actual work hours of the employees in Taiwan.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
第一節 工作時間 3
第二節 彈性工時制度 6
第三節 工時偏好 10
一、工時偏好的背景 10
二、影響工時偏好的因子 10
第四節 時間分配理論:實際工時與理想工時的差距 14
一、簡單勞動—休閒模型 14
二、實際工時與理想工時的差距 14
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節 研究架構 17
第二節 研究假設 18
第三節 研究工具 19
一、 樣本資料收集 19
二、 變項操作型定義與衡量方法 19
三、 敘述性統計 21
四、 邏輯迴歸分析(Logistic Regression Analysis) 22
第四章 實證研究 23
一、 台灣每周工時的趨勢 23
二、 台灣男性與女性的工時 28
三、 台灣員工工時偏好與實際工時的落差 28
四、 台灣女性的工時偏好 31
五、 全時工作者長時工作之決定因素 32
第五章 抽樣調查結果與分析 38
第一節 樣本特性分析 38
第二節 工時與工時偏好 41
一、每週平均工時 41
二、工時偏好 41
三、影響工時偏好的因素 46
第三節 北部地區白領員工長工時的決定因素 53
第六章 結論與建議 54
第一節 實證研究結果 54
第二節 抽樣調查研究結果 56
第三節 外國政府解決工時偏好與實際工時差距之方法 62
一、美國公部門實施時間津貼制度 62
二、美國私部門實施時間津貼制度 63
第四節 管理意涵 66
一、對政府的建議 66
二、對企業的建議 66
第五節 研究限制 68
第六節 後續研究建議 69
參考文獻 70
一、中文部分 70
二、外國部分 70
三、網站資料 73
附錄 問卷 74
一、中文部分
中華民國行政院主計處,1980-2005,人力運用調查資料
中國民國行政院主計處,2003,台灣婦女婚婚育就業調查報告
吳明隆,2003,SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計,知城數位科技出版
林國榮、李秉正、徐世勳,1998,縮減工時對台灣經濟衝擊之一般均衡分析,《台灣經濟學會年會論文集》
邱駿彥,2000,勞動基準法當前課題之研究—以縮短工時相關法制為中心,
2000年工業關係研討會論文
吳明隆、涂金堂,2006,SPSS與統計應用分析,五南圖書
吳清滄,2005,勞動基準法實用,復文書局
萬建邦,2004,部份工時者與多份工作者:他們為何與常人不同,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文

二、外國部分
Allan, C., Brosnan, P. and Walsh, P., 1998, “Non-standard Working-time Arrangements in Australia and New Zealand”, International Journal of Manpower, 19(4): 234-249
Bailey, W. and Kelmen, B., 1988, “Towards More Flexible Working-time Arrangements”, Economic Planning Advisory Council Discussion Paper 88/02, EPAC, Canberra
Barnett, R. and Baruch, G., 1985, “Women’s Involvement in Multiple Roles and Psychological Distress”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 135-145
Becker, G., 1991, A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bell, L., 1998, “Differences in Work Hours and Hours Preferences by Race in the U.S.”, Review of Social Economy, 56: 481-500
Bielenski, H., Bosch, G. and Wagner, A., 2002, Working Time Preferences in Sixteen European Countries, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Ireland, 127-152
Böheim, R. and Taylor, M. P., 2004, “Actual and Preferred Working Hours”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(1): 149-166
Clardberg, M. and Moen, P., 2001, “Understanding the Time-Squeeze: Married Couples’ Preferred and Actual Work-Hour Strategies”, The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7): 1115-1136
Costa, G., Åkerstedt, T., Nachreiner, F., Baltieri, F., Carvalhais, J., Folkard, S., Dresen, M. F., Gadbois, C., Gartner, J., Sukalo, H. G., Kandolin, M. H. I., Sartori, S. and Silvério, J., 2004, “Flexible Working Hours, Health, and Well-being in Europe. Some Considerations from a SALTSA Project”, Chronobiology International, 21(6):831-844
Crosby, F. J., 1987, Spouse, Parent, Worker: on Gender and Multiple Roles, New Haven: Yale University Press
Eastman, W., 1998, “Working for Position: Women, Men and Managerial Work Hours”, Industrial Relations, 37(1):51-66
Ehrenberg, R. G. and Smith, R. S., 2006, Modern Labor Economics-Theory and Public Policy, ninth edition, Pearson International Edition
Dempster-McClain, D. and Moen, P., 1987, “Employed Parents: Role Strain, Work Time, and Preferences for Working Less”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(3):579-590
Fagan, C., 2001, “Time, Money and the Gender Order: Work Orientations and Working-Time Preferences in Britain”, Gender, Work and Organization, 8(3): 239-266
Fagan, C., Warren, T. and McAllister, L., 2001, Gender, Employment and Working Time Preferences in Europe, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Ireland, 61-107
Fagan, C., Warren, T. and Tracey, 2001, Gender, Employment and Working Time Preferences in Europe, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Ireland, 49(1): 2-10
Felder, J., Highfill, Jannett, K., Sattler, E. L., 1995, „Multiple Worker Households and Multiple Job Holding: Rigid vs. Flexible Hours”, American Economist, 39
Frone, M. R., Russell, M. and Cooper, M. L., 1992, “Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Conflict: Testing a Model of the Work-Family Interface”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1): 65-78
Fujimoto, T., 2006, “Preferences for Working Hours over Life Course among Japanese Manufacturing Workers”, Career Development International, 11(3): 204-115
Gerson, K. and Jacobs, J., 1998, “Who Are The Overworked Americans?” Review of Social Economy, 56: 442-459
Giebel, O., Janßen, D., Schomann, C., and Nachreiner, F., 2004, “A New Approach for Evaluating Flexible Working Hours”, Chronobiology International, 21(6): 1015-1024
Golden, L., 1997, ”Family Friend or Foe? Working Time, Flexibility, and the Fair Labor Standards Act”, Economic Policy Institute, USA
Golden, L., 1998, “Work Time and the Impact of Policy Institutions: Reforming the Overtime Hours Law And Regulation”, Review of Social Economy, 56: 522-541
Golden, L, 2001, “Flexible Work Schedules: What Are We Trading off to Get Them?” Monthly Labor Review, US
Golden, L., 2001, “Flexible Work Schedules: Which Workers Get Them?” The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7): 1157-1169
Golden L., 2003, “Comp Time Bills Off Target”, Economic Policy Institute
Golembiewski, R. T. and Proehl, C. W., 1978, “A Survey of the Empirical Literature on Flexible Work Hours: Character and Consequences of A Major Innovation”, Academy of Management Review, 3(4): 837-853
Higgins, C. A., Duxbury, L. E. and Irving, R. H., 1992, “Work-Family Conflict in the Dural-Career Family”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51: 51-75
Idson, T. and Robbins, P. K., 1991, “Determinants of Voluntary Overtime Decisions”, Economic-Inquiry, 29(1):79-91
Kush, K. S. and Stroh, L. K., 1994, “Flextime: Myth or Reality?” Business Horizons, 37: 51-55
Kyl, J., 2005, “Comp-Time and Fles-Time: Giving Employees a Say”, Republican Policy committee, USA
Lewis, S., 2003, “The Integration of Paid work and The Rest of Life: Is Post-industrial Work?” Leisure Studies, 22: 343-355
Osterman, P., 1995, “Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4): 681-700
Papalexandris, N. and Kramar, R., 1997, “Flexible Working Patterns: Towards Reconciliation of Family and Work”, Employee Relations, 19(6): 581-595
Philp, B., Slater, G. and Harvie, D., 2005, “Preferences, Power and the Determination of Working Hours”, Journal of Economics Issue, 39(1): 75-90
Reynolds, J., 2004, “When Too Much Is Not Enough: Actual and Preferred Work Hours in the United States and Abroad”, Sociological Forum, 19(1): 89-120
Rones, L. P., Ilg, E. R. and Gardner, M. J., 1997, Monthly Labor Review
Scandura, T. A. and Lankau, M. J., 1997, “Relationships of Gender, Family Responsibility and Flexible Work Hours to Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(4): 377-391
Scott, K.S., Moore, K. S. and Micelli, M. P., 1997, “An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences of Workaholism”, Human Relations, 50(3):287-314
Thom, N. and Blum, A., 1998, “The Structure of Working Hours in Swiss Companies”, Human Resource Management Journal, 8(3): 77-84
Whittaker, G. W., 2003, “Compensatory Time vs. Cash Wages: Amending the Fair Labor Standards Act”, The Library of Congress, USA
Wood, S. G. and Sevison, A. B., 1990, “Flexible Working Hours: A Preliminary Look at the Phenomenon of Flexibility in the American Workplace”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 38:325-340
Väisänen, M. and Nätti, J., 2002, “Working Time Preferences in Dual-earning Households”, European Societies, 4(3): 307-329

三、網站資料
行政院勞工委員會,2006,工時制度http://www.cla.gov.tw/cgi-bin/SM_theme?page=433376b3
中央研究院調查研究專題中心「政府抽樣調查資料庫」
http://srda.sinica.edu.tw/govdb/
U.S. Department of Labor, 2006
http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_29/Part_553/29CFR553.25.htm
Untied States Office of Personnel Management, 2006
http://www.opm.gov/oca/pay/HTML/COMP.HTM
Town of Coupeville, Personnel Policies
http://mrsc.org/govdocs/c691ppolicy.pdf
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 文迪(2001)。兩岸婚姻問題。交流,54,57-60。
2. 石世明(2000)。對臨終者的靈性照顧。安寧療護雜誌,5(2),41-65。
3. 何粵東(2005)。敘說研究訪法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55-72。
4. 余玉眉、陳月枝、劉璧玉、周治蕙、金繼春(1975)。身體心像。護理雜誌,22(4),39-46。
5. 余斯光、楊美賞(2000)。靈性護理併以認知治療於一位精神病患之護理經驗。高雄護理雜誌,17(2),7-20。
6. 吳芝儀(2003)。累犯暴力犯罪者犯罪生涯及自我觀之發展與演變。犯罪學期刊,6(2),127-176。
7. 林美玲、毛新春(1996)。心靈困擾及其護理。醫學繼續教育, 6(4),360-366。
8. 林美珠(2000)。敘事研究:從生命故事出發。輔導季刊,36(4),27-34。
9. 林笑(2000)。靈性照護與人性關懷。榮總護理,17(2),153-58.
10. 林靜琪、邱豔芬(1996)。談癌症末期病人靈性照顧。護理新象,6(2),49-56
11. 邱麗蓮(1998)。與乳癌共生婦女再生命意義探索上現象學研究。護理研究,7(2),119-128。
12. 胡文郁、戴玉慈、陳慶餘、釋惠敏、陳月枝 (2003)。從台灣文化賣落下剖析與建構癌末病人健康相關生活品質內涵之研究。安寧療護雜誌,8(2),113-133。
13. 翁開誠(2002冬)。覺解我的治療理論與實踐—通過故事來成人之美。應用心理研究,16,23-69。
14. 翁開誠(2004秋)。當Carl Rogers遇上了王陽明—心學對人文心理與治療知行合一的啟發。應用心理研究,23,157- 200。
15. 高碧月(2000)。尋找心中的樂園—臨床靈性照顧的省思。安寧療護雜誌,5(2),14-17。