臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

60年代起，臺灣經濟起飛，以OEM代工之中小企業蓬勃興起；至90年代新興國家崛起，尤其中國大陸政府鼓勵外資投資，土地取得容易，人力充沛，工資低廉，十三億人口潛在消費市場之誘因，中大型企業紛紛西進遷移，台灣中小企業優勢漸失，面對強勁的國際競爭，使台灣產業環境趨於惡化，長此下去若不盡速變革，台灣中小企業將逐漸消失。本論文以A公司為例，主要探討，在經營環境驟變之下，台灣中小企業如何利用現有資源找出存活變革之道及其因應策略。

個案A公司是由經營傳統大量生產消費性電子產品轉向經營少量多樣客製化醫療器材，兩種不同性質的經營策略皆有超過10年以上的經驗，經營者運用累積十幾年的技術、管理及行銷的有利資源，面對內外產業環境的變遷，以精簡的組織，透過產銷分工的營運模式，選定少量、多樣、高難度、高利潤客製化的產品，堅持執行既定的經營策略，同時引進ERP系統進行企業e化，委任專業代工，整合人力資源不足。透過客戶的專屬專賣，健全客戶財務體質，降低銷售風險。使上下游的價值鏈完美整合，強化了營業績效與銷售契機，讓A公司由原本的「成本導向」轉為「利潤導向」，十餘年來仍能維持合理的利潤，在台灣最艱困的環境之下，掌握競爭優勢存活下來。

透過SWOT分析A公司的內部資源，外部產業環境，策略的運用，供應鏈的整合，人力資源的管理，競爭優勢的創造，期望可以將理論及實務結合，整理出關鍵成功因素如下：(1)定位明確：選定經營方針做小池塘的大魚 (2)技術領先：充份發揮研發、製造優勢 (3)制度化知識管理：善用制度彌補人力素質弱點(4)結合策略夥伴：運用有限資源管理整合外部資源(5)創新的差異化：整合多項創新優勢佈局成持續的優勢差異性。

個案顯示台灣中小企業只要掌握適當的關鍵時機，權衡自身的有效資源，充分發揮中小企業特有的優點，靈活的組織彈性，超強的反應速度與勤奮敬業的員工，因應新競爭環境，求新與求變的韌性，重新調整腳步訂定經營策略，在台灣永續經營。

Since the economic expansion in Taiwan from the 1960’s, small-and- middle-sized enterprises for OEM have been booming. In the 1990’s, new countries grow up, especially, since the mainland China government encourages foreign investment’ easily-obtained land, abundance of human resources, lower wages, and the huge potential in the consumer market of 1.3 billion persons, all cause middle-and-large enterprises to move westward. The advantages of small-and- middle-sized enterprises in Taiwan have been reduced gradually. Facing strong global competition and deteriorating industry environment in Taiwan, the enterprises will disappear if they fail to accelerate their reform. This paper takes company A as an example, to discuss how small-and-middle-sized enterprises in Taiwan, under the dramatically changing operational environment, find ways to continue their survival and reform using current resources; and their responding strategies.

Company A is a customized medical equipment manufacturer with a small amount yet many varieties of product, transformed from one formerly operating a traditional large-scale consumer electronic production. It has over 10 years experience in each of two different operation strategies. The operator, relying on the resources accumulated for over 10 years in technology, management, and marketing, insists on the established operational strategy, with a streamlined organized operation with classification of production and marketing, selecting customized products in small amounts, but large varieties for high demand, and high profit reward. At the same time, the company brings in ERP to make it IT-based and entrusts professional OEM to make up the human resource deficiency. It perfects the client’s financial system to reduce sales risks by creating client franchises. The upstream and downstream value chain has been integrated perfectly, and the operational performance and sale opportunities have been strengthened. Company A transfers from cost-oriented to profit-oriented. It can still retain rational profits as in the past decade and survives with its competitive edge in the most challenging environment in Taiwan.

It is expected, through analyzing the internal resources of the Company with SWOT, by the review and application of external industry environmental strategies, by the integration of the supply chain, the management of human resources, and the creation of competitive edges to put theory into practice some key factors of its success may evolve. These would be as follows: (1) To clearly define a position and select its operating principle of being “a big fish in a small pond.” (2) To develop leading technology so as to fully play its advantages in R&D and manufacturing. (3) To use systemized knowledge management to compensate for weaknesses in human qualifications within the system. (4) To form strategic partnerships to manage and integrate the external resources using limited resources (5) To address the differences in creation by integrating many creation advantages into one sustained advantage.

The case study indicates that small-and-middle-sized enterprises in Taiwan can sustain their operation only if they can grasp critical opportunities; evaluate their effective resources; play out their specific advantages, such as flexible organization, super response, and diligent employees; adapt to new competition environments; retain their toughness of seeking innovation and changes; and adjust their development pace to set up new operational strategies.

第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與動機1
第二節 研究目的4
第三節 研究流程5
第二章 文獻探討6
第一節 產業分析6
第二節 產業分析方法9
第三節 關鍵成功因素20
第三章 研究方法28
第一節 研究架構28
第二節 研究方法30
第三節 研究對象30
第四章 產業與個案公司分析32
第一節 外部環境分析32
第二節 內部環境分析41
第三節 個案公司SWOT 分析55
第四節 個案公司關鍵成功因素58
第五章 結論與建議63
第一節 結論63
第二節 對業者建議65
第三節 後續研究方向67
第四節 研究限制67
參考文獻69
附錄一 褥瘡的介紹72
附錄二 個案公司專利清單73

英文部份

Aaker, D.A. (1984), Strategic Market Management, Humanities, New York.

Ansoff, H.I.. (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Barney, J.B. ( 1991). “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, 1, pp.99-120.

Boseman, Glenn (1986), Strategic Management : Text and Cases, New York: John Wiley and Sons , Inc., pp 28.

Boynton, A. C., and R. W. Zmud (1984), “An Assessment of Critical Success Factor,” Sloan Management Review, Summer, pp.19-21.

Collis and Ghemawat (1994). Industry Analysis: Understanding Industry Structure and Dynamics. John Wiley, New York

Dainel, R. D. (1961), Management Information Crisis,” Havard Business Review, Sep-Oct. Vol.39, No.5, pp.107-118.

David, F.R. (1986), Fundamentals of Strategic Management, Macmillan Pub Co.

Day, G. S. and Wensley, R. (1988), “Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority,” Journal of Marketing, 52(4), 1-20.

Ferguson, C.R. and Dickinson, R. (1982), “Critical Success Factor for Directors in the Eighties,” Business Horizons, May-June, pp.14-18.

Glueck, W. F. (1980), Business Policy and Strategy Management, 3rd, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Grove, A.S. (1996), Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company and Career, Harper Collins Business.
Hill, C.W.L., and Jones, G.R. (1995), Strategic Management Theory, Houghton Mifflin Co, New York.

Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R. (2001), Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, Houghton Mifflin, New York.

Hofer, C.W. and Schendle D.(1978)﹐Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts﹐West Publishing Co.

Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, New York.

Kenichi O. (1987), The Mind of the Strategy – The Art of Japanese Business, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Leidecker, J.K. and Bruno, A.V..(1984), “Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors”, Long Range Planning, Vol.17,No.1, 1984, pp.26-52.

Mescon M.H., Albert, M. and Khedouri, F. (1998), Management, Prentice Hall.

Porter, M,E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press.

Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press.

Rockart, J. F. (1979), “Chief executives define their own date needs,” Harvard Business Review, 65(8), pp 81-93.

Scherer, F.M. (1970), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Rand McNally College Publishing Co, Chicago.

Srivastava, R.K, Fahey, L. and Christensen, H.K. (2001), “The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, No. 6, 777-802.

Shepherd, W.G. (1979), The economics of industrial organization, Prentice-Hill, New York.

Weihrich, H.(1982), Heinz Weihrich : The Tows Matrix: A Tool for Situational Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.

中文部份
司徒達賢（民68），「台灣企業之環境分析」，企銀季刊，3(1)。

司徒達賢（民87），「策略管理（二版）」，台北：遠流。

司徒達賢（民94），「策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法」，台北：智勝文化。

李仁芳、洪子豪（民75），「企業概論」，台北：華泰書局。

余朝權（民80），「產業分析構面之探討」，台北市銀行月刊，22(7)。

余朝權（民83），「產業競爭分析專論」，台北：五南圖書。

吳思華（民73），「產業特質與企業經營策略關係研究」，政治大學企管所。

吳思華（民77），「產業政策與企業策略－台灣地區產業發展歷程」，中國經濟企業研究所。

吳思華（民89），「策略九說：策略思考的本質」，第三版，臉譜文化。

吳責松（民81），「臺灣資訊電子業關鍵成功因素之探討」，中華民國管
理科學學報。

孟德芸（民77），「企業成功關鍵因素之研究－以個人電腦產業為實證」，中興大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。

白錫盈(民90)，「台灣裝飾五金產業創新策略之探討」，大葉大學事業經營研究所。

黃明豐（民91），「台灣紡織產業－纖維織品經營策略研究分析」，大葉大學事業經營研究所。

黃營杉譯(民85)，Hill, Charles W.L., Jones, Gareth 著，「策略管理」，華泰文化。
晏國祥(民81)，「SWOT分析與策略行銷核心之整合理論及實務運用」，國立政治大學/國際貿易研究所