跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.220.247.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/16 20:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳新樺
研究生(外文):Chen, Hsin-hua
論文名稱:策略群組結構與廠商動態能力之研究──以國內汽車製造廠商為例
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Strategic Group Structure and Firms' Dynamic Capabilities: An Example of Domestic Automobile Manufacturers
指導教授:侯嘉政侯嘉政引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hou, Jia-jeng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:策略群組移動障礙動態能力汽車製造廠商
外文關鍵詞:strategic groupmobility barrierdynamic capabilityautomobile manufacturer
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:263
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
  自從Hunt(1972)創造「策略群組」一詞以來,這個觀念即變成產業經濟學與策略管理等學科的重要領域,而吸引許多學者研究產生原因、影響程度、後續結果。其中,學者普遍認同群組間存在有移動障礙,而類似於進入障礙,會影響廠商在群組間的移動。在此同時,其他學者則提出,在變化日趨激烈的環境當中,企業必須進行資源重組以便調和內部與外部環境,才能確保競爭優勢之來源。因此,策略群組之廠商如何因應態勢、開創新局,持續領先其他廠商或群組,成為現今重要課題。
  本研究以江幸鴻(1999)提出之論文為基礎,繼續研究1999至2006年之台灣地區國產汽車製造廠商的策略群組結構,以及群組間績效差異與跨期間動態性。此外,本研究利用McGee and Thomas(1986)提出之移動障礙三大來源,以及Teece et al.(1997)提出之動態能力三大構面,探討各廠商是否可以藉由發展動態能力克服群組間移動障礙。最後,則是透過比較成功移動與未成功移動之廠商,進一步確認,在有效克服移動障礙之後,廠商是否確實能夠跨越至另一群組。
  透過統計資料分析,以及次級資料蒐集、企業主管訪談,結果發現,廠商發展動態能力的某些構面,可以克服移動障礙之特定構面,意即確認了兩者之間的對應關係。另外,成功跨越群組之廠商,在動態能力表現方面,確實勝過未成功跨越群組之廠商。
  因此,廠商在思考未來經營策略、進行競爭重定位之時,將可針對特定移動障礙之構面,找尋對應之動態能力構面,並且予以發展,以便協助企業克服該移動障礙,進一步幫助跨越至其他群組,爭取更好績效表現。
  Since Hunt(1972) coined the term "strategic group," this concept has become the important research field of industrial organization and strategic management, attracting many scholars to research the cause and effect, and related results. Scholars commonly recognize there are mobility barriers between the groups, which can effect the mobility of firms to another group, as entry barriers do to the new entrants. Meanwhile, other scholars argued, in the environment with much change, firms have to reallocate the resources to strike a balance between internal and external environments to ensure the source of competitive advantage. As a result, it has become the important issue for the firms in the strategic groups to adjust themselves to the environment and fight for the futur, in order to lead other firms or strategic groups.
  This research is based upon the master thesis by Chiang(1999), and proceeds to the research of the strategic group structure of domestic automobile manufacturers in Taiwan from 1999 to 2006, as well as performance difference between the groups and the dynamics of group structure of different periods. Futhermore, this research takes advantage of three sources of mobility barriers (McGee and Thomas, 1986) and three dimensions of dynamic capabilities (Teece et al., 1997) to treat the possibility of firms to develop dynamic capabilities to overcome the mobility barriers between the groups. Finally, through the comparison of the firms moving successfully and the firms moving unsuccessfully, this research confirms that, firms can actually move to another group after effectively overcoming the mobility barriers.
  After reading the analysis of statistical information, collecting the secondary data, and interviewing the corporate executives, this research found that firms can overcome certain dimensions of mobility barriers by developing related dimensions of dynamic capabilities, which meant that tis research has confirmed the corresponding relationship between dynamic capabilities and mobility barriers. Moreover, the firms successfully moving to another group just lead the firms unsuccessfully moving to another group in the respect of dynamic capabilities.
  As a result, when thinking about the future business strategies and making the competitive repositioning, firms can find out the suitable dimensions of dynamic capabilities to overcome the corresponding dimensions of mobility barriers, which helps firms move to another group and make better performance.
目錄
目錄_______________________________Ⅰ
表目錄______________________________Ⅲ
圖目錄______________________________Ⅴ
第一章 緒論___________________________1
  第一節 研究背景與動機____________________1
  第二節 研究目的與問題____________________1
  第三節 研究流程_______________________2
第二章 文獻回顧_________________________3
  第一節 策略群組_______________________3
  第二節 移動障礙_______________________27
  第三節 動態能力_______________________31
第三章 研究方法_________________________35
  第一節 研究架構_______________________35
  第二節 研究假設_______________________36
  第三節 研究操作型定義與衡量_________________43
  第四節 資料蒐集方法_____________________52
第四章 統計分析結果與討論____________________57
  第一節 樣本分析_______________________57
  第二節 策略群組結構分析___________________61
  第三節 策略群組平均績效分析_________________66
  第四節 動態能力與移動障礙的對應關係_____________68
  第五節 廠商間動態能力之比較分析_______________95
  第六節 綜合討論_______________________102
第五章 結論與建議________________________105
  第一節 研究結論_______________________105
  第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵__________________108
  第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議________________110
參考文獻_____________________________113
附錄一 研究問卷_________________________123
附錄二 國內汽車製造廠商各時期重大策略______________133
表目錄
表2-1 策略群組之定義_______________________4
表2-2 策略群組之分群構面_____________________6
表2-3 移動障礙之來源_______________________28
表3-1 動態能力與移動障礙之對應關係________________42
表3-2 分群構面之來源_______________________43
表3-3 分群構面之操作型定義____________________44
表3-4 移動障礙之操作型定義____________________45
表3-5 移動障礙之衡量問項_____________________46
表3-6 動態能力之操作型定義____________________48
表3-7 動態能力之衡量問項_____________________49
表3-8 研究變相之資料來源_____________________53
表4-1 問卷發放與回收情形_____________________58
表4-2 研究樣本資料描述______________________58
表4-3 填答者年齡分布人數_____________________59
表4-4 填答者年資分布人數_____________________59
表4-5 填答者所屬部門分布人數___________________60
表4-6 填答者擔任職務分布人數___________________60
表4-7 第五期(1999至2002年)策略構面因素分析___________61
表4-8 第五期(1999至2002年)策略構面集群分析___________62
表4-9 第六期(2003至2006年)策略構面因素分析___________63
表4-10 第六期(2003至2006年)策略構面集群分析___________63
表4-11 第四至五期之策略群組動態性_________________64
表4-12 第四至五期之策略群組動態性_________________65
表4-13 第五期(1999至2002年)策略群組平均績效ANOVA分析_____66
表4-14 第六期(2003至2006年)策略群組平均績效ANOVA分析_____67
表4-15 動態能力與移動障礙之對應關係_______________69
表4-15-1 動態能力程序構面之「協調整合」與移動障礙之相關係數____70
表4-15-2 動態能力程序構面之「學習」與移動障礙之相關係數______73
表4-15-3 動態能力程序構面之「重置轉換」與移動障礙之相關係數____75
表4-15-4 動態能力位置構面之「技術資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____77
表4-15-5 動態能力位置構面之「互補資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____78
表4-15-6 動態能力位置構面之「財務資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____80
表4-15-7 動態能力位置構面之「名譽資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____82
表4-15-8 動態能力位置構面之「結構資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____83
表4-15-9 動態能力位置構面之「制度資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____84
表4-15-10 動態能力位置構面之「市場資產」與移動障礙之相關係數____86
表4-15-11 動態能力位置構面之「組織疆界」與移動障礙之相關係數____87
表4-15-12 動態能力路徑構面之「路徑相依」與移動障礙之相關係數____88
表4-15-13 動態能力路徑構面之「技術機會」與移動障礙之相關係數____90
表4-16 動態能力與移動障礙之對應關係的假設驗證結果_________92
表4-17 動態能力構面對應移動障礙構面之個數統計表__________93
表4-18 移動障礙構面對應動態能力構面之個數統計表__________94
表4-19 全部廠商之動態能力平均數比較表_______________96
表4-20 第五期車種行銷導向群組之廠商的動態能力平均數比較表_____97
表4-21 第五期價格定位導向群組之廠商的動態能力平均數比較表_____98
表4-22 研究假設驗證結果_____________________102
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程__________________________2
圖3-1 研究架構__________________________35
圖4-1 策略群組結構及廠商競爭定位推移圖______________103
一、中文部份
Michael E. Porter(1980),《競爭策略──產業環境及競爭者分析》(周旭華譯),台北:天下。
三陽工業(2005),《三陽工業股份有限公司年報》。
三陽工業(2006),《三陽工業股份有限公司簡介》。
中華汽車(2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005),《中華汽車工業股份有限公司年報》。
王介昌(2004),以動態能力觀點探討策略群組理論之價值,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
江幸鴻(1999),動態策略群組結構、競爭重定位、與經營績效之研究─臺灣汽車產業之縱斷面分析,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
吳佳綺(2000),國道客運業策略群組、營運績效與移動障礙相關性之研究,國立交通大學運輸工程與管理學系碩士論文。
施佑靜(2005),台灣壽險業動態策略群組之實證研究─論金改對壽險業者策略與績效之影響,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發(民93),產業經濟學,台北:雙葉書廊。
梁欣蓓(2006),產業環境變動性對企業動態能力與經營績效關係之研究,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
裕隆汽車(1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005),《裕隆汽車製造股份有限公司年報》。
經濟部技術處(2000),《2000年汽車產業綜論》,新竹:工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心。
蘇志欣(2006),顧客關係管理策略與經營績效之作為:動態能力觀點,國立嘉義大學行銷與流通管理研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份
Aaker, D. A.(1984), "Strategic Market Management," NY: John Wiley and Sons
Bain, J. S.(1956), "Barriers to New Competition," MS: Harvard University Press
Barney, J. B. and R. E. Hoskisson(1990), "Strategic Groups: Untested Assertions and Research Proposals," Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 187–198
Caves, R. E. and P. Ghemawat(1992), "Identifying Mobility Barriers," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 1-12
Caves, R. E. and M. E. Porter (1977), "From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 91, pp. 241-259
Christman, J. J., C. W. Hofer and W. R. Boulton(1988), "Toward for Classifying Business Strategies," Academy of Management Review,Vol. 13, pp. 413-428
Cool, K. O.(1985), "Strategic Group Formation and Strategic Group Shifts: A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry,1963-1982," Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, Purdue University
Cool, K. O. and I. Dierickx(1993), "Rivalry, Strategic Groups and Firm Profitability," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 47-59
Cool, K. O. and D. Schendel(1987), "Strategic Group Formation and Performance: The Case of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982," Management Science, Vol. 33, pp. 1102-1124
Dess, G. G . and P. F. Davis(1984), "Porter's(1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Stretagic Group Membership and Organizational Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 467-488
Dranove, D., M. Peteraf and D. Shanley (1998), "Do Strategic Group Exist? An Economic Framework for Analysis," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 19, pp. 1029-1044
Ferguson, T. D., D. L. Deephouse and W. L. Ferguson(2000), "Do Strategic GroupsDiffer in Reputation?" Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1195-1214
Fiegenbaum, A., J. McGee and H. Thomas(1987), "Exploring the Linkage between Strategic Groups and Competitive Strategy," International Studies of Management and Organigation, Vol., pp. 6-25
Fiegenbaum, A. and H. Thomas(1990), "Strategic Groups and Performance: The U.S. Insurance Industry, 1970-84," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 197-215
Grant, Robert M. (2005), "Contemporary Strategy Analysis," MA: Blackwell Publishing
Greve, H. R.(1998), "Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See Is What You Do," Strategic Management Journal, Volume 19, pp. 967-988
Hambrick, D. C.(1983), "High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach," Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 26, pp.687-7070
Harrigan, K. R.(1985), "An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Volume 6, No. 1, pp. 55-73
Hatten, K. J.(1974), "Strategic Models in the U.S. Brewing Industry," Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Purdue University
Hatten, K. J. and M. L. Hatten(1985), "Some Empirical Insights for Strategic Marketers: The Case of Beer." In H. Thomas and O. Gardner (eds.), Strategic Marketing and Management, Wiley, Chichester, pp.275-292
Hatten, K. J. and M. L. Hatten(1987), "Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, pp. 329–342
Hatten, K. J. and D. E. Schendel(1977), "Heterogenity within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry, 1952-1971," Journal of Industrial Economics, Volume 26, pp. 97-113
Hatten, K. J., D. E. Schendel and A. C. Cooper(1978), "A Strategic Model of the U.S. Brewing Industry: 1952-1971," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 592-610
Hergert, M.(1983), "The Incidence and Implications of Strategic Grouping in U.S. manufacturing industries," Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University
Hergert, M.(1987), "Causes and Consequences of Strategic Grouping in U.S. Manufacturing Industries ,"International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 18, pp. 26-49
Hofer, C. W. and D. Schendel(1978), "Strategy Formulation: Analytic Concepts", MN: St. Paul
Houthoofd, Noel and Aime Heene(1997), "Strategic Groups as Subsets of Strategic Scope Groups in the Belgian Brewing Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 653-666
Hunt, M. S.(1972), "Competition in the Major Home Appliance Industry, 1960-1970," Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University
Johnson, G. and H. Thomas(1987), "The Industry Context of Strategy, Structure and Performance: The U.K. Brewing Industry," Strategic Management Journal,Vol.8, pp.343-361
Ketchen, D. J., C. C. Snow and V. L. Hoover(2004), "Research on Competitive Dynamics: Recent Accomplshments and Future Challenges," Journal of Management, Vol. 30, pp. 779-804
Kumar, K. Ravi (1987), "The Relationship between Mixed Strategies and Strategic Groups," Managerial and Decision Economics, Volume 8, No. 3, pp. 235-242
Lawless, M. W. , D. D. Bergh and W. D. Wilsted(1989), “Performance Variations among Strategic Group Members: An Examination of Individual Firm Capability,” Journal of Management, Vol. 15, pp.649-661
Lee, J., K. Lee and S. Rho(2002), "An Evolutionary Perspective on Strategic Group Emergence: A Genetic Algorithm-Based Model" Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 23, pp.727-746
Mas-Ruiz, F. J., J. L. Nicolau-Gonzalbez and F. Ruiz-Moreno(2005), "Asymmetric Rivalry between Strategic Groups: Response, Speed of Response and Ex Ante VS. Ex Post Competitive Interaction in the Spanish Bank Deposit Market," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 713-745
Mascarenas, B.(1989), "Strategic Group Dynamics," The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 333-352
Mascarenhas B, and Aaker D. A.(1989), "Mobility Barriers and Strategic Groups," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 475 – 485
Mason E. S.(1939), "Price and Production Policies of Large Scale Enterprise," American Economic Review, Supplement, 29 March
McGee, J. and H. Thomas(1986), "Strategic Group: Theory, Research, Taxonomy," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, pp.141-160
McGee, J. and H. Thomas(1989), "Strategic Groups: A Further Comment," Strategic Management Journal, V. 10, pp. 105-107
McNamara, G. M., D. L. Deephouse and R. A. Luce(2003), "Competitive Positioning within and across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 161-181
McNamara, G. M., R. A. Luce and G. H. Tompson (2002), "Examining the Effect of Complexity in Strategic Group Knowledge Structure on Firm Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 153-179
Mehra, A.(1996), "Resource and Market Based Determinants of Performance in the US Banking Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol, 17, pp.307-322
Nair, A. and L. Filer(2003), "Cointegration of Firm Strategies within Groups: A Long-Run Analysis of Firm Behavior in the Japanese Steel Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 145-159
Nair, A. and S. Kotha(2001), "Does Group Membership Matter? Evidence From The Japanese Steel Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 221-235
Newman, H. H.(1978), "Strategic Groups and the Structure-Performance Relationship," The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 60, pp. 417-427
Newman, W. H. and J. P. Logan(1971), "Strategy, Policy and Central Management," OH: South-Western Publishing
Nohria, N. and C. Garcia-Pont(1991), "Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure," Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, Vol. 12, pp. 105-124
Osborne, J. D., C. I. Stubbart and A. Ramaprasad(2001), "Strategic Groups and Competitive Enactment: A Study of Dynamic Relationships between Mental Models and Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 435-454
Oster, S. M.(1982), "Interindustry Structure and the Ease of Strategic Change," Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64, pp. 376-383
Patton, R.(1976), "A Simultaneous Equation Model of Corporate Strategy: The Case of the U.S. Brewing Industry," Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University
Pegels, C. C., Y. I. Song and B. Yang(2000) "Management Heterogeneity, Competitive Interaction Groups, and Firm Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 911-923
Peteraf, M. and M. Shanley(1997), "Getting to Know You: Strategic Group Identity," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, Summer Special Issue, pp. 165-186
Porter, M. E.(1973), "Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power, and Manufacturer Strategy in Consumer Goods Industries," Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University
Porter, M. E.(1979), "The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance," Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, pp. 214-227
Reger, R. K. and A. S. Huff(1993), "Strategic Groups: A Cognitive Perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 103-124
Segev, E., A. Raveh and M Farjoun(1999), "Conceptual Maps of the Leading MBA Programs in the United States: Core Courses, Concentration Areas, and the Ranking of the School," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 549-565"
Short, J. C., D. J. Ketchen, JR., T. B. Palmer and G. T. M. Hult (2007), "Firm, Strategic Group, and Industry Influences on Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp.147-167
Smith, K. G., C. M. Grimm, S. Wally and G. Young(1997), "Strategic Groups and Firm Behavior: Towards a Reconciliation," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 149-157
Smith, K. G., J. P. Guthrie and M. J. Chen(1986), "Miles and Snow's Typology of Strategy,Organizational Size, and organizational Performance," Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings: 45-49
Stigler, G. J.(1956), "The Statistics of Monopoly and Merger," Journal of Marketing, Vol.37
Tallman, S. B. and D. L. Atchison(1996), "Competence-Based Competition and the Evolution of Strategic Configurations," in Sanchez, R., A. Heene and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition, Pergamon, Free Press, pp.349-375
Tang, M. J. and H. Thomas(1992), "The Concept of Strategic Group: Theoretical Construct or Analytical Convenience," Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 13, pp.323-329
Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen(1997), "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management," Strtegic Management Journal, Vol.18, pp. 509-533
Thomas(1987)
Thomas, H. and N. Venkatraman(1988), "Research on Strategic Groups: Progress and Prognosis," Journal of Management Studies, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp. 537-555
Zajac, E. and S. Shortell(1989), "Changing Generic Strategies:Likelihood, Direction, and Performance Implications," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 10, pp.413-430
三、網際網路
MEMO人事資源網,www.memo.com.tw
三陽工業股份有限公司,www.sym.com.tw
中華汽車工業股份有限公司,www.5230.com.tw
太子汽車工業股份有限公司,www.auto21.com.tw
台朔汽車股份有限公司,www.fasc.com.tw
台塑關係企業,www.fpg.com.tw
台灣五十鈴汽車工業股份有限公司,www.isuzu.com.tw
台灣本田股份有限公司,www.honda-taiwan.com.tw
台灣區車輛工業同業公會,www.ttvma.org.tw
全國商工行政服務入口網,gcis.nat.gov.tw
和泰汽車股份有限公司,www.hotaimotor.com.tw
南陽實業股份有限公司,www.nanyang.com.tw
裕隆企業集團,www.yulongroup.com.tw
裕隆汽車製造股份有限公司,www.yulon-motor.com.tw
國瑞汽車股份有限公司,www.kuozui.com.tw
福特六和汽車股份有限公司,www.ford.com.tw
三陽工業股份有限公司,www.sym.com.tw
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 于有慧。民90年02月。<後冷戰時代中共新安全觀的實踐與挑戰>。《中國大陸研究》,第44卷第2 期,頁57-76。
2. 田立仁。民國88年。<歐盟共同外交暨安全政策與北約新戰略觀>。《中華戰略學刊》,冬季刊,頁187-212。
3. 甘逸驊。民國92年。〈北約東擴--軍事聯盟的變遷與政治意涵〉。《問題與研究》,第42卷第4期,頁1-23。
4. 沈玄池。民國94年1月。<歐洲聯盟第五次擴大對其共同外交際安全政策影響>。《全球政治評論》,第9期,頁1-22。
5. 吳東野。民國82年。<後冷戰時期北約的兵力結構及戰略調整>。《問題與研究》,第32卷第11期,頁26-36。
6. 吳萬寶。民國88年。<歐洲安全與合作組織--民主制度與人權中心之研究>。《大葉學報》,第8卷第2期,頁33-44。
7. 吳朝旺。民國89年。<北大西洋公約組織成立五十週年以後的戰略發展>。《中華戰略學刊》,冬季刊 ,頁215-252。
8. 李大中。民國85年。<北約之轉型:德國與大西洋兩岸秩序的重建>。《問題與研究》,第35卷第3期,頁65-80。
9. 邱淑美。民國87年。<波海三國加入北約之戰略研究>。《問題與研究》,第37卷第9期,頁45-66+90。
10. 林碧炤。民國83年。<論集體安全>。《問題與研究》,第33卷第8期,頁1-23。
11. 洪茂雄。民國80年。<捷克的『絲絨革命』與政權轉移過程>。《問題與研究》,第30卷第5期,頁23-41。
12. 胡敏遠。 民國90年.07月。< 後冷戰時期「北約東擴」對中亞國際政治經濟影響之研究>。《國防雜誌》,第17卷第1期,頁74-86。
13. 翁明賢。1994年。<後冷戰時期北約與歐洲安全關係>。《美歐月刊》,第9卷第8期,頁8-10。
14. 陳文賢。民國82年。<美國外交政策中的現實主義因素>。《問題與研究》,第32卷第3期,頁69-77。
15. 陳朝政。民國90年。<強權在中亞與外高加索地區的競逐>。《美歐季刊》,第15卷第1期,頁117-152。