跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/12 09:14
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:游東道
研究生(外文):Tung-tao Yu
論文名稱:一位大一英文教師課堂內提問策略之個案研究
論文名稱(外文):A Case Study on an EFL Teacher's Questioning Strategy in Taiwan
指導教授:梁中行梁中行引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jong-shing Liang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東教育大學
系所名稱:英語學系碩士班
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:99
中文關鍵詞:提問策略展示性問題擴展性問題
外文關鍵詞:Questioning strategyDisplay questionsReferential questions
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:1148
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:157
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
一位大一英文教師課堂內提問策略之個案研究

摘要
本研究旨在探討一位大學英語教師的課堂提問策略,包括其問題的功能以及提問策略改變的因素。參與本研究的教師是一位國立大學英語教師以及大一英文課堂中的三十六位學生。觀察時間從九十五年九月至九十六年一月,共計六個月。資料蒐集方式則以教室觀察為主,教師訪談為輔。教室觀察與訪談皆轉譯成逐字稿供後續資料分析。本研究使用雙層次的編碼系統。第一個層次用於分類該教師的提問類型,而第二層次目的則在於更進一步分類該教師的展示性問題。另外,教師的訪談則是以被研究者的角度來詮釋研究者的資料分析。
首先,本研究發現該教師的在課堂中最常使用展示性問題與擴展性問題。該教師的展示性問題有四種功能,確認學生理解、架構學生理解、擴展學生教室發言、強調語言形式 (Focus on form)。而她的擴展性問題亦有兩種功能,連結課本內容與學生先備經驗、開啟與學生的私下言談。再者,研究結果顯示該教師提問策略隨著時間而改變,而其策略改變乃歸因於四個因素,聽力活動與課堂作業後續的提問時間縮短、改變檢查學生答案的方法、學生語言能力改變、師生關係增進。最後,本研究進一步檢視該教師的展示性問題,並發現該類型問題不僅可以引發訊息,還可以強調語言形式。前者歸類為訊息相關展示性問題,而後者為語言形式相關展示性問題。經由進一步的編碼分類,語言形式展示性問題包含四種次分類,以發音為標的、以拼字為標的、以文法為標的、以字彙為標的。
研究者認為教師的展示性問題與擴展展性問題在語言教室中皆佔有重要的角色。教師提問不僅可以促使學生練習與使用目標語,還可以強調語言形式。而教師的提問策略也必須隨著學生的語言能力調整。本研究建議未來可進一步探討教師提問策略改變與學生回應語句長度的關係,以及在小班教學中教師提問策略是否有所不同。
A Case Study on an EFL College Teacher’s Questioning Strategy in Taiwan

Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine a college English teacher’s question types and whether the teacher’s questioning strategy changes over time. One English teacher and a Freshman English Class were invited to participate in this study. The class has been observed and video-taped from September 2005 to January 2006. The data sources are the recorded lesson transcripts and the interview with the teacher.
The first finding is that the most commonly asked questions types are display questions and referential questions, followed by confirmation checks, comprehension checks, clarification checks and rhetorical questions. From my analyses and the interview with the teacher, four functions of the teacher’s display questions were identified, to ensure students’ comprehension, to scaffold students’ comprehension, to expand classroom talk and to draw students’ attention to form. The teacher’s referential questions also have two functions, to connect the textbook with students’ personal experiences and to stimulate private talk.
Second, the teacher’s questioning strategy did change over time and that four factors contributed the teacher’s change in her question strategy, including the decrease of Q-and-A sessions after listening activities and in-class assignments, the change in the teacher’s answer-checking technique, the maturity of students’ language competence, and a closer teacher-student relationship.
Third, the teacher’s display questions could be sub-categorized into two sub-types: information-related and form-related. The former is for known information exchanges whereas the latter, which can be targeted to pronunciation, spelling, grammar and vocabulary, is to focus on form.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHINESE ABSTRACT …………………………………………………….. i
ENGLISH ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………. ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………… iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………… iv
LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………….. vii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ………………………………………… 1
The Purpose of the Study ……………………………………………… 4
The Significance of the Study …………………………………………. 5
Key Terms ……………………………………………………………… 5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ………………………………… 7
The Significance of Questions in Language Classrooms ……………… 7
Teachers’ Questions in Language Pedagogy....................... 8
The Forms of Questions ………………………………….......... 9
The Functions of Questions ……………………………......... 11
The Characteristics of Teachers’ Questions in
Language Classrooms ………………………………………........ 13
Display Questions and Referential Questions in
Language Classrooms ………………………………………........ 15
Studies on Teachers’ Questions in the ESL Context ………………… 16
Studies on Teachers’ Questions in Taiwan ……………………………… 17
Summary ………………………………………………………………............. 20
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY …………………………………………............ 22
The Rationale …………………………………………………………… 22
The Participants ………………………………………………………… 23
The Freshman English Class and the Students ……………… 23
The Teacher ………………………………..……………………….... 24
Data Collection …………………………………………………………......... 24
Observing the Classroom with a Video Camera …………… 24
Interviewing the Teacher ………………………………………… 25
Data Management and Selection ………………………………… 26
Data Analysis …………………………………………………………........ 28
The First Level: The Functions of theTeacher’s Questions
........................................................29
The Second Level: The Foci of Display Questions
........................................................30
Trustworthiness ……………………………………………………….......... 30
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………….. . 33
The Teacher’s Question Types ………………………………….......... 33
The Functions of the Teacher’s Display Questions ..... 39
Function 1: To Ensure Students’ Comprehension …40
Function 2: To Scaffold Students’ Comprehension..41
Function 3: To Expand Students’ Classroom Talk … 42
Function 4: To Draw Students’ Attention to Form .. 44
The Functions of the Teacher’s Referential Questions …… 45
Function 1: To Connect the Textbook with Students’
Personal Experiences …………………………. 45
Function 2: To Stimulate Private Talk …………… 48
The Developmental Changes in the Teacher’s Questioning Strategy 51
Factor 1: The Decrease of Q-and-A Sessions after
Listening Activities and In-ClassAssignments … 53
Factor 2: The Change in the Teacher’s
Answer-Checking Technique …………………………… 54
Factor 3: The Maturity of Students’
Language Competence ........................... 56
Factor 4: A Closer Teacher-Student Relationship ..57
The Foci of the Teacher’s Display Questions ………………………… 59
Information-Related Display Questions ………………………… 60
Form-Related Display Questions …………………………………. 61
Pronunciation-Targeted Display Questions …………61
Spelling-Targeted Display Questions …………………62
Grammar-Targeted Display Questions ………………… 63
Vocabulary-Targeted Display Questions …………… 65
Summary …………………………………………………………………........... 68
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ………………….......... 70
Summary of the Study …………………………………………...... 70
Implications for English Education …………………………… 73
Limitations and Reflections ……………………………………… 74
Suggestions for Further Studies ………………………………… 76
REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………. 77
APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………….. 82
APPENDIX 1: Interview Questions …………………………………………... 83
APPENDIX 2: Transcription Conventions ……………………………………. 84
APPENDIX 3: Sample Recorded Lesson Transcript ……………………… 85
APPENDIX 4: Sample Interview Transcript …………………………………. 90





LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1: Data Collection Schedule ……………………………………… 27
Table 4.1: The Teacher’s Question Types ……………………………… 33
Table 4.2: The Comparison of Display Questions and Referential Questions in Each Week ………………………………………………………….. 52
Table 4.3: Time Allocation of IA and LA that were Followed by Q-and-A Sessions ………………………………………......................... 53
Table 4.4: The Foci of the Teacher’s Display Questions ……………60
REFERENCES
English
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education(6th ed.). London: Thomas Learning.
Barnes, D. (1969). Language in the secondary classroom. In Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Rosen, H. (Eds.), Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Bottorff, J. (1994) Using videotaped recordings in qualitative research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods. CA: Sage.
Brock, A. C. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 47-59.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Carlsen, W. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 157-178.
Cazden, B. C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Chang, Y. S. (2005). An examination of classroom interactions through teachers’questioning practices. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, S. Y. (2005). Questioning strategy use and perceptions of native and non-native teachers and students’ responses: An EFL class at elementary school level. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taiwan.
Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52-3, 179-187.
Dudley-Marling, C., & Searle, D. (1991). When students have time to talk: Creating contexts for learning language. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407-431.
Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In Doughty, C., & Long, M. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, (pp. 224-255). MA: Blackwell.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ho, D. (2005). Why do teachers ask the questions they ask? RELC, 36(3), 297-310.
Ho, W. C. (2000). A study on teacher vocabulary explanation in vocational high school EFL classrooms. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua.
Hsu, W. H. (2001). How classroom questioning influences second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
Kearsley, G. P. (1976). Questions and question-asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 355-375.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. (2002). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The Taipei lectures. Taipei: Crane.
Lai, Y. C. (1999). Teacher code-switching in senior high school EFL classrooms: A case study. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.
Liang, J. S. (1995). The use of group work in EFL college pedagogy in Taiwan: A classroom case study. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, New York University.
Liang, J. S. (1996). An analysis of two language teachers’ display questions: A pilot study. Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL, 125-142.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-447.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lin, H. Y. (1996). Questioning Strategies Used by Experienced and Less Experienced EFL Teachers. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan.
Lincoln. Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C., & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Long, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In Selinger, H. W. & Long, M (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. (pp. 268-286). Rowley MA: Newbury House.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talk: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491-500.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English teachers. London: Edward Arnold.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher: Managing the learning process. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Nunn, R. (1999). The purpose of language teachers’ questions. IRAL, XXXVII-1, 23-42.
Oskarsson, M. (1975). On the role of the mother tongue in learning FL vocabulary: An empirical investigation. ITL, 27, 19-32.
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 737-758.
Richards, J. C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). Pausing phenomena: influence on the quality of instruction. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 203-224.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). New York: Oxford.
Sinclair, J. M., & R. M. Coulthard (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steinberg, D. (1993). An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Longman.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. M., & Madden, C. G.. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 236-244). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review. 50(1), 158-163.
Tai, F. Y. (2003). The effects of instructional language use on English achievements of senior high EFL students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung.
Tseng, S. D. (1992). Adding a third language: An in-depth analysis of the teacher’s questioning processes in a Chinese classroom. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, M. J., & Wang, M. F. (2004). An analysis of the teachers’ questioning strategies in senior high school English classes. 2004 International Conference and Workshop on TEFL and Applied Linguistics, 495-505.
White, J., & Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Asking and answering in ESL classes. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 40(2), 228-244.
William, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583-625.
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1985). When does teachers’ talk work as input? In Gass. S., & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 7-50). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Wu, K. Y. (1993). Classroom interaction and teacher questions revisited. RELC Journal, 24(2), 49-67.
Yen, S. J. (2005). Teacher questioning strategies used in EFL reading classes: A descriptive study focusing on a junior high school teacher. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.
Chinese
王瓊珠 (民93)。故事結構教學家分享閱讀對增進國小閱讀障礙學童讀寫能力與
故事結構概念之研究。台北市立師範學院學報,第35卷,第二期,1-22。
石素錦 (民92)。國小英語教學師生言談互動模式之探討。高雄師大學報,15期,
419-446。
張玉成 (民88)。教師發問技巧 (第二版)。台北:心理出版社。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top