臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣地區資優教育推展三十多年來，自高中資優班畢業的女性為數頗眾，本研究主要目的在於探討人格特質與性別刻板知覺對於女性資優學生生涯成功之預測情形及其影響。
本研究以台灣地區75-87學年度高中資優班畢業女性共470位為研究對象。研究工具為「生涯成功量表」、「人格特質量表」、「性別刻板知覺量表」和「生涯訪談大綱」。本研究採用問卷調查法蒐集資料，以逐步迴歸分析探討人格特質、性別刻板知覺對於生涯成功的預測情形並運用結構方程模式驗證研究架構，最後依「生涯成功」量表篩選九位女性資優學生進行訪談，深入探討人格特質與性別刻板知覺對於女性資優學生內在生涯成功之影響。
本研究所獲致的結論如下：
一、女性資優學生的內在生涯成功可由人格特質中的「嚴謹性」、「神經性」、「外向性」與「和善性」加以預測；女性資優學生的外在生涯成功可由人格特質中的「嚴謹性」以及「性別刻板知覺」加以預測。

二、以結構方程模式檢驗「生涯成功、人格特質與性別刻板知覺」關係模式發現，人格特質對於生涯成功有非常高的預測力；性別刻板知覺可以負向預測生涯成功；人格特質對於生涯成功之預測力高於性別刻板知覺。

三、由訪談分析中發現，對工作產生助力的人格特質包括做事嚴謹負責、自我意志強、勇於任事、正面思考、開放的學習心態、樂於助人、友善隨和、有計畫性、具同理心和富創造力；對工作產生阻力的人格特質有焦慮、負面想法、自我放棄、懶散膽小及猶豫。性別刻板知覺對於生涯的影響方面，多數受訪者感受到性別在工作上的助、阻力；受訪者視價值觀的不同，對於婚姻或工作的偏重順序或有不同；在家庭照顧上，支持系統對於受訪者兼顧家庭與事業而言是很重要的一環。

四、訪談分析也發現嚴謹性高的女性資優學生其生涯發展較優異。女性資優學生經歷工作困擾時，若傾向以負向看法與態度去面對與解讀，其生涯滿意度低；若是女性資優學生採取積極正面的態度面對工作困擾，則其生涯滿意度高。

The purposes of this study were: (1) to analyze the predictive ability of personality and gender stereotype perception on career success, and (2) to explore the related factors of career success of the gifted women.
470 gifted young women graduated from gifted classes in senior high schools during 1986 to 1998 in Taiwan were recruited in the study. Questionnaires including “Career Success Scales”, “Personality Scales”, “Gender Stereotype Perception Scales”, and “Interviewing Guideline” were used for data collection, and stepwise regression was used for data analysis. Meanwhile, a model of career success on personality and gender stereotype perception was proposed and tested on the subjects mentioned above via a structural equation modeling. Furthermore, 9 females were selected for in-depth interview based on the analysis of the influence of personality and gender stereotype perception on intrinsic career success.
Major findings of this study were listed as followed:
1. Conscientiousness, neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness had predictive ability on intrinsic career success in gifted women. Conscientiousness, and gender stereotype perception had predictive ability on extrinsic career success in gifted women.
2. The structural equation modeling of personality and gender stereotype perception on career success showed that the data fitted the theoretical model. The results revealed that personality had high predictive ability on career success. Gender stereotype perception had negatively predictive ability on career success.
3. Data from interviews revealed the main assistance of career development from their personality including conscientiousness, strong will, positive thinking, open mind, to help someone, agreeableness, empathy, and creativity. The barrier of career development came from anxious, negative thinking, ababdoned self, lazy and hesitative. The influence of gender stereotype perception to career development depended on value of marriage as well as working. Basically, seeking for supports were important coping strategies for the married group.
4. Interviews also showed that gifted women possessed higher conscientiousness were better on career development. The satisfaction for their career would be low if they inclined to face and interpret working problems with negative views and attitudes. On the other hand, the satisfaction would be high if they took a positive attitude in facing these problems.

目 錄
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… Ⅰ
英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
目錄 ………………………………………………………………… Ⅴ
表次 ………………………………………………………………… Ⅶ
圖次 ………………………………………………………………… Ⅹ

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題與假設 ………………………………………… 6
第三節 名詞釋義 ………………………………………………… 9

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 生涯成功 ………………………………………………… 11
第二節 人格特質理論 …………………………………………… 20
第三節 性別刻板知覺 …………………………………………… 31
第四節女性生涯成功、人格特質與性別刻板知覺之相關研究… 41

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構 ………………………………………………… 49
第二節 研究對象 ………………………………………………… 50
第三節 研究工具 ………………………………………………… 53
第四節 研究程序 ………………………………………………… 66
第五節 研究資料處理與分析 …………………………………… 70

第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 人格特質和性別刻板知覺對於女性資優學生生涯成功之
預測 ……………………………………………………… 74
第二節 不同背景變項女性資優學生生涯成功之差異分析 …… 87
第三節 不同背景變項女性資優學生人格特質與性別刻板知覺之
差異分析 ………………………………………………… 99

第四節 女性資優學生生涯成功之訪談分析 ………………… 119

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 研究結論和對於女性資優學生之啟示 ……………… 153
第二節 研究限制 ……………………………………………… 161
第三節 教育應用上的建議 …………………………………… 162
第四節 未來研究的建議 ……………………………………… 165

參考文獻 …………………………………………………………… 166

附錄
附錄一生涯發展量表預試量表 ……………………………… 183
附錄二 生涯發展量表正式量表 ……………………………… 188
附錄三 女性資優學生生涯訪談大綱專家效度名單 ………… 194
附錄四 女性資優學生生涯訪談大綱專家評定版 …………… 195
附錄五 女性資優學生生涯訪談大綱專家審查意見一覽表 … 198
附錄六 女性資優學生生涯訪談大綱正式版 ………………… 200
附錄七 人格特質量表項目分析 ……………………………… 202
附錄八 生涯滿意度量表項目分析 …………………………… 204
附錄九 性別刻板知覺量表項目分析 ………………………… 205
附錄十 資料編碼範例 ………………………………………… 206
附錄十一 從資料的共通性歸納主題的範例 ………………… 207

中文部分
王雅各譯（2002）。不同的語音：心理學理論與女性的發展。Gilligan, C.著。台北市：心理。
方德琳（2006）。我的三歲教練。商業週刊，991，140-148。
田秀蘭（1998）。男女大學生生涯阻礙因素之分析研究。教育心理學報，30（1），133-148。
任東屏（1999）。碩士程度的女性國小教師專業發展研究。國立 屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
余德慧（1991）。中國女人的生涯觀。台北市：張老師。
何英奇（2004）。心理與特殊教育新論。台北市：心理。
李美枝（1979）。社會心理學。台北市：大洋。
李美枝（1987）。女性心理學。台北市：大洋。
李美枝、鍾秋玉（1996）。性別與性別角色析論。本土心理學研究，6，260-299。
李俊杰（2004）。組織生涯管理、員工個人生涯規劃、人格特質 與工作滿意度之關聯研究。國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學 系碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
車先蕙、李燦如、帥文慧、陳正文、張明玲譯(2004) 。人格理論第二版。 Schultz, D. & Schultz, S.E.著。台北市:湯姆生出版，揚智文化發行。
沈聰益（2002）。人格五因素模式預測保險業務員銷售績效的效度─NEO-PI-R量表之跨文化檢驗與人際特質架構之實證探討。國立交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文，未出版，新竹 市。
林大衛（1994）。生涯成功、激勵制度與工作滿意度之研究。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹 市。
林上祚（2006，11月21日）。全球最具影響力女強人蓋茲老婆。中國時報。2006年11月21日，取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/061120/4/6tcq.html。
林生傳（2000）。教育社會學（三版）。台北市：巨流。
林幸台（1993a）。高一資賦優異學生生涯發展歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，9，191-214。
林幸台（1993b）：測驗在生涯輔導上的運用。載於中國測驗學會主編：心理測驗的發展與應用（頁385-412）。台北市：心理。
林美和（1997），女性觀點的成人婦女教育課程。成人教育，37，頁9-15。
林美和（2003）。女性心理學研究及其在教學上意義。載於郭為藩編著，成人學習—心理學的探討（頁126-158）。台北市：心理。
林芬英（2003）。女性領導者領導特質與領導風格之研究。國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林靜宜（2001）。國小女性教師生涯阻礙及其因應方式之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
吳淑敏（2004）。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程及其成功因素之探討。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文，未出版， 台北市。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北市：雙葉。
胡夢蕾（2004）。餐旅學生人格特質與實習工作滿意度關係之研究。教育研究資訊，12（1），103-132。
徐甄慧(1998) 。女性人格特質、角色衝突與擔任高階主管關係之研究。國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版， 台北市。。
張雨青（2001）。資優和普通班兒童的人格差異。華人心理學 報，2(1)，139-152。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北市：東華。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學。台北市：東華。
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市：東華。
郭為藩（2003）。成人學習—心理學的探討。台北市：心理。
郭靜姿、林美和（2003）。女性資優在那裏。資優教育季刊，89 ，1-17。
郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉（2003）。高中資優班畢業女性之角色刻板知覺、生涯阻礙因素與潛能發揮自評。資優教育研究，3（2），1-34。
郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉（2006）。女性資優生在工作或學業上 的助力、阻力、因應及轉變。教育研究月刊，143，41-56。
黃小鳳(2001)。性別角色刻板印象、晉升者性別及平權意識喚起對晉升決策的影響。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文， 未出版，台北市。
黃芳銘（2002）。結構方程模式。台北市：五南。
黃惠美、盧欽銘（1984）。職業成功女性人格特質與工作滿足之研究。家政教育，9（4），118-128。
莊佩珍（1994）。資優女性生涯發展及其相關因素之研究。國立 彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
莊耀嘉、李雯娣（2001）。兒童性格結構：五大模型的本土化檢 驗。中華心理學刊，43（1），65-82。
楊國樞(1988)。中國人對於人之性格的看法。(中國人叢書3，中國人的蛻變)。台北市：桂冠。
趙明德（2004）。國小資優生與普通生人格特質與問題解決態度之相關研究。國立花蓮師範學院輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。
廖素華（1978）。國小校長領導方式、教師人格特質與教師工作滿足的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出 版，台北市。
葉光輝譯（2005）。性格心理學理論與研究。Pervin, L.   A.,Cervone, D., & John, O.著。台北市：雙葉書廊。
歐陽萌君（1992）。資優者成年入社會後之人格適應、自我實  現及其生涯歷程之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研  究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2003)。多變量分析方法：統計軟體應用。台北市：五南。
陳幸仁譯(1996) 。成就與能力在性別差異上的探討。 D U. Levine & R J. Havighurst著。教育資料文摘，38（5），148-155。
簡維君、郭靜姿、林美和（2005）。婚姻與家庭的影響：高中美術資優班畢業女性生涯發展之助力與阻力。資優教育研究5（1），1-34。
蔡欣嵐（2001）。工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係-以半導體業為例。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文， 未出版，中壢市。
劉秀娟、林明寬譯（1996）。兩性關係--性別刻板化與角色。Basow著。台北市：揚智。
劉慧俐（1985）。醫師專業生涯與婚姻、家庭之研究—著重女醫師角色之探討。國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
羅寶鳳（1993）。成年婦女生涯轉變之相關因素研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。




英文部分
Albury, R. J. (1991). A comparative study of successful women artists and artistically gifted female art students. University Microform International No. AAT9215173.
Badolato, L. A. (1998). Recognizing & meeting special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Today, 21(6), 32-37.
Bizzari, J. C. (1997). An intergenerational study of three gifted women: Obstacles and challenges confronting women of high potential. University Microform International No. AAT9727909.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737.
Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., & Judge, T. A.(2001). Effects of personality on executive career success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 53-81.
Bozionelos, N.(2004). The relationship between disposition and career success: A British study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 403-625.
Burke, R. J.(2001). Managerial women's career experiences, satisfaction and well-being：A five country study. Cross Cultural Management, 8(3-4), 117-133.
Carter, J.(2004). Beyond the blue: Mentoring relationships as determinants of tradeswomen’s. University Microform International No.AAT 1424358.
Chen, L. (2005). A study of the glass ceiling and strategies for women’s career advancement. University Microform International No.AAT 3171603.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.　　
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R .R. (1992). Professional Manual for The NEO PI-R And NEO-FFI. Odessa,FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Chybb, N. H., Fertman, C. I. & Ross, J. L. (1997).　Adolescent self-esteem and locus of control： A longitudinal study of gender and age differences. Adolescence, 32（125）, 113-129.
Dauber, S. L., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Aspects of personality and peer relations of extremely talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 10-15.
Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of Gifted and Talented (5 th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (2002). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. In B. De Raad & M.Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp.1-26). WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Edgehill, A. B. (2005). How sixteen professional business women in the northeastern USA think about career success and how their thoughts influence their approach to achieving it. University Microform International No.AAT 3175662.
Farmer, H. S. (Ed.). (1997). Diversity & women’s career development. London: Sage.
Fiske, D. W.(1949). Consistency of the factoral structure of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Personality and Abnormal Psychology, 44, 329-344.
Frey, C. P. (1993). Meeting the affective needs of gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 16(3), 52-54.
Gattiker, U. E., & Larwood, L.(1988). Predictors for managers’career mobility, success and satisfaction. Human Relations, 41, 569-591.
Goldberg, L. R.(1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C.D. Spielberger &J. N. Butcher(Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 203-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldberg, L. R.(1990). An alternative description of personality：The Big Five Factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M.(1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Hollinger, C. L., & Fleming, E. S. (1988). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(2), 254-259.
Hollinger, C. L. (1991). Facilitation the career development of gifted young women. Roeper Review, 13(3), 135-139.
Horner, M. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-176.
Janos, P. M., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp.149-195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
John, O. P. (1990). The Big Five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin(Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research(pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford Press.
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. Jr(1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485-519.
Judge.T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C.J.& Barrick,M.R.(1999). The big five personal traits,general mental ability,and career success the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621-652.
Kelly, K., & Colangelo, N.(1990). Effects of academic ability and gender on career development. Journal for the Education of Gifted, 13, 168-175.
Kelly, K., & Hall, A. (1994). Effects of academic achievement and gender on occupational aspirations and career interests. In N, Colangelo, S. Assouline, & D.Ｌ. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development(pp.447-453). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Kemp, A. W.(1997). The lives of women as teacher educators: A kaleidoscope of reflections. University Microform International No. AAT 9729216.
Kerr, B. A. (1994). Smart girls two: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Ohio：Ohio Psychology Press.
Kerr, B. A. (1997). Developing talents in girls and young women. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 483-497). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kerr, B. A., Colangelo, N., & Gaeth, J. (1988). Gifted adolescents’ attitudes toward their giftedness. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 245-248.
Korman, A. K., Wittig-Bergman, U., & Lang, D. (1981). Career success and personal failure: Alienation in professionals and managers. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 342-360.
Kuijpers, M. A. C. T., Schyns, B., & Scheerens, J.(2006). Career competencies for career success. The Career Development Quarterly, 55(2), 168-178.
Lincoln,B.C.(2000). Career and family: a qualitative study of working mothers. University Microform International No. AAT 9967341.
Marx, D. M. & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183-1193.
Marks, G., & Houston, D. M.(2002). The reterminants of young women intentions about education, career development and family. Journal of Education and Work, 15(3), 321-336.
Matijevic, P. A. (2005). Creating opportunity: A study of the factors that influence professional advancement for senior-level women administrators from lllinois colleges and universities. University Microform International No.AAT 3174251.
Matkins, J. J., & Miles, R. (2000). Life strategies of five wives mommies and scientists. Gifted Child Today, 23(6), 36-41, 50.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., JR. (1986). Personality, copying, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 385-405.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., JR. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.
McCrae, R .R., & Costa, P. T., JR.(1994). The stability of personality: Observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 173-175.
McCrae, R. R.,& Costa, P. T., JR. (2003). Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective( 2nd edition). New York: Guilford Press.
McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. M., & Lord, C. G. (2003). Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83-90.
NG, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
Norgang, G.(1994). Gifted women’s perspectives on giftedness and success. University Microform International No. AAT NN 00591.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abonumal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
Patton, M. Q. (1995). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
Poole, M. E., Langan-Fox, J. & Omodei, M. (1991). Sex differences in perceived career success. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 117(2), 155-174.
Poole, M. E., Langan-Fox, J. & Omodei, M. (1993). Contrasting subjective and objective criteria as determinants of perceived career success：A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66(1), 39-54.
Reddin,J.(1997). High-achievement women. In H.S.Farmer (Ed.), Diversity & women’s career development (pp.95-126). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Reis, S. M. (1991). The need for clarification in research designed to examine gender differences in achievement and accomplishment. Roeper Review, 13(4), 193-198.
Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone: Compromises and challenges of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Reis, S. M. (2000). Choices and compromises of gifted and talented females. In K. Maitra (ed.), Towards excellence: Developing and nurturing giftedness and talent (pp.89-105). India: Mosaic Books.
Reis, S. M. (2002). Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females. Gifted Child Today, 25(1), 14-28.
Rhee, S. B. (1993). Variables related to career success: Korean-American women of distinction tell their stories. University Microform International No. AAT 9324991.
Rimm, S.(2006). Winning girls, winning women. In B. Wallace & G. Eriksson (Eds.), Diversity in gifted education (pp.189-197). NY: Routledge.
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin ,132, 1-25.
Sales, E.（1978）. Women’s Adult Development. In I. H. Frieze,
R. Katz, D. Ruble and E. Sales（Eds.）, Women and Sex Roles： A Social Psychological Perspective. New York：North.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L.（1999）. Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.
Seibert, S. E.,& Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 1-21.
Seibert-Lark, G.(1993). Social-psychological dimensions of low-income and middle-income women’s achievement of psychology at the doctoral level. University Microform International No. AAT 9318153.
Shaffer, D. R. (1996). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence(4th edition). CA: Brooks/Cole.
Shein, E. H.（1990）. Career anchors：Discovering your real values. San 　Diego, Calif：University Associate Inc.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.3-28). Denver: Love.
Simpson, R., Sturges, J., Woods, A.,& Altman, Y.(2004). Career progress and career barriers: women MBA graduates in Canada and the UK. Career Development International, 9(5), 459-477.
Sinacore-Guinn, A. L., Akcali, F. O., & Fledderus, S.W.(1999). Employed women: family and work-reciprocity and satisfaction. Journal of career develioment, 25(3), 187-204.
Smith, J. L. & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a women’s issue. Sex roles, 47(3/4), 179-191.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M.(1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
Stangor, C. (1988). Stereotype accessibility and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 694-708.
Strop, J. M. (1986). Perceptions of high-achieving gifted and average-achieving adolescents and their parents on counseling needs. Unpublish doctoral dissertation, University of Denver.
Subotnik, R. F., Arnold, K. D., & Noble, K. D. (1995). Gifted is as gifted does but what does gifted do? Roeper review, 18(1), 4-5.
Super, D.E.(1990). A life-span approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice( 2ed, pp.235-280). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Boss Publishers.
Tellegen, A.,& Waller, N.(1987). Reexaming basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Poster presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H.(1935). Genetic studies of genius: Vol.3. The promise of youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tong, J. & Yewchnk (1996). Self concept and sex-role orientation in gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 15-23.
Walder, B. (2000). Career perspectives of female superintendent in the state of Arizona. University Microfilms No. AAT 9964038.
Walker, A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive style in autobiographies of creative achievers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 75-94.
Witz, A., & Savage, M. (1992). The Gender of Organizations. In Gender and Pureaucracy. MA: Blackwell.
Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). The effect of age and role information on expectation for big five personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1482-1496.
Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.
Yee, D. K. & Elccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children math achievement. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 19(5/6), 317-333.
Yewchuk, C., Aysto, S., & Schlosser. G.(2001). Attribution of career facilitators by eminent women from Canada and Finland. High Ability Studies, 12(1), 89-112.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp.581-610). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.