(3.236.231.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/04/14 02:02
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許佩棋
論文名稱:應用PDA支援專題學習-學生學習成效及互動行為分析
論文名稱(外文):Using PDA in project-based learning –Analysis of students’ performance and interaction behaviors
指導教授:吳正己吳正己引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:資訊教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:96
中文關鍵詞:PDA專題學習互動行為
外文關鍵詞:PDAProject-based learningInteractive behaviors
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:170
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本研究的目的在探討應用PDA在專題活動的學習成效及學生同儕與師生互動行為。研究採準實驗研究法,研究參與者為臺北市某國小五年級兩班學生,其中一班26位學生為實驗組(PDA組),另一班24學生為控制組(非PDA組)。研究的自變項為學生是否使用PDA於專題學習活動,依變項為學生學習的態度、成就、及學生同儕互動與師生互動行為。研究結果發現:(1) 實驗組的學生在主動學習方面有較好的表現。(2) PDA應用於專題活動有助於提高學生的學習成就。(3)學生同儕互動行為與是否使用PDA於專題活動並無顯著關聯。(4) 師生互動行為與PDA的使用與否並無顯著關聯,但教師對於控制組提供較多的情感支援。未來教學實施方面,建議教師可以利用PDA輔助專題活動實施教學,但教師需要有完善的教室管理機制。另外,建議後續研究,宜加強學生互動的規劃、擴大樣本、及增加實驗教學的時間,深入探討PDA對師生互動的影響。
This study investigated the effectiveness of using PDA in project-based learning and how the use of PDA might affect interactions among teacher and students. A quasi-experiment design was implemented to study the problem. Two classes of fifty 5th grade students participated in the experiment. One class of students who used PDA in project-based learning served as the experiment group (PDA group), while the other class of students were assigned to the control group (non-PDA group) without using PDA. The findings of this study were: (1) The PDA using group demonstrated more active learning attitude. (2) Using PDA in project-based learning enhanced students’ achievement. (3) There was no significant difference on students’ peer interactive behaviors between the PDA group and the non-PDA group. (4) Using PDA or not did not affect the interactions between students and the teacher; however, the teacher provided the non-PDA group students with more emotional support. To improve the validity of the study, we suggested that future research should improve the design of learning activities, increase the sample size, and extend the time of the treatment.
表次 iii
圖次 iv
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 專題學習 4
第二節 PDA在學習的應用 11
第三節 互動行為分析 18
第四節 綜合討論 25
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究設計 26
第二節 研究參與者 26
第三節 研究工具 27
第四節 專題活動設計 29
第五節 實施步驟 37
第六節 資料分析 39
第四章 結果與討論 40
第一節 學習態度 40
第二節 學習成就 46
第三節 互動行為 48
第四節 專題活動實施情形 52
第五章 結論與建議 55
第一節 結論 55
第二節 建議 57
參考文獻 59
附錄一 PDA操作講義 63
附錄二 專題教學設計 71
附錄三 專題活動學習單 77
附錄四 課堂觀察表(實驗組) 86
附錄五 課堂觀察表(控制組) 87
附錄六 教師反思日誌 88
附錄七 成就測驗 89
附錄八 學習活動問卷(實驗組) 92
附錄九 學習活動問卷(控制組) 93
附錄十 互動行為分析表 94
田佩玉(2006):應用PDA在國小自然科教學之個案研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育所,台北市。

鄒慧英(2001):課程、教學、評量三位一體的專題學習。臺南師範學報,34期, 154-194。

蔡敏玲、彭海燕譯(1998):教室言談:教與學的語言。臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:1988)

Bales, R. F. (1950). A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interaction. American Sociological Review, 15(2), 257-263.

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 369-398.

Brown, G. (1975). Micro-teaching a programme of teaching skills. London : Methuen.

Chan, T., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Sharples, M., Brown, T. O. M., & Patton, C. (2006). One-to-one Technology-Enhanced Learning: An Opportunity for Global Research Collaboration. Retrieved Januar 16, 2007, from http://www.g1on1
.org /Chan%20et%20al2006_One-to-one%20technology-enha.pdf

Chard, S. (2001). Project Development Structure: The Project Approach. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://www.project-approach.com/development/ phases.htm

Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359.

Cortez, C., Nussbaum, M., Lopez, X., Rodriguez, P., Santelices, R., Rosas, R., et al. (2005). Teachers' Support with Ad-Hoc Collaborative Networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 171-180.

Danesh, A., Inkpen, K., Lau, F., Shu, K., & Booth, K. (2001). GeneyTM: designing a collaborative activity for the palmTM handheld computer. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 388-395.

Fahy, P. J. (2005). Online and Face-to-Face Group Interaction Processes Compared Using Bales' Interaction Process Analysis (IPA). European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning Retrieved June 07, 2007, from http://www.eurodl. org/materials/contrib/2006/Patrick_J_Fahy.htm

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

Harris, P. (2001). Going Mobile. Retrieved January 09, 2007, from http://www. learningcircuits.org/2001/jul2001/harris.html

Karasavvidis, I., Pieters, J. M., & Plomp, T. (2003). Exploring the mechanisms through which computers contribute to learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 115-128.

Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Perry, J. (2005). Using Palm Technology in Participatory Simulations of Complex Systems: A New Take on Ubiquitous and Accessible Mobile Computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 285-297.
Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for Participatory Simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(5), 347-359.

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.

Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497.

Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching Children Science: A Project-based Approach. Boston : McGraw-Hill.

Lai, C. Y., & Wu, C. C. (2006). Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 284-297.

Liang, J. K., Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Chang, B., Deng, Y. C., Yang, J. C., et al. (2005). A few design perspectives on one-on-one digital classroom environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 181-189.

Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., Bilezikjian, M., Klemmer, S. R., & Landay, J. A. (2000). Exploring a New Interaction Paradigm for Collaborating on Handheld Computers. UC Berkeley Computer Science Division Technical Report. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~rlmandry/ personal/work/pubs/GeneyTechReport.pdf

Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting Project-Based Science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.

Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 195-212.

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2005). Report 11: Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Nesta Futures Lab. Retrieved January, 10, 2007, from http://www.nestafuturelab.org

Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A Study of Whole Classroom Mathematical Discourse and Teacher Change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175-207.

Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Envisioning the handheld-centric classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 281-294.

Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, Wireless, In-Your-Pocket Learning. Retrieved January 09, 2007, from http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/ cqmmwiyp.htm

Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-272.

Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1, 145-168.

Soloway, E., Grant, W., Tinker, R., Roschelle, J., Mills, M., Resnick, M., et al. (1999). Log on education: Science in the palms of their hands. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 21-26.

Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2001). Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.

Staarman, J. K., Drol, K., & Meijden, H. (2005). Peer Interaction in three collaborative learning environments. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 29-39.

Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Handhelds Go to School: Lessons Learned. Computer, 36(9), 30-37.

Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2003). Learning With Handhelds: Findings From Classroom Research. Stanford Research Institute (SRI) International Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.intel.com/education/ handhelds/SRI.pdf

Vahey, P., Crawford, V., Lewis, A., Huang, Y. T. J., & Whaley, A. (2002). PalmTM Education Pioneers Program: Final Evaluation Report. SRI International Retrieved January 17, 2007, from http://www.palmgrants.sri.com/ PEP_Final_Report.pdf

Vonderwell, S., Sparrow, K., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Using Handheld Computers and Probeware in Inquiry-Based Science Education. The Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology. Retrieved August 15, 2006, from http://www.rcetj.org/?type=art&id=3383&
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔