參考文獻
石素錦（1998）從認知心理與社會互動談兒童語言發展—從皮亞傑與維高斯基理論談兒童英語學習。課程與教學，2（3），54-68。
邱上真（1991）。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育與復健學報，1，1-49。何榮桂（1998）。從教育部之資訊教育推展策略看未來中小學資訊教育的願景。資訊與教育68，2-13。何東墀、胡永崇（1996）。後設認知設略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。特殊教育學報，11，173-210。林玟慧（1995）。閱讀理解策略教學對國中閱讀障礙學生閱讀效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。胡永崇（1995）。後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。李禎祥(1995)。多媒體電腦科技在聽障學生的教學應用。特教園丁，11(1)，17-20。李品蓓（2001）。電腦化教學對閱讀障礙學生識字成效之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。吳宗立（1996）。閱讀理解教學的後設認知策略。研習資訊，13（1），33-37。吳訓生（2002）。國小高、低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略之比較研究。特殊教育學報，16，65-104。吳訓生（2001）。國小低閱讀能力的學生閱讀理解策略教學教學效果之研究。特殊教育學報，15，177-215。林宜真（1998）。閱讀障礙學生與普通學生閱讀理解方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。林蕙蓉（1995）。國小學童後設認知策略教學對國語科閱讀理解效能之研究。國立台南師院學報，28，271~312。
林雲龍（2002）。刺激褪除導向詞彙辨識學習系統對中度智能障礙學童學習成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。洪育慈（2002）。多媒體兒歌對國小低年級智障伴隨語障學生詞彙教學成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。柯華葳（1993）。語文科的閱讀教學。載於李永吟（主編），學習輔導，（頁307-349）。台北：心理。
姚崇昆（1999）。閱讀理論與英語教學之探討。人文及社會學科教學通訊，10（4）, 14-31。涂金堂（1999）。閱讀理解推論歷程之研究。教育研究，7，129-141。
郭為藩（1978）。我國學童閱讀缺陷問題的初步調查及其探討。師大教育研究所集刊，20，57-75。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張再明、陳政見(1998)。特殊教育實施電腦輔助教學之相關問題探討。嘉義師院學報，12，73-93。張新仁（1988）。現代教學方法的新趨勢。教育研究，2，69-88。
張新仁（1992）。寫作教學研究：認知心理學取向。高雄：復文書局。
陳建明（1997）。閱讀理解策略教學效果之個案研究—以花蓮縣安通部落阿美族國小學生為例。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。陳明聰、李天佑、王華沛、楊國屏（2000）。應用電腦輔具結合刺激褪除策略教導國小中重度智能障礙學生識字之研究。特殊教育年刊：e 世代的特殊教育，251-261。
曾陳密桃（1990）。國民中小學生的後設認知及其與閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。詹文宏（1995）。後設認知閱讀策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。葉淑欣（2002）。電腦輔助教學對國小低成就學生識字學習之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。黃瓊儀（1996）。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。黃國禎（1998）。直接教學法對國小數學科低成就學生教學效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。楊芷芳（1995）。國小不同後設認知能力兒童的閱讀理解能力與閱讀理解策略之研究。初等教育研究集刊，3，215-216。
鄧秀芸（2002）。電腦輔助教學對國小中重度智能障礙兒童功能性詞彙識字學習成效之研究。國立花蓮師範學院特殊教育教學碩士論文。賴育民（1995）。如何精進閱讀理解能力---後設認知的取向。研習資訊，12（3），29-31。劉玲吟（1994）。後設認知閱讀策略的教學對國中低閱讀能力學生閱讀效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。姜毓玟（2004）。應用英語童書閱讀教學策略於英語補救教學之個案研究。國立台北師範學院碩士論文。鍾雅婷（2000）。學習策略教學對國小六年級學童閱讀理解成效之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。鍾敏華（2004）。繪本與兒童語文創造力。師友月刊，442，74-78。鍾添騰（2003）。國小國語科閱讀指導教學之行動研究—以騰雲班閱讀指導教學為例。教育資料與研究，51，39-43。
鐘樹椽(1996)。國小學生電腦合作學習之研究小組友誼、獎勵結構和學生因素之探討。台北：師大書苑。
蕭金慧（2001）。電腦輔助教學在輕度智障兒童識字學習之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。Alexander, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problems. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 131-148.
Alessi, P & Trollip, F. (1991). Computer-based instruction—methods and development. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Anderson, T. H. (1978). Technical Report No. 6. Another look at the self-questioning study technique. Urbana：University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Andre, M. E. D. A., & Anderson, T. H. (1978-79). The self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605-623.
Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. Technical Report No. 6. Urbana：University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Armbruster, B. B. (1986). Schema theory and the design of content-area textbook. Educational Psychologist, 21(2), 253-267.
Ausubel (1968). Symbolization and symbolic thought: response to forth. Child Development 39(3), 997-1001.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills of reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp.353-394). New York: Longman.
Bateman, J.(2004). Reading Strategies That Work. School Library Journal, 50(9).
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Budoff, A., Thormann, F. & Guass, B. (1984). .Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge. MA: Brookline Books.
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 21(3), 461-481.
Carver, R. P.(1992). Effect of prediction activities, prior kKnowledge, and text type upon amount comprehended: using rauding theory to critique schema theory research. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(2), 165-74.
Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Ellis J. & Saborrue M.(1986).Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices and preliminary findings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(4),1-16.
Eysenck, M. W. (1990). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flood, J., Lapp, D., & Flood, S. (1984). Types of writings found in the early levels of basal reading programs: Preprimers through second grade readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 241-255.
Foley, C. L. (1993). Prediction: A Valuable Reading Strategy. Reading Improvement, 30(3), 166-170.
Freeman, R. H. (1982). Improving the comprehension stories using predictive strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED.222869).
Gagn’e, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Gagne, R. M. (1974). Educational technology and the learning process. Educational Researcher 3(1), 3-8.
Gambrell, L. B. & Heathington, B. S. (1981). Adult disabled readers’ metacognitive awareness about reading rasks and strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13(3), 215-222.
Graesser, A. C. & Kreuz, R. J. (1993) . A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145-160.
Griggs M. C., Daane Y. J., & Campbell J. R.（2003）.The Nation’s Report Card. Washington. DG: U.S. Department of Education.
Hidi, S. & Anderson, V. (1986). Producting written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473-542.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problemsolving behavior. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe, (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp.31-64).
Kendall, J. R. & Mason, J. M. (1982). Metacongnition from the historical context of teaching rading. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois, Conter for the Study of Reading.
Kintsch, W., & Van, D. T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension on and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Lally (1981). Computer Assisted Instruction of the development of basic skill with intellectually handicapped school children. Austrailan Education Research and Development Committess. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED222170.)
Linden, M. & Wittrock, M. C. (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning. Reading Research Quarterly 17(1), 44-57.
Lerncer, J. W. (1989). Learning disabilities. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Myers, M. & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
Myers, S. S. (1991). Performance reading comprehension—product or process. Educational Review, 43(3), 257-272.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology：A cognitive approach.Boston： Little, Brown and Company.
McNeil, J. D. (1984). Reading comprehension: New directions for classroom practice.
McGrath, A.（2005）. A New Read on Teen Literacy. U.S. News & World Report, 138(7).
Malena, R. F. & Coker, K. J. A. (1987). Reading “O” prehension: The missing elements. Journal of Developmental Education, 10, 24-25.
Mealey, D. L. & Nist, S. L. (1989). Postsecondary teacher directed comprehension strategies. Journal of Reading, 32(6), 484-493.
Nessel, D. (1988). Channeling knowledge for reading expository text. Journal of Reading, 32(3), 231-235.
Nichols, J. N. (1983). Using prediction to increase content area interest and understanding. Journal of Reading, 27, 225-228.
Nolan, T. E. (1991). Self-Questioning and Prediction: Combining Metacognitive Strategies. Journal of Reading, 35(2), 132-138.
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, N. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1(2), 117-175.
Paris, S. G. & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
Polloway, E. A. & Patton, J. R. (1993). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Pearson, P. D. & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell(Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Schirmer, B. R. & Winter, C. R. (1993). Use of cognitive schema by children who Are deaf for comprehending narrative text. Reading Improvement, 30(1), 26-34.
Silven, M. (1992). The role of metacognition in reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 36(3), 211-221.
Stahl, N. A. (1985). Developing independent learners: Strategies and tactics for mastery of text. College Reading and Learning Assistance Technical Report, 85-100.
Terry, S. & Steve F.（2005）. Teaching Students to Interact with Text. Educational Leadership, 63(2), 90-93.
Tie, E. & Stewart (1985). Effective studying from text: applying metacognitive strategies. Forum for Reading, 16, 46-55.
Torgenson, J. K. & Horen, N. M. (1992). Using computers to assist in reading instruction for children with learning disabilities. In S. A. Vogel (Ed.), Educational alternatives for students with learning disabilities. (pp. 159-181). New York: Springer Verlag.
Vicky Z., Matthew B. W. & Lourdes H. S（2005）.Engaging Students with text: The 3-2-1 Strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 381-384.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weisberg, R. & Balajathy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers’ meta-comprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6, 117-136.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2) , 227-68.