跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.95.131.146) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/07/29 02:21
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王諭駿
研究生(外文):Yu-Jun Wang
論文名稱:上市公司董事會屬性對董事會運作過程影響之研究
論文名稱(外文):The study on impact of Board of directors' attributes on the processes of Board from Taiwan listed companies
指導教授:謝錦堂謝錦堂引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chin-Tang Hsieh
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:公司治理董事會屬性董事會運作
外文關鍵詞:corporate goveranceboard of directors'' attributeboard of directors process
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:248
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
全球相繼爆發一連串企業弊案,例如美國安隆(Enron)、世界通訊(Worldcom),使投資人信心銳減。基於各國發生財務醜聞、企業弊案,致使股價下跌,為挽救投資人信心,各國開始重視公司治理相關議題,積極整頓。
回顧過去文獻,主在探討公司治理制度的實施與公司績效之關係研究、董事會功能與公司績效之關係研究等。學者亦指出在這樣關係研究上似乎存在著「跳躍式的錯誤」,即忽略董事會群體運作過程之內含現象,引發本研究探索董事會運作相關議題之興趣,透過文獻探討發現董事會之運作受其屬性影響甚大。
研究結果可歸納為下列三點:
(1) 董事會組成對溝通與決策過程皆有顯著的影響,應適時的注意該公司董事成員內/外部的比例分配
(2) 董事成員的年齡、教育程度及過去擔任董監事的經驗,均會對群體決策過程產生影響,董事會成員特徵的因素是不容忽視的。
(3) 董事會領導結構是會影響到董事會的溝通品質,即影響了資訊交換的準確性、即時性、適當性及完整性
Break out a series of enterprise corruptions one after another, as Enron, Worldcom, the investors confidence downs sharply. In domestic, make use of the funds of listed company and it’s own stocks to be pledged, relation the person trade, the benefit transport an etc. illegal matter, also causing the stock market maul heavily. In order to save investors confidence because of the stock price decline caused by finance scandal, enterprise corruption happened in countries, they start valuing at corporate governance issue, restructuring actively.
According to the literature, the most research were discussed about the relationship of implement the system of corporate governance between company performance, and the function of board of directors between company performance. The scholar also points out on this relation research to exist "Great inferential leaps" apparently recently. Because of that, this research strated to explore the issue about board processes. Therefore, this research will through former literature, inquire into the influence that board of directors attribute and board of directors operate process.
The findings may induce into the following three points:
(1) The board of directors composes to communicates all has the influence with the decision-making process, so we should pay attention to the insider/outsider proportion of board of directors.
(2) Member's age, the education level and the experience can influence the decision-making process, the board of directors member characteristic factor should not to be ignored.
(3) The leader’s structure can affect board of directors's communication quality, namely has affect the accuracy, the instantaneity, the aptness and the integrity of information exchange.
目 錄
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目 錄 IV
圖 次 VI
表 次 VII
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及問題 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究範圍 4
第四節 論文架構 5
第貳章 文獻探討 7
第一節 公司治理 7
第二節 群體與團隊 15
第三節 董事會屬性 18
第四節 董事會之溝通 21
第五節 董事會之決策過程 26
第參章 研究方法 30
第一節 概念性架構 30
第二節 研究假說發展 32
第三節 抽樣設計 35
第四節 分析方法 38
第肆章 實證結果分析 39
第一節 敘述統計分析 39
第二節 因素分析與信度分析 43
第三節 假說驗證 45
第伍章 研究結論與建議 64
第一節 研究結論 64
第二節 策略意涵與實務建議 67
第三節 研究建議與研究限制 69
參考文獻 70
英文部份 70
中文部份 72
附錄一 73
附錄二 74
英文部份
1.Burton, C.(1991). “The Promise and the Price: The Struggle for Equal Opportunity in Women’s Employment.” Australia: Allen & Unwin.
2.Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E.&Johnson,J.L.(1998) “Meta-Analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, Issue 3, p269, 269-290
3.Finkelstein, S.& D'aveni, R.A.(1994), “Uality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 1079-1108
4.Forbes,D.P.& Milliken, F.J.(1999), “Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups”, Academy of Management, Vol. 24, Issue 3, 489-505
5.Gillan, S.L.,(2006) “Recent Developments in Corporate Governance: An Overview”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.12, Issue 3, 381-402
6.Gillan, S.L.& Starks, L.T.(2003) “Corporate Governance, Corporate Ownership, and the Role of Institutional Investors: A Global Perspective”, Journal of Applied Finance, Vol.13, Issue 2, 4-22.
7.Goldhaber, G.M. & Krivonos, P.D.,(1977) “The ICA Communication Audit: Process, Status, Critique”, Journal of Business Communication, Vol.15, Issue 1, 41-55.
8.Goodstein, J. & Boeker, W.(1991) “Turbulence at The Top: A New Perspective on Governance Structure Changes and Strategic Change”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, Issue 2, 306-330
9.Griffin R.W.,(1996) “Managing Interpersonal Relations and Communication”, Management, 5thed., Houghton Miffin Company Press,.
10.Hambrick, D.C.,(1987) “The top management team: Key to strategic success”, California Management Review, Vol. 30, Issue 1, 88-108
11.Jones, T.M. & Goldberg, L.D.(1982) “Governing the large corporation: More arguments for public directors”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 603-611
12.Krone, K., Frederic, M. & Putnam, L.(1987) Communication Theory and Organizational Communication: Multiple Perspectives, Handbook of Organizational Communication, Newbury Park, CA Sage Publications, Inc, 11-17
13.Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D.K.(1993) The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High Performance Organization, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14.Lipton M. & Lorsch, J.W.,(1993) “On the Leading Edge: The Lead Director”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.71, Issue 1,79-80
15.Mallin, C.A.(2004) “Corporate Governance”, Oxford University Press
16.OECD,”Principles of Corporate Governance”,P1-69, http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,2340,en_2649_201185_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html
17.Quick, T.L.(1992) Successful Team Building, New York: American Management Association.
18.Robbins, S.P.(2003) Organizational Behavior, 10 edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Person Education, Inc.
19.Rosenstein, S. & Wyatt, J.G.(1990) “Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26 Issue 2, pp.175-191
20.Schein, E.H.(1970) The Psychological Contract, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
21.Shelby, A.N.(1988) “A Macro Theory of Management Communication”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol.25, No.2,13-27.
22.Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W.(1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52 Issue 2, 737-783
23.Shonk, J.H.(1982) Working in Teams: A Practical Manual For Improving Work Groups, New York: AMACOM.
24.Smeltzer, L.R. & Thomas, G.F.(1994) “Managers as Writers: A Metaanalysis of Research in Context”, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol.8, 186-211
25.Solomon, J. & Solomon, A.(2004) Corporate governance and accountability”, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
26.Walt, N.V.D. & Ingley, C.(2003) “Board Dynamics and the Influence of Professional Background, Gender and Ethnic Diversity of Directors”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol.11, Issue 3, pp.218-234
27.World Bank, Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation—Overview, (1999), http://www.worldbank.org/
28.Yermack, D.(1996) “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, Issue 2,185-211
29.Zahra, S.A. & Pearce II, J.A.(1989) “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model”, Journal of Management, Vol.15, Issue 2, 291-334

中文部份
1.三民書局編(2006),商事法,台北市,三民書局
2.臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司,上市上櫃公司治理實務守則,發文日期:中華民國九十一年十月四日,發文字號:台證(九一)上字第0二五二九八號http://www.tse.com.tw/docs1/data01/set/public_html/025298.htm
3.古永嘉譯(2003),企業研究方法,台北市,麥格羅希爾
4.林建煌譯(1995),現代管理學,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,台灣台北市
5.林國彬(2006),「董事忠誠義誠與司法審查標準之研究—以美國法為範圍」,企業經營者責任與投資人保護學術研討會,國立台灣大學法律學暨社會科學國際會議廳,2006年12月15日
6.許士軍(1990),管理學,台北:東華
7.葉銀華、李存修(2003),公司治理研究報告-第3冊,-子計劃二:建構一個創造股東價值的董事會,初版,台北市,中華公司治理協會
8.葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩(2002),公司治理與評等系統,第1版,台北市,商智文化
9.廖川億(1996),「研究發展團隊特性與創新績效關係之研究」,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
10.劉紹樑(2002),從莊子到安隆---A+公司治理,第一版,臺北市,天下雜誌
11.劉連煜(2006),現代公司法,初版,臺北縣板橋市,新學林,79-84
12.劉韻僖,葉匡時(民88),「企業監控之研究」,經濟情勢暨評論季刊,第五卷第一期
13.鄧成連(2001),設計管理,產品設計之組織、溝通與運作,臺北市,亞太圖書出版社
14.謝錦堂(民89),股票上櫃過程董事會改造之研究,國立台北大學企業管理學系,博士論文
15.謝錦堂(2003),「董事會的功能構造與結構特徵」,全國律師,9月號,中華民國律師公會全國聯合會,76-87
16.鍾喜梅,劉韻僖,葉匡時(2003),我國上市公司家族控制力與董事會運作關係之探討」, 中山管理評論, 第十一卷,第二期,341-365
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top