臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣近年貧富差距日益擴大，有錢人越有錢，不停地向上累積財富，多數人卻是相對的成為新貧階級，台灣貧富差距的擴大已成為一個值得探討的議題。根據主計處的家庭所得統計，將全國家庭依所得高低分成5組加以平均，統計出來的貧富差距，近年來都在6倍上下，並且薪資所得高低不同會影響支出的分配。有鑑於此，本研究依家戶所得在各項主要支出項目之支出比例加以分群，以探討不同支出分配群組之特性。本論文利用中央研究院調查研究專題中心所提供之華人家庭動態資料庫2005年主樣本資料作為實證分析的資料，依據家庭決策與支出群組中之變數，將不同支出項目在薪資所得中所佔比率，作為分群的依據。再分別利用鑑別分析與多類羅吉斯迴歸模型來檢視成功歸類的機率，發現多類羅吉斯迴歸模型的效果較為良好。並將分群之結果進一步探討不同群組支出現象與貧富階層的關係，並針對不同所得支出群組所得分配之社會心理態度做一分析討論。

Recently,the property gap in Taiwan is bigger and bigger。The rich people keep accumulating huge of money unceasingly。On the other hand, most of the people switch to the new needy group relatively。So,it is essential for researchers to investigate the expanding of property gap in depth。The data reported by the Directorate-General of Budget,Accounting and Statistics show that the ratio of average household income of the highest 20% to the lowest 20% is closed to 6 in Taiwan。And,the expenditure allocation is affected by salary income。For this reason,the data set of Panel Study of Family Dynamics provided by SINICA Survey Research Data Archive is adopted to analyze the allocation of household income。 Base on the variables of household decision and expenditure allocation, the ratio of major expenditure items to the household income is applied on Cluster Analysis to identify different expenditure allocation groups。 Furthermore,we use Discriminate Analysis and Multicategory Logit Models to confirm the classification obtained by Cluster Analysis。 This research found that the result of discrimination obtained by Multicategory Logit Models is more consistent with the classification by Cluster Analysis than applied by Discriminate Analysis。 Finally,the relationship between the different expenditure allocation and fortune stratum will be discussed and the attitudes of social psychology of each the expenditure allocation group will also be investigated。

第一章 緒論第二章 文獻探討第三章 研究方法第四章 實證分析第五章 研究結果探討第六章 結論

[1]Xi H.;Bigelow K.A.;Boggs C.H.(1997)，Cluster analysis of longline sets and fishing strategies within the Hawaii-based fishery,Fisheries Research(Vol.31, No.1, July),pp.147 - 158。 [2]John D.;Nicholas M.;Alan K.(1997),New Perspectives on Farm Household Incomes，Journal of Rural Studies(Vol.13，No.1)，pp.57 - 64。 [3]Yannis M. Ioannides;Tracey N. Seslen(2002),Neighborhood Wealth Distributions，Economics Letters(76)，pp.357 - 367。 [4]Hardman A.M.;Ioannides, Y.M.(1998)，Income mixing in neighborhoods; Part I: theory and evidence from neighborhood clusters of the American Housing Survey, presented at AREUEA meetings, Chicago, January, Tufts University, mimeo。 [5]Kiel K.;Zabel J.E.(1998)，The impact of neighborhood characteristics on house prices: what geographic area constitutes a neighborhood ? Working paper98 - 04, Wellesley College, presented at the AREUEA meetings, Chicago, January。 [6]Jody W. Lipford;Robert D. Tollison(2003)，Religious Participation and Income，Journal of Economic Behavior $&$ Organization(Vol.51)，pp.249 - 260。 [7]R. Nurkse,Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries。 [8]James, J.(2000),Consumption, globalization and development, New York: S.T.Martin's Press。 [9]G. Punj;D. Stewart(1983),Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research:Review and Suggestions for Application,Journal of Marketing Research，pp.145。 [10]Alpaydm, E.(2004),Introduction To Machine Learning，Combridge,MA：MIT Press。 [11]魏書娥、李美玲、蔡春燕(2003)，消費結構與消費排擠:台灣1980 - 2000的實證研究，2003年台灣社會學會年會暨邁向新世紀的公平社會 -- 社群、風險與不平等 研討會。 [12]林弘文(1999),台灣省家庭所得與消費支出的成長及差距變化分析,中國工商學報,No.21,頁287 - 302。 [13]李貳連、呂光和、莊文寬、陳隆華(2006),我國與主要國家所得分配之比較,行政院主計月刊,No.606,頁63 - 70。 [14]莊文寬(2006),我國經濟發展與所得分配的演變,行政院主計月刊,No.608,頁49 - 61。 [15]李皇照(1998),在家和在外食品消費支出分析與預測,臺灣土地金融季刊,民87年6月,頁225 - 239。 [16]吳慧瑛(1998),家戶人口規模與所得分配:1976-1995,經濟論文,民87年3月,頁19 - 50。 [17]許漢章(2004),台灣地區家庭消費支出型態之研究,輔仁大學應用統計學研究所博士論文。 [18]張文玲(2002),台灣地區家庭保健及醫療支出行為之分析,國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文。 [19]曹添旺、張植榕(1998)，家庭屬性與家庭所得，台灣經濟學會 1998 年年會論文集，頁213 - 242。 [20]曹添旺、張植榕(2000)，台灣家庭高低所得階層屬性分佈與所得分配，國家科學委員會研究彙刊，頁344 - 361。