跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.205.192.201) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/08/05 11:03
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:徐凱儀
研究生(外文):Hsu Kai-yi
論文名稱:審計公費與資訊透明度
論文名稱(外文):Audit Fees and Information Transparency
指導教授:薛敏正薛敏正引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shiue Min-Jeng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:審計公費資訊透明度資訊揭露評鑑系統
外文關鍵詞:Audit FeesInformation TransparencyInformation Disclosure and Transparency Ranking System
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:334
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
提高企業資訊透明度係現階段政府極欲努力改善提升的重點項目,而對國內企業而言提升資訊透明度也是進軍國際市場所需的必要條件。本研究之主要目的即在探討資訊透明度與審計公費間之關聯,以檢視會計師在作成審計公費訂價決策時是否會考量企業之資訊透明度。資訊透明度的提升,除了透露出健全的公司治理機制訊息外,亦隱含了企業價值較高、盈餘管理行為減少以及代理成本下降的訊息。這些訊息對會計師而言皆為訴訟風險較低的訊號,當會計師所承擔之訴訟風險較低時,他們所需承擔的額外成本亦較低,進而向委託人收取較低的審計公費。另方面,由於資訊揭露評鑑系統中自願揭露的加分項目,大多屬於年報的評鑑項目,當公司增加報導自願性揭露訊息時,會計師所暴露的查核風險將提高,因此需付出更多的時間與努力查核,進而收取較高的審計公費。據此,本研究推論企業資訊透明度與審計公費有關。

實證分析結果發現,審計公費與資訊透明度間呈顯著正相關,即當公司的資訊透明度較高時,會計師的確需付出更多的努力及時間查核,換言之,治理機制運作過程中,會計師的確扮演了重要的輔助角色。在敏感性分析的部分,本研究亦就委託人自我選擇會計師及透明度指標進行Hausman (1978)的內生性檢定,和額外考量其他可能的遺漏變數影響,研究結果仍具穩定性。
Information transparency is part of corporate governance systems. No matter the practices, academics or government, more and more people pay more attention to this topic all over the world. Especially for managers of those companies which are going to issue equity through the international markets. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between audit fees and information transparency. The advance of information transparency implies that higher enterprises value, earnings management behaviors declining, and lower agency cost expect for better corporate governance system. These signals express with the lower litigation risk to CPAs. The lower litigation risk indicates the lower additional cost that CPAs have to bear, therefore audit fees would decrease. In contrast, owing to the voluntary disclosure bonus point items of the information disclosure and transparence ranking system belong to annual financial reports for the most part. Accordingly, CPAs have to spend more time and devote more efforts when their clients disclose more information and then asking their clients pay more audit fees. Thus, we expect that there is a positive correlation between audit fees and the extent of information transparency.

Research results show that there is a positive association between audit fees and information transparency. These findings imply that auditors indeed have to spent more time and devote more efforts to audit while their clients present more additional disclosures. That is, CPAs do play an accessory role in our society. The result is robust in consideration of endogenous variable problems in our research models.
第一章 緒論----------------------------1
第一節 研究背景、動機、目的與貢獻------1
第二節 研究主題------------------------5
第三節 研究流程與架構-------------------6
第二章 文獻探討-----------------------8
第一節 資訊透明度----------------------8
第二節 審計公費-----------------------16
第三節 資訊透明度與審計公費----------19
第三章 研究方法----------------------23
第一節 研究假說-----------------------23
第二節 研究模型-----------------------25
第三節 樣本選取及資料來源-----------31
第四章 實證分析----------------------34
第一節 敘述統計-----------------------34
第二節 相關性與單變量分析-----------37
第三節 多變量分析--------------------41
第四節 敏感性分析--------------------43
第五章 研究結論與建議---------------56
第一節 研究結論---------------------56
第二節 建議---------------------------57
第三節 研究限制-----------------------58
參考文獻------------------------------59
江向才與何里仁,2003,公司治理之資訊透明度與經營績效關聯性之實證研究,管理會計,第63期:1-19。
李建然、陳信吉和張石羨珍,2005a,資訊評鑑系統與股票評價之攸關性,2005當前會計理論與實務研討會論文。
───,廖秀梅和黃雨頎,2005b,審計公費與非審計公費之決定因素及其交互影響,2005當前會計理論與實務研討會論文。
周建新與林宗得,2005,資訊透明度對企業價值增額解釋能力之研究,會計與公司治理,第2卷,第2期:25-46。
林美花,2005,防止公司舞弊應重視內外部監理機制--落實充份揭露 加強資訊透明,會計研究月刊,第236期:60-63。
馬君梅、蘇裕惠和李珮珮,2003,台灣上櫃公司審計公費決定因素之研究,東吳經濟商學學報,第四十一期:25-50。
陳冠宙、陳育成和陳雪如,2005,影響上市公司網站資訊透明度因子之實證,會計與公司治理,第2卷,第1期:33-59。
許崇源、陳瑞斌和翁慈青,2005,公司治理結構對於資訊透明度之影響,台灣財務金融學會年會暨學術論文研討會論文。
張文瀞、周玲臺與林修葳,2001,自願性盈餘預測公司之盈餘管理行為與審計品質之影響,2001 會計理論與實務研討會論文。
張仲岳與曹美娟,2005,台灣上市公司審計公費之決定因素,當代會計,第6卷,第2期:125-152。
張瑞當與方俊儒,2006,資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響,會計評論,第42 期:1-22。
薛明玲,2002,資訊透明度與企業競爭力,會計研究月刊,第200 期:14-15。
薛明玲與蔡朝安,2003,從資訊揭露看公司治理,月旦法學雜誌,第96 卷:335-343。
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2006. Earnings management, litigation risk, and asymmetric audit fee responses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25 (1): 85-98.
Botosan, C. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (3): 323-349.
Chiang, H. 2005. Analyst financial forecast accuracy and information transparency. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 7 (2): 164-167.
Chaney, P. K., D. Jeter, and L. Shivakumar. 2004. Self-Selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 51-72.
Danielsen, B. R., R. A. V. Ness, and R. S. Warr. 2007. Auditor fees, market microstructure, and firm transparency. Journal of Business Finance&Accounting 34 (1-2): 202-221.
Dunn, K. A., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 35-58.
Francis, J. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (2): 133-151.
Fan, J. P., and T. J. Wong 2005. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (1): 35-72.
Gul, F., and J. S. Tsui. 1998. A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from audit pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (2): 219-237.
Healy, P., and K. Palepu. 1993. The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7 (1): 1–11.
Heninger, W. G. 2001. The association between auditor litigation and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (1): 111-126.
Hunton, J., R. Libby, and C. Mazza. 2006. Financial reporting transparency and earnings management. The Accounting Review 81 (1): 135-157.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360
───,and R. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: the scientific
evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (1-4): 5-50.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54 (2): 471-517.
Lobo, G., and J. Zhou. 2001. Disclosure quality and earnings management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 8 (1): 1-20.
Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
───, and M. Stein. 1996. The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15 (Supplement): 119-134.
Shaw, K. 2003. Corporate disclosure quality, earnings smoothing, and earnings’ timeliness. Journal of Business Research 56 (12): 1043-1050.
Singhvi, S., and H. B. Desai. 1971. An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review 46 (1): 129-138.
Su, Y. H., 2002. Audit fees and auditor size: A study of audit market in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review. 1: 59-78.
Welker, M. 1995. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry, and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 801-827.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top