臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

栗喉蜂虎(Merops philipinnus)為集體生殖的鳥類，在土坡上挖掘洞穴做為巢洞以進行生殖。自2003至2006年，本研究監控金門島上的夏候遷徙生殖族群。經由繫放回收資料顯示，發現部份生殖個體會在來年選擇與前一季相同的生殖群(breeding colony)；此類行為定義為棲地忠實性(site fidelity)。在其他鳥種的研究中，生殖經驗影響生殖個體對於生殖棲地的忠實性；因為生殖成功是為綜合了環境因子與生物因子交錯作用後的最終結果，而且生殖成功可視為一種用於評估生殖棲地環境品質的訊號。對於集體生殖的鳥類而言，生殖成功可分劃成兩種參數，個體的生殖成功(Individual reproductive success )以及生殖群的生殖成功(Local reproductive success)。本研究測試兩項參數IRS與LRS，探討何者明顯影響栗喉蜂虎生殖個體在來年的生殖棲地的選擇。根據邏輯廻歸的分析結果，IRS顯著影響棲地忠實性，而LRS並無呈現顯著影響。不論IRS與LRS，其第二年的生殖表現皆與前一繁殖季呈現顯著性相關。栗喉蜂虎是為使用洞穴型的築巢使用者，不若其他一般開放性巢穴鳥類，容易獲得其他個體的生殖情形訊息。因而推測巢穴性生殖特徵，造成LRS此社會性訊息可能難以在群體之中被傳遞；所以巢穴性生殖即成為了無法獲得LRS的訊息的限制因子。於是在本研究中，LRS對栗喉蜂虎的生殖棲地選擇，未呈現具有顯著影響。

Most Blue-tailed bee-eaters (Merops philipinnus) are colonial breeders. They excavated nest burrows on sandy banks or cliffs. I monitored a migratory bee-eater breeding population on Kinmen Island, from 2003-2006. I found that certain bee-eaters bred at the same colony in consecutive years, and thus show site fidelity. In other bird species, variation in site fidelity has been explained by past reproductive success (RS). Because RS is the result of a combination of physical environment and biological factors, RS can be used as the cue for assessing the quality of breeding habitat. For colonial species, RS can be further divided into individual reproductive success (IRS, the relative reproductive success of the individual) and local reproductive success (LRS, the relative reproductive success of the colony). I investigated whether previous IRS or LRS affected the likelihood that individual bee-eaters would return in future years to breed at the same colony. Using backward stepwise Logistic regression, I found that IRS significantly influenced site fidelity while LRS did not. Moreover, IRS ad LRS in second year was significantly correlative with prior year. Since bee-eaters are burrow nesters, unlike other opening-nested colonial breeding birds, LRS might be more difficult to gather the public information; therefore, it may lead to the lack of significant influence of LRS.

謝誌……………………………………………………………………І
摘要……………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
Abstract………………………………………………………………Ⅳ
前言……………………………………………………………………1
研究方法與材料………………………………………………………8
研究樣區………………………………………………………………8
研究物種………………………………………………………………9
營巢坡面整地…………………………………………………………9
生殖群、生殖成功及生殖棲地選擇監控……………………………10
個體繫放………………………………………………………………………11
性別血液鑑定…………………………………………………………11
資料分析之限制………………………………………………………12
資料分析………………………………………………………………………13
結果……………………………………………………………………16
生殖成功監控與回收的繫放個體……………………………………16
生殖成功是否存在著生殖棲地品質上的空間變異…………………16
在連續的繁殖季生殖成功是否呈現相關……………………………17
分析影響生殖群聚選擇之因子………………………………………17
討論……………………………………………………………………19
訊息形成與否及物理環境條件限制…………………………………19
個體生殖成功表現與學習經驗………………………………………21
栗喉蜂虎生殖特徵與社會性訊息傳遞………………………………23
研究限制………………………………………………………………25
未來研究發展………………………………………………………..26

參考文獻………………………………………………………………27
圖………………………………………………………………………33
表………………………………………………………………………38

王力平 2003 金門島栗喉蜂虎 (Merops philippinus) 營巢地選擇與繁殖生物學研究 碩士論文 國立台灣大學森林學研究所
王怡平 2005 金門島栗喉蜂虎 (Merops philippinus) 營巢棲地復育效應與棲地選擇模式 碩士論文 國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所
王元均 2005金門島栗喉蜂虎單獨與集體營巢之生殖策略分析 碩士論文 國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所
王怡平、袁孝維。2006。金門栗喉蜂虎營巢地及生殖族群變遷監測。國家公園學報。
袁孝維 2004 金門栗喉蜂虎營巢地復育及生殖生態學研究 內政部營巢建署金門國家公園管理處委託研究報告
劉小如 1999 金門國家公園鳥類生態記錄研究 金門國家公園管理處
Beletsky, L. D., and G. H. Orians. 1991. Effect of breeding experience and familiarity on site fidelity in female Red-Winged Blackbirds. Ecology 72:787-796.
Bêty, J., J. F. Giroux, and G.. Gauthier. 2004. Individual variation in timing of migration: causes and reproductive consequence in greater snow geese (Anser caerulescens atlanticus) Behavior Ecology Sociobiology 57 :1-8.
Black, J.M. 1996. Introduction: pair bonds and partnerships. In: partnership in Birds: the study of Monogamy (Ed. by J.M. Black): Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp.3-20.
Boulinier, T., and E. Danchin, 1997. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in territorial migratory species. Evolution Ecology 11:505-517.
Boulinier, T., and J. Y. Lemel. 1996. Spatial and temporal variations of factors affecting breeding habitat quality in colonial birds: some consequence for dispersal and habitat selection. Acta Oecologica 17: 531-552.
Brooks, R.P., and W. J. Davis. 1987. Habitat selection by breeding Belted Kingfishers ( Ceryle alcyon). The American Midland Naturalist 117:63-70.
Brown, C. R. and M. B. Brown. 2000. Weather-mediated natural selection on arriver time in cliff swallows(Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology 47: 339-345.
Brown C. R., M. B. Brown, and E. Danchin. 2000. Breeding habitat selection in cliff swallows: the effect of conspecific reproductive success on colony choice. Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 133-142.
Brown, J. H., and K. A. Brown. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445-449.
Cody, M.L. 1985. Habitat selection in birds. Physiological ecology. Academic press, San Diego, California, USA.
Danchin E., Boulinier T. and Massot M. 1998. Conspecific Reproductive success and Breeding habitat selection: implications for the study of coloniality. Ecology 79: 2415-2428.
Danchin, E., Heg, D. and Doligez, B. 2001. Public information and breeding habitat selection. Chapter 17. In Dispersal (Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A. A. and Nichols, J. D. Eds) Oxford University Press, Oxford. 243- 258.
Danchin E. and J.Y. Monnat. 1992. Population dynamics modeling of two neighboring kittiwake Rissa tridactyla colonies. Ardea 80:171-180.
Danchin, E., L. A. Giraldeau, T. Valone, and R.H. Wagner. 2004. Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487-491.
Danchin, E.and R. Wagner. 1997. The evolution of coloniality; the emergence of new perspectives. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:342-347.
Doligez, B., C. Cadet, E. Danchin,and T. Boulinier. 2003. When to use public information for breeding habitat selectionNULL The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Animal Behaviour 66: 973-988.
Doligez, B., E. Danchin, and C. Cadet. 2002. Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population. Science 297: 1168 – 1170.
Doligez, B., E. Danchin, Clobert, J. and Gustafsson L. 1999. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non- colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 1193-1206.
Drent, R., C.Both, M. Green, J. Madsen, and T. Piersma, 2003. Pay-offs and penalties of competing migratory schedules. Oikos 103 274-292.
Ens, B.J., S. Choudhury, and J. M,Black. 1996. Mate fidelity and divorce in monogamous. In partnerships in Birds: the study of monogamy (Ed. by J.M. Black), Oxford University Press.Oxford. 341-401.
Fry, C.H. 2001. Meropidae (Bee-eater). In Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 6. ( J.D. Hoyo, A. Elliot, and J.Sargatal., editors) Lynx Edicions, Bacelona.286-325.
Greenwood P.J. 1980. Mating system, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28:1140-1162.
Greenwood P.J., and P. H. Harvey. 1982 .The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annual Review Ecology Systematics 13:1-21.
Harvey, P. H., P.J. Greenwood, B.Campbell, and M.J. Stenning. 1984. Breeding dispersal of the Pied Flycatcher( Ficedula hypoleuca). Journal of Animal Ecology 53:727-736.
Henegerg, P. 2001. Size of sand grains as a significant factor affecting the nesting of Bank Swallows (Riparia riparia). Biologia 56:205-210.
Henegerg, P. 2003. Soil particle composition affects the physical characteristics of Sand Martin Riparia riparia holes. Ibis 145: 392-399.
Holmes, R.T., P. Marra, P. and T.W. Sherry. 1996. Habitat specific demography of breeding black-throated blue warblers (Dendroica caerulescens): implications for population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:183-195.
Kokko, H., M.P Harris, and S. Wanless. 2004. Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot (Uria aalge) Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 367-376.
Kossenko, S. M., and C. H. Fry. 1998. Competition and coexistence of the European Bee-eater Merops apiaster and the Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus in Asia. Ibis 140:2-13.
Forbes,L. S., and G. W. Kaiser. 1994. Habitat Choice in Breeding Seabirds: When to Cross the Information Barrier .Oikos 70: 377-384.
Martin, T.E. 1993. Nest predation and nest sites. BioScience 43:523-532.
Newton, I. 1993.Age and site fidelity in female sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus. Animal Behaviour 46:161
Netwon, I. 1994. Experiments on the limitation of bird breeding densities: a review. Ibis 136:397-411.
Orians, G.. H. and J. F.Wittenberger, 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. American Naturalist. 137: S29-S49.
Oro, D., E. Cam, R. Pradel, and A. Martíneze-Abraín.2003. Influence of food availability on demography and local population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society OF London. Series B, 271:387-396.
Paton, P.W.C.,and T.C.Edwards. 1996. Factors affecting interannual movements of Snowy Plovers. Auk 113:534-543.
Schjørring, S., J. Gregersen, and T. Bregnballe. 2000. Sex difference in criteria determining fidelity breeding sites in the great cormorant. Journal of Animal Ecology 69 214-223.
Schmidt, K.A. 2001. Site fidelity in habitat with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 3 633-648.
Schmidt, K.A. 2004. Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence Ecology Letters 7:176–184.
Scott, C. 1990. How to measure inclusive fitness. Biological Sciences 241: 229-231.
Steele, B.B. 1993. Selection of foraging and nesting site by Black-Throated Blue Warblers: their relative influence on habitat choice. The Condor 95:568-579.
Southern, W. E., S. R. Patton., L.K Suthern., And L.A. Hanners. 1985 . Effects of nine years of fox predation on two species of breeding gulls. Auk 102:827-833.
Suryan, R.M. and D.B. Irons. 2001. Colony and population dynamics of Black-Legged Kittiwakes in a heterogeneous environment 118:636-649.
Switzer, P.V. 1993. Site Fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evolutionary Ecology. 7:533-555.
Switzer P.V. 1997. Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40: 307-312.
Valone, T. J. 1989. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:569-577.
Weatherhead P. J., and K. W. Dufour. 2000. Fledging success an index of recruitment in Red-Winged Blackbirds. Auk 117:627–633.
Whittingham, M. J., R. Swetnam, J. D. Wilson, D. E. Chamberlain , and R. P. Freckleton. 2005. Habitat selection by yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella on lowland farmland at two spatial scales: implications for conservation management. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:270-280.
Wiens, J. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 7:81-120.
Yuan H. W., D. B. Burt, L. P. Wang, W.L Chang, M. K. Wang, C.R. Chiou, and T. S. Ding. 2006(a). Colony site choice of blue-tailed bee-eaters: influences of soil, vegetation, and water quality Journal of natural history 40:485-493.
Yuan, H.-W., M.-K. Wang., W. L. Chang, L. P. Wang, Y.M. Chen and C.R. Chiou. 2006 (b). Ecological Research. Soil composition affects the nesting behavior of blue-tailed bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) on Kinmen Island. 21:510-512.