臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文將台灣高科技產業的組織網絡當成一個技術知識學習創新機制，試圖分析科技後進國的企業透過技術知識學習創新網絡從國外引進技術知識，將新的技術知識與他們既存的知識、經驗等結合在一起，進行創新活動的實際過程。科技後進國開始著手技術學習、推動技術的修正以及創新活動之時，拿到跨國流通與擴散的技術知識、抓住從國外引進技術知識的機會就是必要的前提。但先前的研究很少討論這些跨國技術知識流通與擴散如何發生，科技後進國透過什麼樣的機制從國外科技先進國引進新的技術知識，學習知識，將新的知識轉變為自己的創新活動等。筆者採用複數的因果條件彼此受影響的組合作用之理論架構，將「技術」、「制度（包含國家產業政策以及文化規範等）」、「跨國技術學習創新網絡」的三個因素之間的互動關係當成研究對象以免陷入技術決定論和制度決定論的限制。「跨國技術學習創新網絡」指的是新的技術知識透過正式的制度安排以及社會或人際網絡跨越國境擴散到不同國家企業組織以及整個產業裡面的機制。在跨國技術學習創新網絡的運作中，筆者特別強調「外部開放性結構」與「內部封閉性結構」對於科技後進國引進新知識、學習知識、進入創新的過程帶來關鍵性影響。「外部開放性結構」指的是科技後進國企業從科技先進國引進新技術的開放性階段，「內部封閉性結構」是科技後進國從科技先進國引進新技術之後，在接受新技術知識的組織成員之間的封閉性空間，分享新知識，將新知識與既存的知識結合在一起，進入創新活動的封閉性階段。
本研究相關廠商的跨國田野訪談後發現，開放性的社會網絡結構促成知識流通的「外部開放性結構」，封閉性的社會網絡結構對於「內部封閉性結構」的發展帶來正面的影響。日本產業界的封閉性組織網絡結構促成企業組織內部行動者之間的凝聚力與信任關係，在組織內部學習新知識、修正知識的「內部封閉性結構」發揮他的優勢。但封閉性網絡結構往往引起知識流通與人才流動的阻塞情形，造成資訊的重疊性、僵硬且缺乏彈性的組織結構等的困境。台灣產業界的開放性網絡結構偶爾會造成企業內機密性技術知識往外面洩漏的風險，但開放性網絡結構促成知識流通與人才流動，能夠迅速地吸收多樣化的資訊，不容易引起組織僵硬化的問題，在從外面引進新技術知識的「外部開放性結構」發揮他的本領。並且，在台灣有幾個高科技產業群聚，技術知識與技術人才在這些群聚邊界裡面流通，雖然技術知識跟著技術人才的流動跨越每間企業的邊界，但技術知識與know-how在特定的產業群聚裡面累積下去．就變為整個產業群聚的知識財產。

This thesis argues the operation of cross-national technology learning innovation network on the knowledge diffusion among US, Japan and Taiwan''s high-tech industry. Cross-national technology learning processes are influenced by many factors; they occur in interaction among technological, institutional, cultural, social network structural elements, which together is called “cross-national technology learning innovation network”. In these complicated learning processes, the countries with weak technological bases introduce cutting edge of technology from other advanced industrial country, learn new technological knowledge and integrate new knowledge in their existing knowledge, advance to the innovation stage. In order to conduct comparative analyses between Taiwan''s IC and LCD industry''s cross-national learning innovation network, I provide two stages of knowledge diffusion network mechanisms, one is the open network structure between knowledge receiver and brokerage, and the other is the closed network in the organization of knowledge receiver. Based on the cross-national field research the analysis reveals that the differences of social network structure among US, Japan and Taiwan have a profound influence on the introduction of foreign technical knowledge and know-how in Taiwanese IC and LCD industry. Open social network structure strengthens open knowledge diffusion network structure; closed social network structure has a positive effect on closed knowledge diffusion network structure. More specifically, closed network structure in Japanese industry strengthens the trust relationships among technical personnel in corporate organization, however, strong ties not infrequently impedes the knowledge diffusion and the mobility of human resources, brings out the problem of knowledge redundancy and the rigidity of organization. By contrast, in the open network structure of Taiwanese industry, there is a possibility of opportunism and leakage of advanced technology, however, extremely frequent knowledge diffusion and the mobility of human resources accelerate the assimilation of diversified knowledge, and it is unlikely to cause the rigidity of organization. In addition to this, Taiwanese government established several industrial clusters in Taiwan, technological knowledge and technical personnel flow freely in these industrial clusters. Technological knowledge diffuses across the boundary of each corporate organization along with the mobility of human resources, however, technological knowledge and know-how accumulated in the certain industrial cluster, turn into knowledge property in the entire industry.

目 錄
第一章　研究動機與目的 1
第二章　文獻探討 6
一、理論架構……. 6
（一）因果複雜性與技術學習創新網絡 6
（二）、跨國技術學習創新網絡的兩個階段 9
二、網絡理論與跨國技術學習創新機制 16
三、技術特性對於跨國學習創新網絡帶來的影響 20
四、制度對於跨國技術學習帶來的影響 23
五、技術、制度與跨國技術學習網絡機制之間的交互作用 30
第三章　研究方法 39
第四章　積體電路產業的跨國技術學習創新模式 46
一、跨國技術學習與創新的歷史背景 46
二、技術的特性與跨國學習創新之間的互動作用 50
三、制度對於跨國技術創新學習網絡帶來的影響 66
四、組織網絡對於跨國技術創新學習帶來的影響 69
五、小結 71
第五章　液晶顯示器產業的跨國技術學習創新模式 73
一、跨國技術學習與創新的歷史背景 73
二、制度與跨國學習創新之間的互動作用－工研院的實驗階段的技術與日本的量產技術的結合 76
三、技術特性與跨國學習創新之間的互動作用—日本技術擴散與滲透在台灣TFT-LCD產業的過程 89
四、制度、網絡結構與跨國技術學習之間的互動—政府策略以及產業的組織規模對於大規模的投資帶來的影響 99
五、網絡結構的位置與跨國技術學習之間的關係—與美國電子大廠之間的網絡關係促成與日本之間的合作 102
六、日本產業的網絡結構轉變對於技術人員的跨國流動帶來的影響 110
七、小結 116
第六章　知識仲介人於積體電路與液晶顯示器產業扮演角色的比較分析 118
一、留美歸台學人對積體電路產業知識移入的影響 121
二、日籍技術人才對液晶顯示器產業知識移入的影響 127
三、小結 132
第七章　台灣高科技產業知識擴散機制 134
一、台灣與日本積體電路產業知識擴散機制的比較 134
二、台灣液晶顯示器產業知識擴散機制 137
三、小結 146
第八章　結論與討論 148
附錄一：訪談資料 153
附錄二：中文、英文、日文的職位對照表 159
參考文獻 160

一、中，日文部份
（1）學術論文部份
小池和男，2000，聞きとりの作法，東京，東洋經濟新報社。
王淑珍，2003，《台灣邁向液晶王國之秘》。台北：中國生產力中心。
田畠真弓，2000，《台灣IC產業國際間企業的合作模式－以本土企業與日本企業的合作為例》。台北：台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
巫木誠，2001，〈邁向世界第一的晶圓專製業〉。頁170-192，收錄於《活力：台灣如何創造半導體與個人電腦產業奇蹟》。台北：時報文化。
吳思華，1999，〈台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡〉。頁65-127，收錄於張苙雲主編《網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性》。台北：遠流。
林宜文，2000，高科技產業技術學習進程與策略聯盟學習機制－以台灣半導體產業製造部門為例，台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
洪世章、呂巧玲，2001，〈台灣液晶顯示器產業之發展〉，科技發展政策報導。行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心。　
陳東升，1997，高科技產業組織間關係的權力分析：以台灣集體電路產業的設計公司為例，台大社會學刊　25期：47-104。
陳東升，1999，產業組織間關係統理結構的探討：以台灣積體電路產業封裝部門為例，中山管理評論 7:293-324。
陳東升，2001a，〈高科技產業組織網絡與技術學習╱創新〉。收錄於《高科技產業人力資源研討會論文集》。中央大學台灣經濟發展研究中心。
陳東升，2001b，〈積體電路產業組織網絡的形成及其形成的制度基礎〉，收錄於《台灣的企業：組織結構與國際競爭力》，張維安編，台北：聯經。
陳東升，2003，《積體網路－台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北：群學。
徐進鈺，1999，〈流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力與高科技發
　　展〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，第35期：75-118。
菊地正典著，王政友譯，2004，《圖解半導體－科技業的黑色鏈金術》。台北：世茂。
潘美玲，2004，〈全球產業的鑲嵌與群聚：台灣液晶顯示器（TFT-LCD）產業的建立與發展〉，2004年台灣社會學年會發表文章。新竹：清華大學。
鄭景文，1989，〈日本半導體產業發展中政府扮演之角色〉。收錄於《主要國家經貿政策分析月刊》。台北：經濟部。
鄭陸霖，2004，〈「全球在地化」的控制與學習：由跨界產業場域觀點
再訪台萬產業經驗〉，台灣發展研究中心與社會學系「台灣與發展理論」研討會發表文章。台北：台北大學。
（2）相關資料部份
e天下雜誌，2005/2，〈坐三望二，張汝京的下一步？〉，http://www.techvantage.com.tw/content/050/050042.asp
Global Sources 電子工程專輯，2006年3月22日, http://www.eettaiwan.com/ART_8800411208_480102_26a6ae88200603.HTM
今周刊，2001/10/21∼2001/10/27，〈北友達　南奇美－台灣LCD產業的雙霸天〉，
253期，http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/Web_Content/article.aspx。
今周刊，2006/8/21~2006/8/27，〈郭台銘、施崇棠、林百里、李焜耀的四角習題〉，504期，http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/Index/index.aspx
商業周刊，2003/10/13，〈反擊與競爭的生存遊戲－nVIDIA 與Ati重量級拳王爭霸啟示錄〉，829期，頁156-160。
商業周刊，2005/07/18，〈堅持101分，他贏得郭台銘鞠躬〉，921期，
http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=20670
工商時報，2001/3/07　
工商時報，2003/5/24
工商時報，2003/6/17
工商時報，2004/2/17
今周刊，2004/2/23，〈奇美企業的日籍傭兵〉。
市場報導，2005/5/02，〈台灣將於2006年超越南韓成為面板第一出貨量國〉。行政院國科會科資中心資訊服務處的市場報導。http://cdnet.stic.gov.tw/techroom/market/eedisplay/eedisplay129.htm
黃素芬，2001，〈晶圓代工〉。收錄於《交銀產業調查與技術季刊》，2001/1。
黃朝義，2000，《韓國TFT-LCD產業分析》。PIDA產業資訊網。
http://www.pida.org.tw/optolink/optolink_pdf/89012502.pdf
黃鋰，2003，《TFT-LCD產業發展現況與展望》。台北：拓墣產業研究所。
曾俊洲，2004年4月19日，〈大尺寸TFT-LCD產業基本資料〉。
http://tie.tier.org.tw/tie/DownloadFileService?report_id=3304&data_base_id=DB001&category_id=IND21-12&user_id=testtesttesttesttesttestte&session_id1=tetetstetsetsetestetesttest&session_id2=tetetstestetetetetetea&session_id3=4e2409fva0fsa0uvfad80fvz0cv0a9f&session_id4=904819　
劉承愚．賴文智，2001，《協調IP整合授權IP Pool巧扮月下老人》。益思科技法律事務所網站。www.is-law.com/專文發表/IA/ 協調整合IP授權%20IP%20Pool巧扮月下老人.htm - 40k
廖顯杰，2005/3/18，《2004年TFT LCD產值台韓日比較》。ITIS產業資訊服務網。(http://www.itis.org.tw/viewreporter.jhtm?search=&searchTmp=&page=1&size=10&WSOPTION=searchRptByCls&mainclass=%A5%FA%B9q&selRptChk=#)
盧志遠，1997/11，《台灣半導體產業技術奇蹟之見證由自主研發專案至產業落實生根》。科學月刊全文資料庫。
(http://lib.swsh.tpc.edu.tw/science/content/1997/00110335/0005.htm)
鴻海科技集團網站，http://www.foxconn.com.tw/
Joint venture’s 2003 index of silicon valley, Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network.
二、英文部份
Abegglen, James and Stalk, George 1985 Kaisha, the Japanese Corporation, Basic Books: New York.
Adler, Paul S. and Seok-Woo Kwon, 2002, “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.” Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17-40.
Ahuja, Gautam 2000. “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study” Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
Amsden, Alice H. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Appleyard, Melissa 1996. “How Does Knowledge Flow? Interfirm Patterns in the Semiconductor Industry” Strategic Management Journal 17: 137-154.
Arita, Tomokazu and MacCann, Philips 2002. “The Spatial and Hierarchical Organization of Japanese and US Multinational Semiconductor Firms” Journal of International Management 8:121-139.
Biggard, Woolsey Nicole. 1991. “Explaining Asian Economic Organization: Toward a Weberian Institutional Perspective” Theory and Society, Vol. 20, No.2, 199-232.
Boisot, M. 1983. “Convergence Revisited: The Codification and Diffusion of Knowledge in a British and a Japanese Firm” Journal of Management Studies, 1:159-190.
Burt, Ronald S. 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action, New York: Academic Press
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: the Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, M.A. :Harvard University Press.
Brass, Daniel and Burkhardt, Marlene. 1992 “Centrality and Power in Organizations” Pp191-215, in Nohria, Nitin and Eccles, Robert (ed.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Harvard Business School Press.
Burkhardt, Marlene and Brass, Daniel. 1990 “Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effect of a Change in Technology on Social Structure and Power” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:104-127.
Chen, Dung-sheng 2001. “Taiwan’s Social Changes in the Patterns of Social Solidarity in the 20th Century” The China Quarterly 165: 61-82.
Chiffoleau, Y. 2005. “Learning about Innovation through Networks: The Development of Environment-Friendly Viticulture” Technovation, 25:1193-1204.　
Cohen, Stephan S. and Fields Gary 2000. “Social Capital and Capital Gains: An Examination of Social Capital in Silicon Valley” Pp.190-217. in Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, edited by Martin Kenny. California: Stanford University Press.
Cohen, Wesley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A. 1990. “Absorptive Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1:128-152.
Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:95-121.
Dajl, Michael S. and Pedersen Christian. 2005. “Social Networks in the R&D Process: the Case of the Wireless Communication Industry around Aalborg, Denmark” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22:75-92
DiMaggio, Paul. 1992. “Nadel’s Paradox Revisited: Relational and Cultural Aspects of Organizational Structure” Pp118-142, in Networks and Organizations-Structure, Form, and Action-edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, Harvard Business School Press.
Edquist, Charles. 1997. “Systems of Innovation Approaches- Their Emergence and Characteristics.” Pp. 1-29, in Charles Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations, Pinter: London.
Edquist, Charles and Johnson, Bjorn 1997. “Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation” Pp41-60, in Charles Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London.
Estades, Jacqueline and Ramani V. Shyama. 1998. “Technological Competence and the Influence of Networks: A Comparative Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms in France and Britain.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,10: 483-495.
Fang, Shih-Chieh and Lin, Julia L. et al. 2002 “The Relationship of Foreign
R&D Units in Taiwan and the Taiwanese Knowledge-Flow System”
Technovation, 22:371-383.
Florida, Richard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class…and How It’s
Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, & Everyday Life, New York:
Basic Books.
Foray, Dominique. 1997. “Generation and Distribution of Technological Knowledge: Incentives, Norms, and Institutions.” Pp64-85, in Charles Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter: London.
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: The Free Press.
Gerlach, Michael L. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business, University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
Gerlach, Michael L. and Lincoln, James R. 1992. “The Organization of Business Networks in the United States and Japan” Pp.491-520, in Networks and Organizations-Structure, Form, and Action-edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, Harvard Business School Press.
Granovetter, Mark 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6:1360-1380.
Granovetter, Mark 1982. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.”Pp105-130, in Social Structure and Network Analysis-edited by Peter, V. Marsden and Nan, Lin, Sage.
Gulati, Ranjay 1995a. “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliance” Academy of Management Journal 38:85-112.
Gulati, Ranjay 1995b. “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619-653.
Gulati, Ranjay 1998. “Alliance and Networks” Strategic Management Journal 19:293-317.
Gulati, Ranjay 1999. “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?” The American Journal of Sociology 104:1439-1493.
Hall, Edward 1977. Beyond Culture, Anchor books: New York.
Hamilton, Gary G. and Biggart Woolsey Nicole 1988. “Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East”. The American Journal of Sociology, 94: S52-S94.
Hargadon, Andrew and Sutton Robert 1996. “Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 716-749.
Hines, Peter 1995 “Networking Sorcing: a Hybrid Approach” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31, 2:17-24
Hsu, Jinn-Yuh and Saxenian, AnnaLee 2000 “The Limits of Guanxi Capitalism: Transnational Collaboration between Taiwan and the USA” Environment and Planning A, 32:1991-2005
Johnson, Björn 1992. “Institutional Learning.” Pp23-44, in Bengt-Ake Lundvall (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter: London.
Jou, Sue-Ching and Chen, Dung-Sheng 2000. “Keeping the High-tech Region Open and Dynamics: the Organizational Networks of Taiwan’s Integrated Circuit Industry” GeoJournal 53: 81-87.
Kale, P., H. Singh, H. Perlmutter. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal. 21 217-137.
Lin, Nan et al. 1981. “Social Resources and Strength of Strong Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Attainment.” American Sociological Review 46: 393-405.
Lundvall, Bengt-Ake. 1992. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-19, in Bengt-Ake Lundvall (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter: London.
Mathews, John A. 1995 High-Technology Industrialization in East Asia: The Case of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and Korea, Taipei: Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Mente, Boye. 1990 How to Do Business with the Japanese: A Complete Guide to Japanese Customs and Business Practices, NTC Publishing Group.
North, C. Douglas. 1994 “Economic Performance Through Time” The American Economic Review, 83, 3:359-368.
Orru, M., Hamilton, G. G., and Suzuki, M. 1989. “Patterns of Inter-firm Control in Japanese Business”, Organization Studies 10, 4: 549-74.
Perry, Martin. 2000 “Network Intermediaries and Their Effectiveness” International Small Business, 14:72-80.
Phene, Anupama and Tallman, Stephan. 2002. “Knowledge Flows and Geography in
Biotechnology.” International Journal of Medical Marketing, 2,3: 241-253.
Portes, Alejandro 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern
Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 22:1-40.
Powell, Walter 1998. “Learning from Collaboration-Knowledge and Networks in the
Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries.”California Management Review,
40,3:228-240.
Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American
Community. Touchstone Books, 2001.
Premaratne, S. P. 2001. “Networks, Resources, and Small Business Growth: The
Experience in Sri Lanka” Journal of Small Business Management, 39:363-371.
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and
Quantitative Strategies. California; University of California Press.
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Ragin, Charles C. and John Sonnett. 2004. “Between Complexity and Parsimony:
Limited Diversity, Counterfactual Cases, and Comparative Analysis.”
www.compass.org/sp.htm
Rosenberg, Nathan 1994. Exploring the Black Box. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the Black Box. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1997. “Transnational Entrepreneurs and Regional Industrilization
: The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection.” Cities and Design No. 2/3: 25-39.
Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1999. Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San
Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
Saxenian, AnnaLee and Hsu, Jinn-Yuh. 2001. “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading” Industrial and Corporate
Change 10, 4:893-920.
Smith, Keith. 1997.“Economic Infrastructures and Innovation Systems” Pp86-106, in
Charles Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and
Organizations, Pinter: London.
Strang, David and Sarah A. Soule. 1998. “Diffusion in Organizations and Social
Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.” Annual Review of Sociology
24:265-90.
Tabata, Mayumi（田畠真弓）and Dung-sheng Chen. 2000. “Inter-organizational
Co-operation between Taiwanese IC companies and Japanese Companies-Trust
Formation and Power Dynamic” working paper, workshop on Networked
Production and Globalization held by MIT IPC, July 8, 2000, Taipei.
Tzeng, Rueling （曾瑞鈴）. 2004. “Utilizing Multiethnic Resources in Multinational
Corporations: Taiwan-based Firms in Silicon Valley” Taiwanese Journal of
Sociology 32: 103-147.
Waguespack David M. and Birnir Johanna Kristin. 2005. “Foreignness and the
　Diffusion of Ideas” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22:
31-50
Wan-Hung Shiu and Yang Chyan. 2003. “The IC Fables Industry in Taiwan:Current Status and Future Challenge” Technology in Society 25: 385-402.
Walker, Gordon, Bruce Kogut, and Weijian Shan. 1997. “Social Capital, Structural
Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network. ”Organization Science
8(2):109-25.