跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.120.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/13 04:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:楊智翔
研究生(外文):Chih-Hsiang Yang
論文名稱:應用CLIGEN氣候生成模式模擬台灣北部地區有效降雨事件及其驗證
論文名稱(外文):Using Climate Generator Model of CLIGEN to Simulate the Effective Rainfall Events in Northern Taiwan and their Verification
指導教授:范正成范正成引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jen-Chen Fan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:生物環境系統工程學研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:50
中文關鍵詞:氣候生成模式CLIGEN有效降雨事件土壤沖蝕降雨沖蝕指數
外文關鍵詞:Climate generator modelCLIGENEffective rainfall eventSoil erosionRainfall erosivity index
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:303
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
  CLIGEN氣候生成模式可利用連續日之氣象資料,合成產生出與降雨相關之參數,可用以輸入評估土壤沖蝕之模式,如WEPP模式、RUSLE公式等。由於整套模式在美國發展至成熟階段,對於其他地區之適用性尚屬未知,因此本研究針對台灣北部地區土壤沖蝕有效降雨事件,利用CLIGEN模式進行模擬,將其結果與1961年至1990年的歷史資料進行比對。驗證之參數分別為,年平均降雨量、月降雨分布、降雨強度、標準偏差、降雨事件機率及降雨沖蝕指數等。結果顯示在降雨量、降雨月分布及降雨事件機率上模擬結果良好,但在標準偏差、降雨強度及降雨沖蝕指數部分,有偏低之現象;由於CLIGEN模式建構於大陸性氣候的氣象資料庫之上,其模擬結果以低中強度降雨居多,而台灣地區屬海島型季風氣候,常受隨颱風而來之高強度暴雨影響,因此造成此一誤差現象之發生。
Using the climate generator model of CLIGEN, continuous daily climate data can be used to generate the parameters related to rainfall. These parameters can be used in the equations for evaluating soil erosion, such as the WEPP and the RUSLE models. The CLIGEN model has been developed to a mature stage in the continent of the United States; however, the adaptability of the model in the other areas is still unknown. Therefore, in this study, the effective rainfall events for soil erosion in northern Taiwan were simulated and compared with the historic data from 1961 to 1990. Parameters verified in this study were annual mean rainfall amount, monthly rainfall distribution, rainfall intensity, standard deviation, probability of rainfall event and rainfall erosivity. The results showed that the simulations of rainfall amount, monthly rainfall distribution and the probability of rainfall were good; however, standard deviation, rainfall intensity and rainfall erosivity were underestimated. The reasons for this may be because the CLIGEN model was established by using the continental climate data, which mainly consisted of the rainfalls with medium and low intensity. However, the Taiwan island is in a monsoon area, accordingly, the rainfall intensities are frequently very high because of typhoons.
謝誌.................................................I
中文摘要............................................II
Abstract...........................................III
圖目錄..............................................VI
表目錄.............................................VII
第一章 緒論 ........................................1
1.1 研究背景.........................................1
1.2 研究目的.........................................1
第二章 文獻回顧 ....................................3
2.1 通用土壤流失公式.................................3
2.2 降雨沖蝕指數.....................................3
2.3 氣候變遷對降雨沖蝕指數之影響.....................5
2.4 CLIGEN模式適用性驗證.............................6
2.5 以CLIGEN輸出項估算降雨沖蝕指數...................7
第三章 研究方法.....................................9
3.1 研究內容.........................................9
3.2 研究區域分析....................................10
3.2.1 基隆地區......................................12
3.2.2 宜蘭地區......................................12
3.2.3 台北地區......................................12
3.2.4 新竹地區......................................13
3.3 雨量資料數化....................................13
3.3.1 Matlab程式....................................13
3.3.2 VBA程式.......................................14
3.3.2 數化方法及流程................................15
3.4 CLIGEN模式......................................19
3.5 降雨沖蝕指數之推................................21
第四章 結果與討論..................................23
4.1雨量資料數化.....................................23
4.2 有效降雨事件分..................................25
4.3 降雨量及降雨事件特性之模擬驗....................30
4.4降雨沖蝕指數之模擬驗.............................41
第五章 結論與建議..................................45
5.1 結論............................................46
5.2 後續建議........................................47
參考文獻............................................48
附錄................................................51
1.史婉麗、楊勤科、穆婉紅(2006),隨機氣候生成器在黃土高原的適用性檢驗,中國水土保持科學,4(2):18-23。
2.伍婉貞(1991),台北市區自然降雨動能及其降雨強度之關係,國立台灣大學農業工程所碩士論文。
3.吳上智(1997),台灣中北部與美國地區雨滴粒徑分佈及沖蝕性之研究,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
4.吳志剛、楊道昌、游保杉(2002),氣候變遷對高屏溪流域水資源衝擊探討,第十一屆水利工程研討會,p81-83,台北市。
5.吳明進(2001),台灣環境變遷與全球氣候變遷衝擊之評析-子計畫-台灣環境變遷與全球氣候變遷衝擊之評估-氣候變遷(三)-PartⅡ-水資源國科會專題報告研究計畫成果報告NSC-89-2621-Z-002-037。
6.吳藝昀(2004),台灣地區降雨沖蝕指數之修訂,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
7.洪念民(1997),氣候變遷對大安溪水資源營運之影響,國立台灣大學農業工程研究所碩士論文。
8.馬明明(1995),台灣中部與台北地區降雨特性及沖蝕性關係之研究,國立中興大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
9.黃俊德(1979),台灣降雨沖蝕指數之研究,中華水土保持學報,10(1):127-144。
10.童慶斌、洪念民、陳主惠(1999),氣候變遷對水資源影響評估與適應策略研擬,農業工程學報,45(4):73-90。
11.童慶斌(2003),氣候變遷與環境生態講義,台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系,第三章。
12.張光輝(2004),CLIGEN天氣發生器在黃河流域的適應性研究,中國水土保持學報,18(1):175-178。
13.盧昭堯等人(1997),台北地區降雨特性及其與土壤沖蝕性關係之研究,國科會專題研究計畫報告,NSC-86-2621-P-005-009。
14.盧光輝(1999),降雨沖蝕指數之修訂,中華水土保持學報,30(2):87-94。
15.盧昭堯、蘇志強、吳藝芸(2005),台灣地區年降雨沖蝕指數圖之修訂,中華水土保持學報,36(2):159-172。
16.謝龍生、柳文成、童慶斌(2004),氣候變遷對大漢溪及新店溪流域防洪系統潛在衝擊影響之研究,農業工程學報,50(3):32-47。
17.Arnoldus, H. M. J. 1980. An approximation of rainfall factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. In Assessment of Erosion, 127-132. M. De Boodt and D Gabriels, eds. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
18.Arnold, C. D., ed., 1993. Agro-Meteorological Data for Makerere University College Farm, Kabanyolo, Uganda, 1960-1986. Kampala, Uganda: Makerere University, Department of Agricultural Engineering.
19.Arnold, C. D., and W. J. Elloit. 1996. CLIGEN weather generator predictions of seasonal wet and dry spells in Uganda. Trans. ASAE 39(3): 969-972.
20.Arnold, J. G., and J. R. Williams. 1989. Stochastic generation of internal storm structure. Trans. ASAE 32(1): 161–166.
21.Arnold, J. G., J. R. Williams, A.D. Nicks and N.D. Sammons. 1990. SWRRB, A basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management. Texas A&M University Press. 236 pp.
22.Elloit, W. J., and C. D. Arnold. 2001. Validation of the weather generator CLIGEN with precipitation data from Uganda. Trans. ASAE 44(1): 53-58.
23.Baffaut, C., M. A. Nearing, and A. D. Nick. 1996. Impact of CLIGEN parameters on WEPP-predicted average annual soil loss. Trans. ASAE 39(2): 447-457.
24.Brown, L. C. and G. R. Foster. 1987. Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distribution. Transaction of the ASAE 30(2): 379-386.
25.Cooley, K. R. 1980. Erosivity values for individual storm design. Jour. Irr, and Drainage Div. Amer. Soc. of Civil Engr. 106(IR2): 135-145.
26.Favis-Mortlock, D. T., and J. Boardman. 1995. Nonlinear responses of soil erosion to climate change: A modeling study on the UK South Downs. Catena 25: 365-387.
27.Flanagan, D. C., and S. J. Livingston. 1995. WEPP User Summary: USDA–Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP). NSERL Report No. 11. W. Lafayette, Ind.: USDA–ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory.
28.Hsu, H. H. and C. T. Chen. 2002. Observed and projected climate change in Taiwan. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 79: 87-104.
29.IPCC, 1996: Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. J. T. Houghton, L. A. Meria Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg and K. Maskell(eds.), Cambridge, 572pp.
30.IPCC, WGI, 2001. Climate Change 2001-The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group I, to the third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Edited by J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, C. A. Johnson. 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, 881pp.
31.Liu, C. M., M. C. Wu and W. C. Wang. 1996. Potential climate change in Taiwna during greenhouse warming: A semi-empirical approach. J. of the Envir. Prot. Soc. R.O.C., Vol.19, No1, 1-23.
32.Nearing, A. M. 2001. Potential changes in rainfall erosivity in the U. S. with climate change during the 21st century. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 56(3): 229-232.
33.Nearing, M. A. 2001. Impacts of Climate Change on Erosivity in the United States: 2000-2050. Pp. 268-270 in Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century, Proc. Int. Symp. (3-5 January 2001, Honolulu, HI, USA). Eds. J.C. Ascough II and D.C. Flanagan. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.701P0007
34.Pruski, F. F., and M. A. Nearing. 2002. Runoff and soil loss responses to changes in precipitation: A computer simulation study. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 57(1): 7-16.
35.Renard, K. G., and J. R. Freidmund. 1994. Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. J. Hydrology 157: 287-306.
36.Renard, K. G., G. R. Foster, G. A. Weesies, and J. P. Porter. 1991. RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation. J. Soil Water Conserv. 46(1): 30–33.
37.Scheele, W. J. Elloit, and D. E. Halll. 2001. Enhancements to the CLIGEN Weather Generator for Mountainous or Custom Applications. Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century, Proc. Int. Symp. (3-5 January 2001, Honolulu, HI, USA). Eds. J. C. Ascough II and D. C. Flanagan, St, Joseph, MI: ASAE. 701p007. Pp. 392-395.
38.Williams, J., M. A. Nearing, A. Nicks, E. Skidmore, C. Valentine, K. King, and R. Savabi. 1996. Using soil erosion models for global change studies. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 51(5): 381-385.
39.Wischmeier, W. H. and D. D. Smith. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses-A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA AGR. Handbook 537. USDA Science and Education Administration. 58pp.
40.Yu, P. S., T. C. Yang, and C. K. Wu. 2002. Impact of climate change on water resources in southern Taiwan. Journal of Hydrology. 161-175.
41.Yu, B. 2002. Using CLIGEN to generate RUSLE climate inputs. Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 45(4): 993 1001.
42.Zhang, G. H., M. A. Nearing, and B. Y. Liu. 2005. Potential effects of climate change on rainfall erosivity in the Yellow River Basin of China. Trans. ASAE 48(2): 511-517.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top