跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.94.18) 您好!臺灣時間:2023/12/10 15:22
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:莊慧君
研究生(外文):Hui-Chun Tsuang
論文名稱:精神分裂症遺傳負荷、內在表現型以及慣用手側之探討
論文名稱(外文):The relationship between genetic loading for schizophrenia, sustained attention deficits, schizotypy, and handedness
指導教授:陳為堅陳為堅引用關係
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:流行病學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:英文
論文頁數:101
中文關鍵詞:精神分裂症持續注意力缺失連續性表現測驗內在表現型遺傳負荷精神分裂性人格特質慣用手側
外文關鍵詞:SchizophreniaSustained attention deficitsContinuous Performance Test (CPT)EndophenotypesGenetic loadingSchizotypyHandedness
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:388
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
論文以下列三個子研究探討持續注意力缺失、精神分裂症之遺傳負荷、精神分裂性人格特質與慣用手側之關聯性。

研究一:單發性及多發性精神分裂症非精神病性家屬之持續注意力缺失
  藉由連續性表現測驗所測量之持續注意力缺失被許多研究者視為精神分裂症之內在表現型。然而,現今對於持續注意力缺失於精神分裂症患者一等親是否與精神分裂症之遺傳負荷有所關聯之了解仍相當有限。本研究檢視來自單發精神分裂症家庭的107位雙親和84位無病手足,以及多發家庭的72位雙親和56位無病手足。使用的測量工具包括「遺傳研究診斷會談」與「連續性表現測驗」。知覺負荷一變項,是以「連續性表現測驗」有遮蔽及無遮蔽兩個版本之分數進行迴歸分析所得之殘差來估計。對於兩類家族成員之「連續性表現測驗」結果進行比較時,採用的統計方式能將家族相關予以調整。結果顯示,來自多發家庭之手足,在有遮蔽之「連續性表現測驗」之表現,較來自單發家庭之手足來得差。同樣的,多發家庭之手足在知覺負荷的表現,也不如來自單發家庭之手足。然而,來自多發和單發家庭之雙親,在「連續性表現測驗」及知覺負荷的表現則無顯著差異。根據上述研究發現,我們得到以下結論:伴隨有知覺負荷之持續注意力此一能力,於具有較高家族遺傳負荷之精神分裂症無病手足,會出現較嚴重的損傷。此研究之發現,可能有助於未來的精神分裂症遺傳研究。

研究二:精神分裂症患者之無精神病性家屬在精神分裂性人格特質的多重面向分析及其與持續注意力之關聯性
  本研究致力於檢視具有不同遺傳負荷之精神分裂症患者之家屬,於精神分裂性人格特質的多重面向。並且,將進一步以持續注意力缺失來驗證之。本研究共納入203名單發精神分裂症家庭之一等親及1,310名多發家庭之一等親。所有參加研究的親屬,均接受「遺傳研究診斷會談」。此一會談工具,涵蓋了「準精神分裂症結構化問卷」。同時,受訪者亦均接受遮蔽與無遮蔽兩種版本之「連續性表現測驗」。本研究所進行之探索性及驗證性因素分析,均以Mplus進行分析。對於持續注意力缺失和精神分裂性人格特質關聯性進行分析時,家族相關會予以校正。探索性因素分析,以單發精神分裂症家庭之家屬為研究對象,結果抽取出四個因子,分別為負性因子、正性因子、人際敏感度以及社會退縮/內向性。上述結果,再以多發精神分裂症家庭之家屬的資料,進行驗證性因素分析。結果顯示此四因子構成之結構,在各項適合度的指標上,都顯示足夠的適切性。四個因子當中,只有負性因子能一致地鑑別單發家庭和多發家庭的家屬。此外,此四個因子與「連續性表現測驗」的幾項指標呈現不同的關聯性:正性因子和人際敏感度兩因子與假警報率成正相關;負性因子和社會退縮/內向性兩因子則與正確率、敏感度呈現負相關。根據上述研究結果,我們得到以下結論:精神分裂性人格特質的四因子結構穩定的存在於具不同遺傳負荷之非精神病性家屬。而這些因子與「連續性表現測驗」的關聯性對於精神分裂症病因之探討,可以提供研究設計方面之建議。

研究三:慣用手側與精神分裂性人格特質於精神分裂症患者家屬之關聯性
  相當多的證據均指出精神分裂症患者較常非慣用右手。然而,探討慣用手側與精神分裂性人格特質關聯性的研究卻得到不一致的研究結果。此外,這些研究幾乎都是以大學生為研究對象,因此其外推性受到相當的質疑。本研究檢視慣用手側與四個精神分裂性人格因子於精神分裂症患者家屬之關連性。本研究共納入850名雙親及334名手足。所有參加研究的親屬,均接受「遺傳研究診斷會談」。此一會談工具,涵蓋了「準精神分裂症結構化問卷」。同時,這些親屬亦完成了「Annett慣用手側問卷」。研究中對於慣用手側採取了類別和連續兩類的指標。研究結果顯示,若使用Annett的分類方式將慣用手側分為慣用右手與非慣用右手,則非慣用右手的手足相較於慣用右手者,較常出現正性的精神分裂性人格特質。當慣用手側被視為連續變項,或者採用Briggs-Nebes之分類方式,慣用手側和精神分裂性人格特質之關聯性均不顯著。此外,若是以雙親為研究對象,不論使用何種方式界定慣用手側,其與精神分裂性人格特質之關聯性均不顯著。強烈反對使用左手應該是在雙親此一世代普遍存在的社會壓力,而此社會壓力可能使欲觀察的關聯性被低估,而無法達到統計顯著之水準。總結來說,本研究所提供的證據顯示,過去僅僅在大學生或社區樣本觀察到的慣用手側和正性精神分裂性人格特質之關聯性,也可以在精神分裂症患者之手足觀察到。此外,本研究之結果點出在進行相關研究時,必須要留意所使用之慣用手側的指標。至於究竟採用類別變項或連續變項來界定慣用手側,才更能釐清慣用手側和精神分裂性人格特質之關係,則需要後續研究來繼續探討之。
Three studies were conducted to investigate the relationship between sustained attention deficits, genetic loading for schizophrenia, schizotypy, and handedness in non-psychotic first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients.
Study 1. More severe sustained attention deficits in nonpsychotic siblings of multiplex schizophrenia families than in those of simplex ones
Sustained attention deficits measured by the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) have been proposed as an endophenotype of schizophrenia. However, little is known about whether sustained attention deficits in first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients are associated with familial loading for schizophrenia. We examined 107 parents and 84 siblings of simplex schizophrenia families as well as 72 parents and 56 siblings of multiplex schizophrenia families, all nonpsychotic, using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies and two sessions of the CPT (undegraded and degraded). The effect of perceptual load was assessed using the residual of the regression of the degraded score on the undegraded one. Statistical models that can adjust for familial correlations were used to compare the CPT performance of relatives between the two types of families. Siblings from multiplex families exhibited worse performance on the degraded CPT and less proficiency in processing the perceptual load than those from simplex families. No such difference was observed for the parents on either CPT version. We concluded that sustained attention along with perceptual load processing is more impaired in the siblings of schizophrenic patients with high familial loading and that this finding might be useful for future genetic dissection of schizophrenia.

Study 2. The Multidimensionality of Schizotypy in Nonpsychotic Relatives of Patients with Schizophrenia and Its Relations with Sustained Attention
Objective. To examine the multidimensionality of schizotypy in relatives from families with different genetic loading and to validate the structure using sustained attention deficits measured by the Continuous Performance Test (CPT).
Method. A total of 203 and 1,310 nonpsychotic first-degree relatives from simplex and multiplex schizophrenia families, respectively, were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, which contains a section of the modified Structured Interview for Schizotypy, and completed two sessions on the CPT. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using the Mplus program with categorical factor indicators. The relationship between sustained attention performance and schizotypal factors was assessed by means of linear mixed effect regression analysis to adjust for within-family correlation.
Results. A four-factor model, containing Negative Schizotypy, Positive Schizotypy, Interpersonal Sensitivity, and Social Isolation/Introversion, was extracted by exploratory factor analysis from relatives of simplex families and the results of confirmatory factor analysis in relatives of multiplex families indicated a good fit. Among the four factors, only the Negative Schizotypy factor consistently discriminated relatives of the simplex families from those of the multiplex ones. The four factors further displayed differential relations to performance indexes on the CPT, with Positive Schizotypy and Interpersonal Sensitivity positively associated with false alarm rate, whereas Negative Schizotypy and Social Isolation/Introversion inversely associated with hit rate and sensitivity.
Conclusions. A consistent four-factor model of schizotypy could be derived in non-psychotic relatives across families of different genetic loadings, and their differential relations to CPT indexes have etiological implications.

Study 3. Handedness and schizotypy in nonpsychotic first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patient
Convincing evidence showed excess of non-right handedness in schizophrenic patients. However, existing studies have found the relationship between handedness and schizotypy to be inconsistent and were limited regarding to generalization since only highly homogeneous groups have been investigated. This study examined the relation between handedness and the four schizotypal factors identified in a previous confirmatory factor analysis in 850 parents and 334 siblings of schizophrenic patients. All participants were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, which contains a section of the modified Structured Interview for Schizotypy, and the 12-item Annett handedness questionnaire. Both categorical and continuous indicators for handedness were examined. Non-right handed siblings of schizophrenic patients displayed more positive schizotypal features than their right handed counterparts when the two-way Annett’s handedness classification was adopted. No association was found when handedness was treated as continuous or when the Briggs-Nebes’ classification was used. The relationship between handedness and schizotypy was insignificant for parents probably due to the strong social pressure against left-handedness in that generation. In conclusion, the relationship between handedness and positive schizotypy has been confirmed in siblings of schizophrenic patients. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of taking into account the effect of handedness indicators on relating studies. Whether categorical or continuous approach of handedness better identify people with high positive schizotypy warrants further investigation.
口試委員會審定書……………………………………………….. i
誌謝……………………………………………………………….. ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………….. iii
ABSTRACT……..………………………………………………... vi
CONTENTS………………………………………………………. ix
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………… xi
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………….. xi
INTRODUCITON………………………………………………………. 1
CHAPTER 1 More severe sustained attention deficits in nonpsychotic siblings of multiplex schizophrenia families than in those of simplex ones……………3
1.1 Introduction……………………………………….. 3
1.2 Methods……………………………………………. 5
1.2.1 Probands……………………………………. 5
1.2.2 Measurements………………………………. 6
1.2.3 Relatives: psychiatric status and exclusion criteria………………………………………8
1.2.4 Data analysis……………………………....... 10
1.3 Results……………………………………………… 11
1.4 Discussion………………………………………….. 13
CHAPTER 2 The multidimensionality of schizotypy in nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia and its relations with sustained attention……21
2.1 Introduction………………………………………… 21
2.2 Methods……………………………………………. 23
2.2.1 Subjects…………………………………….. 23
2.2.2 Interview Instruments and Diagnostic Procedures………………25
2.2.3 Continuous Performance Test………………. 26
2.2.4 Data analysis………………………………... 27
2.3 Results……………………………………………… 28
2.4 Discussion………………………………………….. 30
CHAPTER 3 Handedness and schizotypy in nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients………38
3.1 Introduction………………………………………… 38
3.2 Methods…………………………………………….. 40
3.2.1 Subjects……………………………………... 40
3.2.2 Interview Instruments and Diagnostic Procedures…………………………41
3.2.3 Structured Interview for Schizotypy………... 42
3.2.4 Hand Preference Questionnaire…………….. 42
3.2.5 Data analysis………………………………... 43
3.3 Results……………………………………………… 44
3.4 Discussion………………………………………….. 45
CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSIONS…………………………………… 51
CHAPTER 5 FUTURE PERSPECTIVES………………………... 53
REFERENCES……………………………………………………... 55
APPENDICES……………………………………………………… 70
Modified Structured Interview for Schizotypy……. 70
Hand Preference Questionnaire…………………… 101
1.Baron M: Genetics of schizophrenia and the new millennium: progress and pitfalls. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68:299-312
2.Tsuang M: Schizophrenia: genes and environment. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47:210-220
3.Altmuller J, Palmer LJ, Fischer G, Scherb H, Wjst M: Genomewide scans of complex human diseases: true linkage is hard to find. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 69:936-50
4.Gottesman, II, Gould TD: The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:636-45
5.Gottesman I, Shields J: Schizophrenia: The Epigenetic Puzzle. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1982
6.Rosvold HE, Mirsky AF, Sarason I, Bransome ED, Jr., Beck LH: A Continuous Performance Test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 1956; 20:343-350
7.Chen WJ, Faraone SV: Sustained attention deficits as markers of genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet (Neuropsychiatr Genet) 2000; 97:52-57
8.Cornblatt BA, Malhotra AK: Impaired attention as an endophenotype for molecular genetic studies of schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet 2001; 105:11-5
9.Seidman LJ, Van Manen K-J, Turner WM, Gamser DM, Faraone SV, Goldstein JM, Tsuang MT: The effects of increasing resource demand on vigilance performance in adults with schizophrenia or developmental attentional/learning disorders: a preliminary study. Schizophr Res 1998; 34:101-112
10.Epstein JI, Keefe RSE, Roitman SL, Harvey PD, Mohs RC: Impact of neuroleptic medications on continuous performance test measures in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1996; 39:902-905
11.Finkelstein JRJ, Cannon TD, Gur RE, Gur RC, Moberg P: Attentional dysfunctions in neuroleptic-naive and neuroleptic-withdrawn schizophrenic patients and their siblings. J Abnorm Psychol 1997; 106:203-212
12.Liu SK, Chen WJ, Chang C-J, Lin H-N: Effects of atypical neuroleptics on sustained attention deficits in schizophrenia: a trial of risperidone versus haloperidol. Neuropsychopharmacol 2000; 22:311-319
13.Liu SK, Chiu C-H, Hwang T-J, Chang C-J, Hwu HG, Chen WJ: Deficits in sustained attention in schizophrenia and affective disorders: Stable versus state-dependent markers. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:975-982
14.Mojtabai R, Bromet EJ, Harvey PD, Carlson GA, Craig TJ, Fennig S: Neuropsychological differences between first-admission schizophrenia and psychotic affective disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:1453-1460
15.Nelson EB, Sax KW, Strakowski SM: Attentional performance in patients with psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression and schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:137-139
16.Battaglia M, Cavallini MC, Macciardi F, Bellodi L: The structure of DSM-III-R schizotypal personality disorder diagnosed by direct interviews. Schizophr Bull 1997; 23:83-92
17.Baron M, Gruen R, Rainer JD, Kane J, Asnis L, Lord S: A family study of schizophrenic and normal control probands: implications for the spectrum concept of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:447-55
18.Clementz BA, Grove WM, Katsanis J, Iacono WG: Psychometric detection of schizotypy: perceptual aberration and physical anhedonia in relatives of schizophrenics. J Abnorm Psychol 1991; 100:607-12
19.Kendler KS: Diagnostic approaches to schizotypal personality disorder: a historical perspective. Schizophr Bull 1985; 11:538-53
20.Kendler KS, McGuire M, Gruenberg AM, O''Hare A, Spellman M, Walsh D: The Roscommon Family Study. III. Schizophrenia-related personality disorders in relatives. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:781-8
21.Laurent A, Biloa-Tang M, Bougerol T, Duly D, Anchisi AM, Bosson JL, Pellat J, d''Amato T, Dalery J: Executive/attentional performance and measures of schizotypy in patients with schizophrenia and in their nonpsychotic first-degree relatives. Schizophr Res 2000; 46:269-283
22.Nuechterlein KH, Asarnow RF, Subotnik KL, Fogelson DL, Payne DL, Kendler KS, Neale MC, Jacobson KC, Mintz J: The structure of schizotypy: relationships between neurocognitive and personality disorder features in relatives of schizophrenic patients in the UCLA Family Study. Schizophr Res 2002; 54:121-130
23.Vollema MG, Postma B: Neurocognitive correlates of schizotypy in first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull 2002; 28:367-377
24.Chen WJ, Liu SK, Chang C-J, Lien Y-J, Chang Y-H, Hwu H-G: Sustained attention deficit and schizotypal personality features in nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1214-1220
25.Dassonville P, Zhu XH, Uurbil K, Kim SG, Ashe J: Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997; 94:14015-14018
26.Satz P, Green MF: Atypical handedness in schizophrenia: some methodological and theoretical issues. Schizophr Bull 1999; 25:63-78
27.Sommer I, Ramsey N, Kahn R, Aleman A, Bouma A: Handedness, language lateralisation and anatomical asymmetry in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2001; 178:344-51
28.Cannon M, Byrne M, Cassidy B, Larkin C, Horgan R, Sheppard NP, O''Callaghan E: Prevalence and correlates of mixed-handedness in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1995; 59:119-25
29.Hauser P, Pollock B, Finkelberg F, McGrail S, Voineskos G, Seeman M: On sinistrality and sex differences in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142:1228
30.Lishman WA, McMeekan ER: Hand preference patterns in psychiatric patients. Br J Psychiatry 1976; 129:158-66
31.Sperling W, Martus P, Barocka A: Non-right-handedness and obstetrical complications in paranoid hallucinatory schizophrenics. Psychopathology. 1999; 32:267-276
32.Tyler M, Diamond J, Lewis S: Correlates of left-handedness in a large sample of schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res 1995; 18:37-41
33.Annett M: Left-handedness as a function of sex, maternal versus paternal inheritance, and report bias. Behav Genet 1999; 29:103-14
34.Crow TJ: Twin studies of psychosis and the genetics of cerebral asymmetry.[see comment][comment]. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175:399-401
35.Klar AJ: Genetic models for handedness, brain lateralization, schizophrenia, and manic-depression. Schizophr Res 1999; 39:207-18
36.Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ, Faraone SV: Heterogeneity of schizophrenia: Conceptual models and analytic strategies. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156:17-26
37.Farmer A, McGuffin P, Gottesman, II: Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy: response to Dalen. Schizophr Bull 1990; 16:367-70
38.Lewis SW, Reveley AM, Reveley MA, Chitkara B, Murray RM: The familial/sporadic distinction as a strategy in schizophrenia research. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151:306-13
39.Kendler KS: Sporadic vs familial classification given etiological heterogeneity: I. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. Genet Epidemiol 1987; 4:313-330
40.Kendler KS: The sporadic v. familial classification given aetiological heterogeneity: II. Power analyses. Psychol Med 1988; 18:991-999
41.DeLisi LE, Mesen A, Rodriguez C, Bertheau A, LaPrade B, Llach M, Riondet S, Razi K: Clinical characteristics of schizophrenia in multiply affected Spanish origin families from Costa Rica. Psychiatric Genet 2001; 11:145-52
42.Almasy L, Blangero J: Endophenotypes as quantitative risk factors for psychiatric disease: Rationale and study design. Am J Med Genet 2001; 105:42-44
43.Cornblatt BA, Keilp JG: Impaired attention, genetics, and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1994; 20:31-46
44.Chen WJ, Chang C-H, Liu SK, Hwang TJ, Hwu H-G, Collaborators from the Multidimensional Psychopathology Group Research Project: Sustained attention deficits in nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients: a recurrence risk ratio analysis. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 55:995-1000
45.Roy MA, Flaum MA, Gupta S, Jaramillo L, Andreasen NC: Epidemiological and clinical correlates of familial and sporadic schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1994; 89:324-328
46.Walker E, Shaye J: Familial schizophrenia. A predictor of neuromotor and attentional abnormalities in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39:1153-1156
47.Falconer D, Mackay T: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Harlow, 1996
48.Braff D: Information processing and attention dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993; 19:233-59
49.Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME: Information processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenic disorders. . Schizophr Bull 1984; 10:160-203
50.Chang C-J, Chen WJ, Liu S-K, Cheng JJ, Ou Yang W-C, Chang H-J, Lane H-Y, Lin S-K, Yang T-W, Hwu H-G: Morbidity risk of psychiatric disorders among the first degree relatives of schizophrenic patients in Taiwan. Schizophr Bull 2002; 28:379-392
51.NIMH Genetics Initiative: Family Interview for Genetic Studies. Rockville, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, 1992
52.Nurnberger JI, Jr., Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simpson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J, Severe JB, Malaspina D, Reich T: Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Rationale, unique features, and training. NIMH Genetics Initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:849-859
53.Chen WJ, Hsiao CK, Hsiao L-L, Hwu H-G: Performance of the Continuous Performance Test among community samples. Schizophr Bull 1998; 24:163-174
54.Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME, Gitlin M, Ventura J, Goldstein MJ, Snyder KS, Yee CM, Mintz J: Developmental Processes in Schizophrenic Disorders: longitudinal studies of vulnerability and stress. Schizophr Bull 1992; 18:387-425
55.Nuechterlein KH: Vigilance in schizophrenia and related disorders, in Handbook of Schizophrenia, Vol. 5: Neuropsychology, Psychophysiology and Information Processing. Edited by Steinhauer SR, Gruzelier JH, Zubin J. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1991, pp 397-433
56.Swets J: The relative operating characteristic in psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition. . Science 1973; 182:990-1001
57.Lin CCH, Hsiao CK, Chen WJ: Development of sustained attention assessed using the Continuous Performance Test among children 6-15 years of age. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1999; 27:403-412
58.Laird NM, Ware JH: Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982; 38:963-74
59.Zeger SL, Liang KY: Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42:121-30
60.Goldin LR, DeLisi LE, Gershon ES: Unravelling the relationship between genetic and environmental risk factors in psychiatric disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151:302-5
61.Lencer R, Malchow C, Trillenberg-Krecker K, Schwinger E, Arolt V: Eye-tracking dysfunction (ETD) in families with sporadic and familial schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47:391-401
62.Lencer R, Trillenberg-Krecker K, Schwinger E, Arolt V: Schizophrenia spectrum disorders and eye tracking dysfunction in singleton and multiplex schizophrenia families. Schizophr Res 2003; 60:33-45
63.Ross RG, Olincy A, Harris JG, Radant A, Adler LE, Freedman R: Anticipatory saccades during smooth pursuit eye movement and familial transmission of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 44:690-697
64.Roy MA, Crowe RR: Validity of the familial and sporadic subtypes of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:805-814
65.Kendler KS, MacLean CJ: The impact of altered fitness on the risk of illness in relatives. . Genet Epidemiol 1989; 6:481-491
66.Faraone SV, Seidman LJ, Kremen WS, Toomey R, Pepple JR, Tsuang MT: Neuropsychologic functioning among the nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenic patients: the effect of genetic loading. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:120-126
67.Tuulio-Henriksson A, Arajarvi R, Partonen T, Haukka J, Varilo T, Schreck M, Cannon T, Lonnqvist J: Familial loading associates with impairment in visual span among healthy siblings of schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:623-8
68.Pukrop R, Matuschek E, Ruhrmann S, Brockhaus-Dumke A, Tendolkar I, Bertsch A, Klosterkotter J: Dimensions of working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2003; 62:259-68
69.Meehl P: Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. Am Psychol 1962; 17:827-838
70.Fanous A, Gardner C, Walsh D, Kendler KS: Relationship between positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and schizotypal symptoms in nonpsychotic relatives. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58:669-673
71.Fanous AH, Kendler KS: Genetic heterogeneity, modifier genes, and quantitative phenotypes in psychiatric illness: searching for a framework. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10:6-13
72.Vollema MG, van den Bosch RJ: The multidimensionality of schizotypy. Schizophr Bull 1995; 21:19-31
73.Kendler KS, Thacker L, Walsh D: Self-report measures of schizotypy as indices of familial vulnerability to schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22:511-520
74.Kendler KS, Lieberman JA, Walsh D: The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (SIS): a preliminary report. Schizophr Bull 1989; 15:559-571
75.Kendler KS, McGuire M, Gruenberg AM, Walsh D: Schizotypal symptoms and signs in the Roscommon Family Study. Their factor structure and familial relationship with psychotic and affective disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52:296-303
76.Chen WJ, Hsiao CK, Lin CC: Schizotypy in community samples: the three-factor structure and correlation with sustained attention. J Abnorm Psychol 1997; 106:649-654
77.Raine A, Reynolds C, Lencz T, Scerbo A, Triphon N, Kim D: Cognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized features of schizotypal personality. Schizophr Bull 1994; 20:191-201
78.Venables PH, Rector NA: The content and structure of schizotypy: a study using confirmatory factor analysis. Schizophr Bull 2000; 26:587-602
79.Vollema MG, Hoijtink H: The multidimensionality of self-report schizotypy in a psychiatric population: an analysis using multidimensional Rasch models. Schizophr Bull 2000; 26:565-575
80.Bergman AJ, Silverman JM, Harvey PD, Smith CJ, Siever LJ: Schizotypal symptoms in the relatives of schizophrenia patients: an empirical analysis of the factor structure. Schizophr Bull 2000; 26:577-586
81.Fogelson DL, Nuechterlein KH, Asarnow RF, Payne DL, Subotnik KL, Giannini CA: The factor structure of schizophrenia spectrum personality disorders: sign and symptoms in relatives of psychotic patients from the UCLA family members study. Psychiatry Res 1999; 87:137-146
82.Mata I, Gilvarry CM, Jones PB, Lewis SW, Murray RM, Sham PC: Schizotypal personality traits in nonpsychotic relatives are associated with positive symptoms in psychotic probands. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29:273-283
83.Miller P, Byrne M, Hodges A, Lawrie SM, Owens DG, Johnstone EC: Schizotypal components in people at high risk of developing schizophrenia: early findings from the Edinburgh High-Risk Study. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180:179-184
84.Gooding D, Matts C, Rollmann E: Sustained attention deficits in relation to psychometrically identified schizotypy: Evaluating a potential endophenotypic marker. Schizophr Res 2006; 82:27-37
85.Franke P, Maier W, Hardt J, Hain C, Cornblatt BA: Attentional abilities and measures of schizotypy: their variation and covariation in schizophrenic patients, their siblings, and normal control subjects. Psychiatry Res 1994; 54:259-272
86.Bergida H, Lenzenweger M: Schizotypy and sustained attention: confirming evidence from an adult community sample. J Abnorm Psychol 2006; 115:545-551
87.Keefe RS, Silverman JM, Mohs RC, Siever LJ, Harvey PD, Friedman L, Roitman SE, DuPre RL, Smith CJ, Schmeidler J, Davis KL: Eye tracking, attention, and schizotypal symptoms in nonpsychotic relatives of patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:169-176
88.Lenzenweger MF: Reaction time slowing during high-load, sustained-attention task performance in relation to psychometrically identified schizotypy. J Abnorm Psychol 2001; 110:290-296
89.Lenzenweger MF, Cornblatt BA, Putnick M: Schizotypy and sustained attention. J Abnorm Psychol 1991; 100:84-89
90.Tsuang HC, Lin SH, Liu SK, Hsieh MH, Hwang TJ, Liu CM, Hwu HW, Chen WJ: More severe sustained attention deficits in nonpsychotic siblings of multiplex schizophrenia families than in those of simplex ones. Schizophr Res 2006; 87:172-180
91.Hwu H-G, Faraone SV, Liu C-M, Chen WJ, Liu S-K, Shieh M-H, Hwang T-J, Tsuang M-M, OuYang W-C, Chen C-Y, Chen C-C, Lin J-J, Chou FH-C, Chueh C-M, Liu W-M, Hall M-H, Tsuang MT: Taiwan schizophrenia linkage study: The field study. Am J Med Genet (Neuropsychiatr Genet) 2005; 134B:30-36
92.Kendler KS, Ochs AL, Gorman AM, Hewitt JK, Ross DE, Mirsky AF: The structure of schizotypy: a pilot multitrait twin study. Psychiatry Res 1991; 36:19-36
93.Muthen L, Muthen B: Mplus: Statistical Analysis With Latent Variables: User''s Guide. Los Angeles, Muthen and Muthen, 2004
94.Bentler P: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990; 107:238-246
95.Eisenberg J, Mei-Tal G, Steinberg A, Tartakovsky E, Zohar A, Gritsenko I, Nemanov L, Ebstein RP: Haplotype relative risk study of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Association of the high-enzyme activity val allele with adhd impulsive-hyperactive phenotype. Am J Med Genet 1999; 88:497-502
96.Avramopoulos D, Stefanis NC, Hantoumi I, Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Stefanis CN: Higher scores of self reported schizotypy in healthy young males carrying the COMT high activity allele. Mol Psychiatry 2002; 7:706-711
97.Rebollo I, de Moor M, Dolan C, Boomsma D: Phenotypic factor analysis of family data: correction of the bias due to dependency. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9:367-376
98.Green MF, Satz P, Smith C, Nelson L: Is there atypical handedness in schizophrenia? J Abnorm Psychol 1989; 98:57-61
99.Bishop DV: Motor immaturity and specific speech and language impairment: evidence for a common genetic basis. Am J Med Genet 2002; 114:56-63
100.Crow TJ, Done DJ, Sacker A: Cerebral lateralization is delayed in children who later develop schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1996; 22:181-5
101.Rado S: Dynamics and classification of disordered behavior. Am J Psychiatry 1953; 110:406-416
102.Annett M, Moran P: Schizotypy is increased in mixed-handers, especially right-handed writers who use the left hand for primary actions. Schizophr Res 2006; 81:239-46
103.Nicholls MER, Orr CA, Lindell AK: Magical ideation and its relation to lateral preference. Laterality 2005; 10:503-15
104.Jaspers-Fayer F, Peters M: Hand preference, magical thinking and left-right confusion. Laterality 2005; 10:183-191
105.Dragovic, Hammond, Jablensky: Schizotypy and mixed-handedness revisited. Psychiatry Res 2005; 136:143-152
106.Stefanis NC, Vitoratou S, Smyrnis N, Constantinidis T, Evdokimidis I, Hatzimanolis I, Ntzoufras I, Stefanis CN: Mixed handedness is associated with the Disorganization dimension of schizotypy in a young male population. Schizophr Res 2006; 87:289-96
107.Chen WJ, Su C-H: Handedness and schizotypy in non-clinical populations: influence of handedness measures and age on the relationship. Laterality 2006; 11:331-49
108.Poreh AM: Reexamination of mixed handedness in psychosis-prone college students. Pers Individ Differ 1994; 17:445-448
109.Overby LA: Handedness patterns of psychosis-prone college students. Pers Individ Differ 1993; 15:261-265
110.Kim D, Raine A, Triphon N, Green MF: Mixed handedness and features of schizotypal personality in a nonclinical sample. J Nerv Ment Dis 1992; 180:133-5
111.Chapman JP, Chapman LJ: Handedness of hypothetically psychosis-prone subjects. J Abnorm Psychol 1987; 96:89-93
112.Claridge G, Clark K, Davis C, Mason O: Schizophrenia Risk and Handedness: A Mixed Picture. Laterality 1998; 3:209-220
113.Shaw J, Claridge G, Clark K: Schizotypy and the shift from dextrality: a study of handedness in a large non-clinical sample. Schizophr Res 2001; 50:181-9
114.Gregory AM, Claridge G, Clark K, Taylor PD: Handedness and schizotypy in a Japanese sample: an association masked by cultural effects on hand usage. Schizophr Res 2003; 65:139-145
115.Barnett KJ, Corballis MC: Ambidexterity and magical ideation. Laterality 2002; 7:75-84
116.Annett M: Handedness as a continuous variable with dextral shift: sex, generation, and family handedness in subgroups of left- and right-handers. Behav Genet 1994; 24:51-63
117.Dean RS, Reynolds CR: Cognitive processing and self-report of lateral preference. Neuropsychol Rev 1997; 7:127-42
118.Su C-H, Kuo P-H, Lin CCH, Chen WJ: A school-based twin study of handedness among adolescents in Taiwan. Behav Genet 2005; 35:723-33
119.Bishop DV: Individual differences in handedness and specific speech and language impairment: evidence against a genetic link. Behav Genet 2001; 31:339-51
120.Annett M: The binomial distribution of right, mixed and left handedness. Quart J Exp Psychol 1967; 19:327-33
121.Briggs GG, Nebes RD: Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex 1975; 11:230-8
122.Loo R, Schneider R: An evaluation of the Briggs-Nebes modified version of Annett''s handedness inventory. Cortex 1979; 15:683-6
123.Annett M: A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970; 61:303-321
124.Annett M: Left, right, hand, and brain: The right shift theory. Hove, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associations Ltd, 1985
125.Corey DM, Hurley MM, Foundas AL: Right and left handedness defined: a multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001; 14:144-52
126.McManus I: RIght hand, left hand. 2002
127.Ellis SJ, Ellis PJ, Marshall E, Windridge C, Jones S: Is forced dextrality an explanation for the fall in the prevalence of sinistrality with age? A study in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52:41-4
128.Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ: Hand preference and age in the United States. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30:601-8
129.Crow TJ: Schizophrenia as failure of hemispheric dominance for language. Trends in Neurosciences. 1997; 20:339-43
130.Gur R: Is schizophrenia a lateralized brain disorder? Schizophr Bull 1999; 25:7-9
131.Leask SJ, Crow TJ: Lateralization of verbal ability in pre-psychotic children. Psychiatry Res 2005; 136:35-42
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top